Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
Tue Jun 14, 2016, 02:29 PM Jun 2016

Walmart, for Victory!



WHY CLINTON AND (JEBTHRO) BUSH ARE NOW IN THE POCKETS OF WALMART, CHEVRON AND GOLDMAN SACHS

FRI, 7/17/2015 - BY PAUL LEWIS AND WILL TUCKER
THIS ARTICLE ORIGINALLY APPEARED ON THE GUARDIAN (Link below)

EXCERPT...

Disclosures to the Federal Election Commission reveal how lobbyists for Walmart, Chevron, Facebook and Goldman Sachs have been acting as fundraising captains for Clinton and Bush, bundling donations to channel to the two frontrunners.

CONTINUED...



Clinton and Bush campaign war chests filled with help of corporate lobbyists

Analysis of FEC documents reveal scale of donations from lobbyists including Walmart and Goldman Sachs, which could pay dividends after the election

FTNTTC: Walmart is where Big Money is. Its example precisely shows the concentration of capital over the past 36 years. While Walmart isn't the only corporation in the article and links, its example tells the story of government since Reagan and Trickle Down Voodoo Economics, where policies in Washington benefit the rich over everyone else, including the capital created by the labor of the many flooding into the pockets of the few at the top. They use small fractions of pennies on the dollar to buy the influence needed to keep it that way.
62 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Walmart, for Victory! (Original Post) Octafish Jun 2016 OP
one more day.....n/t chillfactor Jun 2016 #1
Anything to say about the post? Octafish Jun 2016 #3
That's it. Get it out of your system. Maru Kitteh Jun 2016 #9
Nothing to get out. It's called free expression of ideas. Octafish Jun 2016 #10
Only business laserhaas Jun 2016 #12
The Press Octafish Jun 2016 #15
Did they consider it a business laserhaas Jun 2016 #17
Well, it's the news business... Octafish Jun 2016 #20
What is destroying this country is people looking the other way when they are confronted with the insta8er Jun 2016 #42
That's something you'll see demonstrated here very well... MrMickeysMom Jun 2016 #56
It's not walmarts job to raise the minimum wage, it's Congress. Congress knows underpaid americans Sunlei Jun 2016 #19
Please tell me you are not defending WalMart? Silver_Witch Jun 2016 #29
sure it's a moral duty but it's congresses JOB to raise federal minimum wage. Sunlei Jun 2016 #40
I thought Walmart increased the wages of all their employees yeoman6987 Jun 2016 #55
Truths won't disappear despite DU restrictions. panader0 Jun 2016 #4
^^^^^^ This times 10 ^^^^^ laserhaas Jun 2016 #13
... to the 10th power. closeupready Jun 2016 #22
+ eighty gazillion Scuba Jun 2016 #21
Infinity... bobthedrummer Jun 2016 #23
:) Infinity ...Plus 1 laserhaas Jun 2016 #24
...!100++++ 840high Jun 2016 #32
Thank you. nt dflprincess Jun 2016 #52
Time form e to leave this cesspool, where progressives have become an endangered species. zonkers Jun 2016 #60
This countdown of yours is so tiresome! 7wo7rees Jun 2016 #5
Yup...only the oppressive delight in oppressing laserhaas Jun 2016 #18
Help me I being oppressed on the Intertubes! snooper2 Jun 2016 #28
Why should you waste your beautiful mind, eh? RufusTFirefly Jun 2016 #53
I have seen all those posters on the walls telling us how jwirr Jun 2016 #2
That is an interesting question. I wonder if those on their Board of Directors knows the answer? Octafish Jun 2016 #6
This is really tiresome, you know. MineralMan Jun 2016 #7
What part is tiresome? Octafish Jun 2016 #8
It IS tiresome....We need to change politics so we have better choices Armstead Jun 2016 #11
We have a better choice with Bernie Sanders laserhaas Jun 2016 #16
It's called "an election". Sanders lost it Tarc Jun 2016 #26
Actually...the appropriate term laserhaas Jun 2016 #31
I do not think that word means what you think it means Tarc Jun 2016 #35
Votes weren't counted..polli g places blocked laserhaas Jun 2016 #36
This is not even remotely true Tarc Jun 2016 #38
It is highly disingeuous that Hillarians aren't complaining laserhaas Jun 2016 #50
K&R-lay down and take a snooze then MM, here's a tune for everyone that's "tired" bobthedrummer Jun 2016 #14
The Treatment Octafish Jun 2016 #34
When you tell sheep that they are sheep..they respond laserhaas Jun 2016 #41
Not as tiresome (and dishonest) as the 5 month pep fest dflprincess Jun 2016 #54
7/17/2015, running out of new material, so it's time to recycle old ones? Tarc Jun 2016 #25
If everybody knows it, how come no one talks about it? Octafish Jun 2016 #39
You tried playing this class warfare card in the primary Tarc Jun 2016 #43
Who do you think is winning the ''class warfare''? Octafish Jun 2016 #46
Pictures of Kissinger coming next? Clintons and Trump? Tarc Jun 2016 #47
Stating the facts isn't ''bashing.'' Octafish Jun 2016 #49
^^^^^^ This times 10 ^^^^^ laserhaas Jun 2016 #51
Actually that stupid Henry Ford quote is bullshit- He paid $5 a day so the didn't quit snooper2 Jun 2016 #27
You do know all jobs and hours SUCKED ass back then - right? Silver_Witch Jun 2016 #30
Tick Tock Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #33
BOOM laserhaas Jun 2016 #37
Tick tock...nt SidDithers Jun 2016 #44
Don't #bernout just yet MyNameGoesHere Jun 2016 #45
Don't forget, it costs the local community about a million dollars a year for each pdsimdars Jun 2016 #48
as demonstrated by Gilens and Page. "U.S. No Longer An Actual Democracy" Agony Jun 2016 #57
$5 Billion in Political Contributions Bought Wall Street Freedom from Regulation, Restraint Octafish Jun 2016 #58
that 12 point checklist is golden Agony Jun 2016 #61
Clinton's Wall Street backers: We get it bobthedrummer Jun 2016 #59
The Clinton's controversial foundation (The Week June 2015) bobthedrummer Jun 2016 #62

