2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumRead the Tweets from the Media Director of Netroots Nations. He knew this would happen.
Bernie Sanders and Martin O'Malley were ambushed, and they are owed an apology.
https://twitter.com/elonjames
Elon James White ?@elonjames 2h2 hours ago
And y'all Bernie Sanders supporters are gonna fuck it up for Bernie. You're mad for your candidate. We're mad about losing our lives. #NN15
108 retweets 84 favorites
Elon James White ?@elonjames 2h2 hours ago
This is a severe problem within the progressive community. Black Issues are often pushed aside. Candidates need to be pushed back. #NN15
199 retweets 156 favorites
Elon James White ?@elonjames 2h2 hours ago
White Progressives are gonna learn today. #SayHerName #NN15.
madfloridian
(88,117 posts)Elon James White
@elonjames
CEO, @TWIBNation. Publisher, http://www.ThisWeekInBlackness.com , Media Dir. @netroots_nation. Writer. Professionally funny. Habitual creator. -- #TWIBnation
#TWIBnation
elonjameswhite.com
Joined March 2007
Our candidates were ambushed.
leveymg
(36,418 posts)The only major Democratic candidate who wasn't there to get spattered when this thing exploded on the stage.
quickesst
(6,283 posts)It looks like the Invasion Of Texas is going to have some company.
artislife
(9,497 posts)JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)We all know Hillary had nothing to do with it.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)They said she benefits.
There is a difference.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)Seen people here claiming it was "an ambush".
arcane1
(38,613 posts)That still has nothing to do with Clinton.
mahina
(17,763 posts)Control-Z
(15,682 posts)than those two. Though, I can't imagine her not handling it well had she been there.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)But I certainly will step up to the plate and state if you don't recognize that as a political stunt, then you haven't been paying attention.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,719 posts)eom
TheNutcracker
(2,104 posts)leveymg
(36,418 posts)That's exactly what makes this a meme, a misleading political trick that's designed to create a false impression of the candidate. In this case, it's "Bernie doesn't care about minorities." False and misleading, but repeat it often enough, as a Big Lie, some will begin to believe it.
This meme started on the Internet -- we've seen the Big Lie spread here -- and is now morphing into a real-world dirty tricks operation. Meme 2.0.
NikolaC
(1,276 posts)Yesterday, while driving home from our trip, we turned on SiriusXM Progress and listened to a show that was hosted by someone that I used to listen to regularly in the afternoon. He had a fill in host who claimed that he and his guest during the last hour were going to talk about Hillary's economic plan. They spent a minute talking about it and the rest of the hour was a bash Bernie fest.
The host claimed to have very little knowledge of Bernie, or his stance regarding minorities. His guest claimed to like Bernie and said that he would vote for him, BUT, he was very disturbed about his lack of relationship with minorities or his stance regarding issues of race and that Bernie would have to do better regarding outreach. They had only callers who would back up their viewpoint and, when a confused sounding woman called in claiming the media was ignoring Bernie, the host (who claimed he didn't know much about Bernie earlier) stated that he saw him everywhere MSNBC, CNN, NBC, etc. Yet still claimed ignorance about what Bernie stood for.
For a good part of the hour, the two engaged in very transparent bashing using tactics that were akin to something that Fox would use. It was politics as usual. The whole thing was very disingenuous and went far afield of the topic that was supposed to have been discussed, all for the sake of spending an hour to bash one of the candidates. It was only their echo chamber, very few facts, information about Bernie's actual record, or opposing viewpoints.
leveymg
(36,418 posts)mass for going viral. Once it does, it will be very hard to counter, particularly by a candidate who is so underfunded.
I just hope that people see through this, and take it as yet more reason to reject the dirty-politics-as-usual campaigns. This could very well backfire in a game changing way.
chknltl
(10,558 posts)...in my humble opinion of course.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,719 posts)chknltl
(10,558 posts)Wow, this seems like a great place to throw shit against a wall in order to see what sticks. If it can rile up savvy DUers just imagine the political benefits it could have on hard workin but 'less than savvy' voters!
(but then again, this is still just my humble opinion... I'm no expert on this sort of thing so what do I know).
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,719 posts)I remember in 2008 PBO had a gospel concert in SC and one of the scheduled singers made some homophobic remarks...i am not going to relitigate it now but PBO opponents, mostly HRC people, tried to make political hay out of it. As far as I know and I'm a big news consumer it got one passing mention on CNN...
I doubt this latest kerfuffle has wheels but we'll see...
PEACE
zeemike
(18,998 posts)Big money has big power when it comes to media.
cui bono
(19,926 posts)okasha
(11,573 posts)The murdered kids are just irrelevant.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)arcane1
(38,613 posts)I've seen it "missed" here as well.
mmonk
(52,589 posts)the poster says it a conspiracy, points out Hillary wasn't there, and we are supposed to not think the poster meant Hillary did it. Right.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)Difference!
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,719 posts)Respectfully, it seems everybody made the correct inference but you and willful blindness isn't a defense
arcane1
(38,613 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,719 posts)Thank you in advance.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)Stop following me and derailing the thread. Geez.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,719 posts)But out of respect I will stop responding to you.
DonViejo
(60,536 posts)confrontation with Governor O'Malley and/or Senator Sanders?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251456257#post44
artislife
(9,497 posts)I just said that we know how Martin and Bernie handled it.
We can only image how she would have.
You can imagine her handling it with ease and a gentle ear to the protesters
Others can imagine it differently.
None of us knows for sure because she wasn't there.
I don't think there is a conspiracy on her part in being in Arkansas instead of Netroots.
Believe it or not.
(I will let that one land.)
I am sure she had that well scheduled before and it makes sense that she would be there.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)These days on DU you just never know with some people.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)<--- Person directly saying it.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)Aerows
(39,961 posts)would that be?
From where I'm standing, that was a stunt you could see from space.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,719 posts)eom
Aerows
(39,961 posts)I'll come right out and say it.
If this disturbs you, let me remind you that Mohammed Ali never backed down, never backed away, and owned the things he stated.
O'Malley and Sanders are cut from the same cloth in that respect.
Response to Aerows (Reply #126)
DemocratSinceBirth This message was self-deleted by its author.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,719 posts)O'Malley and Sanders are cut from the same cloth in that respect.
Muhammad Ali didn't lie about people. If he had a beef with them he got them in the ring and whipped their ass. And to compare the greatest heavyweight boxer of all time and one of the seminal African American figures of the twentieth century with Bernie Sanders and Martin O'Malley is facile and when I see Sanders supporters making claims like that i can see why his support among African American voters is almost non-existent.
Since you invoked Muhammad Ali you must be familiar with his career...Why would Hillary need dirty tricks to dispatch of Bernie Sanders ? He represents as much threat to her as Jean Pierre Coopman represented to Muhammad Ali.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)does Hillary Clinton stand for that you particularly agree with?
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,719 posts)Immigration reform
Protecting and expanding the ACA
Paid family leave
Raising the minimum wage
Expanding glbtq rights
Gun control
Criminal justice reform
Voting rights
Recognition of Cuba
SCOTUS
BrotherIvan
(9,126 posts)He could throw shade just as well as a punch. You should read more about he and Joe Frazier.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,719 posts)He had 61 fights.., I have probably seen >50 of them... I lived and died with every outcome. October 30, 1974 was probably the happiest day of my teen age life. i have probably read twenty five books about him... I am well aware of his trilogies with Joe Frazier and Ken Norton. And on top of it all my mom met the GOAT. My mom worked at the HUD office in Orlando in 87 which was also the home to the federal court house. Muhammad Ali was there as a character witness. During a break he sat in the cafeteria and signed autographs. My mom asked for his autograph and said "my son loves you." He signed it with my name and on it. She also said he was the most handsome man she ever met .
He was sui generis...
It's sad he never had a middle age because of the Parkinson's Disease/Syndrome but what a full life he lived...Reminds me of Dr. King's musings about longevity.
PEACE
BrotherIvan
(9,126 posts)I too have read about boxing in general for reasons I can't explain, lol. I'm just saying that Ali is also a human and some of the stuff he pulled with Frazier can not be considered angelic. It's hard to say that about your heroes, but it is necessary to see they are humans too. Not meaning to derail the thread though.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,719 posts)Ali was blessed though. He was as good with his mouth as with his hands.
I also think "trash talking" was his way of overcoming his own fears.
I'd like to hear H20Man weigh in...He's a huge Ali fan.
BrotherIvan
(9,126 posts)And he was talking about how Ali as a young kid could run for miles and miles and loved it. I think his ability was just as much of a miracle as all the historic athletes that dominated their time, like a gift from god in a sense. He is remarkable in so many ways. He also lived in the perfect time for himself if that makes sense. He echoed the mood of the country and history. It's funny that I'm not big on sports, but maybe it's the writing and the romance of boxing is why I read about it. It's fascinating. I will give full disclosure that I have a lot of affection and respect for Frazier though. He proved he had heart to do what he did. Watched a great documentary on him last year and was very sad when he passed. He sort of faded from time but he definitely deserves to get some of the credit too.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,719 posts)Gil Clancy, the famed boxing trainer, worked in Ali's corner with Angelo Dundee for a very short time at the beginning of his career... He said if not for his heart he would have been just another very good boxer but not the GOAT, think Roy Jones, Jr, but with better footwork. He took some incredible punishment in the ring.
And don't forget his skills languished and he grew older during his 3 1/2 year exile.
Back to Joe... I actually communicated via e-mail with Ferdie Pacheco, Ali's physician who has wrote several boxing books a couple of times...In one of his books he wrote of how he told Ali, "You're a black man, Joe is a black man. How can you talk to him like that?" He said Ali didn't have any idea how much his words strung...
