Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

woolldog

(8,791 posts)
Mon Jul 4, 2016, 02:32 PM Jul 2016

When is Sanders going to start campaigning against Republicans instead of Democrats?

All I hear is him tearing down the Democratic Party. When is he going to pull a Liz Warren and start hitting the GOP for a change?

Thoughts on when we can expect this to happen?

112 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
When is Sanders going to start campaigning against Republicans instead of Democrats? (Original Post) woolldog Jul 2016 OP
When he clinches the Democratic Party's presidential nomination - and not before. BlueCaliDem Jul 2016 #1
Explains why he is still dragging around the SS pandr32 Jul 2016 #26
Yup obamanut2012 Jul 2016 #107
Theres a good chance the bar will be raised each time one demand is met. kerry-is-my-prez Jul 2016 #111
Post removed Post removed Jul 2016 #2
I do not want an endorsement anymore. I feel it will do more harm than good. Nt seabeyond Jul 2016 #3
By the time he decides to jump on the Clinton bandwagon, it'll already have gone. baldguy Jul 2016 #28
Does it really matter? Where in clintons poll numbers is this really adversely affecting her? La Lioness Priyanka Jul 2016 #4
I do not think he is affecting Clinton either. A couple weeks ago, 81% of his supporters, supported seabeyond Jul 2016 #5
Exactly. If he is not really hurting our chances La Lioness Priyanka Jul 2016 #8
It's annoying though. woolldog Jul 2016 #11
I guess I'm not paying attention to him La Lioness Priyanka Jul 2016 #13
Nobody is FORCING Hillary to the right. kacekwl Jul 2016 #104
It should be 90+ woolldog Jul 2016 #105
I actually agree with you. And you put it in a very unbiased, no sarcastic way. Thank you. floriduck Jul 2016 #17
I agree, which is why I think he shouldn't get the leverage he's demanding obamanut2012 Jul 2016 #108
that i agree with. La Lioness Priyanka Jul 2016 #109
The number of Sanders supporters who are not voting for the Dem candidate will have to be made kerry-is-my-prez Jul 2016 #112
He is already coco77 Jul 2016 #6
Why aren't his supporters going to Cleveland to protest? pnwmom Jul 2016 #48
They will be protesting in Cleveland AgingAmerican Jul 2016 #51
I'm going to be supporting Democrats, not protesting Democrats. If these supposed pnwmom Jul 2016 #55
Will you be protesting in Cleveland? AgingAmerican Jul 2016 #56
No. I think supporting Hillary in a positive way is much more important. pnwmom Jul 2016 #57
I think for some its all about coco77 Jul 2016 #89
I don't know a single person who's only voting FOR her because of her gender. pnwmom Jul 2016 #90
It has nothing to do with gender... Silver_Witch Jul 2016 #99
Activism is about much more than protesting . . . EffieBlack Jul 2016 #73
The poster I am replying to is calling for protests in Cleveland AgingAmerican Jul 2016 #74
Because large numbers of his supporters plan to protest in Philly. pnwmom Jul 2016 #91
When will Whigs campaign against the Tories?!!? zazen Jul 2016 #7
We're seeing in real time why Sanders has been so ineffective in Congress. stopbush Jul 2016 #9
Precisely!! n/t cosmicone Jul 2016 #22
Boom! pandr32 Jul 2016 #27
+ a million! eom BlueMTexpat Jul 2016 #46
I don't consider advocacy of a political program to be "tearing down." David__77 Jul 2016 #10
He already is... Dems2002 Jul 2016 #12
Isn't he a sitting senator? woolldog Jul 2016 #18
Do you know how Congress works? Dems2002 Jul 2016 #29
This^^^ +1000 Silver_Witch Jul 2016 #100
Because as the Democratic runner up, it is his job to do so AgingAmerican Jul 2016 #52
I just think that as a sitting senator woolldog Jul 2016 #66
Because she is not a Senator? LiberalFighter Jul 2016 #86
She's still a lawmaker. Her job is even more important Exilednight Jul 2016 #87
+ 1000 LiberalLovinLug Jul 2016 #21
Sanders isn't a Democratic figure. woolldog Jul 2016 #36
This message was self-deleted by its author rjsquirrel Jul 2016 #58
He's filed paperwork to run for Senate as an Independent. nt woolldog Jul 2016 #67
Bernie Sanders is not up for re-election in 2016... k8conant Jul 2016 #76
And? woolldog Jul 2016 #84
The last dem election is proof that a majority of dems don't want him as a standard bearer and uponit7771 Jul 2016 #32