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
10. Nothing to get out. It's called free expression of ideas.
Tue Jun 14, 2016, 03:10 PM
Jun 2016


What is the only business named in the entire Constitution?

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
15. The Press
Tue Jun 14, 2016, 03:20 PM
Jun 2016
AMENDMENT I: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
20. Well, it's the news business...
Tue Jun 14, 2016, 03:30 PM
Jun 2016

...Ben Franklin and Tom Paine used it to spread the words about liberty and stuff.

Artists and scholars, at least it seems until recently, were wont to appreciate Guttenberg.

In my grandparents' time, the Press included the radio and television broadcasting that made mass media possible.

In my time, it has expanded through satellite communication to encompass new media like the Internet.

The essential idea behind them all, from our Founders' day to this moment: What is essential to Democracy, to the Bill of Rights, the Constitution, our Republic, and to our future is learning, knowing and sharing the truth.

It's how we shape what matters in the present day to form the future.

 

insta8er

(960 posts)
42. What is destroying this country is people looking the other way when they are confronted with the
Tue Jun 14, 2016, 04:29 PM
Jun 2016

cold hard truth. But hey...at least they can call her Madam President!!!

MrMickeysMom

(20,453 posts)
56. That's something you'll see demonstrated here very well...
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 06:53 AM
Jun 2016

Kicking your post, insta8er...

Any time expression of what is going on contrary to the coronation and rigged vote counting is met with the asinine, "one more day" response, or "get over it".

Just what do they think people in the United States should get used to here, again?

The personality parade here has revealed itself so well.

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
19. It's not walmarts job to raise the minimum wage, it's Congress. Congress knows underpaid americans
Tue Jun 14, 2016, 03:27 PM
Jun 2016

can get foodstamps & welfare and medicalcare, legal government benefits.

Congress can raise the minimum wage anytime they want.

 

Silver_Witch

(1,820 posts)
29. Please tell me you are not defending WalMart?
Tue Jun 14, 2016, 04:05 PM
Jun 2016

Seriously - you don't think paying workers a living wage is a moral duty of every company? You don't think WalMart should have respect for their employee...or do you think Corporate Welfare is okay - but free college is just a bunch of TAKERS wanting free stuff.

 

yeoman6987

(14,449 posts)
55. I thought Walmart increased the wages of all their employees
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 06:41 AM
Jun 2016

Perhaps it's time for other corporations to follow suit.

7wo7rees

(5,128 posts)
5. This countdown of yours is so tiresome!
Tue Jun 14, 2016, 02:36 PM
Jun 2016

One more day and no more truth, is that it? No more posts from Octafish will be allowed?

This op would get locked? I sure as hell hope not or I imagine there will be a much larger exodus than you may be hoping for "chill"!

