Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
63 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why Hillary Lost: An Exhaustive Look (Original Post) tgards79 Jan 2017 OP
Except that she didn't lose... TheDebbieDee Jan 2017 #1
Except she did lose in states that Democrats usually win. jonno99 Jan 2017 #5
of course 11 days before the election, comey releasing the letter to the republicans in still_one Jan 2017 #14
She lost under the stupid electoral college rules we're stuck with. The Velveteen Ocelot Jan 2017 #8
There were a lot of factors, but I think what dealt the worst blow was the FBI interference still_one Jan 2017 #15
Yes, she did. Trump is president. You know how the system works. dionysus Jan 2017 #19
Sec Clinton got more votes, point blank! TheDebbieDee Jan 2017 #23
The winner is whoever wins the electoral college, you know this! She got more dionysus Jan 2017 #24
For analysis, see: states the campaign neglected Hassin Bin Sober Jan 2017 #41
That would be nice BeyondGeography Jan 2017 #28
Coulda, woulda, shoulda. Time to move on. democratisphere Jan 2017 #2
The article is wrong about Stein kenfrequed Jan 2017 #3
Good point. It's too binary to assume every single vote of hers would go to Clinton underpants Jan 2017 #30
Rather than saying "white working class," why don't they just say "racists?" Hoyt Jan 2017 #4
Beacuse that will guarantee more Democrat losses in the future. nt jonno99 Jan 2017 #6
Yeah, we need to attract racists to the Party. Do I need a sarcasm thingie? Hoyt Jan 2017 #7
Joe disagrees with your analysis - jonno99 Jan 2017 #10
Because "non college whites with middling income" are not all racist? dionysus Jan 2017 #25
I'm sorry, it is obvious Trump is a racist. I think voting for him is too. Hoyt Jan 2017 #45
No need to apologize, trump caters massively to racists, or is a racist himself. dionysus Jan 2017 #47
The media danced around that for his whole campaign underpants Jan 2017 #31
If we treated the pro-union part of the white working class as part of our base (which they are) 40yearyellowdog Jan 2017 #35
Oh, they voted for an obvious racist because they were called racists. Hoyt Jan 2017 #44
I think they voted for the one they thought would work to create jobs in their hometowns and didn't 40yearyellowdog Jan 2017 #49
So greed and racism. Their "white plight" is so bad, they'll accept the racist Trump. Ain't right. Hoyt Jan 2017 #50
Agree with every single word of this -great summary of all the factors (except for one) pkdu Jan 2017 #9
Yes no one mentions that or other suppression moved underpants Jan 2017 #33
Heartily agree.... and this is something WE ALWAYS TEND TO OVERLOOK... Raster Jan 2017 #53
Marking for later read underpants Jan 2017 #11
Let's ignore the fact that since 2013 14 states added restrictive voter and voter ID requirements. still_one Jan 2017 #12
???? tgards79 Jan 2017 #17
I told ya, the mere subject will make heads explode, some will go nuts and not even dionysus Jan 2017 #26
You got that right! tgards79 Jan 2017 #46
I did read the frigging thing, and my head DIDN'T explode. I don't agree that the reason she lost still_one Jan 2017 #56
Yes I did. I believe the effect was greater because of the 47% who didn't vote. still_one Jan 2017 #55
I think most of the voter ID laws were overturned, or there were ways around them. Agree on Comey Hoyt Jan 2017 #51
Not entirely true. In North Carolina, thousands of voters were removed from the voting roster. The still_one Jan 2017 #54
I got purged from rolls too in a town I had not voted in in 10 years because I moved. Hoyt Jan 2017 #57
That isn't why the NAACP won the case against North Carolina for the purging of the votes. still_one Jan 2017 #58
That's why it's important to check your registration, vote often, etc. Hoyt Jan 2017 #59
you mean North Carolina? still_one Jan 2017 #60
Sorry, although not a big difference nowadays. Hoyt Jan 2017 #61
North Carolina was pretty close, and Roy Cooper did get in as Governor, I would like to think my still_one Jan 2017 #62
Lived in Raleigh 50+ years ago. You are right, NC is not always red. I'm south of U. Hoyt Jan 2017 #63
I am saddened that he repeats the false claim that Trump did better than Romney among Latinos. StevieM Jan 2017 #13
Is this the claim you are referring to? Uponthegears Jan 2017 #32
Yep, that's the one. I hate that this fictitious claim is still being widely referenced as if StevieM Jan 2017 #37
I liked your link Uponthegears Jan 2017 #39
How many different ways can you say Blue_Tires Jan 2017 #16
Agreed underpants Jan 2017 #34
Its a good piece, but sayong "read it and weep" is a bit trollish... dionysus Jan 2017 #18
Apologies tgards79 Jan 2017 #21
Thanks. I thought it covered everything except GOP voter suppression, which sadly dionysus Jan 2017 #22
A bit? nt JTFrog Jan 2017 #43
One shouldn't forget the media. LisaL Jan 2017 #20
Here's my breakdown 60% was airtime. underpants Jan 2017 #36
From the article... Buckeye_Democrat Jan 2017 #27
"If everyone who voted for Jill Stein in Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin had voted for Hillary 40yearyellowdog Jan 2017 #29
With 11 days to go she was in good enough shape to win even without those votes. StevieM Jan 2017 #38
Comey n/t Lil Missy Jan 2017 #40
Not this shit again. JTFrog Jan 2017 #42
If it is shit you are worried about... tgards79 Jan 2017 #48
fuck putin and t-rump. stonecutter357 Jan 2017 #52

