"How Banks Bought the Tea Party: Cash Transforms Populist Insurgents To Reliable Vote For
How Banks Bought the Tea Party: Cash Transforms Populist Insurgents To Reliable Vote For The Financial Industry Think Progress
By Josh Israel and Adam Peck on May 21, 2012 at 3:45 pm at Think Progress
http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2012/05/21/484283/how-banks-bought-the-tea-party/
"SNIP.............................................................
The 15 freshmen Republican representatives in the House Tea Party Caucus each ran in 2010 on a populist anti-Wall Street message, highlighting their opposition to bank bailouts like the 2008 Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) and criticizing Washington for enabling the banking sector as it became Too Big to Fail. After winning, all fifteen received significant PAC contributions from the banking industry and have become a reliable vote and mouthpiece for the financial industry, a ThinkProgress analysis of campaign contributions, voting records and public statements reveals.
Rather than campaigning on a typical pro-business platform, the Tea Party freshmen tapped into public resentment of big banks and bailouts. For example, then-candidate Sandy Adams (R-FL) said on her campaign website that she opposes government bailouts and would have voted against TARP and the auto bailout. Jeff Landry (R-LA) said bailouts of private businesses had corrupted our free market system by rewarding the irresponsible and penalizing the responsible, blasting bank bailouts, which led to taxpayer money directly or indirectly going into multi-million dollar bonuses.
But in Congress, the Tea Party has towed the line for big banks. Eleven of the 15 have become co-sponsors of H.R. 3461, a top priority for the ABA. According to Americans for Financial Reform, the legislation would tilt the playing field further in the direction of excessive deference to industry interests and tie the hands of regulators attempting to protect the public interest. The bill would make it harder for bank examiners to do their job, giving regulatory responsibilities to an industry thats already shown it cant police itself.
Here is what happened:
................................................SNIP"