RufusTFirefly

(8,812 posts)
53. Why should you waste your beautiful mind, eh?
Tue Jun 14, 2016, 11:02 PM
Jun 2016


After all, it's just Walmart workers. I'll bet they don't even belong to the Club!

jwirr

(39,215 posts)
2. I have seen all those posters on the walls telling us how
Tue Jun 14, 2016, 02:34 PM
Jun 2016

much money the employees of Walmart have given to various charities. I have also seen that these donations may no be voluntarily.

So are the Walmart workers forced to donate to the Walmart politicians?

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
6. That is an interesting question. I wonder if those on their Board of Directors knows the answer?
Tue Jun 14, 2016, 02:42 PM
Jun 2016

You know who was on the Board? Hillary Clinton!



Clinton Remained Silent As Wal-Mart Fought Unions

By BRIAN ROSS MADDY SAUER
RHONDA SCHWARTZ
ABC News, Jan. 31, 2008

In six years as a member of the Wal-Mart board of directors, between 1986 and 1992, Hillary Clinton remained silent as the world's largest retailer waged a major campaign against labor unions seeking to represent store workers.

Clinton has been endorsed for president by more than a dozen unions, according to her campaign Web site, which omits any reference to her role at Wal-Mart in its detailed biography of her.

Wal-Mart's anti-union efforts were headed by one of Clinton's fellow board members, John Tate, a Wal-Mart executive vice president who also served on the board with Clinton for four of her six years.

Tate was fond of repeating, as he did at a managers meeting in 2004 after his retirement, what he said was his favorite phrase, "Labor unions are nothing but blood-sucking parasites living off the productive labor of people who work for a living."

Wal-Mart says Tate's comments "were his own and do not reflect Wal-Mart's views."

But Wal-Mart founder Sam Walton and other company officials often recounted how they relied on Tate to lead the company's successful anti-union efforts.

CONTINUED...

http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/clinton-remained-silent-wal-mart-fought-unions/story?id=4218509



I visited opensecrets.org, but had a bit of trouble finding anything specific on 2016. Nice overview, of sorts, but needs some TLC. One article linked back to The Guardian piece in the OP.
 

laserhaas

(7,805 posts)
16. We have a better choice with Bernie Sanders
Tue Jun 14, 2016, 03:20 PM
Jun 2016

And the entire main stream..DNC and every other powers that be have united to keep him from having a fair chance

Tarc

(10,476 posts)
26. It's called "an election". Sanders lost it
Tue Jun 14, 2016, 03:48 PM
Jun 2016

It is time to accept that and move on, rather than screaming "foul!" to explain why more people picked another candidate rather than your favorite one.

Tarc

(10,476 posts)
35. I do not think that word means what you think it means
Tue Jun 14, 2016, 04:18 PM
Jun 2016

Voters voted.
A candidate won.
A candidate lost.

It isn't more complicated than that.

 

laserhaas

(7,805 posts)
36. Votes weren't counted..polli g places blocked
Tue Jun 14, 2016, 04:22 PM
Jun 2016

System rigged

No matter how much you gloat in the outcome

It is tainted

Oppressively

Tarc

(10,476 posts)
38. This is not even remotely true
Tue Jun 14, 2016, 04:24 PM
Jun 2016

Except in Arizona, where the Republicans closed down many polling places...which hurt Hillary more than Bernie...there has been no election fraud. The Sanders campaign has filed no challenges to any state's results, which shows that that the pro-Sanders bloggerverse really has no substance to their outlandish complaints.

 

laserhaas

(7,805 posts)
50. It is highly disingeuous that Hillarians aren't complaining
Tue Jun 14, 2016, 10:53 PM
Jun 2016

Because they like the outcome

If the situations were reversed..you'd be calling for Bernie's head..on a platter

dflprincess

(28,086 posts)
54. Not as tiresome (and dishonest) as the 5 month pep fest
Tue Jun 14, 2016, 11:04 PM
Jun 2016

that's about to begin here.

Apparently anyone who pulls their head out of the sand and comments on what they see won't last long - no matter how valid their points may be.

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
39. If everybody knows it, how come no one talks about it?
Tue Jun 14, 2016, 04:26 PM
Jun 2016


Here's more Old News:



Billionaire Bonanza: The Forbes 400 and the Rest of Us

Wealthiest 20 people own more wealth than half the American population


BY CHUCK COLLINS AND JOSH HOXIE
Institute for Policy Studies-IPS, DECEMBER 1, 2015.