Ali and Jim Brown were close friends. One day they shadow boxed in street clothes in a park...Jim couldn't touch him and Ali was flicking jabs that landed a fraction of an inch from his noggin...
Here's an iconic photo of when Ali met with the leading black athletes of his era to discuss his opposition to being drafted:
It's funny...My pops was a Joe Frazier fan...He thought he was too strong for Ali...He died when I was fourteen. He died in 73 so he didn't live to see Ali win their rematch and the rubber match... He was alive for the first Ali-Norton fight which he lost. We watched it together and I was heartbroken and shocked but I had faith he would come back...i was obsessed as a young man with Ali...One time our sophomore class went to the local community college to see what it was like and we went to the computer center and I asked the director if the computer would tell me if Ali would beat Foreman. I was a crazy kid.
BrotherIvan
(9,126 posts)That's cool about Pacheco. I read his book too. Now I'm gonna blow your stack that I think I agree with some people that Sugar Ray Robinson might have been the greatest! Ha! That's probably another thread.
mythology
(9,527 posts)unless you think Joe Frazier was actually an Uncle Tom and that he was so ugly, smelly and stupid that people in Manilla were going to think black people were animals.
Yes Ali later apologized, but he still was willing to attempt to debase another man racially and as a person to promote a fight.
Ali was a hell of a fighter, and has done a lot of good stuff, but he was also flawed by his ego.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,719 posts)But there is a difference between insulting someone and lying about somebody, the latter of which occurred here and that is why I took exception to it. i can respond to an insult. A lie is much harder to undo.
And you have to remember the politics of the time, especially prior to the FOTC. God bless Joe, he didn't ask for it but he was the darling of the right "who was going to shut up the loud mouthed draft dodger." By the time of the Thrilla in 75 a lot of that emnity towards him was gone.
Ali also used racial taunts against Floyd Patterson and Ernie Terrell, especially with Terrell where he punctuated the beating he was administering with taunts of "What's my name?"
Muhammad Ali wasn't a cookie cutter saint. After all he made a living beating people silly, but at his core he was an exceptionally kind, naturally intelligent, and brave man and that is why I love him.
snagglepuss
(12,704 posts)we see whether Black Lives Matter does something similiar to Hillary.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,719 posts)It was a nasty insinuation. I stand by it. And I rather have a cap busted in my ear than withdraw it.
2banon
(7,321 posts)Having said that.. I've seen up front and personal how Identity Politics (here in the Bay Area) can and does completely dismantle progressive organizing and good work. It's very very disheartening to see it in action against the only candidate who actually gives a damn.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)No Liberal candidate should ever associate themselves with that sham of a 'Liberal' organization. Not one thing that happened today is a surprise to those of us who know the history of that phony organization and its founders.
Hillary not being there, is to say the least, 'interesting'. SHE has a problem with the AA community after her remark at a Black Church which many in the AA considered to be extremely insensitive.
Somehow those in power are desperate to stop Bernie Sanders and if I were to make a bet, I would bet that this was a dirty trick planned to try to do so at that phony 'liberal' gathering.
It has been plagued by controversy, since its inception. Mainly because of WHO founded it. As has DK itself.
But to be honest, I gave up trying to warn people about Kos a long time ago. Maybe this will revive the interest in uncovering just who is behind the 'gatekeeper' blog DK and end the charade of Netroots Nation once and for all.
m-lekktor
(3,675 posts)very interesting! I am not a fan of his blog or him.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)Crashing The Gates, and who was the main founder of DK, and who ended up being convicted of internet fraud, not related to DK, but to has 'activities' on other blogs, made it 'desirable' to disconnect Netroots from DK.
The fact that Hillary wasn't there, is well, 'interesting' to say the least.
m-lekktor
(3,675 posts)I am surprised I didn't know this was his thing. haha your Hillary comment was the first thing I thought of but i keep telling myself now way , she wouldn't!!! it DOES sound like something David Brock (now a HIllary toady) would orchestrate when he was a right wing hatchet man in the 90's! lol
madfloridian
(88,117 posts)They are completely separate entities now.
m-lekktor
(3,675 posts)but didn't know there was a connection at any time for this event. thanks for the info!
Autumn
(45,120 posts)He founded Netroots Nation? Interesting.
madfloridian
(88,117 posts)Jerome Armstrong
Peregrine Took
(7,420 posts)there's that.
haikugal
(6,476 posts)What happened?
dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)Been offline, Obviously missed something big.
madfloridian
(88,117 posts)dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)madfloridian
(88,117 posts)Divernan
(15,480 posts)JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)It should've been handled better, but who could really prepare for something like that.
Also, I meant sticking around afterward. The good news is nobody watches netroots so it won't even make the news I'm guessing.
madfloridian
(88,117 posts)Thanks.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)Something can be a trainwreck without being their fault. For example, if Hillary was giving a speech and her teleprompters broke it would be a trainwreck, but not her fault.
artislife
(9,497 posts)Poor Martin wasn't allowed enough time to really settle in.
Maybe Bernie had a campaign schedule to keep. One of Bernie supporters is seeing him tonight.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)Hillary is shellacking him when it comes to the minority vote.
madfloridian
(88,117 posts)He made some excellent points, but no one could hear him.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)This is a national election.
You're not in overwhelmingly white Vermont anymore.
SoapBox
(18,791 posts)Give the racist crap a rest.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)truebrit71
(20,805 posts)It's Hillary supporters like you that turn people away from your candidate.
Keep up the good work and we can expect President Cruz ....
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)is pretty pathetic, but hilarious!
Oh noez, some anonymous poster on the interwebz just put me on ignore.
I'm utterly crushed.
madfloridian
(88,117 posts)That truly disturbs me.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)Seriously, it's only going to get worse.
You have to withstand it if you want to be President. Hillary was accused of murdering Vince Foster and Obama was accused of being a secret Muslim hell bent on destroying America.
So some people were a little mean to Bernie? That's nothing.
Response to Cali_Democrat (Reply #30)
Post removed
Response to Cali_Democrat (Reply #30)
Bobbie Jo This message was self-deleted by its author.
JustAnotherGen
(32,040 posts)I'm not upset about it - because he has "grit".
seveneyes
(4,631 posts)Their actions can not be defended.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)Michelle Obama gets heckled and Du cheers ...
Bernie (and O'Malley) gets heckled and DU talks about respect.
That truly disturbs me.
madfloridian
(88,117 posts)My late hubby and I were Obama supporters and worked for his campaign on the ground here.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)madfloridian
(88,117 posts)Most people never were.
Again you are lumping together. Please don't do that.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)Autumn
(45,120 posts)1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)Right?
Autumn
(45,120 posts)What they did to him was a lousy thing to do to someone making an effort to talk to people about their concerns. You couldn't hear what he was saying, they didn't allow him to talk, they kept him standing there on stage. Hell of a way to treat a candidate that's on your side, I didn't even stick around for more than a couple minutes of Bernie. That was a waste of time for any candidate.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)talking about respect?
Autumn
(45,120 posts)FFS. At one time people here might have had respect for them but as I remember that kind of changed years ago.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)Your not in this one:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1017120551
Or, this one:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022953975
Or, this one:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/101664335
Or, this one:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1014491300
Here ... How about you make it a little easier. How about you post a link to you post where you condemned the heckling of President Obama.
Prism
(5,815 posts)http://www.democraticunderground.com/10141126610#post27
http://www.democraticunderground.com/113727571 (this one is really interesting)
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251309974
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x9422322 (old school thread!)
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)So by your own logic that you are trying to use on Autumn, you also support the senseless heckling of President obama.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)and using their absence from the threads you linked as proof of that support. An absence that you share.
You aren't whining, but you are being very dishonest.
Autumn
(45,120 posts)search for them yourself. for some reason "Don't make me link to Code Pink! n/t" brought to mind "Don't make me turn this car around!"
But if your cool with what they did to O'Malley and Sanders today you have no right to complain about Code Pink heckling Obama.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)Autumn
(45,120 posts)1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)my bad "complained" ... I must have implied it.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)JoeyT
(6,785 posts)More specifically I was thinking about how the people cheering this on are the very ones that have a full blown fit every time Code Pink is even mentioned. I guess being anti-war isn't good enough because #muslimlivesdon'tmatter
MH1
(17,635 posts)I just watched the O'Malley video. The protesters hijacked the event. She was offered to ask a question and then she took over for 15 minutes just leaving O'Malley to stand there and wait. If the NN people hadn't eventually taken control back she would have gone on and on.
At first it was cool but to keep it going that long, disrupting the program more than a little - much more than mere heckling - I found it disrespectful and tiresome.
The moderator had tried to give her a chance to speak (why did she get a chance and not each of the other hundreds in the audience?) - she took advantage.
She didn't change my political opinion one bit. I was already on their side politically. Not so impressed with how they direct their actions though, now.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)DemocratSinceBirth
(99,719 posts)Autumn
(45,120 posts)I see why she stays in a little bubble. Bernie and O'Malley both did great and they showed what they are made of.
London Lover Man
(371 posts)Bernie's too white to be President!
Guess what, so is Clinton. And O'Malley.
What else do you have?
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)Blue_In_AK
(46,436 posts)DCBob
(24,689 posts)I dont know how he can turn that around but for sure its not going to be easy.
madfloridian
(88,117 posts)Nobody wins when that happens.
It's really too bad that he and O'Malley are considered racist.
DCBob
(24,689 posts)I think its a deeper issue where many listen to Bernie and other progressives and notice that their focus always seems to be on economics. Many in the AA community see a much bigger problem.. eg.. just surviving walking down the street... and they think Bernie and his crowd simply dont get it.. imo.
rbnyc
(17,045 posts)We need to do a better job on these issues.
If my son or daughter had dark skin and I had to worry about him/her getting killed by a cop every time s/he leaves the house, that might be the only issue I care about and I would probably be screaming about it.
