2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumThis is not a coronation, it's a convention
We are so used to everyone being happy with whoever was nominated, we forget conventions aren't always just nice parties..
http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/03/the-craziest-conventions-in-us-history-213727
We were upset when they silenced the anti trump faction, but hate our dissidents...Hillary IS GOING TO BE PRESIDENT..get over it!
MFM008
(19,808 posts)no one said it was a coronation.
You dont BBBBOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO everyone on the stage.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)angstlessk
(11,862 posts)not necessarily at a convention
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)There are normally right ways and wrong ways to do anything.
However, the nation will at least see clips of Sanders' former and current out-of-control supporters booing him, booing many other speakers, shouting through Elijah Cummings' speech, etc.. Some even were calling for Hillary to be locked up just as those slimy Hillary haters on the right did. This will not go over well and will be remembered.
They need to get behind Sanders, remember that courtesy can also be a tool, and take his lead if they want to have power to accomplish anything but irritating people and embarrassing themselves before going home.
angstlessk
(11,862 posts)compare/contrast
Response to MFM008 (Reply #1)
Name removed Message auto-removed
RonniePudding
(889 posts)Renew Deal
(81,856 posts)The convention is a marketing opportunity. And those that make excuses for it are Trump enablers
angstlessk
(11,862 posts)as they should. The Hillary supporters are doing just fine drowning out the booers..
Renew Deal
(81,856 posts)There shouldn't be booers and there shouldn't be a need to drown out anyone. At this point there is only one goal. Electing Hillary.
angstlessk
(11,862 posts)Conventions USED to decide the nominee, imagine the booooooos back then...?
Renew Deal
(81,856 posts)In this case, the voters have spoken
angstlessk
(11,862 posts)convention since 1968...
Renew Deal
(81,856 posts)And I don't get your point about 1968. The convention is a marketing opportunity. Nothing less.
Demsrule86
(68,556 posts)And I will remind you we lost that year but maintained congressional control...we lose this year...we lose everything. So much fun...not.
angstlessk
(11,862 posts)Lockstep is NOT REQUIRED!
Response to angstlessk (Reply #62)
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin This message was self-deleted by its author.
Demsrule86
(68,556 posts)Dissent is disunity and leads to a loss...we lost in 1968. What followed was hardly 'democracy'. Attacking Democrats and that is what is happening in Philly...leads to GOP victories which in this case given the age of the Supreme Court justices would destroy progressive politics and possibly 'democracy' for a generation. Democracy might not even survive Comrade Heil Trump. He reminds me of those who ran for election once and then became presidents for life. And this so called 'democracy' in action is disrespectful to Hillary Clinton voters: many who are POC. We won the primary, and it was not stolen. She had more votes. And to boo Elijah Cummings...was just beyond the pale. Most in that hall are not fit to lick his boots.
Lord Magus
(1,999 posts)The reason that "there has not been a contentious Democratic convention since 1968" is that since 1968 Democrats have held a primary or caucus in every state instead of letting state delegations be chosen without voter input.
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(107,956 posts)In 1968 the nominee Hubert Humphrey did not complete in a single primary. In 1968 young men could be drafted to fight an unpopular war.
Those who compare 1968 to now lack perspective.
angstlessk
(11,862 posts)Why everyone is so anti democratic just blows me away! Hillar has it locked...some Bernie supports are letting off steam...wowzer! Did not know we had so many lockstep supporters!
Response to angstlessk (Reply #4)
geek tragedy This message was self-deleted by its author.
angstlessk
(11,862 posts)30% of delegates are green party? How did they get credentialed?
Response to angstlessk (Reply #15)
geek tragedy This message was self-deleted by its author.
angstlessk
(11,862 posts)let them cry and shout, most'll vote in November for Hillary, some maybe Jill. I can't imagine any voting for trump.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)I just know I don't want them involved in choosing our party's future.
Lord Magus
(1,999 posts)angstlessk
(11,862 posts)should just as well pull the lever (in the olden days) for trump
B Calm
(28,762 posts)annavictorious
(934 posts)And the betrayal of the people that he allowed to be certified as delegates.
His vanity got the better of him, and he thought he could control the mob he created.
Sanders tweeted a couple of hours ago, asking his delegates not to do this. Their response was to spit in his face. Fuck them all.
angstlessk
(11,862 posts)trump supports agree that there should not be dissent, or disagreement!
BobbyDrake
(2,542 posts)angstlessk
(11,862 posts)Has there ever been a society which has died of dissent? Several have died of conformity in our lifetime. [Jacob Bronowski "Science and Human Values," 1956]
BobbyDrake
(2,542 posts)civilization running. Agreeing to live by the same values, in the same space, that's what makes a culture. Fighting all the time is what bratty children do, on their way to building absolutely nothing.
angstlessk
(11,862 posts)Has there ever been a society which has died of dissent? Several have died of conformity in our lifetime. (Jacob Bronowski "Science and Human Values," 1956)
angstlessk
(11,862 posts)WOW...Kings would still rule every country if not for dissent.