jonno99

(2,620 posts)
5. Except she did lose in states that Democrats usually win.
Wed Jan 18, 2017, 04:35 PM
Jan 2017

And the problem is not just that Hillary lost, but Democrats also lost down-ballot races as well.

We need to understand why, and adjust.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/12512681084

still_one

(91,954 posts)
14. of course 11 days before the election, comey releasing the letter to the republicans in
Wed Jan 18, 2017, 05:24 PM
Jan 2017

congress had nothing to do with it, nor the media mischaracterizing it as "the email investigation was being reopened", A LIE, nor the 14 states which added new strict voting, and voter ID requirements since 2013, which included, Wisconsin, Ohio, and North Carolina.

Then of course is the fact that there were people who identified themselves as progressives who refused to vote for Hillary, and either voted third party or didn't vote

47% of those who were eligible to vote didn't.

In Michigan Hillary lost by .3%. Jill Stein won 1.1%. Similar results in Wisconsin and the other swing states.

Hillary didn't lose to those who voted for trump, she lost because of the FBI interference, and because some progressives decided to vote third party or didn't vote.

Those down ballot losses were also a reflection of the FBI interference, which contributed to some of the 47% not showing up to vote

What added insult to injury was the down ballot races.

Russ Feingold and every Democrat running for Senate in those critical swing states as you mentioned, lost to the establishment, incumbent republican.

I am not sure that Wisconsin can even be designated as a swing state anymore. Wisconsin is now controlled by right to work, anti-union republicans. That Scott Walker not one survived his recall, but won multiple elections in that state is testimony to that.

The Velveteen Ocelot

(115,279 posts)
8. She lost under the stupid electoral college rules we're stuck with.
Wed Jan 18, 2017, 04:41 PM
Jan 2017

If you lose the EC you can win the popular vote by the millions - and she did - and still not get to be President. So she didn't win, unfortunately.

still_one

(91,954 posts)
15. There were a lot of factors, but I think what dealt the worst blow was the FBI interference
Wed Jan 18, 2017, 05:35 PM
Jan 2017

11 days before the election.

I am looking forward where the post mortem group will fade away

dionysus

(26,467 posts)
19. Yes, she did. Trump is president. You know how the system works.
Wed Jan 18, 2017, 06:38 PM
Jan 2017

Thats like saying Al Gore won, despite never taking office.

I don't get this stubborn refusal to admit she lost. Denying reality is a republican trait.

That said, the wording in the OP is childish, and distracts from a thoughtful analysis of the election.

 

TheDebbieDee

(11,119 posts)
23. Sec Clinton got more votes, point blank!
Wed Jan 18, 2017, 06:46 PM
Jan 2017

All the analysis and dissecting won't explain THAT away!

dionysus

(26,467 posts)
24. The winner is whoever wins the electoral college, you know this! She got more
Wed Jan 18, 2017, 06:48 PM
Jan 2017

votes, yes, a lot more, but she didn't win! Had she won she qould be president!

kenfrequed

(7,865 posts)
3. The article is wrong about Stein
Wed Jan 18, 2017, 04:32 PM
Jan 2017

Stein was almost a non-factor and if you subtract the numbers of people that voted for her in 2012 or the greens in 2008 it is reduced to even less of a factor.