It's hard to understand things deeply when they don't impact you directly. The least we can do is listen undefensively.
PotatoChip
(3,186 posts)Hopefully Loretta Lynch will act.
PoC are justifiably angry; as we all should be. Things have got to change immediately.
Autumn
(45,120 posts)jeff47
(26,549 posts)But it fits the story you want to tell.
Both Sanders and O'Malley have incorporated reforming structural racism into their speeches.
But you don't care. You have a story to tell instead.
DCBob
(24,689 posts)jeff47
(26,549 posts)Could you point me to Clinton's specific plan, btw? I'd like one from all the main Democratic candidates.
DCBob
(24,689 posts)from work she has done in the past and also being the spouse of the "First Black President".
jeff47
(26,549 posts)The one who ramped up mandatory minimums, ramped up the drug war, destroyed the safety net and deregulated banks so that they gave black borrowers far worse terms than white borrowers.
Yeah....that's an "interesting" way to argue she has "creds".
DCBob
(24,689 posts)Look at the polling.. she trounces all other candidates with AA voters.
elehhhhna
(32,076 posts)My hubs is a homebuilder. Doesn't make me one.
Hilly DGAF bout no one but her family and 1% friends.
eridani
(51,907 posts)eridani
(51,907 posts)Autumn
(45,120 posts)It's almost like O'Malley wasn't there and there, it's just an excuse to trash Bernie. They are so transparent.
Bobbie Jo
(14,341 posts)Good lord, say what you mean for once.
They, they, they,.... Who??
Autumn
(45,120 posts)http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/they
Definition of THEY
1
a : those ones used as third person pronoun serving as the plural of he, she, or it or referring to a group of two or more individuals not all of the same sex <they dance well>
b : 1he 2 often used with an indefinite third person singular antecedent <everyone knew where they stood E. L. Doctorow> <nobody has to go to school if they don't want to N. Y. Times>
2
: people 2 used in a generic sense <as lazy as they come>
Last edited Sun Jul 19, 2015, 01:00 AM - Edit history (1)
Say what you mean, already.
No, WHO is "they," not what.
WHO:
who
\ˈhü, ü\
pronoun
: what or which person or people
used to question a person's character or authority
used after a noun or pronoun to show which group of people you are talking about
Full Definition
1 :what or which person or persons used as an interrogative <who was elected?> <find out who they are> used by speakers on all educational levels and by many reputable writers, though disapproved by some grammarians, as the object of a verb or a following preposition <who did I see but a Spanish lady Padraic Colum> <do not know who the message is from G. K. Chesterton>
http://i.word.com/idictionary/who
mmonk
(52,589 posts)He has walked the walk. Seems many are just uninformed.
jwirr
(39,215 posts)has a history being the wife of the "first black president" as Bill has been called. That history includes harsher sentencing for crimes that has resulted in many more black incarcerations for longer periods of time and families destroyed. Her history includes lobbying for it.
He also did "welfare reform" at a time when fathers were being be sent to jail and mothers were raising their children alone. He could not help that because it was veto proof but he could have forced them to override that veto.
I do not trust that this history will end up any different just because she says it will.
eridani
(51,907 posts)appalachiablue
(41,203 posts)Here's an OP on Sanders speech in IOWA last night, emphasizing ending predatory police practices, mass incarceration and start investing in education and jobs (this video point starts at 15:00).
Bernie: I want an America where young black men are not harassed, shot and killed in the streets.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1251455509
arcane1
(38,613 posts)Response to arcane1 (Reply #82)
appalachiablue This message was self-deleted by its author.
Trajan
(19,089 posts)Goodbye ...
No room in my life for calculating liars ...
Pitiful ...
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)I managed to make out that an O'Malley speech was interrupted. Where does Bernie come in?
madfloridian
(88,117 posts)Netroots Nation just lost all credibility.
villager
(26,001 posts)Which is why the right stays in -- and increases its -- power.
scarletwoman
(31,893 posts)Shouting someone down does not open up any sort of useful dialogue.
snagglepuss
(12,704 posts)The Left in their eyes is white. It'll be interesting to see if they do the same to Hillary.
villager
(26,001 posts)n/t
stranger81
(2,345 posts)And I'm not sure they are part of the Left. They are concerned about racial inequality, of course, but seem unbothered about income inequality, workers rights, environmental issues, or any of the other traditionally left issues.
Agschmid
(28,749 posts)Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)Bernie's offer to simply hand the stage over to the protesters and his use of framing for a (generally white) Netroots Nation audience, rather than the framing and language more appropriate for the audience Black Lives Matter protesters have pushed this appearance out to are costing him primary votes among the black community. Twitter is not happy with how either he or O'Malley handled the protesters.
Well, good luck with getting anything useful out of Hillary.
White progressives are learning something today indeed. That it's still just as easy to split the 99% and turn them against one another.
madfloridian
(88,117 posts)Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)based on PoC I know on twitter saying Bernie just lost their primary vote.
Heckled or not, interrupted or not, the candidates had to rise above, and it doesn't sound like they pulled it off in the eyes of the black and brown community.
I don't think their long term goals will be served better by a Hillary Presidency, but it is what it is. And I know Bernie wants to stay on his chosen message, but he can't win a primary on just white votes, and the framing of his messages doesn't fill the need here. His words on police brutality and injustice are too abstract. The protesters wanted a direct acknowledgement of the plight of people of colour under the racist 'justice' system, and for a full-throated embrace of the cause, not a technocratic speech about authoritarianism. This was a major stumbling stone, and recovery among the black community especially is going to be tough.
madfloridian
(88,117 posts)If anyone thinks that trainwreck helped the cause of those shouting out everyone else, then I think that's sad.
Watch it for yourself. I did. I watched it all the way through. I even saw the host hand the mic to the lady who took over and he welcomed her to the stage. But the shouting did not stop.They chanted they shouted.
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)I mean 'rise to the occasion'. They needed to satisfy the protesters, not talk past them. To actually communicate.
madfloridian
(88,117 posts)Maedhros
(10,007 posts)There is nothing either candidate could do to avoid looking bad - the entire event was planned to make them look bad, and the subsequent twitter campaign was planned to undercut their support.
This had little to do with BLM, and a lot to do with Move On creating controversy from which to profit.
historylovr
(1,557 posts)And given that Bernie had a meeting with them scheduled for afterwards, a meeting he canceled because of their antics, they now have even more ammunition to throw.
Response to historylovr (Reply #324)
Maedhros This message was self-deleted by its author.
onecaliberal
(32,998 posts)People on the right aren't the only ones voting against themselves.
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)I didn't watch, so I'm trying to understand based on the comments. It sounds like NN host lost control of the event. Sanders and OMalley were shouted down, not permitted to respond by the protestors. What, are they expected to shout back? As near as I can tell, the candidates handled the disruption as diplomatically as possible.
While I agree with the protestor's agenda, the manner of their protest makes them look like an unruly mob. That gives them a black eye, and hurts their cause. And NN also deserves a black eye. If the protestor's had approached them in advance for booth space and speaking time, that should have been arranged. If NN was unaware the protest was going to occur, then it appears security was lacking. The people who really got screwed were the attendees who were there to listen to the candidates, and were unable. Are they going to be sympathetic to the protestor's? Are they ever going to attend another NN event? Is NN going to gain in credibility? I'd say the answer to all is no.
DinahMoeHum
(21,835 posts). . .and they wonder why people don't want to listen or talk with them?
Sheesh.
Considering the shit that went on, Bernie Sanders carried himself much better than expected.
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)If they really cared about the issue, they would be cultivating allies. Sanders certainly is one. It looks to me that they were more interested in having a spotlight than in finding a solution. And that Elon guy should be canned immediately, if NN hopes to retain a shred of credibility.
WorseBeforeBetter
(11,441 posts)And a group carrying on Jerry Springer-style falls into that 'fools' category.
eridani
(51,907 posts)DinahMoeHum
(21,835 posts). . .and in so doing, they shit all over themselves.
I'll support them when they do the same thing at REPUBLICAN campaigns and debates.
jwirr
(39,215 posts)O'Malley have stated their opposition to racism and police brutality. And yes, they probably will not support either of them in favor of Hillary who is not who they think she is. They need to go back and look at what she and Bill did for the black community.
If I remember correctly she did not address the protests in Ferguson MO until they were over.
BeyondGeography
(39,395 posts)The whole tweeting lot of it.
I wonder how the twitterati handle it when they are invited somewhere only to be treated like a fire hydrant.
Autumn
(45,120 posts)I notice she wasn't there attempting to address their concerns.
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)Despite all my cynical talk, I've always had that hidden streak of optimism that keeps getting crushed over and over again by politics.
Autumn
(45,120 posts)and I think that people can see through what happened at netroot nation. She can't even commit to raising the minimum wage FFS.
George II
(67,782 posts)...(tonight) months ago.
I noticed that Sanders hasn't addressed any of the dozens of Jefferson Jackson Dinners around the country. Wonder why? After tonight Clinton will have done two in support of STATE Democratic Parties and Elizabeth Warren has addressed one (here in Connecticut 3 weeks ago)
Autumn
(45,120 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)....because Clinton wasn't at Netroots Nation today.
Autumn
(45,120 posts)George II
(67,782 posts)...she decided to NOT go?
"I notice she wasn't there attempting to address their concerns."
Similar sentiment has been expressed around here all day, "she could have been there", "she gave up on the far left", yadda yadda...implying if not saying outright that she intentionally chose to not be there. There were even some comments like "she should have addressed them via video feed like Obama did".
Whatever, I certainly won't argue the point with you.
Autumn
(45,120 posts)msanthrope
(37,549 posts)indicates you are unfamiliar with the importance of the event for Arkansas Democratic candidates, and that you are also unaware of the primary change.
