2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumHey AFT leadership: Here is all the data you need to make an endorsement....
FeelTheBern
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)But didn't make it into Hillary's top group.
Although I note his 'top' cuts off at 35k and hers at $265k.
Gman
(24,780 posts)Nor should it be. Their priority is education. And doing everything they can for teachers.
BrotherIvan
(9,126 posts)Which is why they should have gotten the candidate they planned to endorse to commit to ending NCLB, opposing vouchers and charters, ending high stakes testing, and drawing a line in the sand on tenure. Hillary Clinton is on record on ONE of those issues. Now they have no leverage to get those things. That's why AFT members are pissed.
Gman
(24,780 posts)I don't pay dues to them. It's none of my, or yours or anyone else who doesn't pay dues to AFT's business.
BrotherIvan
(9,126 posts)The teachers are sorting it out. They are giving the people in charge a real earful.
Gman
(24,780 posts)In organized labor. Nothing pisses them off worse than someone that doesn't pay dues telling them what to do. They need unity and outsiders stirring crap don't help.
Frankly, I seriously doubt Sanders would approve.
BrotherIvan
(9,126 posts)And it just keeps adding to the narrative that not being completely honest, transparent, or winning on her merits is the plan.
Gman
(24,780 posts)so I'm not putting a lot of stock in discontented members. They're just pissed off that they did not endorse Sanders. When less than a fifth of your membership is complaining it's not good reason to change everything.
BrotherIvan
(9,126 posts)So the rest who were not allowed to vote are very angry.
Gman
(24,780 posts)It wasn't an election. It was a poll. Done scientifically by the sane me firm that does Sanders' polling. I don't know where this got started about asking every member. It's an impractical waste of dues money to ask every member. I don't believe any said they would ask every member. Now maybe somebody read something that way. Something like "We're going to be asking the members..." Well, frankly if they're that dumb they shouldn't be teaching school anyway.
BrotherIvan
(9,126 posts)roguevalley
(40,656 posts)BrotherIvan
(9,126 posts)dissent. Have you received the fundraising email for Clinton? I saw a few teachers mention that on twitter and were upset about it.
roguevalley
(40,656 posts)I know. I was president, vp and secretary for AFT and state sec over since forever.
BrotherIvan
(9,126 posts)I have seen similar statements on blogs like Diane Ravitch where highly involved members were completely blindsided. The fairest request is that they should have waited and they should have consulted with members. If your convention is in July, why did they do the endorsement first? It will be interesting to see how it goes.
Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)Hillary voted for No Child Left Behind.
BrotherIvan
(9,126 posts)I used to be a teacher (NEA) and my mother was a teacher for 40 years. I have been up with the problems with education all my life and still speak with friends who are teachers daily. To say this is just partisan on the part of those who are questioning the move is false.
Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)We have had to endure that NCLB and all this evaluation of students and teachers.
roguevalley
(40,656 posts)elleng
(131,320 posts)brooklynite
(94,929 posts)...means they're too stupid to take this "smoking gun" into account?
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)Trying to turn everyone who supports Hillary into the "enemy" is absolutely NOT a winning strategy. For the most part, nearly every Hillary supporter would vote for Bernie if he wins nomination, but not if non-supporters keep pissing off her supporters. If people can't lift up their candidate without tearing others down, they will not have solidarity. And solidarity is the only way to win elections.
BrotherIvan
(9,126 posts)JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)Say they won't vote for Bernie if he wins nomination, but plenty of Bernie supporters here brag about not voting for Hillary.
BrotherIvan
(9,126 posts)I have personally been called a racist and now a union basher. So the only honest assessment is that no group's hands are clean.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)BrotherIvan
(9,126 posts)This is the internet so nuances are lost.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)If every Hillary voter will vote for Bernie if he wins the primaries then Bernie is every bit as electable as Hillary.
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)DanTex
(20,709 posts)whereas her largest totals come from individuals.
kenfrequed
(7,865 posts)Qualify that comment.
roguevalley
(40,656 posts)DanTex
(20,709 posts)that Hillary raised from individuals who work at Citibank. Not particularly surprising, since Citibank is one of the largest employers in her home state of New York.
Citibank is a person. That is a riot.
DanTex
(20,709 posts)Many of those persons who work for Citibank contributed to Hillary's campaign. The total amount is shown in the "Individuals" column in that chart.
You didn't actually think that Citibank just cut her campaign a check, did you? You do realize that's against the law: corporations can't contribute directly to campaigns for national office.
I agree. Banks are run by banksters.
DanTex
(20,709 posts)First, you can see that Hillary's numbers are much larger. Second, you can see that Hillary's big numbers fall under the "Individuals" column, while Sanders's big numbers fall under the "PACs" column.