Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
37 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hey AFT leadership: Here is all the data you need to make an endorsement.... (Original Post) Playinghardball Jul 2015 OP
Got to be at least a tiny bit embarrassing that the AFT is among Bernie's top contributors Erich Bloodaxe BSN Jul 2015 #1
As teachers that's not part of their endorsement process Gman Jul 2015 #2
Which is why they should have let them vote BrotherIvan Jul 2015 #4
I'm not one to tell the AFT how to run their business as a union Gman Jul 2015 #6
I guess that's the new line as I've heard that a few times BrotherIvan Jul 2015 #8
I was once on a couple of executive boards Gman Jul 2015 #13
It is the members who raised the issue in the first place BrotherIvan Jul 2015 #14
according to the survey it was 19% supporting Sanders Gman Jul 2015 #18
The poll was .04% of the membership BrotherIvan Jul 2015 #19
That matters not Gman Jul 2015 #20
Well, at least we know where you stand BrotherIvan Jul 2015 #22
I'm, AFT amd fuck the board for this. roguevalley Jul 2015 #25
Well, apparently the poster above doesn't have the highest opinion of your BrotherIvan Jul 2015 #27
no, not yet. I expect it. Nothing pisses union teachers off more than boards doing unilateral roguevalley Jul 2015 #32
And you were out of the loop? BrotherIvan Jul 2015 #34
I wasn't asked to vote Rosa Luxemburg Jul 2015 #31
She also supports charters, testing and the reform movement BrotherIvan Jul 2015 #35
Teachers are on the front line. Politicians decide Rosa Luxemburg Jul 2015 #36
they're making NEA look good. :D (Its a long personal story in my area) roguevalley Jul 2015 #24
HIGHLY informative response to AFT's questionaire from MARTIN O'MALLEY: elleng Jul 2015 #3
I see...and the survey showing support for Hillary among AFT members... brooklynite Jul 2015 #5
Just a tip regarding the primaries: JaneyVee Jul 2015 #7
That road goes both ways BrotherIvan Jul 2015 #9
Yet, you probably can't find 3 posts here that... JaneyVee Jul 2015 #10
Sanders supporters are routinely demonized, attacked from right and left BrotherIvan Jul 2015 #15
Mmm hmm. JaneyVee Jul 2015 #16
Is that agreement or disagreement? BrotherIvan Jul 2015 #17
I don't see how that can be true and yet still argue Bernie is unelectable Fumesucker Jul 2015 #11
Of course. That's how elections work. JaneyVee Jul 2015 #12
Not only is Hillary a much better fundraiser than Bernie, but his largest totals come from PACs, DanTex Jul 2015 #21
Source please. kenfrequed Jul 2015 #23
How about Citibank being a person now. Does that qualify as an 'individual' for Hillary? roguevalley Jul 2015 #26
The Citibank money listed in that chart is in the "individuals" column. It is money DanTex Jul 2015 #29
Hah kenfrequed Jul 2015 #30
The persons who work for Citibank are persons. Citibank doesn't have an all-robotic workforce. DanTex Jul 2015 #33
Yup kenfrequed Jul 2015 #37
The source is the OP. DanTex Jul 2015 #28

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
1. Got to be at least a tiny bit embarrassing that the AFT is among Bernie's top contributors
Mon Jul 13, 2015, 01:36 PM
Jul 2015

But didn't make it into Hillary's top group.

Although I note his 'top' cuts off at 35k and hers at $265k.

Gman

(24,780 posts)
2. As teachers that's not part of their endorsement process
Mon Jul 13, 2015, 01:42 PM
Jul 2015

Nor should it be. Their priority is education. And doing everything they can for teachers.

BrotherIvan

(9,126 posts)
4. Which is why they should have let them vote
Mon Jul 13, 2015, 02:18 PM
Jul 2015

Which is why they should have gotten the candidate they planned to endorse to commit to ending NCLB, opposing vouchers and charters, ending high stakes testing, and drawing a line in the sand on tenure. Hillary Clinton is on record on ONE of those issues. Now they have no leverage to get those things. That's why AFT members are pissed.

Gman

(24,780 posts)
6. I'm not one to tell the AFT how to run their business as a union
Mon Jul 13, 2015, 03:13 PM
Jul 2015

I don't pay dues to them. It's none of my, or yours or anyone else who doesn't pay dues to AFT's business.

BrotherIvan

(9,126 posts)
8. I guess that's the new line as I've heard that a few times
Mon Jul 13, 2015, 03:19 PM
Jul 2015

The teachers are sorting it out. They are giving the people in charge a real earful.

Gman

(24,780 posts)
13. I was once on a couple of executive boards
Mon Jul 13, 2015, 03:33 PM
Jul 2015

In organized labor. Nothing pisses them off worse than someone that doesn't pay dues telling them what to do. They need unity and outsiders stirring crap don't help.

Frankly, I seriously doubt Sanders would approve.

BrotherIvan

(9,126 posts)
14. It is the members who raised the issue in the first place
Mon Jul 13, 2015, 03:35 PM
Jul 2015

And it just keeps adding to the narrative that not being completely honest, transparent, or winning on her merits is the plan.