Autumn
(45,120 posts)She was at a fundraiser. Was I wrong? No need to be so hostile and infer I'm stupid. That hurts my fee fees.
* No I did not. Reading is fundamental. I didn't use that word in my post but nice try.
*Why yes, Hillary was at a fundraiser. They raise funds for Arkansas Democratic candidates.
Don't like my post? Fucking sue me.
285. She was at a fundraiser. She wasn't there to address their concerns Bernie and Martin were there.
http://www.usnews.com/news/politics/articles/2015/07/17/hillary-clinton-returns-to-arkansas-now-behind-gop-lines
snagglepuss
(12,704 posts)Absolutely spot on.
Autumn
(45,120 posts)went there to adress their issues. They would have been better served had they borrowed a page from Hillary and gone to a fund raiser and blown off netroots nation instead. I'm not blaming the Black Lives Matter group but I think the host and the organizer Elon James White had this planned in advance from the tweets that were posted here. It brought that Acorn video guy to mind.
winter is coming
(11,785 posts)It looks like a deliberate set-up, and she'll likely be blamed for it, right or wrong.
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)In which case, maybe we're reading this wrong. If they're planning to put EVERY candidate on the left on notice, maybe they're actually refusing to be taken for granted any more, and the general candidate who decides to ignore their needs might be another 'Gore 2000'.
artislife
(9,497 posts)The twitter universe is pretty fleeting. Don't dispair.
madfloridian
(88,117 posts)Le Taz Hot
(22,271 posts)because several people were yelling at him at the same time but the accusation is that "black issues are often pushed aside." Issues need a dialogue -- a back-and-forth. This was a train wreck.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)SoapBox
(18,791 posts)And what did the hecklers accomplish?
Nada.
That type of bullshit gets your point no place.
Try that crap with ANY RePuke candidate and see how far it gets you.
Of all candidates for President, these are the ones that they should not have been yelling at.
leveymg
(36,418 posts)Not accidental, if the Media Director was aware beforehand. Worse, if he was the one doing the tweeting.
leveymg
(36,418 posts)madfloridian
(88,117 posts)leveymg
(36,418 posts)Last edited Sat Jul 18, 2015, 06:20 PM - Edit history (1)
About 8,630 results (0.36 seconds)
Search Results
Staff | Netroots Nation
www.netrootsnation.org About Us
Netroots Nation
Raven Brooks (@ravenb / Facebook) is the executive director of Netroots ... Elon James White (@elonjames) is Netroots Nation's media director and CEO of ...
madfloridian
(88,117 posts)Here's his bio:
Elon James White
@elonjames
CEO, @TWIBNation. Publisher, http://www.ThisWeekInBlackness.com , Media Dir. @netroots_nation. Writer. Professionally funny. Habitual creator. -- #TWIBnation
#TWIBnation
elonjameswhite.com
Joined March 2007
Why would you think they are not his tweets? His name is on them.
If he retweeted someone their name would be on it.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)I wonder who he's thinking of voting for.
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)But it sure looks like it was a trainwreck for NN. I doubt they'll be taken seriously in the future.
leveymg
(36,418 posts)Ambush. This is an extension of the "Bernie doesn't care about minorities" meme that's been playing out here and across the internet.
I've gotta say, these people are Lee Atwater level serious about their political dirty-tricks.
sufrommich
(22,871 posts)Last edited Sat Jul 18, 2015, 09:04 PM - Edit history (1)
I'm pretty sure they're not for hire.
quickesst
(6,283 posts)...specifically?
dreamnightwind
(4,775 posts)madfloridian
(88,117 posts)Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)Yet, very little appreciation for the stunt he pulled. Perhaps some people actually did listen to the candidates.
a kennedy
(29,778 posts)that will change a dynamic in this country....THAT BLACK LIVES DO MATTER. Just saying....it will not happen with just the POTUS, although this Black President HAS done a lot for the cause. JMHO.
MADem
(135,425 posts)That will teach staffers to a) Monitor twitter accounts of organizers in future; b) Take steps to limit access to the stage.
SAY HER NAME has to do with women who have been murdered by police:
https://instagram.com/p/5SYAK6j9Au/
Candidates use this opportunity to get some free publicity for themselves--it is a situation that is fraught with uncertainty if there's not enough structure to the proceedings.
From what little reading I've done, I understand that some Latino contributors were a bit annoyed that they were only invited to weigh in on the immigration issue, and not on other issues, like the economy, jobs, etc.
madfloridian
(88,117 posts)Did you watch the video?
MADem
(135,425 posts)scarletwoman
(31,893 posts)Invite speakers to your event, then treat them like they're the Enemy?
This just seems like a really bullshit deal to me.
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)I'm still trying to understand wtf happened. If he knew in advance, then what a douche-bag. He didn't help Black Lives Matter, probably hurt them. Looks like he's just trying to make a name for himself.
scarletwoman
(31,893 posts)I didn't have any way to actually watch the event, I was just following the posts on Bigtree's thread here: http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=455953
dreamnightwind
(4,775 posts)I think it was about helping HRC.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)women and it amazes me how little people here know of its controversial history. It is a construct of the DLC/Third Way and is nothing BUT a sham, always was.
I wish I could have warned Bernie. I and thousands of other Liberals were present on DK when Netroots then called Kos something or other, first began.
Women, minorities and anyone who was to the left were never welcome on that Blog, DK, which itself along with its two founders, have very questionable motives. They were exposed a few years ago by an African American attorney who was banned (thousands were banned for the site mainly for asking questions about its purpose) and rather than just go away, he did his own research into the backgrounds of the 'founders'.
One of those two, Kos being the other, was eventually indicted and convicted of fraud for scamming people on the internet.
When that whole scandal blew up, and people naturally demanded answers since this the 'godfather' of DK, they were told it was all a big mistake, btw, the indicted founder was Kos's co-author of the book 'Crashing the Gates', and soon there would be an explanation when the case was over.
Well the case ended with a CONVICTION for FRAUD and Kos remained silent on the issue.
The fact that Hillary stayed away, that this ambush happened, is no surprise to those of us who know the history of this FAKE LIBERAL BLOG.
The reason the changed the name to Netroots Nation from the original which connected it to Kos, is because by then, people were seriously wondering who was really behind Daily Kos.
A book could be written about this, I watched in real time and was stunned by what I learned along with thousands of others.
I hope this ENDS that phony Liberal organization once and for all.
That they survived the many scandals at all, shows how much money is behind that whole operation.
Kos himself is a 'former' Repub who worked for Henry Hyde, he was one of the worst kind of Fox News Republicans as we found out, so what was he doing operating a 'liberal blog' then smearing and attacking women, gays, AAs, and running them off his blog?
Maybe this is the right time to revisit the exposures that are out there, DK and Netroots Nation are all part of the same operation.
No Liberal should ever go there again, and it's time to expose these fake Liberal blogs that roped in all the energy that was out there during the Bush, then CONTROLLED it. They are without a doubt a 'gatekeeper' blog, kos is a phone, his partner a convicted fraudster and I personally left that place a long time ago along with thousands of women and minorities who witnessed the exposures, the nastiness, the hatred for liberals in general.
This could help to end the scam and I hope it does.
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)Are you denying this fact? Netroots Nation is a construct of that partnership. Changed its name along the way so that people do not connect it to DK unless they know its history. This hopefully will revive the interest in just who was behind this entire organization and there are literally thousands of 'witnesses' who were there when it was exposed by one African American Lawyer who they then tried to smear and discredit. Not very successfully. His work is still available and it is quite revealing.
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)fraudster, his partner, Kos, the junior member of the team airc, at the time, since the convict himself was the known as the 'Godfather' of DK, lied to the membership claiming there was nothing behind the charges and the case would be resolved after which he, Kos, would explain it all.
His 'godfather' was convicted, all attempts to get Kos to keep his promise have failed, and are cause for banning on that phony 'liberal' site.
I hold HIM responsible for his attempt to deceive the membership into believing that his partner done nothing wrong. And for silencing anyone who attempts to get him to keep his promise to 'explain' the whole thing which he claimed was just a 'misunderstanding'. The FBI and the courts did not agree obviously.
I was merely a member of what was advertised as a 'liberal site' at the time, a bystander but who like thousands of others, got to witness the exposure of what had begun to seem like a phony operation, the founders of not just DK, but of what is now known as Netroots Nation.
But there is so much more that was revealed about both of them and as I said, this hopefully will begin the process of exposing the entire phony operation.
Some good liberals managed to survive the many purges of liberals, women, gays, AAs, on that site. And when it came close to total failure, and the pushback was so intense, they didn't dare continue their draconian banning and purging, at least for a while. But we all remember the despicable revelations and as I said, an ambush of two Liberal candidates at one of their 'organizations' is just par for the course when it comes to that entire sham.
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)Its a yes or no question easily answered.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)The reason why so many women, AAs, one of whom is responsible for exposing the entire sordid history of DK's founders and of Netroots Nation since that organization is also part of DK, and Liberals who were clearly the targets of these imposters, Kos himself a Republican who worked for Henry Hyde.
What were they doing BEFORE they started DK? I believe all this is about to be revealed now as a result of this not unexpected dirty trick, considering the source.
Kos has refused to 'explain' his mentor and partner's crime, which he promised to do, claiming his 'godfather' the foundre of DK would NOT be convicted. But unfortunately he WAS convicted of Internet Fraud.
And people wondered, 'who are these people who have taken on the role of 'Liberal Spokespersons'?? When nothing could be further from the truth?
I am now looking forward to an end to the charade that is known as 'Netroots Nation' and its founders, 'DK'.
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)address them. Do you think a Liberal blog owner should disavow a partner who was convicted of fraud especially internet fraud, and keep a promise made to explain why that partner was cheating people on the internet?
