Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

liberalnarb

(4,532 posts)
Mon Jul 11, 2016, 05:38 PM Jul 2016

More reasons why we MUST win down ballot in November :

Ryan Says Clinton is Too Much of a “Liberal Progressive” to Find Common Ground With

House Speaker Paul Ryan, R-WI, says that he would have trouble working with Hillary Clinton because her policy positions are too far to the left.

Ryan said he would have trouble finding common ground with Clinton since she is too progressive.

“I think she is actually a liberal progressive,” Ryan told Politico. “I don’t think she’s faking it. I think she’s a liberal progressive.”

“And I think she’s sitting atop a party that’s now run by [Sens.] Bernie Sanders [I-Vt.] and Elizabeth Warren [D-Mass.],” Ryan added. “This is a Hillary Clinton, Elizabeth Warren, Bernie Sanders party.

“Our party has moved right, their party have moved really left. I think the common ground, say that you had in the early 90s when I was here as a staffer is nothing like the common ground you have right now.”

Ryan also said the Republican obsession with Clinton’s use of a private email server while with the State Department is not political.



We HAVE GOT TO get rid of these people!
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
More reasons why we MUST win down ballot in November : (Original Post) liberalnarb Jul 2016 OP
Great Thread. truthseeker2007 Jul 2016 #1
LOL ... I think Ryan just endorsed HRC ... If the Left was actually paying attention. 1StrongBlackMan Jul 2016 #2
they always say that larkrake Jul 2016 #3
Whether they always say it or not I don't want eight more years filled with obstruction. liberalnarb Jul 2016 #5
neither do I, but both nominees will bring 4 more years of obstruction larkrake Jul 2016 #6
Yeah, we need him out of there! treestar Jul 2016 #4
 

larkrake

(1,674 posts)
6. neither do I, but both nominees will bring 4 more years of obstruction
Wed Jul 13, 2016, 10:35 AM
Jul 2016

neither SHOULD be re-elected, but Bush was so I cant commit to that either

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»More reasons why we MUST ...