The DNC and MSM decided to step in and throw a wrench into the works AgingAmerican Jul 2016 #53
These kind of claims have not only been debunked ad nausea but it relays a mindset not to give uponit7771 Jul 2016 #60
They didn't even try to hide it AgingAmerican Jul 2016 #62
Must be easier to blame everyone else than analyze Sanders' shortcomings, huh? BobbyDrake Jul 2016 #85
.that^ 840high Jul 2016 #37
Bunk. He's never identified as a Democrat before and he isn't now. pnwmom Jul 2016 #49
He caucused with the Democrats for decades AgingAmerican Jul 2016 #63
Why do you keep asking me the same question that I already answered? pnwmom Jul 2016 #69
That's all well and good. woolldog Jul 2016 #83
Senator Sanders liberal from boston Jul 2016 #68
+1000 n/t Triana Jul 2016 #95
He's making himself irrelevant. Beacool Jul 2016 #14
^^^^^^^^^^ Peacetrain Jul 2016 #15
Just the opposite...he's making his and his backers concerns relevant LiberalLovinLug Jul 2016 #24
...!100++++ 840high Jul 2016 #38
I'm too scared to even comment on most of this. How this thread doesn't break some of the silvershadow Jul 2016 #77
Well said, I have always believed we need to first get our house in order instead of ... slipslidingaway Jul 2016 #82
+1000 n/t Triana Jul 2016 #96
This is a good point, he can push for his changes AND... AND be out campaigning with dems not making uponit7771 Jul 2016 #25
Good question, since he doesn't seem to view the Dems as being better than the R's. CrowCityDem Jul 2016 #16
Well, there's at least 13 million Dems who have the same, or similar, notion. -nt- NorthCarolina Jul 2016 #40
About 10.6 million and more of those Sanders supporters are now in Clinton's camp. seabeyond Jul 2016 #42
BS. Voting for her over Trump is not supporting or being in "her camp". Dawgs Jul 2016 #43
Supporting with a vote works for me. And ya, that puts them in Clinton's camp, seabeyond Jul 2016 #47
Some say. NorthCarolina Jul 2016 #93
No, polls say. Best info we have. seabeyond Jul 2016 #94
Thinking Demo are as bad as R's shows a complete lack of knowledge. CrowCityDem Jul 2016 #44
eh, I don't think it really matters anymore. KMOD Jul 2016 #19
Time to move on to the general and politely ignore The Second Stone Jul 2016 #20
I think most Democrats have already moved on. lapucelle Jul 2016 #30
He is like a guy who cosmicone Jul 2016 #23
How do you get away with posting this? rickford66 Jul 2016 #65
For the good of the party, not every obstructionist rule has to be followed cosmicone Jul 2016 #70
I care about the good of the country. 840high Jul 2016 #78
So do Hillary Clinton, Senator Warren and President Obama cosmicone Jul 2016 #80
Without doing a google search Trenzalore Jul 2016 #31
Too late for it to matter. He and his movement will not get an ounce of credit geek tragedy Jul 2016 #33
Maybe 'getting credit' isn't the objective. Triana Jul 2016 #97
Did it ever occur to you WE don't want any credit? Silver_Witch Jul 2016 #101
You will when it comes time to lobby Clinton and Congress. geek tragedy Jul 2016 #103
Never. fun n serious Jul 2016 #34
What's your rush? The convention will happen and then it's GE time. aikoaiko Jul 2016 #35
who?? zappaman Jul 2016 #39
Hah! Good question NastyRiffraff Jul 2016 #45
One wonders, doesn't one Hekate Jul 2016 #41
Who are these Democrats he is 'campaigning' against? AgingAmerican Jul 2016 #50
DWS fun n serious Jul 2016 #98
He is backing her Dem opponent AgingAmerican Jul 2016 #106
I have to ask.. fun n serious Jul 2016 #110
He's getting irrelevant fast Zambero Jul 2016 #54
This message was self-deleted by its author rjsquirrel Jul 2016 #59
When will you to stop campaigning against Sanders and start campaigning against Trump? AgingAmerican Jul 2016 #61
I think, never. nt Jitter65 Jul 2016 #64
He is helping out the Democrats by campaigning for local elections. Xyzse Jul 2016 #71
He's doing more harm now Johnny2X2X Jul 2016 #72
Post removed Post removed Jul 2016 #75
Hillary is campaigning against Trump every day. Elizabeth Warren, pnwmom Jul 2016 #79
If there are faults in the Dem party they Should be called out ... slipslidingaway Jul 2016 #81
During Hillary's Inagural Adress Night Watchman Jul 2016 #88
Let Bernie be Bernie! MoonRiver Jul 2016 #92
Would this post be removed if I write greiner3 Jul 2016 #102