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)Do you hold Kos responsible for the misdeeds of his co author?
historylovr
(1,557 posts)I always felt that Kos was skeevy as hell, but I had no idea how much.
gwheezie
(3,580 posts)She figured it out just like you did
elehhhhna
(32,076 posts)dreamnightwind
(4,775 posts)I have never spent any time over there (DKos) and knew nothing about its history. Fascinating. I didn't even know NRN had anything to do with DKos.
Our own DU's founder was the web site designer for the DLC/PPI site, so it seems that the gates are being well kept. Skinner seems to tolerate us here so long as we play by the rules, which is easy enough.
I watched the whole Netroots fiasco with BLM, O'Malley and Sanders this morning, ruined my whole day, that was hideous. Clearly an ambush. Revealing that they set their trap for the upstart progressives rather than for the corporatist front-runner. We'll see how BLM goes after her, but I'm not holding my breath on that one.
I laughed when the BLM people were booing Bernie for saying we don't need more H1-B visas. Kudos to Bernie for speaking the truth.
I went out and haven't seen the larger event yet, I hope it went better, will look for video of it later, if it even happened. Strange day.
onecaliberal
(32,998 posts)HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)onecaliberal
(32,998 posts)If they were interested in serious dialog, they could have had all questions answered at their scheduled meeting. NRN really screwed up.
dreamnightwind
(4,775 posts)Usually when I see such amazing "screw ups" I consider another explanation that makes their actions more reasonable if you get the context of their actions correct. I don't know the full story, just that it didn't feel at all like a genuine attempt to get issues addressed that matter to black people, it felt like something else entirely.
onecaliberal
(32,998 posts)It does seem absurd they would shout down the candidates and then say their questions were not being addressed when they all knew they had a meeting with Sanders later in the day.
dreamnightwind
(4,775 posts)What concerns me is we've seen, from mostly the corporate Democrat supporters here on DU (I don't hang out elsewhere so I don't know what that is like) a pretty bizarre attempt to frame Sanders as not caring or insensitive about the concerns of people of color. These efforts to frame Bernie that way almost never contain specific policy that they want Bernie to support, it's more like Bernie is supposed to somehow end racism in the hearts of Americans, pity that Obama and Clinton(s) haven't already done so.
I would see it in a different way if it were being done to a candidate like Clinton, who I don't see as having many actual policy stands that will help minorities, except perhaps where corporate interests and minority interests intersect (cheap labor pool for corporations, H1-B and guest workers from Clinton), and who actually used thinly veiled racially coded statements against Obama in the 2008 campaign.
Sanders is the absolutely best candidate minorities have when it comes to policy issues.
So you have the corporate Democrat supporters here who have for some time now been trying to attack Sanders this way, it has seemed very much like a strategic decision that was made, the Clinton people seeing that they had a problem on the left, no doubt came up with a strategy, mostly empty of policy so it didn't cost them anything as far as their corporate donors were concerned, to attack Sanders on minority concerns. What a joke.
The BLM people could have had a good interaction with Sanders and O'Malley, getting specific policies addressed. Bernie would not necessarily give them all the answers they want (he doesn't pander, he tells the truth), such as I think Bernie supports American workers when their interests conflict with allowing unlimited undocumented people into this country (I could be misrepresenting Sanders there), or when corporations and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce (a far RW group that no Democrat should support) want more H1-B visas for cheap labor instead of working with and paying U.S. citizens to do the jobs. Those issues relate more to Latino interests than to U.S. blacks, so I really don't know why black people in this country would not work for positive interactions with Sanders, he is their best chance to take on the abusive police state we live in, to free them from the economic draft they fall victim to when corporations want U.S. soldiers for resource wars, to reduce incarceration, and to provide better access to healthcare, education, and employment. I honestly believe Sanders is better on all of those issues than any other candidate we've had in a long long time. But apparently that isn't good enough, for some reason.
So I think there's a concerted effort to unfairly and wrongly target Sanders as unfriendly to minorities, when it's really just that he isn't someone who will pander and market to them, he is a policy person, which is the substance rather than the marketing effort. All I have seen that feels legitimate is that people want him to showcase minorities and their interests more, to speak more specifically to those interests, to "hear" them, rather than just working on policy issues to advance their interests. Whereas Clinton will do just the opposite, she and her marketing department will put together a beautifully framed and colorful bouquet that shows she cares, and she will look the other way (wherever the money is) when policy issues arise that actually impact their lives.
If BLM really wanted anything specific they would have had an ally in Sanders, and would have done well to work with him. The Netroots host that moderated that fiasco has published books about his life as an undocumented immigrant, I believe (but do not know, I have not read his work) that he advocates completely free and unlimited, unregulated immigration into this country, in other words no border, which would actually put much downward pressure on the wage structure that black people are dealing with, and on their access to employment. There are texts showing that the Netroots founder couldn't wait to sock it to our progressive candidates at this event, and the moderator was clearly part of that effort. Sabrina's posts about Netroots and their DKos ties (and her statements about the possible nature of those ties) have been interesting, I need to learn more about that.
It fits well, though, when looked at through the corporate lens, the corporations' politicians and their wage structures and labor pool all benefit from an attack on Sanders on minority interests. What BLM gets out of it, aside from 15 minutes of attention, is the question.
I don't know what happened, I know something smells really wrong. Sometimes things just stink because they do, and sometimes they stink because there's a rat around. Perhaps as time goes on we'll know more.
onecaliberal
(32,998 posts)I think it smells wrong as well. I am wondering about the leaders of the movement. What their strategy really is. The beligerance isn't going to serve them well. It is also curious that they don't protest the AG, or congress or POTUS for that matter, since they actually have power to do something now.
I have read a few things about the host as well. I don't think BLM understands that his agenda is completely different and at odds with their own.
Why aren't they trying to exert maximum pressure on those people who can change things right now and trying furiously to open dialogue with everyone.
I know the Senator is going to do everything he can but he is not the POTUS or the AG.
I can't wait to hear your thoughts on this matter going forward.
dreamnightwind
(4,775 posts)Black people live in unacceptable conditions in this country. It isn't new, in fact, other than the mass incarceration (a big issue for sure) their fate in this country is perhaps better than ever, which still isn't good at all. But on the scale of problems this nation and planet are facing, driven by systemic economic forces (climate change is the most urgent issue we have to deal with, there is no way to overstate the urgency of that issue), most of our problems are in a downward spiral, economic, climate, wars, oligarchy, surveillance, a runaway and unstable financial system that has pretty much captured the U.S. government and many other governments as well, racial issues still suck but are not in a downward spiral, probably the opposite.
Police brutality has escalated against everyone, it's part of the growing corporate control that advances rapidly toward fascism. Minorities are disproportionately on the receiving end of police brutality. And there is a lot of evidence of white supremacist types in law enforcement. Sanders is excellent on this issue, the others not so much.
Obama and Holder were pretty worthless on these issues. Obama's style was to make nice speeches about it, but he never took on the power structure behind it, never attempted real systemic reform, and Holder also made some superficial gestures but little attempt to bring about real change. I agree with you, they would have been excellent targets for Black Lives Matter. Like Obama and Clinton, I have not seen BLM take on the powerful interests (corporate at root) that are the source of the problems. Perhaps they have and I am not aware of it, but if it were high profile direct interventions such as their co-option of the Netroots talks by O'Malley and Sanders, I'm fairly sure I would know about it. Seems more likely to me they either are, or are being used by, the oligarchy which is getting pretty worried about a rising left-wing populism.
onecaliberal
(32,998 posts)Because the lack of any effort to voice their greevances to the Obama admin it's hard for me to take them seriously.
I agree climate change is the biggest emergency we face and could literally wipe us all out from this Planet.
I know one thing, if the movement thinks verbal shout downs directed at those who would be the most helpful to their cause is going to get them anywhere, I guess they'll find out in short order. I like to think I pay a lot of attention to these things and I've yet to hear of them conducting any kind of demonstration directed at those on power that could do things to help them now, beyond nice speeches no one has done anything to address the police state.
If elected Bernie will do everything in his power to address the issues they care about because he has spent a lifetime trying to address them.
dreamnightwind
(4,775 posts)BuelahWitch
(9,083 posts)Why wasn't there a BLM workshop at NRN? Why did they only show up to disrupt two progressive Presidential candidates? This should be its own OP.
scarletwoman
(31,893 posts)You're responding to a post I made very early in the day yesterday, I learned a lot more since then.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=458166
DCBob
(24,689 posts)Wow. @BernieSanders cancelled all meetings today, including meeting with #BlackLivesMatter organizers. #NN15 #SayHerName
.@SenSanders cancels all small meetings after the #BlackLivesMatter demonstration at #NN15 can you #FeelTheBern more like the #BURN
At #NN15 panel, @elonjames says Bernie Sanders canceled a scheduled meeting with activists after the prez forum.
madfloridian
(88,117 posts)Did you watch the video? All of it?
He has a rally in Phoenix tonight. Maybe they can harass him there also.
DCBob
(24,689 posts)Best to get out of there and regroup. But he does need to address the concerns of this group seriously if he want to be taken seriously.
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)He's not the enemy, he's an ally. BLM really screwed the pooch.
DCBob
(24,689 posts)He needs to do more.
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)If some AAs are tuning him out, it's not because he isn't talking about it. The AA community also tuned out Obama early on, only coming to his side when it began to look like he could win the nomination. I think the same will happen with Sanders. He's not the enemy of AAs.
DCBob
(24,689 posts)BTW.. Bernie is no Obama.. in many significant ways.
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)They fucked up big time. They could have engaged in meaningful dialog with presidential candidates. Who's gonna give them the time of day now? They've marginalized themselves... Too bad, because their cause is just. But their tactics are asinine and self-defeating.
DCBob
(24,689 posts)Now maybe Bernie will take notice.