This report exposes the extreme wealth concentrated within the fortunes of the 400 wealthiest Americans and compares this wealth to the much more meager assets of several different segments of American society.

The report proposes several solutions to close the growing gap between the ultra wealthy and the rest of the country. These policies include closing offshore tax havens and billionaire loopholes in the tax code that the wealthy exploit to hide their wealth.

The report also proposes a direct tax on wealth to break up the concentration of wealth and generate trillions of dollars in new revenue to invest in wealth building opportunities for working families.

SNIP...

KEY FINDINGS:

* America’s 20 wealthiest people — a group that could fit comfortably in one single Gulfstream G650 luxury jet –­ now own more wealth than the bottom half of the American population combined, a total of 152 million people in 57 million households.

* The Forbes 400 now own about as much wealth as the nation’s entire African-American population ­– plus more than a third of the Latino population ­– combined.

* The wealthiest 100 households now own about as much wealth as the entire African American population in the United States. Among the Forbes 400, just 2 individuals are African American –­ Oprah Winfrey and Robert Smith.

* The wealthiest 186 members of the Forbes 400 own as much wealth as the entire Latino population. Just five members of the Forbes 400 are Latino including Jorge Perez, Arturo Moreno, and three members of the Santo Domingo family.

* With a combined worth of $2.34 trillion, the Forbes 400 own more wealth than the bottom 61 percent of the country combined, a staggering 194 million people.

* The median American family has a net worth of $81,000. The Forbes 400 own more wealth than 36 million of these typical American families. That’s as many households in the United States that own cats.


We believe that these statistics actually underestimate our current national levels of wealth concentration. The growing use of offshore tax havens and legal trusts has made the concealing of assets much more widespread than ever before.

CONTINUED...

http://www.ips-dc.org/billionaire-bonanza/



Honestly, how many people know the Waltons were enriched by the policies of the first Bush, the first Clinton, the second Bush and now the Obama administrations? Not many, from what I can tell.

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
46. Who do you think is winning the ''class warfare''?
Tue Jun 14, 2016, 05:46 PM
Jun 2016

Let's ask Phil Gramm and his employees Bill Clinton and George W Bush over at UBS.



After his exit from the US Senate, Phil Gramm immediately found a job at Swiss bank UBS as its Vice Chairman. Gramm today works in the Wealth Management department, where he brought on, among others, former President Bill Clinton, former pretzeldent George W Bush and one James Carville. They work in Wealth Management:



See for you'self.

It's a Buy-Partisan Who's Who:

President William J. Clinton
President George W. Bush Heh heh heh.
Robert J. McCann
James Carville
John V. Miller
Paula D. Polito
Anthony Roth
Mike Ryan
John Savercool

SOURCE: http://financialservicesinc.ubs.com/revitalizingamerica/SenatorPhilGramm.html


Who would have thought President Clinton and Sen. Gramm -- the two key figures in repealing Glass-Steagall -- would work together in Wealth Management at a Swiss bank?

Since the New Deal, Glass-Steagall had protected the US taxpayer from the Wall Street casino by law. After its repeal, the US taxpayer got put on the hook for, among other things, the most recent $16 trillion Wall Street bailout.

In September 2008 on DU2 I described the situation: Know your BFEE: Phil Gramm, the Meyer Lansky of the War Party, Set-Up the Biggest Bank Heist Ever.

Those interested may also enjoy what Robert Scheer thinks about Phil Gramm.



https://panamapapers.icij.org/20160403-panama-papers-global-overview.html

Until the Panama Papers, this information wasn't much interest to the USA's "news media." They don't like to disturb their owners and operators any more than they have to.

Tarc

(10,476 posts)
47. Pictures of Kissinger coming next? Clintons and Trump?
Tue Jun 14, 2016, 05:49 PM
Jun 2016

The majority of voters do not buy your arguments. We had an election; you lost.

Time to move on. The Hillary-bashing will be coming to a close on the DU in a very short while.

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
49. Stating the facts isn't ''bashing.''
Tue Jun 14, 2016, 06:36 PM
Jun 2016

As a US Senator, Phil Gramm led the charge to repeal Glass Steagall.
As President Bill Clinton signed the repeal of Glass Steagall into law.

After leaving office, Phil Gramm took the job as vice chair of UBS, a Swiss bank notorious for all manner of crime.

After the banks went belly up on derivatives in 2008, the US taxpayer was on the hook.
UBS in the bailout got billions, courtesy of the US taxpayer.
Today, Phil Gramm, Bill Clinton and George W Bush work in Wealth Management at UBS.

