Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

La Lioness Priyanka

(53,866 posts)
Tue Nov 22, 2016, 03:17 PM Nov 2016

Prior to the Civil Rights Act, Democrats used to have some of the most virulent racists

in their party. After the CRA passed, these racists slowly moved on.

When some white men start saying things like 'we need to ditch identity politics' the rest of us begin to wonder what Democratic party are you trying to build?

one whose motto is 'stronger together' or one that attracts the white working class while pushing every other working class person out of the door?

People need to think more carefully about the type of coalition they truly want and who they are willing to shove out for it.

1964 was not that long ago.

39 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Prior to the Civil Rights Act, Democrats used to have some of the most virulent racists (Original Post) La Lioness Priyanka Nov 2016 OP
That is exactly right, now the party of Lincoln has assumed that role still_one Nov 2016 #1
yes, and all this loose chatter about identity politics La Lioness Priyanka Nov 2016 #2
Though there was a difference between northern Democrats verses Southern Democrats, Northern still_one Nov 2016 #5
If we go back to pre-1964 radical noodle Nov 2016 #20
Why must any group Sekhmets Daughter Nov 2016 #3
trump is a result of white identity politics, so go forward and fix that. La Lioness Priyanka Nov 2016 #6
Or one could say Sekhmets Daughter Nov 2016 #10
no, it's not. Black people voted for her in large majorities, as did brown people La Lioness Priyanka Nov 2016 #11
Blacks did not turnout for Hillary Sekhmets Daughter Nov 2016 #12
That had everything to do with 8 years of relentless voter suppression ucrdem Nov 2016 #13
1. voter suppression 2. more recent numbers are closing that gap La Lioness Priyanka Nov 2016 #14
You blame white folks for electing Trump Sekhmets Daughter Nov 2016 #15
White people particularly the males, hold most of the power in the US ismnotwasm Nov 2016 #23
No, I stated a simple truth. Sekhmets Daughter Nov 2016 #26
identity politics brought us voting rights act, civil rights act, marriage equality La Lioness Priyanka Nov 2016 #25
*sigh* n/t Sekhmets Daughter Nov 2016 #27
Yeah sigh away other people's voices La Lioness Priyanka Nov 2016 #29
IDK, I think we are perfectly capable of both appealing to economic issues Ligyron Nov 2016 #4
Yes, and we did offer voters that and voters in some areas rejected that La Lioness Priyanka Nov 2016 #7
I agree. While we offered that, clearly there was miscommunication. AgadorSparticus Nov 2016 #36
"Us vs.them, and in the end we're only ordinary men".- Pink Floyd. jalan48 Nov 2016 #8
identity politics is code for focus less on issues that matter to black people, gays, women etc. La Lioness Priyanka Nov 2016 #9
You're right, a lot of those WWC people voted for Trump in reaction to what they Ligyron Nov 2016 #16
I totally agree w/you that people voted for trump as a perceived loss of white privilege. AgadorSparticus Nov 2016 #37
They were Dixiecrats, not modern-day Dems meow2u3 Nov 2016 #17
Obama was able to pull of "stronger together" while celebrating the idea of American unity geek tragedy Nov 2016 #18
Obama did not run against this sort of white nationalism La Lioness Priyanka Nov 2016 #21
I can't imagine him referring to millions of Americans geek tragedy Nov 2016 #28
He literally made that comment about guns and La Lioness Priyanka Nov 2016 #30
It was arguably condescending but (a) attempted geek tragedy Nov 2016 #32
If you are willing to give him context you La Lioness Priyanka Nov 2016 #33
Sure only half the 60 million who voted for him geek tragedy Nov 2016 #34
The "deplorables" argument was pretty much exactly the same in substance. forjusticethunders Nov 2016 #38
She said tens of millions of voters were beyond redemption geek tragedy Nov 2016 #39
Actually, before the Civil Rights Act, all of the virulent racists were Democrats. hedda_foil Nov 2016 #19
Bernie is not a racist and neither he nor his supporters have anything in common with the Dixiecrats Ken Burch Nov 2016 #22
no one said that. nt La Lioness Priyanka Nov 2016 #24
White dudes are talking about "identity politics", from Senators on down. White dudes. nt LexVegas Nov 2016 #31
"I didn't leave the Democratic Party, the Party left me"...quote of old bigots louis c Nov 2016 #35
 

La Lioness Priyanka

(53,866 posts)
2. yes, and all this loose chatter about identity politics
Tue Nov 22, 2016, 03:21 PM
Nov 2016

makes me wonder how many of us really would be ok if we were pre-1964 democrats.

still_one

(92,061 posts)
5. Though there was a difference between northern Democrats verses Southern Democrats, Northern
Tue Nov 22, 2016, 03:31 PM
Nov 2016

Democrats for the most part ignored the Southern Democrats racism, pretending it didn't exist, which was itself a racist act

Sekhmets Daughter

(7,515 posts)
3. Why must any group
Tue Nov 22, 2016, 03:29 PM
Nov 2016

be shoved out the door to make room for others? Many former Democrats believe the white working class was shoved out of the door to make room for blacks and Hispanics. Why should most blacks be Democrats or whites Republicans? That sets up an 'us against them' division. It's time for both parties to end the sickness that is identity politics. Trump is a direct result of identity politics.