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)He was trying to address the issue today when he was repeatedly interrupted. He is not ignoring the issue. The issue is known...if not before by some of public, then certainly by all after Ferguson. There is a lot of sympathy and agreement by many. Sanders certainly is an ally...he's not the enemy. A handful of narcissistic loudmouths just fucking ruined things though.
MH1
(17,635 posts)to "get noticed" by Bernie.
What they did was appear irresponsible and disrespectful and unable to work civilly with an ally. A f***ing ally. You want to get noticed, go do that to the people who need it, the republicans or the oblivious whites who might be stupid enough to vote for republicans.
DRoseDARs
(6,810 posts)Any damage to his campaign is incidental. As long as the meme, noble as its intentions are, gets spread far and wide, who cares what happens to allies (who've been at this for 50 fucking years)?
DRoseDARs
(6,810 posts)And prior to this, he had meetings with them scheduled. Is he a Time Lord too? After the disruption, did he travel back in time to schedule those meetings because only now he "took notice"? BlackLivesHaveMattered to Sanders for 50+ years...
Travis_0004
(5,417 posts)I'm not a clinton fan, but I think she will likely win the primary, and she wasn't there. Why not do something constructive and talk to somebody who is president now instead of shouting at two people who I doubt will even win the primary.
DCBob
(24,689 posts)It could be they simply dont like the white progressive movement getting so much attention perhaps at the expense of issues like Sandra Bland and police brutality.
jwirr
(39,215 posts)speakers stage and at one point they started chanting BLM, BLM, BLM. The crowd turned on them and asked them to quit because no one could hear the speakers.
In Ferguson MO they were up on what they were doing - non-violent protest at its best. But I have a suspicion that they are less up on how to confront the issue when in other situations. In Ferguson MO they needed to confront the enemy that was harassing them all the time. Do this.... Do that....
Here at this event and in Selma they needed a different approach. Because in both Selma and NN they were not facing the enemy but supporters. It does not help to shout down your own allies.
I suspect that next time candidates will not be so willing to attend this event.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)What the hell?
DCBob
(24,689 posts)They certainly have everyone's attention now.
DRoseDARs
(6,810 posts)They didn't do themselves any favors here.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)Brilliant move!
arcane1
(38,613 posts)winter is coming
(11,785 posts)Why they thought that would better serve their interests, I don't know.
Raine1967
(11,589 posts)This was a really bad move.
randys1
(16,286 posts)Sure hope someone asks him about it Friday on Thom's show
BooScout
(10,406 posts)She knew this would happen and that's why she stayed away. Let's start a petition!
Welcome to the real world of a national election for the Presidency! You ain't seen nuthin yet.
leveymg
(36,418 posts)You're right, though. It's sure to get even dirtier.
BooScout
(10,406 posts)Seems to me that Bernie and his campaign walked right into it.....and were ill-prepared too boot. So who is an amateur?
leveymg
(36,418 posts)Ya, I would say that Hillary runs her events with professional advance crews, wide-band media surveillance, and Secret Service doing the security. But, would I want those people to be running Bernie's campaign?
Aerows
(39,961 posts)are coming into this thread pretending that they did not know it was a political stunt by Camp Weathervane, but everyone else knows it.
I'm not even going to pretend that this was authentic. Sell that narrative to someone else, because it does not fly.
BooScout
(10,406 posts)Thanks for your entry though!
Response to Aerows (Reply #117)
Bobbie Jo This message was self-deleted by its author.
quickesst
(6,283 posts)...what I wrote upthread. Looks like the Invasion Of Texas is about to get some company.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)those unruly negroes!
madfloridian
(88,117 posts)Response to 1StrongBlackMan (Reply #48)
Post removed
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)Cha
(298,050 posts)BooScout
(10,406 posts)Speaking up and being heard at a Human Rights event! I am shocked I tell you! Shocked!
madfloridian
(88,117 posts)then I am shocked.
BooScout
(10,406 posts)Bernie Sanders had better learn pretty fast how to go off script and discuss the issues that matter to people other than his one trick pony 1% meme or he is going to sink like a stone. It's not like he doesn't know he has a problem with broadening his base. If he cannot address the issues most important to minorities right now like racism in America, immigration, etc then he has no business attempting to run for President.
madfloridian
(88,117 posts)Didn't matter at all. Nothing matters. He is considered racist. That's it. Bottom line.
It's a shame.
BooScout
(10,406 posts)But he is extremely unprepared to address issues other than his 1% meme. Contrary to popular belief......in the real world, there are other issues that matter.
madfloridian
(88,117 posts)BooScout
(10,406 posts)Holy shit......people get shouted down every day. You want folks to stand in the back of the room with their hands raised while their children are dying on the streets? Or their parents and grandparents are gunned down in church by racist nuts? People are scared and mad and sick and tired of being ignored or pigeon holed into someone's 1% strategy, you know, the one size fits all strategy.
madfloridian
(88,117 posts)jeff47
(26,549 posts)I think you're pretty clueless about what he has been talking about.
Vattel
(9,289 posts)He addressed the concerns of BLM.
BooScout
(10,406 posts)If it makes you fell better.
Vattel
(9,289 posts)1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)leveymg
(36,418 posts)Yes or no?
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)snpsmom
(692 posts)How long do people need to sit down and shut up?
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)That negroes must express themselves in a manner that is acceptable to them?
George II
(67,782 posts)1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)When disrespectful will do.
George II
(67,782 posts)1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)I just wanted people to know ... we know what we are hearing.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)Tell us about the "hard-working americans, white americans" and their feeling that a few years ago, Barack obama "would have been carrying their bags." Then why not let's hear about how Barack obama was coasting along on the color of his skin and "making everything racism" and that he might have also been born in Kenya. Meanwhile, have a giggle over the massacre of Arabs in the wreckage of Libya and Iraq and the hope for the "obliteration" of Iran. Don't forget to talk about how Marriage is a "foundational foundation of history" and is only "Man and woman."
And then when you're done reliving everything your candidate stands for, you come back and tell us how she's the sole champion of all minorities on the democratic ticket. i'm sure we'll all be very receptive.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)I am not a HRC supporter. I am undecided; but, leaning towards O'Malley. I liked how he handled the disruption ... far better than the, "Well if you don't want me here" line.
shaayecanaan
(6,068 posts)you are going to hold Clinton's feet to the exact same fire and expect her to address racism in every speech and come up with solutions to eliminate racism and so forth.
Any day now...
Yep, can't be much longer now...
Yessiree, I reckon its right around the corner...
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)I envy you.
kath
(10,565 posts)Pathetic how so many here are so willing to just sweep all that under the rug.
(And you really can't be a founder of the DLC then credibly act like you are a champion of the poor, African-Americans, and other marginalized groups.)
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)I'm certain there's more, I just can't recall the exact specifics.
freshwest
(53,661 posts)See, all better now...
irisblue
(33,056 posts)On Sat Jul 18, 2015, 09:39 PM an alert was sent on the following post:
Oh ...
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=456389
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS
I know I'm tilting at windmills here, but madfloridian is a damned good DUer who wrote nothing racist in her OP, or in any other post that I've ever seen. This reply is totally over the top and dishonest.
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Sat Jul 18, 2015, 09:57 PM, and the Jury voted 1-6 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: LEAVE this is alert stalking on 1SBM, irisblue
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: This is an important discussion .. let's not be hasty to silence any sincere opinions.
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: not seeing a problem here
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: I adore both DUers. Can't find the context on my tablet. Absent context, leave it alone. Mobile issue needs to be fixed, it would appear
irisblue
(33,056 posts)madfloridian
(88,117 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)Autumn
(45,120 posts)Funny, did Elon James tweet about Martin O'Malley or just Bernie?
ibegurpard
(16,685 posts)Hillary was at a fundraiser.
OKNancy
(41,832 posts)Jefferson-Jackson day dinner.. planned long ago.
BooScout
(10,406 posts)....but since she wasn't at Netroots....it's all her fault that Bernie got interupted and lost his shit.
dsc
(52,173 posts)but those electoral votes aren't in play.
BooScout
(10,406 posts)If you think Hillary Clinton can not take the 6 electoral votes of Arkansas away from the Republicans in 2016 you would be seriously underestimating just how popular and well liked the Clintons are there. Those electoral votes are very much in play.
ibegurpard
(16,685 posts)GoneFishin
(5,217 posts)HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)Sanders had a meeting with them scheduled after his speech. He desired to hear them out and engage in constructive dialog. No other candidate has done so. After their immature outburst, the meeting was cancelled. I can't blame Sanders, they weren't interested in dialog they just wanted the spotlight. No one is going to take them seriously now. The issue is important, but needs leaders who are civil, and don't seek to make enemies out of allies.
GoneFishin
(5,217 posts)They need new leaders.
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)Phlem
(6,323 posts)They should be taking it to Obama if things have not gotten any better. I'm thinking he has more pull currently than any potential candidates and I would think he's got a shared interest in this issue.
This stinks to high heaven.
madfloridian
(88,117 posts)madfloridian
(88,117 posts)He said he would get to the questions after he presented his views. They didn't like it so they kept shouting.
madfloridian
(88,117 posts)Seems the host was egging them on.
LuvNewcastle
(16,867 posts)He was only half-heartedly into the questioning before he abandoned it in favor of the disruptors. It's obvious to me that some people there just wanted to be seen and heard by the crowd. It was all about them. That's all right -- NN has effectively ruined itself as any kind of electoral organizing tool. In the long run, that's probably a good thing.
Cheviteau
(383 posts)...indeed. Jobs, education, jobs, education, jobs, education, jobs, education, jobs, education, jobs, education.................and on and on.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)heaven05
(18,124 posts)and O'Malley and Sanders are owed NOTHING.