If your campaign relies on getting all of the votes of a third party candidate, when half of those that vote for that candidate vote third party every year, then your campaign is inviting defeat and failure.

underpants

(182,274 posts)
30. Good point. It's too binary to assume every single vote of hers would go to Clinton
Wed Jan 18, 2017, 07:28 PM
Jan 2017

There ARE Green Party voters who will always vote that way. That's how you build a party. Likewise there ARE Libertarians who had a 50 state candidate (first time?) and were going to vote Libertarian. Now some of those votes were Brexit/joke/protest votes but not most of them.

dionysus

(26,467 posts)
25. Because "non college whites with middling income" are not all racist?
Wed Jan 18, 2017, 06:56 PM
Jan 2017

Just a guess. If you think they are, you're mistaken.

WWC is just easier to say.

And like the saying with terrorists, while most racists are part of the wwc, not all wwc are racist.

There are actually racists in all demographics.

dionysus

(26,467 posts)
47. No need to apologize, trump caters massively to racists, or is a racist himself.
Wed Jan 18, 2017, 10:12 PM
Jan 2017

That much is obvious...

Some amount of his voters believe that when we call him a racist, it's a left wing lie. It's crazy, but it happens.

underpants

(182,274 posts)
31. The media danced around that for his whole campaign
Wed Jan 18, 2017, 07:30 PM
Jan 2017

At the beginning it was clear that he was going after the scrim but he was good for ratings and god forbid the media be seen as liberal (which they will anyway).

40yearyellowdog

(4 posts)
35. If we treated the pro-union part of the white working class as part of our base (which they are)
Wed Jan 18, 2017, 07:42 PM
Jan 2017

rather than dismissing them as racists, we likely would have won.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
44. Oh, they voted for an obvious racist because they were called racists.
Wed Jan 18, 2017, 08:56 PM
Jan 2017

Last edited Thu Jan 19, 2017, 09:30 PM - Edit history (2)

40yearyellowdog

(4 posts)
49. I think they voted for the one they thought would work to create jobs in their hometowns and didn't
Thu Jan 19, 2017, 09:21 PM
Jan 2017

care if people call him racist or not. Clinton and her PACs outspent Trump and his PACs by 2X. I am glad she has ads pointing out Trump's racist demagoguery, but she didn't need to run those ads continually until they bored people. She would have be more effective if she had had more different types of ads, including some directed at people concerned about job growth in rust-belt towns. We lost by very small margins in Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin; with the right strategy, we could have won.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
50. So greed and racism. Their "white plight" is so bad, they'll accept the racist Trump. Ain't right.
Thu Jan 19, 2017, 09:33 PM
Jan 2017

pkdu

(3,977 posts)
9. Agree with every single word of this -great summary of all the factors (except for one)
Wed Jan 18, 2017, 04:41 PM
Jan 2017

Operation Crosscheck.

underpants

(182,274 posts)
33. Yes no one mentions that or other suppression moved
Wed Jan 18, 2017, 07:31 PM
Jan 2017

This analysis is good but it's missing the carpet when describing the design.

Raster

(20,996 posts)
53. Heartily agree.... and this is something WE ALWAYS TEND TO OVERLOOK...
Thu Jan 19, 2017, 10:04 PM
Jan 2017

...Voter supression is probably the single-most effective nefarious tool the rethuglicans use to affect elections. They don't have to worry about someone voting against them, IF THEY CAN KEEP THEM FROM VOTING. That simple.

Crossheck is yet another rethuglican tool to disenfranchise legal, lawful voters with a patina of legitimacy, when in effect, it still boils down to depriving lawful voters of their chance to participate in democracy.