 

La Lioness Priyanka

(53,866 posts)
11. no, it's not. Black people voted for her in large majorities, as did brown people
Tue Nov 22, 2016, 03:38 PM
Nov 2016

just because you say something doesn't make it true.

ucrdem

(15,512 posts)
13. That had everything to do with 8 years of relentless voter suppression
Tue Nov 22, 2016, 03:48 PM
Nov 2016

including the 2013 Supreme Court decision striking down federal oversight of elections. Well, it worked.

 

La Lioness Priyanka

(53,866 posts)
14. 1. voter suppression 2. more recent numbers are closing that gap
Tue Nov 22, 2016, 03:53 PM
Nov 2016

that article was written well before all votes were counted

also, clearly if whites had voted like blacks or asians or hispanics, this would not have happened.

Sekhmets Daughter

(7,515 posts)
15. You blame white folks for electing Trump
Tue Nov 22, 2016, 04:03 PM
Nov 2016

just as those same people blamed blacks for Obama's election. Identity politics is a deadly force and it cuts in every direction.

ismnotwasm

(41,967 posts)
23. White people particularly the males, hold most of the power in the US
Tue Nov 22, 2016, 06:47 PM
Nov 2016

What you just did was usd a specious "reverse racism" type argument

 

La Lioness Priyanka

(53,866 posts)
25. identity politics brought us voting rights act, civil rights act, marriage equality
Tue Nov 22, 2016, 06:51 PM
Nov 2016

i literally dont know wtf you are talking about.

Ligyron

(7,616 posts)
4. IDK, I think we are perfectly capable of both appealing to economic issues
Tue Nov 22, 2016, 03:30 PM
Nov 2016

and standing up for the rights of all people.

It's all about thje money - always has been.

Everybody, no matter their sex or ethnic background basically wants the same things, safe places to raise their families, enough money to do so, a good education so they can find a worthwhile career and enough money (again)to live comfortably once they retire along with other things along the way.Like decent healthcare and some vacation time.

The GOPers will provide little to none of the above except for maybe the 5 or 10% and probably for less than that.

The Democratic party can be seen to represent the majority of Americans without trampling the rights of anyone.

That's my take on what was said.

 

La Lioness Priyanka

(53,866 posts)
7. Yes, and we did offer voters that and voters in some areas rejected that
Tue Nov 22, 2016, 03:33 PM
Nov 2016

there are many ways of fixing this, but focusing on identity politics (which used to be a right wing term), is dumb and unwarranted

AgadorSparticus

(7,963 posts)
36. I agree. While we offered that, clearly there was miscommunication.
Wed Nov 23, 2016, 09:40 PM
Nov 2016

The receiver did not get the message. We need to do better at communicating this.

jalan48

(13,842 posts)
8. "Us vs.them, and in the end we're only ordinary men".- Pink Floyd.
Tue Nov 22, 2016, 03:34 PM
Nov 2016

I get the feeling Identity Politics means us vs. them.

 

La Lioness Priyanka

(53,866 posts)
9. identity politics is code for focus less on issues that matter to black people, gays, women etc.
Tue Nov 22, 2016, 03:36 PM
Nov 2016

just focus on the economy.

although a black mother who is middle class may be more afraid that the cops will shoot her son than the economy. let's never talk about her.

Ligyron

(7,616 posts)
16. You're right, a lot of those WWC people voted for Trump in reaction to what they
Tue Nov 22, 2016, 05:13 PM
Nov 2016

perceived was a loss of "white privilege" and a changing culture they'll probably never adapt to. I've no way to actually prove that but I still think it's true. It's a f.u. backlash thing for a lot of them.

Bad news for them is: the people and culture they don't cotton to ain't going away and eventually the demographics and attrition will take care of that problem - whether they like it or not.

Unemployment isn't really that bad either even in the rust belt. We've all seen the figures - it's under 5% for the most part.

The problem, of course, is that the jobs they or their kids have now don't pay anything like what it takes to maintain the lifestyle of a middle class family 30 or 40 years ago and NAFTA has become the whipping boy for many of them in that respect. They blame the likes of Hillary for NAFTA even though it was a GOP push through for the most part, just like the crime bill. For them, with their traditional view of things, the wife is just a reflection of her husband, Bill's will.