BlueCaliDem

(15,438 posts)
1. When he clinches the Democratic Party's presidential nomination - and not before.
Mon Jul 4, 2016, 02:37 PM
Jul 2016


And no. I'm not joking. This is the sense I'm getting.

Response to woolldog (Original post)

 

La Lioness Priyanka

(53,866 posts)
4. Does it really matter? Where in clintons poll numbers is this really adversely affecting her?
Mon Jul 4, 2016, 02:39 PM
Jul 2016

The primaries are over. She decidedly won. He'll come around when and if he does, but he doesn't seem to be really affecting her negatively.

 

seabeyond

(110,159 posts)
5. I do not think he is affecting Clinton either. A couple weeks ago, 81% of his supporters, supported
Mon Jul 4, 2016, 02:41 PM
Jul 2016

Clinton.

 

La Lioness Priyanka

(53,866 posts)
8. Exactly. If he is not really hurting our chances
Mon Jul 4, 2016, 02:44 PM
Jul 2016

Let him do him. We need to focus on our nominee and work to get her elected.

 

woolldog

(8,791 posts)
11. It's annoying though.
Mon Jul 4, 2016, 02:49 PM
Jul 2016

And it's counterproductive in that it's probably forcing Clinton to the right to pick up Bernie's slack.

 

La Lioness Priyanka

(53,866 posts)
13. I guess I'm not paying attention to him
Mon Jul 4, 2016, 02:51 PM
Jul 2016

To me he is back to being the senator from Vermont and not being from Vermont, I'm not paying much attention to him.

kacekwl

(7,014 posts)
104. Nobody is FORCING Hillary to the right.
Tue Jul 5, 2016, 11:24 AM
Jul 2016

If 85% of his supporters are voting for her then no Right movement needed right? RIGHT ?

obamanut2012

(26,047 posts)
108. I agree, which is why I think he shouldn't get the leverage he's demanding
Tue Jul 5, 2016, 04:33 PM
Jul 2016

Warren, Obama, Biden, O'Malley......

kerry-is-my-prez

(8,133 posts)
112. The number of Sanders supporters who are not voting for the Dem candidate will have to be made
Tue Jul 5, 2016, 09:25 PM
Jul 2016

up somewhere. Looks like she's going after married suburban women who are usually Indys. If Sanders would have wholeheartedly endorsed Clinton and had been helping her campaign, more Sanders supporters would be voting for her. Clinton could have moved more to the left. Now she and the party ironically will have to go more to the center. I don't think he will ever endorse her and if he does it will be a very lukewarm endorsement.