It fucking sucks. And I wonder -after each election- why this is seemingly never addressed until it is too late.

still_one

(91,954 posts)
12. Let's ignore the fact that since 2013 14 states added restrictive voter and voter ID requirements.
Wed Jan 18, 2017, 04:59 PM
Jan 2017

Let's also ignore the fact that 11 day before the election Comey released a letter to the republicans in Congress where MSNBC was the first to incorrectly report as "Breaking News", that the FBI had reopened the email investigation, and then for the next hour paraded every right wing politician across their screen to propagate the LIE, with other networks soon following suit

Let's also examine those self-identified progressives who refused to vote for Hillary by either voting third party or not voting.

Let's also observe that in Michigan Hillary lost by .3%, and Jill Stein received 1.1% of the vote. Similar results in the other swing states.

Let's also observe that every Democrat running for Senate in those critical swing states, lost to the establishment, republican, incumbent.

and in spite of the media's double standard coverage, misinformation, and falsehoods, Hillary still won the popular vote by more than 3 million.



tgards79

(1,415 posts)
17. ????
Wed Jan 18, 2017, 06:11 PM
Jan 2017

The articles mentions Comey and Jill Stein and the closeness of the turned states. Did you read it?

dionysus

(26,467 posts)
26. I told ya, the mere subject will make heads explode, some will go nuts and not even
Wed Jan 18, 2017, 06:59 PM
Jan 2017

read the friggin thing...

still_one

(91,954 posts)
56. I did read the frigging thing, and my head DIDN'T explode. I don't agree that the reason she lost
Thu Jan 19, 2017, 10:31 PM
Jan 2017

was primarily due to the white working class voter

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
51. I think most of the voter ID laws were overturned, or there were ways around them. Agree on Comey
Thu Jan 19, 2017, 09:36 PM
Jan 2017

and third parties.

still_one

(91,954 posts)
54. Not entirely true. In North Carolina, thousands of voters were removed from the voting roster. The
Thu Jan 19, 2017, 10:23 PM
Jan 2017

NAACP successfully challenged the law, and got those voters reinstated, but I suspect since it got reinstated late in the game, some voters who were initially removed from the voting lists, didn't end up voting after all.

Here is a map of those states with strict voter ID laws:

http://www.ncsl.org/research/elections-and-campaigns/voter-id.aspx

While I agree the effect on the results is debatable, I don't think it will be debatable after the next four years, and the republicans have consolidated power by appointing judges who will insure that strict voting requirements get instituted.


 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
57. I got purged from rolls too in a town I had not voted in in 10 years because I moved.
Thu Jan 19, 2017, 10:45 PM
Jan 2017

That is reason for a lot of the purging. Not denying GOPers have restricted votes, but their are usually ways around it.

In NC a utility bill, etc., wI'll get you a mail in ballot.

 

Hoyt

(54,770 posts)
59. That's why it's important to check your registration, vote often, etc.
Thu Jan 19, 2017, 11:02 PM
Jan 2017

The Get Out the Vote efforts need to focus on that aspect and encourage people to vote early and by mail when possible. My experience with South Carolinians is that a few alleged purged voters didn't make a difference in Trump winning.

still_one

(91,954 posts)
62. North Carolina was pretty close, and Roy Cooper did get in as Governor, I would like to think my
Thu Jan 19, 2017, 11:09 PM
Jan 2017

call banking helped, but since Deborah Ross and Hillary lost, I doubt it

StevieM

(10,499 posts)
13. I am saddened that he repeats the false claim that Trump did better than Romney among Latinos.
Wed Jan 18, 2017, 05:23 PM
Jan 2017

Here is my post on this subject.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10028471760

And here is the article that the post links to:

http://touch.latimes.com/#section/-1/article/p2p-92304395/

 

Uponthegears

(1,499 posts)
32. Is this the claim you are referring to?
Wed Jan 18, 2017, 07:30 PM
Jan 2017

"Clinton did MUCH worse than Obama among all Non-White voters, a drop of 8 points, some of whom, shockingly, went to Trump (3 points) and more of whom (5 points) went to Johnson/Stein. When you drill down, Trump actually did better among Latinos – a group he directly insulted (at least Mexicans) – than Romney"?

StevieM

(10,499 posts)
37. Yep, that's the one. I hate that this fictitious claim is still being widely referenced as if
Wed Jan 18, 2017, 07:56 PM
Jan 2017

it is a fact.

underpants

(182,274 posts)
34. Agreed
Wed Jan 18, 2017, 07:34 PM
Jan 2017

Some were suppressed and I think the "she's won" lead others to not think they needed to vote.