BobbyDrake
(2,542 posts)JFC, this got ridiculous fast.
You've made the claim that dissent builds societies. YOU name one. But not America, as that was founded on the agreement of the Founders and those who voted on revolution to all do so together. Or any other modern democratic society, founded on the same valuesof cooperation.
Even in democracy, the concept of "dissent" is limited by the fact that all adherents of the democratic system agree to live by the results of a vote! There is nowhere like what you're claiming, where constant bickering as displayed by these immature Sanders delegates has built anything even resembling a society.
annavictorious
(934 posts)It's disrespect. The mob booed Sanders today. Then they spit in his face after he sent out that desperate tweet asking them "out of professional courtesy to me" not to do this. They looked him in the eye, and answered "Fuck you."
Maru Kitteh
(28,340 posts)They look, walk, talk and SMELL like Trump/Putin Supporters. And we know them by their fruit.
Demsrule86
(68,556 posts)Personally, I think a coronation would be way more helpful to Democrats and the country...because if Trump is elected president...kiss Bernie's revolution goodbye and this country too. This is not a good thing...it is embarrassing to me as a Democrat.
angstlessk
(11,862 posts)they shut off the mics of his dissenters...it just proves we believe in democracy and not demigods!
Maru Kitteh
(28,340 posts)And fuck Naderites.
angstlessk
(11,862 posts)who won because of the makeup of the supreme court?
Maru Kitteh
(28,340 posts)Not really rocket science.
Do you stand with the SHITWIT Green assholes who are right now, trying to get us a Trump presidency? It kinda smells like you are.
Or do you join with Bernie Sanders who says we must elect Hillary Rodham Clinton?
angstlessk
(11,862 posts)Like I said in another post...wish I was 12...instead of 60 something, being a woman..if 12 what a different future I could have dreamed of!
Maru Kitteh
(28,340 posts)But you are then old enough, as am I, to understand the unseemly and ugly behavior of these "supporters" is of NO BENEFIT to our party and the ultimate success of this ticket.
These people are acting like they are 12. I don't think they're real supporters of Bernie so much as they are anarchists and privileged little Greens who care more about their own agenda and could actually give a flying F about the country and those who will suffer under a tRump/Putin presidency. So really. To hell with them. The hateful disruptors among them should lose their credentials and be ejected.
Demsrule86
(68,556 posts)And it hurts Bernie and his revolution too. The delegates appear rude and out of control. It makes the Dem party look bad which helps Comrade Heil Trump and Putin his best bff.
BobbyDrake
(2,542 posts)At a certain point, basic respect has to factor into it, and these delegates weren't invited with the intent of them shouting down anyone they don't like all night. Or all week, god forbid.
It's sore losing, and it needs to end already.
annavictorious
(934 posts)"We're on the floor now. We don't need you anymore. Sit down, and shut up."
angstlessk
(11,862 posts)enjoy the convention...I am sure there will be more "Bernie, Bernie, Bernie" shoting...but it ain't going to change the outcome, and I have not missed one word because of the cheers and jeers.
Zynx
(21,328 posts)angstlessk
(11,862 posts)BobbyDrake
(2,542 posts)And now you're brushing that claim off, because its effects can be traced back to certain points in time that you're confusingly equating with victory?
Holy cow.
angstlessk
(11,862 posts)don't know how to answer that?
BobbyDrake
(2,542 posts)angstlessk
(11,862 posts)Zynx
(21,328 posts)angstlessk
(11,862 posts)Zynx
(21,328 posts)The 1968 convention gave us Nixon. I bet the country would be a far better place today had Humphrey won.
angstlessk
(11,862 posts)lead to 600,000 deaths!
Zynx
(21,328 posts)angstlessk
(11,862 posts)...if that's true don't blame Bernie!
joeybee12
(56,177 posts)The media is now only reporting that there's dissension, nothing about anything good...the filth fringe needs to STFU
angstlessk
(11,862 posts)Edward R Morrow?
joeybee12
(56,177 posts)Children don't, and the media will zero in on a crying, petulant little sh*t before the adult listening respectfully.
angstlessk
(11,862 posts)I am truly flabbergasted how many people want to just shut the mouths of those who disagree and voice their disagreement at a POLITICAL CONVENTION!
RBInMaine
(13,570 posts)angstlessk
(11,862 posts)you just want to start at the end.
LaydeeBug
(10,291 posts)angstlessk
(11,862 posts)which will be Hillary,but there are those who will still vote for Sanders during roll call...
LaydeeBug
(10,291 posts)and those emails do not, and would not have, changed that even if they implemented the bullshit, which they did not.
angstlessk
(11,862 posts)I do believe they still do a roll call. only the last umpty ump times it was just the same person for every delegation...this time some will vote for Bernie, but it won't make a difference!
Lord Magus
(1,999 posts)It's a formality now. The voters choose the nominee, not the delegates.
angstlessk
(11,862 posts)and some will vote for Bernie...but Hillary will get 99% of the votes...