 

coco77

(1,327 posts)
6. He is already
Mon Jul 4, 2016, 02:42 PM
Jul 2016

Has,I guess u want everyone to start worshipping so you can feel better, I can vote for the nominee nothing more. Feel better now?

pnwmom

(108,960 posts)
48. Why aren't his supporters going to Cleveland to protest?
Mon Jul 4, 2016, 07:38 PM
Jul 2016

Instead, they're renting campgrounds and planning to protest at the Democratic convention.

pnwmom

(108,960 posts)
55. I'm going to be supporting Democrats, not protesting Democrats. If these supposed
Mon Jul 4, 2016, 10:28 PM
Jul 2016

progressives are going to be protesting anywhere, they should be protesting Trump in Cleveland, not Hillary in Philly.

pnwmom

(108,960 posts)
57. No. I think supporting Hillary in a positive way is much more important.
Mon Jul 4, 2016, 10:31 PM
Jul 2016

And that the so-called progressives who are protesting Hillary instead of Bernie are deeply misguided.

pnwmom

(108,960 posts)
90. I don't know a single person who's only voting FOR her because of her gender.
Tue Jul 5, 2016, 08:11 AM
Jul 2016

She has decades of work for families under her belt, as well as terms as Senator of NY and Secretary of State. There's no one more qualified than she is -- completely apart from her gender.

But I've heard enough misogyny to know that there are plenty of men who have a problem with it.

 

Silver_Witch

(1,820 posts)
99. It has nothing to do with gender...
Tue Jul 5, 2016, 10:47 AM
Jul 2016

Much more to do with bringing people to "heel" ....

Bernie supports Hillary Clinton. He has said so loud and clear. He has other work to do which has nothing to do with the Presidential election. Like stopping prisons for profit or making sure the TPP is not passed.

Clinton has a lock on this election and as many here have posted you don't need Bernie or his supporters so we will do the other work that needs done to help the party stay to the left and for the people and you can continue to celebrate your victory! She is yours, party about her win and stop grousing!

pnwmom

(108,960 posts)
91. Because large numbers of his supporters plan to protest in Philly.
Tue Jul 5, 2016, 08:13 AM
Jul 2016

I don't know why they are going there to protest when the real enemy of all of us will be in Cleveland the week before.

The priorities of those supposed progressives seem awfully strange.

zazen

(2,978 posts)
7. When will Whigs campaign against the Tories?!!?
Mon Jul 4, 2016, 02:42 PM
Jul 2016

World history and events are a little more complex than a corporate-controlled two-party system. Thank God people were willing to think outside the Whig/Tory duopoly or we'd still be operating according to the politics of late Stuart England.

stopbush

(24,393 posts)
9. We're seeing in real time why Sanders has been so ineffective in Congress.
Mon Jul 4, 2016, 02:47 PM
Jul 2016

He knows better than all, he's pure, they're not, etc etc.

From the beginning to the never ending, with Sanders, it's all about Sanders.

David__77

(23,335 posts)
10. I don't consider advocacy of a political program to be "tearing down."
Mon Jul 4, 2016, 02:47 PM
Jul 2016

The Democratic Party contains diverse forces and not a disciplined, centralized membership organization like many European parties. I imagine that Sanders will have much to say in the period ahead about the Republican candidates.

Dems2002

(509 posts)
12. He already is...
Mon Jul 4, 2016, 02:50 PM
Jul 2016

I realize that many people don't get it, but as a political consultant with over fifteen years of experience actually winning campaigns (90% success rate), what Bernie is attempting to do is to HELP the Democrats win.

The party leaders may block his efforts, but that doesn't mean what Bernie is doing is wrong. He is trying to get the party to take extraordinarily popular positions with mainstream America. He is not hurting the party by pushing these positions, the party leadership is hurting the party by supporting toxic agreements like TPP and our current healthcare system that allows corporations to bilk us.