Number23
(24,544 posts)little forum tonight. The wailing and moaning that people who are being slaughtered in the street didn't wait their turn to ask questions!!!11
I'll say it -- 1StrongBlackMan was right. ALL of us were right.
madfloridian
(88,117 posts)I guess I should not be surprised.
SoapBox
(18,791 posts)People will resort to any tactics to either
1. Get THEIR candidate elected
Or
2. Do a slash-and-burn tactic, thinking that it will make a difference but all they do is get further ignored because of their ranting, spewing disrespect.
Do Black Lives Matter?
Yes...as do all lives.
But these antics aren't going to get the message anyplace.
CTBlueboy
(154 posts)Elon James is correct black issues are often push into the back ! we are getting killed every 28 hours by police, our unemployment numbers are sky high, our children poverty rate is high, the income gap is getting bigger, and we still have to deal with bigots,racists from both parties to be honest.
Black progressives are just sick of white candidates/white dems/white progressive not taking what we say seriously. HRC , Chaffe, Webb will all get their turn to hear #blacklivematter
Black progressives are not going to allow this election cycle go without true "black agenda" which whomever the candiate will have to hold true or face repercussions
If you want us to vote you need to hear our cries and our problems
Sanders, HRC, Chaffe, Webb, an etc
madfloridian
(88,117 posts)CTBlueboy
(154 posts)The problem is was going to be a PC
which people fed up with
madfloridian
(88,117 posts)onecaliberal
(32,998 posts)Your questions and you shout them down you don't get to turn around and say they didn't listen. If you think anyone on the right gives two fucks about the violence going on keep alienating those who do really care. See where it gets you.
CTBlueboy
(154 posts)When a protesters interrupted the Obama about lgbt issues did you say the same thing ?,
thank you answer massa let me get back to tending the field
jwirr
(39,215 posts)arcane1
(38,613 posts)jeff47
(26,549 posts)Le Taz Hot
(22,271 posts)CTBlueboy
(154 posts)I'm speaking as a African American activist, who supports blacklivesmatter and their efforts.
Black people are sick of the party not focusing on our issues.
I do not care if it makes HRC, Sanders, or any dem candidate uncomfortable
Le Taz Hot
(22,271 posts)appointed you as their spokesperson. How nice for you.
freshwest
(53,661 posts)sulphurdunn
(6,891 posts)activists heckle the two most liberal democratic candidates for president, the only two who might actually do something about the goddamn status quo in this country. How fucking stupid is that?
jalan48
(13,913 posts)sulphurdunn
(6,891 posts)only American liberals, socialist, communists and other leftists have ever supported their cause with action, and because if they think republicans or "moderate democrats" will give them anything but lip services, they're even stupider than they just behaved.
arcane1
(38,613 posts)I don't understand it.
sulphurdunn
(6,891 posts)be bygones. The problem is that the shit throwing was public and the goddamn right wingers will have a field day spinning it. And I'm not sure that wasn't the idea.
winter is coming
(11,785 posts)Candidates tend to have overscheduled days. Why waste any of that time meeting with people who have demonstrated an unwillingness to actually discuss anything?
sulphurdunn
(6,891 posts)I just hope this doesn't resurrect the "all white people are racist" meme and aim it at the democrats. It's something Karl Rove would dream up.
Its stupid because we want the candidates to address the issues in our community and we are fed up with the dancing around
See this what white privalge allows : black activist - "heckles"
white dems/white progressives- omg shut up he/she is liberal or democrat
I do not give two F*** if your liberal democrat if your Sanders, Martin, Webb, HRC or Biden you going to hear our voices even if it means drowning you out in your comfortable space.
sulphurdunn
(6,891 posts)to address the issues in your community they require the opportunity to do so without being shouted down. It appears as though this disruption was meant to silence them. I don't want to hear all your shit about "white privilege" and "comfortable space" because what happened at the Netroots Nation conference aids and abets the privilege and the comfort of the goddamn neo-Confederate Republican Party.
CTBlueboy
(154 posts)Aww Did I make you uncomfortable about calling you out speaking from your safe white space ?
You dont like when black person fend himslef massa ?
Sorry to burst your bubble by Republicans are not the only one that has bigots and racists in their party
See the racist in Democratic party is that get the blacks to vote and forget them
sulphurdunn
(6,891 posts)You don't know anything about me. No democratic socialist has ever been president of this country. We finally have a chance to put one in the White House, one who might actually do something for race relations, and you gotta start with the "massa" bullshit and the "all whites are racists" innuendos. Unless you want a certifiable racist republican in the White House you better seriously consider getting on the side you should be on and quit working for the Jim Crow party.
jwirr
(39,215 posts)talking about but we do not believe that is the way to solve the issue.
MisterP
(23,730 posts)also "Transit Messiah and the Sword and Shield of Black Children" Damien Goodmon holding up LA's Expo Line for 4 years (he wants to "help" on the LAX/Crenshaw Line too)
silenttigersong
(957 posts)Sandra Bland an activist for BLM who was found dead in a Texas Jail Cell.
silenttigersong
(957 posts)we shall see if the Clinton campaign capitalizes on this event.Although I do not believe it is a campaign trick.Perhaps we can all benefit from this conciseness raising.All of us.
How about this say her name Sandra RIP
jwirr
(39,215 posts)that - we are upset with all of the killings we see even the ones that are not black. It could be any of my grandchildren and great grandchildren. But I do not blame everyone I can find to blame. We try very hard to change our own neighborhood and work with our political leaders when we can on a lot of issues. And when something happens like it did in Ferguson MO we give whatever kind of support we can.
onecaliberal
(32,998 posts)Candidates running that give two shits about them while giving a pass to the corporate who couldn't be bothered to show up. Dumb on so many levels. Net roots is a joke.
gregcrawford
(2,382 posts)... and all the others insinuating that Bernie is "weak on race" had better do their homework. Sanders was risking his life marching in Civil Rights protests in the Deep South when they were barely a gleam in their mothers' eyes, if they'd been thought of at all.
The major issues that Bernie addresses in ALL his speeches transcend racial divisions; they affect EVERYONE, Black, Brown, and White alike. I am for "Black Lives Matter" one trillion percent, but I will NOT let protests based on lies go unchallenged.
These people REALLY piss me off.
CTBlueboy
(154 posts)All the Dem. Candiates are weak when it comes to issues on race
All dem. Candidates need to step out their white bubbles and talk black people because the dem. party has toss black people to the side and only come to us when its election to get us to vote for them
BLACK PEOPLE ARE NOT PAWNS !!!
gregcrawford
(2,382 posts)... but my comment was directed at certain factions attempting to undermine Bernie's candidacy by misdirection and outright lies about his commitment to the concerns of a sizable segment of society that has been oppressed for far too long. People of color.
No matter how sincere our intentions, old white guys like me have to be vigilant and hyper-aware not to overstep. Enthusiasm sometimes outpaces prudence, and mistaken impressions are conveyed.
Bernie is one of my senators. I've met and spoken with him several times, and have followed his career since he first ran for mayor of Burlington. He's the real deal. I'm a cynical old bastard, and I don't trust anyone too readily, let alone politicians of any stripe. But I trust Bernie. I think you can, too.
Take care, and have a good day.
still_one
(92,523 posts)still_one
(92,523 posts)the posts going on around here, I think Netroots is history now
frylock
(34,825 posts)smart move by Clinton to skip this event.
still_one
(92,523 posts)LordGlenconner
(1,348 posts)nikto
(3,284 posts)azmom
(5,208 posts)That the discussion always turns to the appropriateness of the action or to the response. The real issue that needs to be discussed is always lost.
Response to madfloridian (Original post)
cui bono This message was self-deleted by its author.
whereisjustice
(2,941 posts)do something useful to address their concerns unlike "the one who cannot be named", who will charge $250K for a speech about how awesome Wall Street is.
We have lost a generation to prisons and poverty due to policies advanced by the Clinton's and her 3rd way surrogates on Wall Street.
So, how does Clinton deal with protesters?
Ex-CIA Analyst Ray McGovern Beaten, Arrested for Silent Protest at Clinton Speech
http://www.democracynow.org/2011/2/18/ex_cia_analyst_ray_mcgovern_beaten
Sanders and O'Malley will recover. Clinton has everything to lose.
brooklynite
(94,987 posts)White posted these smoking gun tweets AFTER the protests had occurred:
Did O'Malley say White Lives Matter along with #BlackLivesMatter? Y'all wonder why folks shut shit down. #NN15
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)freshwest
(53,661 posts)LeftOfWest
(482 posts)msanthrope
(37,549 posts)freshwest
(53,661 posts)http://www.democraticunderground.com/10026964832
Coming to a state near you... Wait, coming to YOUR state!
I'm concerned, too... Well, not really, we're already doing all of that stuff, too. We love it and are SOOO going to hell up here...
tammywammy
(26,582 posts)Elon James White ?@elonjames
Who's "you guys?" My team didn't organize or even participate in the action. I just support the message.
beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)"And like everybody in this room, I want to see an America where when young black men walk down the street they will not be harassed by police officers, they will not be killed; they will not be shot!"
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=455509
What do they think he learned?
onecaliberal
(32,998 posts)beam me up scottie
(57,349 posts)So busy swift boating him up thread.
onecaliberal
(32,998 posts)I'm so sick of the lies and smears against Bernie. He's been fighting for the cause longer than they've been alive.
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)A manufactured "gaffe" that wasn't/isn't.
What happened at NN reflects not at all on the candidates, only on the NN organizers and the BLM protesters. I share their anger at what is happening in America with respect to police violence and black Americans, but this accomplished little other than to undermine two candidates who could be powerful allies to their cause.
Who did benefit from this? I'll leave that as an exercise for the reader.
Metric System
(6,048 posts)Maedhros
(10,007 posts)She may well have known absolutely nothing about it.
