Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,718 posts)
Fri Jul 24, 2015, 11:29 AM Jul 2015

Hillary Clinton proposes sharp increase in short-term capital gains taxes


Presidential contender Hillary Clinton will announce a proposal Friday afternoon to raise capital gains taxes for assets that are held for less than six years by top-bracket payers as a way to try and encourage long-term investing, and grow the economy.
Clinton's plan specifically seeks to double the period of time for the 39.6 percent top capital gains rate (from up to a year to up to two years), and then institute a sliding rate scale until assets are held for more than six years.


http://www.cnbc.com/2015/07/24/hillary-clinton-proposes-sharp-increase-in-short-term-capital-gains-taxes.html
26 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hillary Clinton proposes sharp increase in short-term capital gains taxes (Original Post) DemocratSinceBirth Jul 2015 OP
KNR! JaneyVee Jul 2015 #1
Yes! mmonk Jul 2015 #2
I never understood why passive income is treated differently than earned income. DemocratSinceBirth Jul 2015 #3
I think most likely lobbying by the traders and also the ideology that taxing capital mmonk Jul 2015 #4
I should have been more careful or specific... DemocratSinceBirth Jul 2015 #5
I agree. mmonk Jul 2015 #7
I'm glad 3 of our candidates are aligned on this issue. mmonk Jul 2015 #6
I agree. It should be the same rate. DanTex Jul 2015 #10
The theory is your losses are capped but your gains aren't. DemocratSinceBirth Jul 2015 #12
I do think that capital losses should be carried forward so that if your investments go DanTex Jul 2015 #14
I feel compelled to point out what is obvious to bankers and investment advisors... Chan790 Jul 2015 #24
That's a bit of a theoretical distinction. DemocratSinceBirth Jul 2015 #25
The argument is that it is "double taxed" taught_me_patience Jul 2015 #20
Hillary is slow and cautious rock Jul 2015 #8
Many well meaning policies have iatrogenic effects DemocratSinceBirth Jul 2015 #9
And in this case? rock Jul 2015 #15
No. My point is prudence is sometimes warranted as the road to Hell is paved with good intentions. DemocratSinceBirth Jul 2015 #16
Gotcha! rock Jul 2015 #23
Hillary does it her way.(eom) oasis Jul 2015 #22
Good policy ibegurpard Jul 2015 #11
As long as it doesn't hit the middle and lower incomes seveneyes Jul 2015 #13
I think a transaction tax would be better to hit the wealthy that buy/sell stocks quickly... cascadiance Jul 2015 #17
In my estimation, both are needed. mmonk Jul 2015 #19
About time. Bernie really is starting to worry her. marble falls Jul 2015 #18
Mahalo DSB Cha Jul 2015 #21
I welcome her slow, cautious, hesitant steps into progressivism! Scootaloo Jul 2015 #26

mmonk

(52,589 posts)
4. I think most likely lobbying by the traders and also the ideology that taxing capital
Fri Jul 24, 2015, 11:38 AM
Jul 2015

promoted by talking heads is a drain on the economy (which we know is ridiculous).

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,718 posts)
5. I should have been more careful or specific...
Fri Jul 24, 2015, 11:43 AM
Jul 2015

I meant investment income...


Social Security, SSDI, and pensions are technically passive income...I can see treating them and taxing them differently and in many instances at a lower rate.

DanTex

(20,709 posts)
10. I agree. It should be the same rate.
Fri Jul 24, 2015, 11:57 AM
Jul 2015

The theory I've heard is that lowering capital gains taxes encourages investment.

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,718 posts)
12. The theory is your losses are capped but your gains aren't.
Fri Jul 24, 2015, 12:05 PM
Jul 2015

For instance it's easy to lose 3k in the market which is where I believe market losses are capped.

I was wiped out in the Great Recession... I lost my home, car, business, and investments...

I had hundreds of stocks of Lucent that I bought at $20.00 or so and rode all the way up to $80.00 or so and down to $1.00.

DanTex

(20,709 posts)
14. I do think that capital losses should be carried forward so that if your investments go
Fri Jul 24, 2015, 12:09 PM
Jul 2015

back up you shouldn't have to pay capital gains tax on "getting back to even". But I think that overall, cap gains and income should be taxed at the same rate.

 

Chan790

(20,176 posts)
24. I feel compelled to point out what is obvious to bankers and investment advisors...
Sat Jul 25, 2015, 08:25 AM
Jul 2015

you haven't gained or lost anything in the market until you sell.

If I bought ZYX at $50, rode it all the way up to $300, down to $1 and sell it at $50...I've not made or lost a dime and there is no tax-impacting gain or loss.

Edit: The problem is a lot of people freak-out when their stock bottoms out and sell. Then when it starts to rise...they want to buy back in. So...they lose money twice.

 

taught_me_patience

(5,477 posts)
20. The argument is that it is "double taxed"
Fri Jul 24, 2015, 03:02 PM
Jul 2015

Dividend income that you receive from the corporation is from post tax profit, therefore, theoretically it has already been taxed at the 39% corporate tax rate. Then you receive the dividend and it is taxed as income.

Corporations pay tax on investment income as if it were ordinary income.

rock

(13,218 posts)
15. And in this case?
Fri Jul 24, 2015, 12:20 PM
Jul 2015

P.S. I did not know the word iatrogenic and I had trouble finding an understandable definition for it. After several references came to the conclusion that it is a (usually undesired) side effect from a treatment, or analogically a policy. But what causes don't have possible side effects? Would it be better if Hillary were quick and reckless?

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,718 posts)
16. No. My point is prudence is sometimes warranted as the road to Hell is paved with good intentions.
Fri Jul 24, 2015, 12:22 PM
Jul 2015

eom

 

cascadiance

(19,537 posts)
17. I think a transaction tax would be better to hit the wealthy that buy/sell stocks quickly...
Fri Jul 24, 2015, 12:27 PM
Jul 2015

... that I think this tax increase proposal is intended to penalize. A transaction tax is far more focused on stopping speculative manipulation and buying by wealthy insiders, etc. or at least making them pay for it a lot more. That kind of activity is not really done by lower or middle class Americans at all, and they for the most part won't even notice a very small transaction tax if they are buying and selling stocks rarely, and using the market to INVEST in stocks and not just to play casino games with these stocks.

The problems with raising short term taxes on stock sales is that often times it hits the middle and lower classes more for the small amounts of stock ownership they might have, as many are forced to sell stocks sooner than they'd like when faced with things like Alternative Minimum taxes if they have that hanging over them on a stock purchase that they can't pay for with other assets they might have, or perhaps they have other big expense from medical issues, etc. that force them to sell stocks or other short term owned assets sooner than they'd like. A wealthy person can sell other assets and then more optimally sell those stocks with alternative minimum tax liability and not get short changed on timing of these sales as a lower class person would.

As a person who paid alternative minimum tax and tax on unemployment benefits the same year back during the dotcom era, I was one of those in the trenches that went through these kind of things.

mmonk

(52,589 posts)
19. In my estimation, both are needed.
Fri Jul 24, 2015, 02:57 PM
Jul 2015

Especially since before Reaganomics and fake trade deals which were more about moving jobs over seas, corporations once carried 32% of the tax burden compared to today's 6%.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Hillary Clinton proposes ...