People, left and right and center, recognize that the system is inherently corrupt and working against the average person. One only has to pay the slightest bit of attention to see this fact.

I support changing the Democratic Party from within as our best path.

 

woolldog

(8,791 posts)
18. Isn't he a sitting senator?
Mon Jul 4, 2016, 03:01 PM
Jul 2016

Why is a sitting senator fooling around with a campaign platform when he has the power to make and enact policy as a senator? Isn't that kind of odd? Like can you imagine Obama caring about the Democratic Party platform and devoting lots of time and energy to it while he's President?

Dems2002

(509 posts)
29. Do you know how Congress works?
Mon Jul 4, 2016, 03:39 PM
Jul 2016

Let's see. We are heading into the Presidential Election. The Republican held Senate has refused to hold hearings for Obama's nominee this entire year. There is pretty much nothing that can be accomplished from the left until after January 5 when the new Congress is sworn in.

The biggest piece of legislation that could come up in the Senate prior to January 5 is the TPP which Senator Sanders vehemently opposes. It is a disaster for average Americans supported only by our business elites who do not care about us.

There is a real threat that this will come up during the lame duck session and it will be approved primarily by Republicans with a few Democratic traitors signing on.

NOW is the time to discuss this disastrous legislation. When there is still a slight chance to prevent it from being approved.

 

AgingAmerican

(12,958 posts)
52. Because as the Democratic runner up, it is his job to do so
Mon Jul 4, 2016, 10:17 PM
Jul 2016

Why is Debbie Wasserman Schultz fooling around with running the DNC when she has the power to make and enact policy as a Senator?

See how silly your question is?

 

woolldog

(8,791 posts)
66. I just think that as a sitting senator
Mon Jul 4, 2016, 11:20 PM
Jul 2016

There would be more consequential things he could do with his time aside from working on something so silly as a platform, one that is non binding and no one reads anyway.

I mean he could be making speeches on the senate floor, proposing and refining real legislation, making alliances with his fellow senators etc.

Exilednight

(9,359 posts)
87. She's still a lawmaker. Her job is even more important
Tue Jul 5, 2016, 07:45 AM
Jul 2016

Since she is a leader in the Democratic Party and all spending bills, by law, must originate in the House.

LiberalLovinLug

(14,165 posts)
21. + 1000
Mon Jul 4, 2016, 03:08 PM
Jul 2016

And some of these posts could be breaking the new DU rules

"Don't bash Democratic public figures"

Its not enough for some to have backed the presumptive winning candidate, they must also bash not only a Democratic candidate but more importantly 46% of their fellow Democrats concerns as well. Talk about divisive.

The process is working. Bernie and his supporters will obviously have to concede on some points (unfortunately for everyone) but eventually, after the convention, I am confident Bernie will focus his attentions on helping the Democrats defeat Trump. But until then, he has a job to to. And 46% of Democrats expect and encourage him.

Response to woolldog (Reply #36)

uponit7771

(90,304 posts)
32. The last dem election is proof that a majority of dems don't want him as a standard bearer and
Mon Jul 4, 2016, 03:42 PM
Jul 2016

... now he doesn't have anything to bargain with including down ballot funds which he has raised comparatively little.

When was it ever that the person who the majority of people did NOT want gets to set standards for the majority of people?

Waste of time and resources

 

AgingAmerican

(12,958 posts)
53. The DNC and MSM decided to step in and throw a wrench into the works
Mon Jul 4, 2016, 10:19 PM
Jul 2016

And attempt to block his campaign at every turn.

Had they not done so, many believe he would have won handily.

uponit7771

(90,304 posts)
60. These kind of claims have not only been debunked ad nausea but it relays a mindset not to give
Mon Jul 4, 2016, 10:54 PM
Jul 2016

... the girl her props... she won by nearly 4 million votes and the Sanders team decided not to compete in the Southern States (their own words) where at least he could've kept it close.