BainsBane
(53,135 posts)This kind of reverence for authority and value of politicians among the people they represent shows a profoundly conservative view of the relationship between elected representatives and the people. They are owed no apologies because they don't know how to deal with a social movement you clearly think inconsequential in comparison to one man's political career. Such disdain for social activism is reprehensible.
Hell will freeze over before I ever support such an authoritarian, conformist view of politics. Political activists do not need to "apologize" to the political elite because those two men mishandled the situation.
Those people are leftists, REAL leftists who are activists, who care about actual issues, who care about something besides the careers of the political elite. And you, in promoting a conformist and authoritarian version of politics where the people rare subordinate to politicians, demand they apologize. There is not now nor ever has been anything leftist about holding politicians above the people. It is profoundly anti-egalitarian and utterly shameful.
ibegurpard
(16,685 posts)BainsBane
(53,135 posts)Good God. Aren't you supposed to be a Democrat? You act like something is wrong with attending a Jefferson-Jackson dinner? FFS.
And none of that covers up the fact you are all engaged in a collective effort to tell Black Lives Matter to sit down and shut up, to be differential to their betters. It's disgusting and shows just how some here are lining up against leftist activism. I don't ever again want to hear about how you are all so "progressive" when it's clear that is far from the case. First we had NRA talking points in response to a mass shooting. Now we have this, outright opposition to social protest.
freshwest
(53,661 posts)ibegurpard
(16,685 posts)A solid red SMALL state that she has no chance of winning. You think because she was once first lady there she has a shot? She didn't go back to Arkansas to run for the Senate after leaving the White House...she went to New York. She's in Arkansas schmoozing for dollars while others are actually braving face time with angry people in the real world. Bernie Sanders isn't going to throw a sit fit and abandon his commitment to civil rights and battling institutional racism because of what happened today. Meanwhile Hillary will keep chasing money and taking votes for granted she probably ought not to. Wasn't that long ago she said "all lives matter" was it?
madfloridian
(88,117 posts)madfloridian
(88,117 posts)Since this is addressed to be I take it rather personally.
You said:
no apologies because they don't know how to deal with a social movement you clearly think inconsequential in comparison to one man's political career. Such disdain for social activism is reprehensible.
So you just know I feel that way?
And I don't even recognize myself here.
Those people are leftists, REAL leftists who are activists, who care about actual issues, who care about something besides the careers of the political elite. And you, in promoting a conformist and authoritarian version of politics where the people rare subordinate to politicians, demand they apologize. There is not now nor ever has been anything leftist about holding politicians above the people. It is profoundly anti-egalitarian and utterly shameful.
I would feel angry but it just makes me sad.
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)Last edited Sun Jul 19, 2015, 09:44 AM - Edit history (1)
not the political elite.
JustAnotherGen
(32,040 posts)That makes him an insider.
madfloridian
(88,117 posts)Unfortunately they went after the progressive Democratic candidates.
I left the site feeling like there will no words, no actions acceptable now. Nothing.
To those of us who really do have liberal progressive thoughts and actions, it is just plain discouraging.
I read one post that said now they (meaning white progressives) know how we feel.
Unfortunately, the right wing blogs are thoroughly enjoying this eating of our own.
JustAnotherGen
(32,040 posts)And if that is true? What next?
What will the Democratic party do?
Ever read the fifth part of The Sound And The Fury? What Dilsey says about their servants at the end?
"They endured."
We have endured in this country for 400 some odd years and will continue to do so - with or without the approval of te elites. We never had their approval to begin with.
romanic
(2,841 posts)Wow! This Elon James dude is an obvious loser; obvious by the fact that he's sitting on his ass responding to every tweet calling his shilling ass out. Boy you ain't nobody so fall back!
madfloridian
(88,117 posts)snagglepuss
(12,704 posts)or those writing those tweets are Clinton operatives because I don't see her being trashed.
madfloridian
(88,117 posts)Frances Lefkowitz ?@YesFrances 16m16 minutes ago
@elonjames Are Bernie Sanders fans the new Scientologists? So intolerant, condescending, and sure they know what's best for "us."
9 retweets 12 favorites
Elon James White retweeted
TeamNoChill ?@MsRita73 30m30 minutes ago
@Basslands @elonjames I can't w/ these so called allies..& I swear if one more cries but he stood w/ MLK who's he standin w/ right now!
View conversation
6 retweets 7 favorites
elonjames retweeted them, so must mean he agrees.
This kind of stuff breaks my heart.
eridani
(51,907 posts)--to combat racism
frylock
(34,825 posts)JustAnotherGen
(32,040 posts)And I think he's done just fine.
frylock
(34,825 posts)What solutions should be proposed? I would sincerely like to know.
JustAnotherGen
(32,040 posts)This Week In Blackness and Goldie Taylor and apologize - like Martin O'Malley did.
frylock
(34,825 posts)and would like to know if they've engaged President Obama.
JustAnotherGen
(32,040 posts)You should reach out to them.
I'm going to do so - and point out on O'Malleys web site where restoring the VRA is a key priority for him.
frylock
(34,825 posts)seveneyes
(4,631 posts)The hecklers and whomever instigated this shitstorm should apologize.
JustAnotherGen
(32,040 posts)Zimpig started it. He should apologize.
And of you don't understand that - where this rage started?
Then you are a good person - but know nothing about us - and we can't waste time on you because you will never get it.
seveneyes
(4,631 posts)Those who ascribe an individual action to define a larger set are dealing with quantum physics, not human nature.
It didn't start with Zimmerman...he just got latched onto by other actors. Many predate him.
Individual hate has been going on since humans got comfortable in life. Using a human individual's action to define those that looks like them is a big fail.
JustAnotherGen
(32,040 posts)It did.
Zimpig.
Trayvon is the new Till.
Whether you like it or not - that's how many in black America viewed that.
Now add in the pressure cooker we have lived in since Obama became President -
And well.
"Don't talk down to me." <-----That's all those folks yelled. That's what they were saying.
You don't have to like what black people think, say, do, yell, write - but we aren't going to stop because you don't like it.
This isn't going away. If you came to my house for Christmas Eve dinner this past year -
A room full of black people - you would see how wrong you are. And my friend - you are wrong.
At this point - I can't save you. I have to let you wallow in your blindness.
Please I beg you - don't tell me How to feel or think on issues that impact the people I love.
You don't know. They aren't your people - so leave us alone.
I will take the hide for this.
seveneyes
(4,631 posts)Some attitudes may come in groups, but that's mostly social engineering, intentional or not.
eridani
(51,907 posts)--go right ahead.
frylock
(34,825 posts)eridani
(51,907 posts)romanic
(2,841 posts)Thirsting for attention like he's somebody. Boy bye not with that face!
Response to madfloridian (Original post)
scarletwoman This message was self-deleted by its author.
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)Rep Hank Johnson.... He's a member of the CBC and CPC...I think he's on the House Judiary Committee also. He was participating in the morning panel discussion...has he issued a statement?
ETA... Oh, very interesting find. He's one of Hillary's Congressional endorsements. The plot thickens.
scarletwoman
(31,893 posts)AA activism. I just highlighted one of them because it seemed most relevant.
I absolutely, categorically do NOT support your conspircay theory bullshit you and others here have been posting for the past two days. I think it's disgusting, ridiculous, delusional, and totally denigrates the very real issues that Black Lives Matter is calling attention to.
You obviously didn't bother with the link I included to the post that I wrote on Saturday, lauding the protestors. Fine, I will delete my post - rather than give any more fuel to the delusional paranoics around here.
When I originally posted, I thought that my fellow Bernie supporters were generally rational people. I've been roundly disabused of that assumption, and it has saddened me greatly.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)and resorted to name-calling rather than answer my questions. He was trashed by both AAs and everyone else for 'attacking allies'. Couldn't get him to answer a direct question, he and a few of his friends responded mostly with name calling 'you're stupid' and other insults. Not that I cared, but it sure says to me does not represent the people I have come to know from BLM.
romanic
(2,841 posts)Elon wasn't originally with BLM, he latched onto it when it got more buzz after the Baltimore riots.
malokvale77
(4,879 posts)It seems he's latched on to a righteous movement and is using it for self promotion.
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)I'll just post my own more comfortable tin hat
malokvale77
(4,879 posts)When you choose to dump on the only two candidates that give a damn about the obstacles you face daily...just what am I suppose to learn from that?
My father, who never stopped me from doing what I was bound to do, always wound up saying "That'll learn ya". He was a big believer in learning through experience.
I can say, this primary season certainly is "learning" me.
By the way...when did the term white progressives get trademarked?
madfloridian
(88,117 posts)You asked:
By the way...when did the term white progressives get trademarked?
First thing I saw, afraid to ask.
shaayecanaan
(6,068 posts)Lenin thought that once the working classes in France and Germany were awakened to their common interests, they would refuse to fight each other, and the imperialist war project would crumble.
Of course it didnt work out that way, and the French and German workers happily did the bidding of their respective ruling classes and slaughtered each other by the millions.
The simple fact is that its easier to appeal to nationalism than to class interest. The Republican Party has learnt that it is easy to make white people vote against their economic interests, and the Democratic Party seems to have learnt the trick as well.
madfloridian
(88,117 posts)Just wondering.
Skittles
(153,310 posts)I don't know, but there sure seems to be a lot of "spokespeople" for them here on DU....I am really tired of the stereotyping
blackspade
(10,056 posts)Peregrine Took
(7,420 posts)The protestors hurt their cause way way more than they helped it. I was in their corner all along but now - the mere mention of the BLM group brings to mind the kind of obnoxious boorish people I loathe.
Make your friggin' point passionately but BE NICE BE RESPECTFUL!!!!
Seems so obvious - if you are a grown up, that is.