Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumABC, CBS,NBC have devoted more mins to Clinton emails this year than **all policy issues combined
http://mediamatters.org/blog/2016/10/26/study-confirms-network-evening-newscasts-have-abandoned-policy-coverage-2016-campaign/214120Walking away from a long-standing tradition of covering issues and presidential policies during campaign season, the network evening newscasts have all but abandoned that type of reporting this year, according to recent tabulations from Tyndall Report, which for decades has tracked the flagship nightly news programs.
Since the beginning of 2016, ABCs World News Tonight, CBS Evening News and NBC Nightly News have devoted just 32 minutes to issues coverage, according to Andrew Tyndall.
Differentiating issues coverage from daily campaign coverage where policy topics might be addressed, Tyndall defines issues coverage by a newscast this way: It takes a public policy, outlines the societal problem that needs to be addressed, describes the candidates' platform positions and proposed solutions, and evaluates their efficacy.
And heres how that kind of in-depth coverage breaks down, year to date, by network:
ABC: 8 minutes, all of which covered terrorism.
NBC: 8 minutes for terrorism, LBGT issues, and foreign policy.
CBS: 16 minutes for foreign policy, terrorism, immigration, policing, and the Environmental Protection Agency.
And this remarkable finding from Tyndall [emphasis added]:
No trade, no healthcare, no climate change, no drugs, no poverty, no guns, no infrastructure, no deficits. To the extent that these issues have been mentioned, it has been on the candidates' terms, not on the networks' initiative.
These numbers are staggering in terms of the complete retreat they represent from issues-orientated campaign coverage. Just eight years ago, the last time both parties nominated new candidates for the White House, the network newscasts devoted 220 minutes to issues coverage, compared to only 32 minutes so far this year. (CBS Evening News went from 119 minutes of issues coverage in 2008 to 16 this year.)
Note that during the Republican primary season alone, the networks spent 333 minutes focusing on Donald Trump. Yet for all of 2016, they have set aside just one-tenth of that for issue reporting.
And look at this: Combined, the three network newscasts have slotted 100 minutes so far this year for reporting on Hillary Clintons emails while she served as secretary of state, but just 32 minutes for all issues coverage. (NBCs Nightly News has spent 31 minutes on the emails this year; just eight minutes on issues.)
Indeed, this approach used to be a hallmark of presidential campaign reporting; outline what candidates stand for, describe what their presidency might look like, and compare and contrast that platform with his or her opponents. i.e. What would the new presidents top priorities be on the first day of his or her new administration?
It seems clear that the medias abandonment of issues coverage benefits Trump since his campaign has done very little to outline the candidates core beliefs. Clinton, by contrast, has done the opposite.
As the Associated Press reported, Trumps campaign has posted just seven policy proposals on his website, totaling just over 9,000 words. There are 38 on Clintons issues page, ranging from efforts to cure Alzheimers disease to Wall Street and criminal justice reform, and her campaign boasts that it has now released 65 policy fact sheets, totaling 112,735 words.
Tyndalls findings echo what other media researchers have found this campaign season, and what commentators have been noting for months
A study released last month from Harvard Kennedy Schools Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics and Public Policy confirmed that during the time of both parties conventions this summer, just eight percent of news coverage centered on policy and issues.
During the convention period, even though questions of policy and leadership were on the agenda within the halls of the national conventions, they were not on journalists agenda, wrote Harvard University professor Thomas Patterson. Polls, projections, strategy and the like constituted about a fifth of all coverage, whereas issues took up less than 1/12 and the candidates qualifications for the presidency accounted for less than 1/13.
Part of the purpose of campaign coverage, including at the flagship network newscasts, is to help inform voters about key issues of public concern. Its troubling that the networks have decided this year to walk away from that responsibility
Since the beginning of 2016, ABCs World News Tonight, CBS Evening News and NBC Nightly News have devoted just 32 minutes to issues coverage, according to Andrew Tyndall.
Differentiating issues coverage from daily campaign coverage where policy topics might be addressed, Tyndall defines issues coverage by a newscast this way: It takes a public policy, outlines the societal problem that needs to be addressed, describes the candidates' platform positions and proposed solutions, and evaluates their efficacy.
And heres how that kind of in-depth coverage breaks down, year to date, by network:
ABC: 8 minutes, all of which covered terrorism.
NBC: 8 minutes for terrorism, LBGT issues, and foreign policy.
CBS: 16 minutes for foreign policy, terrorism, immigration, policing, and the Environmental Protection Agency.
And this remarkable finding from Tyndall [emphasis added]:
No trade, no healthcare, no climate change, no drugs, no poverty, no guns, no infrastructure, no deficits. To the extent that these issues have been mentioned, it has been on the candidates' terms, not on the networks' initiative.
These numbers are staggering in terms of the complete retreat they represent from issues-orientated campaign coverage. Just eight years ago, the last time both parties nominated new candidates for the White House, the network newscasts devoted 220 minutes to issues coverage, compared to only 32 minutes so far this year. (CBS Evening News went from 119 minutes of issues coverage in 2008 to 16 this year.)
Note that during the Republican primary season alone, the networks spent 333 minutes focusing on Donald Trump. Yet for all of 2016, they have set aside just one-tenth of that for issue reporting.
And look at this: Combined, the three network newscasts have slotted 100 minutes so far this year for reporting on Hillary Clintons emails while she served as secretary of state, but just 32 minutes for all issues coverage. (NBCs Nightly News has spent 31 minutes on the emails this year; just eight minutes on issues.)
Indeed, this approach used to be a hallmark of presidential campaign reporting; outline what candidates stand for, describe what their presidency might look like, and compare and contrast that platform with his or her opponents. i.e. What would the new presidents top priorities be on the first day of his or her new administration?
It seems clear that the medias abandonment of issues coverage benefits Trump since his campaign has done very little to outline the candidates core beliefs. Clinton, by contrast, has done the opposite.
As the Associated Press reported, Trumps campaign has posted just seven policy proposals on his website, totaling just over 9,000 words. There are 38 on Clintons issues page, ranging from efforts to cure Alzheimers disease to Wall Street and criminal justice reform, and her campaign boasts that it has now released 65 policy fact sheets, totaling 112,735 words.
Tyndalls findings echo what other media researchers have found this campaign season, and what commentators have been noting for months
A study released last month from Harvard Kennedy Schools Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics and Public Policy confirmed that during the time of both parties conventions this summer, just eight percent of news coverage centered on policy and issues.
During the convention period, even though questions of policy and leadership were on the agenda within the halls of the national conventions, they were not on journalists agenda, wrote Harvard University professor Thomas Patterson. Polls, projections, strategy and the like constituted about a fifth of all coverage, whereas issues took up less than 1/12 and the candidates qualifications for the presidency accounted for less than 1/13.
Part of the purpose of campaign coverage, including at the flagship network newscasts, is to help inform voters about key issues of public concern. Its troubling that the networks have decided this year to walk away from that responsibility
https://twitter.com/chrislhayes?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 789 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (10)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
ABC, CBS,NBC have devoted more mins to Clinton emails this year than **all policy issues combined (Original Post)
factfinder_77
Oct 2016
OP
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)1. Kick!
Thrill
(19,178 posts)2. Not shocking. It's the reason Trump is where he is
Sad