Maybe you got yours, Tarc, I don't know, but I don't like it when people cash in on their government service, especially when me and my fellow US taxpayers are on the hook for their looted trillions.

 

snooper2

(30,151 posts)
27. Actually that stupid Henry Ford quote is bullshit- He paid $5 a day so the didn't quit
Tue Jun 14, 2016, 03:51 PM
Jun 2016

because working 9 hour shifts 6 days a week in his shitty factories sucked ass...

 

Silver_Witch

(1,820 posts)
30. You do know all jobs and hours SUCKED ass back then - right?
Tue Jun 14, 2016, 04:09 PM
Jun 2016

Until UNIONs forced employers to treat people like humans?

Demsrule86

(68,715 posts)
33. Tick Tock
Tue Jun 14, 2016, 04:13 PM
Jun 2016

Old useless article...you want to get rid of money in politics...elect Democrats and fix the Supremes...until all parties have to raise money...course Bernie needs no money since he lost the primary and is going exactly nowhere...what is your motivation...this only helps Trump.

 

pdsimdars

(6,007 posts)
48. Don't forget, it costs the local community about a million dollars a year for each
Tue Jun 14, 2016, 05:52 PM
Jun 2016

WalMart store. That's in lost taxes and also all the government assistance WalMart employees get because they aren't paid enough to live on.

Agony

(2,605 posts)
57. as demonstrated by Gilens and Page. "U.S. No Longer An Actual Democracy"
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 07:16 AM
Jun 2016
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewire/princeton-experts-say-us-no-longer-democracy

Asking "[w]Who really rules?" researchers Martin Gilens and Benjamin I. Page argues that over the past few decades America's political system has slowly transformed from a democracy into an oligarchy, where wealthy elites wield most power.

Using data drawn from over 1,800 different policy initiatives from 1981 to 2002, the two conclude that rich, well-connected individuals on the political scene now steer the direction of the country, regardless of or even against the will of the majority of voters.


Thomas Frank lays it out WRT to the Democratic Party in "Listen, Liberal What ever happened to the party of the people?"
Nonetheless, even with his condemnation of the direction of his Party and Clintonism in particular, he feels trapped into voting for Hillary...

http://listenliberal.com

Hillary needs to address the phenomenon Gilens and Page describe directly and forthrightly if she is to get the support of Sanders Democrats. Given how thoroughly Frank ties her to this problem she has a lot of work to do so that we don't end up with Trump.

Octafish

(55,745 posts)
58. $5 Billion in Political Contributions Bought Wall Street Freedom from Regulation, Restraint
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 09:04 AM
Jun 2016

The Republic, Justice and Democracy depend on Truth. Something you should know about the effects of money thereupon:



$5 BILLION IN POLITICAL CONTRIBUTIONS BOUGHT WALL STREET FREEDOM FROM REGULATION, RESTRAINT, REPORT FINDS

Steps to Financial Cataclysm Paved with Industry Dollars

March 4 - The financial sector invested more than $5 billion in political influence purchasing in Washington over the past decade, with as many as 3,000 lobbyists winning deregulation and other policy decisions that led directly to the current financial collapse, according to a 231-page report issued today by Essential Information and the Consumer Education Foundation.

The report, "Sold Out: How Wall Street and Washington Betrayed America," shows that, from 1998-2008, Wall Street investment firms, commercial banks, hedge funds, real estate companies and insurance conglomerates made $1.725 billion in political contributions and spent another $3.4 billion on lobbyists, a financial juggernaut aimed at undercutting federal regulation. Nearly 3,000 officially registered federal lobbyists worked for the industry in 2007 alone. The report documents a dozen distinct deregulatory moves that, together, led to the financial meltdown. These include prohibitions on regulating financial derivatives; the repeal of regulatory barriers between commercial banks and investment banks; a voluntary regulation scheme for big investment banks; and federal refusal to act to stop predatory subprime lending.

"The report details, step-by-step, how Washington systematically sold out to Wall Street," says Harvey Rosenfield, president of the Consumer Education Foundation, a California-based non-profit organization. "Depression-era programs that would have prevented the financial meltdown that began last year were dismantled, and the warnings of those who foresaw disaster were drowned in an ocean of political money. Americans were betrayed, and we are paying a high price -- trillions of dollars -- for that betrayal."