My full analysis (because your life wouldn't be complete without it) is below.

dionysus

(26,467 posts)
22. Thanks. I thought it covered everything except GOP voter suppression, which sadly
Wed Jan 18, 2017, 06:46 PM
Jan 2017

happens every election. Funny how the poor districts always have few machines, breakdowns, and large lines!

The way you worded ot originally will make heads explode. Hell, posting it worhlit comment will make heads explode.

But it's fair and covers the whole range of reasons, we'd be foolish not to analyze our mistakes and learn from them.

Burying our heads in the sand will not help things one bit!

LisaL

(44,962 posts)
20. One shouldn't forget the media.
Wed Jan 18, 2017, 06:38 PM
Jan 2017

Emails, Comey or Russians wouldn't have had an effect they did, if not for the media running with these stories the way media did. 2 weeks before the election, Clinton's coverage turned extremely negative. Comey's vague letter was talked about non-stop, even though we all know there was nothing of importance in the emails. But it wasn't covered that way.

underpants

(182,274 posts)
36. Here's my breakdown 60% was airtime.
Wed Jan 18, 2017, 07:48 PM
Jan 2017

Last edited Wed Jan 18, 2017, 08:28 PM - Edit history (2)

60% Airtime
He was on like "The Truman Show" - full speeches (even speech setup while Bernie was addressing 10k or so) - when a product is on that much enough people will convince themselves to buy it.
Hillary got 4 direct contacts with the audience (convention and debates) - we heard ABOUT her not FROM her and CNN had two Trump plants (Lord and Lewandowski) on constantly. CNN was the news network for the middle/"undecided".

10% voter suppression/Crosscheck

10% the 25 year (empty) campaign against Hillary

10% all of Comey's appearances. Couple with the long campaign against her

3% there are Green and Libertarian voters.

5% Brexit/protest/joke votes in all the wrong spots

The remaining 2% was sadly that it was going to be hard for the first woman President to come right after the first black President.

Buckeye_Democrat

(14,847 posts)
27. From the article...
Wed Jan 18, 2017, 07:00 PM
Jan 2017
Her Unpopularity. Why is Hillary Clinton so darned unpopular? Clearly, the GOP’s decades-long efforts to demonize her have paid off (for them). Ever since she moved into an office in the West Wing and took on the health care project, ushering in her modern interpretation of First Ladydom, she has been vilified. From Whitewater to Benghazi, through all of her husband’s infidelities, Hillary Clinton has been cast as shifty, sneaky, unprincipled, overly-ambitious, out for herself, ruthless, you name it, unabated for 24 years now. And she has reinforced this with, no doubt, a preference to protect herself through some degree of secrecy and an instinct against transparency. You might do the same if you had undergone decades of being dragged through the mud. But it hurt her.

It seemed to be true in April 2008 as well.

http://abcnews.go.com/images/PollingUnit/1063a3The08Race.pdf
Obama 49%
McCain 44%

Clinton 45%
McCain 48%

The number of Americans who see Clinton unfavorably overall has risen to a record high in ABC/Post polling, 54 percent – up 14 points since January. Obama’s unfavorable score has reached a new high as well, up 9 points, but to a lower 39 percent. A favorability rating is the most basic measure of any public figure’s popularity; it’s trouble when unfavorable views outscore favorable ones. That’s now the case for Clinton, alone among the current candidates.

40yearyellowdog

(4 posts)
29. "If everyone who voted for Jill Stein in Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin had voted for Hillary
Wed Jan 18, 2017, 07:24 PM
Jan 2017

Clinton, Clinton would have won." I am so glad to finally see this in writing, it was like it was illegal to say it.

StevieM

(10,499 posts)
38. With 11 days to go she was in good enough shape to win even without those votes.
Wed Jan 18, 2017, 07:59 PM
Jan 2017

Then James Comey intervened to rig the election.

She ran a great race. But the election just wasn't winnable.

We will never know for sure what they had in store for Sanders or O'Malley. But they certainly would have behaved every bit as unethically, possibly including a bogus FBI investigation.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Why Hillary Lost: An Exh...