Sanders lost, the majority of dems want Clinton and it has little to nothing to do with the MSM those are facts and not just baseless claims

 

AgingAmerican

(12,958 posts)
62. They didn't even try to hide it
Mon Jul 4, 2016, 10:56 PM
Jul 2016

I know you will never admit it, but that's exactly what they did.

And that, in a nutshell, answers your inquiry.

 

BobbyDrake

(2,542 posts)
85. Must be easier to blame everyone else than analyze Sanders' shortcomings, huh?
Tue Jul 5, 2016, 06:14 AM
Jul 2016

Scapegoating won't change his limited message and narrow appeal.

But if progressives want to fail to evolve, and just let themselves be marginalized because they can't work well with others, well, thats your choice. Own it.

pnwmom

(108,960 posts)
49. Bunk. He's never identified as a Democrat before and he isn't now.
Mon Jul 4, 2016, 07:39 PM
Jul 2016

Why isn't he encouraging his supporters to protest in Cleveland instead of in Philadelphia -- where the Dems will be voting on a platform that his own committee members approved?

 

AgingAmerican

(12,958 posts)
63. He caucused with the Democrats for decades
Mon Jul 4, 2016, 11:00 PM
Jul 2016

Thus he is a de facto Democrat. Also, he is a small d democrat.

Will you be protesting in Cleveland?

pnwmom

(108,960 posts)
69. Why do you keep asking me the same question that I already answered?
Mon Jul 4, 2016, 11:43 PM
Jul 2016

This is the third time you've asked the same question, and I'll give you the same answer.

I'm taking positive action FOR Hillary, not protesting anywhere.

Can you stop asking now or are you trying to repeat yourself on purpose for some reason?

And you're wrong about him being a Democrat before. Until last year, he consistently identified himself as an independent and a Democratic Socialist. Like Joe Lieberman (after he left the party) Sanders caucused with the Democrats but didn't identify himself as one.

Beacool

(30,247 posts)
14. He's making himself irrelevant.
Mon Jul 4, 2016, 02:54 PM
Jul 2016

He's holding the platform's agenda over the party's heads. He could push for what he believes in and still be out there campaigning for Democrats. Instead, he seems to only be in attack mode against fellow Democrats and mentions Trump as an afterthought.

LiberalLovinLug

(14,165 posts)
24. Just the opposite...he's making his and his backers concerns relevant
Mon Jul 4, 2016, 03:19 PM
Jul 2016

But you know that of course. So sorry that all the spotlights are not all beaming on Hillary all the time.

Have a little respect for 46% of your fellow Democrats please. Don't worry it will all be over soon. But until then he is working for many Democrats concerns and making sure they get a voice too. Why is this such a big problem.

You'll get your big piece of cake soon. If Bernie manages to sneak in some spinach or zucchini into the cake recipe for the countries well being in the meantime so what? Its not going to kill you, and the winning team will probably just pick out the little green pieces afterwards anyways.

 

silvershadow

(10,336 posts)
77. I'm too scared to even comment on most of this. How this thread doesn't break some of the
Tue Jul 5, 2016, 01:09 AM
Jul 2016

new rules in letter and spirit is beyond me. I just don't even know what to say anymore. I see others are taking wide latitude, so I will just watch for awhile.

slipslidingaway

(21,210 posts)
82. Well said, I have always believed we need to first get our house in order instead of ...
Tue Jul 5, 2016, 03:22 AM
Jul 2016

glaring at another person's fault.

We can shout that their boat is sinking, but we have we looked at our own?

uponit7771

(90,304 posts)
25. This is a good point, he can push for his changes AND... AND be out campaigning with dems not making
Mon Jul 4, 2016, 03:32 PM
Jul 2016

... one dependent on the other.

 

NorthCarolina

(11,197 posts)
93. Some say.
Tue Jul 5, 2016, 09:11 AM
Jul 2016

I'd be quite surprised if there were any real truth to it, but it's more than likely "media truth".