So ironically, some POC are pissed at her for the crime bill but she get's no credit for it from the WWC who probably support the sickening result. Nonetheless, the WWC probably DO blame her for NAFTA and associate her with trade problems like the TTP she once supported.

She can't win and now some people wish she'd never tried.

What everybody really needs is an increase in income and I think that's what we should be all about. That doesn't mean we throw our people to the wolves of voter suppression and killer cops and we push back on bigotry and and violation of civil rights every
time.

But those people and their attitudes are not going away until they eventually die off anyway. Plus, we can't do anything to help anybody until we regain quite a bit of the ground that was lost under the present Democratic leadership and our main message from now on in order to do so should be an economic one.

AgadorSparticus

(7,963 posts)
37. I totally agree w/you that people voted for trump as a perceived loss of white privilege.
Wed Nov 23, 2016, 09:42 PM
Nov 2016

And we really need to hone in on that economic message.

meow2u3

(24,759 posts)
17. They were Dixiecrats, not modern-day Dems
Tue Nov 22, 2016, 05:16 PM
Nov 2016

Ideological realignment began with the passage of the Civil Rights Act and the VRA, which Dixiecrats didn't like one bit. Nixon accelerated the realignment with his dog-whistle-laden "Southern Strategy" to lure white supremacists to the repig party and slowly, racist Dems have switched parties from Dem to puke.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
18. Obama was able to pull of "stronger together" while celebrating the idea of American unity
Tue Nov 22, 2016, 05:20 PM
Nov 2016

Clinton gave us name-checking of specific demographics at speeches, followed up by referring to 20-45% of the country as "deplorable."

People in rural Wisconsin could disagree with Obama but feel that he respected them. There's a reason he constantly referred to his family from Kansas--to reinforce the commonality even between small town auto repair mechanics and a guy whose ancestors came from Kenya and who studied at Harvard.

I think Clinton found herself in a trap--she needed to really boost turnout amongst the Obama coalition, which wasn't as naturally responsive to her. But, she may have neglected to include all segments of society in her outreach--at least in terms of perception if not in terms of policy.

So, no, don't stop celebrating our diversity and certainly never abandon our commitment to civil rights.

At the same time, make sure everyone--regardless of where they live or whether they like NASCAR etc feels at home in the party. I think the focus on the "coalition of the ascendant" had the effect of making some feel like they weren't visible to the party.



 

La Lioness Priyanka

(53,866 posts)
21. Obama did not run against this sort of white nationalism
Tue Nov 22, 2016, 06:39 PM
Nov 2016

he might have also said something similar if he had (clinging on bitterly to god and guns, for instance)

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
32. It was arguably condescending but (a) attempted
Wed Nov 23, 2016, 02:36 PM
Nov 2016

to be empathetic and (b) wasn't intended for public consumption and (c) didn't state these people were irredeemable.

It was also eerily prescient re: Trump.

This is the "economic anxiety" argument.

 

La Lioness Priyanka

(53,866 posts)
33. If you are willing to give him context you
Wed Nov 23, 2016, 03:44 PM
Nov 2016

Should also hear what she said in context .

She clearly said that we should not discount all his voters as irredeemable

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
34. Sure only half the 60 million who voted for him
Wed Nov 23, 2016, 07:14 PM
Nov 2016

It was not a smart thing to say. Especially since a lot of people who might not have been inclined to support Trump had a loved one who did, and would have taken offense.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
39. She said tens of millions of voters were beyond redemption
Wed Nov 23, 2016, 10:27 PM
Nov 2016

as human beings. She took it much further.

Is it pretty much something I've said myself? You bet. But there's a lot of stuff I say that Presidents shouldn't.

I have relatives who are Trumpers. Racist, nutty ignoramuses? Yes. Irredeemable? No.

hedda_foil

(16,371 posts)
19. Actually, before the Civil Rights Act, all of the virulent racists were Democrats.
Tue Nov 22, 2016, 05:25 PM
Nov 2016

The solid South (solidly white because African Americans were kept from voting in the old Confederate states).was solidly Democratic. Then the Civil Rights Act was passed and Nixon started the Southern Strategy to make the Republican Party attractive to racist creeps. Paul Weyrich brought in the bigoted right wing Xtian preachers to convince their flocks that Jaysuz loved bigotry in the name of the Laaawrd. Fifty years later and VOILA!

 

Ken Burch

(50,254 posts)
22. Bernie is not a racist and neither he nor his supporters have anything in common with the Dixiecrats
Tue Nov 22, 2016, 06:44 PM
Nov 2016

n/t.

 

louis c

(8,652 posts)
35. "I didn't leave the Democratic Party, the Party left me"...quote of old bigots
Wed Nov 23, 2016, 09:30 PM
Nov 2016

The Democratic party never left those white, blue collar bigots. We threw them the fuck out.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Prior to the Civil Rights...