Gman

(24,780 posts)
18. according to the survey it was 19% supporting Sanders
Mon Jul 13, 2015, 03:52 PM
Jul 2015

so I'm not putting a lot of stock in discontented members. They're just pissed off that they did not endorse Sanders. When less than a fifth of your membership is complaining it's not good reason to change everything.

Gman

(24,780 posts)
20. That matters not
Mon Jul 13, 2015, 04:02 PM
Jul 2015

It wasn't an election. It was a poll. Done scientifically by the sane me firm that does Sanders' polling. I don't know where this got started about asking every member. It's an impractical waste of dues money to ask every member. I don't believe any said they would ask every member. Now maybe somebody read something that way. Something like "We're going to be asking the members..." Well, frankly if they're that dumb they shouldn't be teaching school anyway.

BrotherIvan

(9,126 posts)
27. Well, apparently the poster above doesn't have the highest opinion of your
Mon Jul 13, 2015, 05:52 PM
Jul 2015

dissent. Have you received the fundraising email for Clinton? I saw a few teachers mention that on twitter and were upset about it.

roguevalley

(40,656 posts)
32. no, not yet. I expect it. Nothing pisses union teachers off more than boards doing unilateral
Mon Jul 13, 2015, 06:00 PM
Jul 2015

I know. I was president, vp and secretary for AFT and state sec over since forever.

BrotherIvan

(9,126 posts)
34. And you were out of the loop?
Mon Jul 13, 2015, 06:03 PM
Jul 2015

I have seen similar statements on blogs like Diane Ravitch where highly involved members were completely blindsided. The fairest request is that they should have waited and they should have consulted with members. If your convention is in July, why did they do the endorsement first? It will be interesting to see how it goes.

BrotherIvan

(9,126 posts)
35. She also supports charters, testing and the reform movement
Mon Jul 13, 2015, 06:05 PM
Jul 2015

I used to be a teacher (NEA) and my mother was a teacher for 40 years. I have been up with the problems with education all my life and still speak with friends who are teachers daily. To say this is just partisan on the part of those who are questioning the move is false.

Rosa Luxemburg

(28,627 posts)
36. Teachers are on the front line. Politicians decide
Mon Jul 13, 2015, 06:09 PM
Jul 2015

We have had to endure that NCLB and all this evaluation of students and teachers.

brooklynite

(94,929 posts)
5. I see...and the survey showing support for Hillary among AFT members...
Mon Jul 13, 2015, 02:30 PM
Jul 2015

...means they're too stupid to take this "smoking gun" into account?

 

JaneyVee

(19,877 posts)
7. Just a tip regarding the primaries:
Mon Jul 13, 2015, 03:15 PM
Jul 2015

Trying to turn everyone who supports Hillary into the "enemy" is absolutely NOT a winning strategy. For the most part, nearly every Hillary supporter would vote for Bernie if he wins nomination, but not if non-supporters keep pissing off her supporters. If people can't lift up their candidate without tearing others down, they will not have solidarity. And solidarity is the only way to win elections.

 

JaneyVee

(19,877 posts)
10. Yet, you probably can't find 3 posts here that...
Mon Jul 13, 2015, 03:23 PM
Jul 2015

Say they won't vote for Bernie if he wins nomination, but plenty of Bernie supporters here brag about not voting for Hillary.

BrotherIvan

(9,126 posts)
15. Sanders supporters are routinely demonized, attacked from right and left
Mon Jul 13, 2015, 03:38 PM
Jul 2015

I have personally been called a racist and now a union basher. So the only honest assessment is that no group's hands are clean.

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
11. I don't see how that can be true and yet still argue Bernie is unelectable
Mon Jul 13, 2015, 03:28 PM
Jul 2015

If every Hillary voter will vote for Bernie if he wins the primaries then Bernie is every bit as electable as Hillary.

DanTex

(20,709 posts)
21. Not only is Hillary a much better fundraiser than Bernie, but his largest totals come from PACs,
Mon Jul 13, 2015, 05:23 PM
Jul 2015

whereas her largest totals come from individuals.

DanTex

(20,709 posts)
29. The Citibank money listed in that chart is in the "individuals" column. It is money
Mon Jul 13, 2015, 05:55 PM
Jul 2015

that Hillary raised from individuals who work at Citibank. Not particularly surprising, since Citibank is one of the largest employers in her home state of New York.

DanTex

(20,709 posts)
33. The persons who work for Citibank are persons. Citibank doesn't have an all-robotic workforce.
Mon Jul 13, 2015, 06:02 PM
Jul 2015

Many of those persons who work for Citibank contributed to Hillary's campaign. The total amount is shown in the "Individuals" column in that chart.

You didn't actually think that Citibank just cut her campaign a check, did you? You do realize that's against the law: corporations can't contribute directly to campaigns for national office.

DanTex

(20,709 posts)
28. The source is the OP.
Mon Jul 13, 2015, 05:53 PM
Jul 2015

First, you can see that Hillary's numbers are much larger. Second, you can see that Hillary's big numbers fall under the "Individuals" column, while Sanders's big numbers fall under the "PACs" column.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Hey AFT leadership: Here ...