 

KMOD

(7,906 posts)
19. eh, I don't think it really matters anymore.
Mon Jul 4, 2016, 03:02 PM
Jul 2016

She has plenty of big hitters excited to hit the campaign trail with her.

lapucelle

(18,190 posts)
30. I think most Democrats have already moved on.
Mon Jul 4, 2016, 03:40 PM
Jul 2016

The media certainly has. The general public perception of Sanders seems to have entered the "crackpot uncle" phase.

On the rare occasions that Sanders gets a mention, the question seems to be "what does he want?' And you never hear the answer "to make things better".





 

cosmicone

(11,014 posts)
23. He is like a guy who
Mon Jul 4, 2016, 03:11 PM
Jul 2016

talks to people on the platform about his upcoming train ride, not realizing that the train has left the station an hour ago.

rickford66

(5,522 posts)
65. How do you get away with posting this?
Mon Jul 4, 2016, 11:13 PM
Jul 2016

I got banned for mentioning that Hillary was once a Goldwater Girl. Why can many of you make disparaging comments about Bernie? If he's irrelevant, why don't you all move on? You may not like it, but he's not doing anything illegal and he's following the rules. He doesn't realize the train already left the station? How did Hillary get on the train?

 

cosmicone

(11,014 posts)
70. For the good of the party, not every obstructionist rule has to be followed
Mon Jul 4, 2016, 11:49 PM
Jul 2016

It is all obstructing the democratic party's chances in November by attacking the party or hamstringing it with unpalatable positions for the GE electorate. Why the shenanigans of protesting against your own convention when you had a democratic way of getting what you wanted?

 

cosmicone

(11,014 posts)
80. So do Hillary Clinton, Senator Warren and President Obama
Tue Jul 5, 2016, 02:27 AM
Jul 2016

No one has an exclusivity on caring for the country and the insinuation that the unnecessary platform fight is about the "good of the country" is pernicious if not downright nefarious.

Trenzalore

(2,331 posts)
31. Without doing a google search
Mon Jul 4, 2016, 03:42 PM
Jul 2016

Can anyone honestly remember anything in the 2012 democratic platform?

I can understand him fighting on, but not for such a meaningless thing as the platform.

Really should be devoting his energy to the Rules Committee. That is where precedent is set for 2020.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
33. Too late for it to matter. He and his movement will not get an ounce of credit
Mon Jul 4, 2016, 03:54 PM
Jul 2016

for electoral success in November, regardless of what he does at this point.

 

Triana

(22,666 posts)
97. Maybe 'getting credit' isn't the objective.
Tue Jul 5, 2016, 09:52 AM
Jul 2016

Maybe being successful (by actually standing up for the wishes of the majority of the members of the party ie: NO TPP) is the objective.

Sanders strikes me as the type of guy who wants success, not credit. If he succeeds in helping to stop the TPP from passing during the lame duck period post-election, that will be a benefit to all of us.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
103. You will when it comes time to lobby Clinton and Congress.
Tue Jul 5, 2016, 11:23 AM
Jul 2016

The LGBT movement threw their weight and money behind Obama, and were in a position to push him hard on their issues. Withdrawing their support--politically and financially--was serious leverage.

Zambero

(8,962 posts)
54. He's getting irrelevant fast
Mon Jul 4, 2016, 10:27 PM
Jul 2016

The major focus has shifted to the two major candidates. Bernie's supporters are more than capable of weighing in on how a President Trump would would impact this country and humanity as a whole. I am confident that most of them don't want to go there, with or without further instructions from Bernie.

Response to Zambero (Reply #54)

 

AgingAmerican

(12,958 posts)
61. When will you to stop campaigning against Sanders and start campaigning against Trump?
Mon Jul 4, 2016, 10:55 PM
Jul 2016

The primaries are over, in case you didn't know.

Xyzse

(8,217 posts)
71. He is helping out the Democrats by campaigning for local elections.
Tue Jul 5, 2016, 12:40 AM
Jul 2016

In essence, that is working to defeat Trump and improve the general make-up of the Democratic party.

One does not have to brown-nose Hillary to support Democrats. Nor do I think that he should.

I don't see the point of endorsing Clinton as one can support progressive ideals and Democrats as he goes.
Hillary Clinton is not the Democratic party, and if one notes, he attacks unfair policies, as he always has.

I don't see this as helping the campaign whatsoever, merely another call out to those who are having a hard time as is with the idea of voting for Clinton.

Perhaps it is better to discuss how her policies would help the general populace.
If unable or limited in doing that, then concentrate on calling Trump a loser. That should not be too high a bar.

The idea is to bring people to accept her and want to vote for her. This, this merely makes people want to dig in their heels more.
In the end, America will get the President it deserves.

Local is where I think damage can be mitigated and probably the best way to help. That is where I am helping.

So to answer, he is already helping Democrats, and has been for a while. He has attacked Republicans for their policies, as he attacks policies. I guess, it just hurts because some of those unfair policies are being fought for by Democrats as well. It is basically the complaint many Democrats point towards Republicans. (Republicans love America like a child loves their parent, blind, trusting and can do no wrong... Democrats love America like an adult, willing to look at the flaws, and work with them to see how to make things better.) The Democratic party is getting help from Sanders, probably not the help they want, but the help they need.(i.e. Helping Local Races, Endorsing Progressive Candidates that are willing to transform the Democratic party from within, attacking Republican policies, and pointing out where Democrats can do better.)

Johnny2X2X

(18,973 posts)
72. He's doing more harm now
Tue Jul 5, 2016, 12:49 AM
Jul 2016

I voted for Sanders and have been a supporter of his for a couple decades, but he is causing harm to his cause now. His ideas are as American as apple pie, but this has to stop. At this point he is going to hurt his causes because he is hurting the party he belongs to. He's acting like a spoiled child.

Response to woolldog (Original post)

pnwmom

(108,960 posts)
79. Hillary is campaigning against Trump every day. Elizabeth Warren,
Tue Jul 5, 2016, 02:21 AM
Jul 2016

Tom Perez, Sherrod Brown and others are out there fighting Trump.

President Obama is about to join them.

Bernie's the major figure who hasn't joined them. It doesn't make sense that he wouldn't want to help them fight Trump.

slipslidingaway

(21,210 posts)
81. If there are faults in the Dem party they Should be called out ...
Tue Jul 5, 2016, 03:18 AM
Jul 2016

in case you have not realized it yet, many long established Dems feel the party is leaving them! He is trying to bridge that gap to make the possibility of voting for Clinton more palatable.

The Dem party is losing it, they are casting aside long time members while doing little to bring in new members.

Warren flipped beliefs so quickly it was as if one was turning a pancake. Sanders rightfully knows that he has also attracted many independent voters and if flipped too soon they will just melt away. But he is also trying to bring about real change, this is not a struggle between Dem and Repub, it is a struggle of power and wealth in both parties against the people.

Sanders understands the incremental changes that are needed, you fight for every last bit you can get and to advance an issue, this is an area in which the Dems are sorely lacking. We should not always bend over backwards and go along with their wishes.

Which Dems fought against invading Iraq, which has now turned the ME into a hell hole with millions affected. Why do they hate us, that was a horrible mistake and No, one cannot just say it was a mistake and move on, those actions have and deep and lasting consequences!

I would think what he is doing should be obvious to most, he called Trump a pathological liar months ago, so please do not pretend that his words are just to tear down Dems, pay attention!!!

But he has some real differences with the way Dems have given lip service to their members and many Dems and Independents do as well, just holding up a D or R banner does not cut it anymore.

If you want to continue and alienate potential voters for the Dem party then continue to espouse these beliefs, but I feel this is the wrong direction.






Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»When is Sanders going to ...