"Congress and the Executive Branch," says Robert Weissman of Essential Information and the lead author of the report, "responded to the legal bribes from the financial sector, rolling back common-sense standards, barring honest regulators from issuing rules to address emerging problems and trashing enforcement efforts. The progressive erosion of regulatory restraining walls led to a flood of bad loans, and a tsunami of bad bets based on those bad loans. Now, there is wreckage across the financial landscape."

12 Key Policy Decisions Led to Cataclysm

Financial deregulation led directly to the current economic meltdown. For the last three decades, government regulators, Congress and the executive branch, on a bipartisan basis, steadily eroded the regulatory system that restrained the financial sector from acting on its own worst tendencies. "Sold Out" details a dozen key steps to financial meltdown, revealing how industry pressure led to these deregulatory moves and their consequences:

1. In 1999, Congress repealed the Glass-Steagall Act, which had prohibited the merger of commercial banking and investment banking.

2. Regulatory rules permitted off-balance sheet accounting -- tricks that enabled banks to hide their liabilities.

3. The Clinton administration blocked the Commodity Futures Trading Commission from regulating financial derivatives -- which became the basis for massive speculation.

4. Congress in 2000 prohibited regulation of financial derivatives when it passed the Commodity Futures Modernization Act.

5. The Securities and Exchange Commission in 2004 adopted a voluntary regulation scheme for investment banks that enabled them to incur much higher levels of debt.

6. Rules adopted by global regulators at the behest of the financial industry would enable commercial banks to determine their own capital reserve requirements, based on their internal "risk-assessment models."

7. Federal regulators refused to block widespread predatory lending practices earlier in this decade, failing to either issue appropriate regulations or even enforce existing ones.

8. Federal bank regulators claimed the power to supersede state consumer protection laws that could have diminished predatory lending and other abusive practices.

9. Federal rules prevent victims of abusive loans from suing firms that bought their loans from the banks that issued the original loan.

10. Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac expanded beyond their traditional scope of business and entered the subprime market, ultimately costing taxpayers hundreds of billions of dollars.

11. The abandonment of antitrust and related regulatory principles enabled the creation of too-big-to-fail megabanks, which engaged in much riskier practices than smaller banks.

12. Beset by conflicts of interest, private credit rating companies incorrectly assessed the quality of mortgage-backed securities; a 2006 law handcuffed the SEC from properly regulating the firms.


Financial Sector Political Money and 3000 Lobbyists Dictated Washington Policy

During the period 1998-2008:

* Commercial banks spent more than $154 million on campaign contributions, while investing $363 million in officially registered lobbying:

* Accounting firms spent $68 million on campaign contributions and $115 million on lobbying;

* Insurance companies donated more than $218 million and spent more than $1.1 billion on lobbying;

* Securities firms invested more than $504 million in campaign contributions, and an additional $576 million in lobbying. Included in this total: private equity firms contributed $56 million to federal candidates and spent $33 million on lobbying; and hedge funds spent $32 million on campaign contributions (about half in the 2008 election cycle).


The betrayal was bipartisan: about 55 percent of the political donations went to Republicans and 45 percent to Democrats, primarily reflecting the balance of power over the decade. Democrats took just more than half of the financial sector's 2008 election cycle contributions.

The financial sector buttressed its political strength by placing Wall Street expatriates in top regulatory positions, including the post of Treasury Secretary held by two former Goldman Sachs chairs, Robert Rubin and Henry Paulson.

Financial firms employed a legion of lobbyists, maintaining nearly 3,000 separate lobbyists in 2007 alone.

These companies drew heavily from government in choosing their lobbyists. Surveying 20 leading financial firms, "Sold Out" finds 142 of the lobbyists they employed from 1998-2008 were previously high-ranking officials or employees in the Executive Branch or Congress.

* * *
Essential Information is a Washington, D.C. nonprofit that seeks to curb excessive corporate power. The Consumer Education Foundation is a California-based nonprofit that supports measures to prevent losses to consumers.

SOURCE: http://www.wallstreetwatch.org/soldoutreport.htm


Rather than paying their corrupt arses billions in bonuses, We the People should put them behind bars. Bill Black knows who and how.

PS: Thomas Frank is a sage. Thank you for also bringing up Gilens and Page in PDF, Agony. For some reason, the talking heads either miss or ignore that report. DU stands among the few places around that bring up information essential to Democracy.

Agony

(2,605 posts)
61. that 12 point checklist is golden
Wed Jun 15, 2016, 04:52 PM
Jun 2016

Hey! I know a great idea! Lets let the banksters voluntarily regulate themselves!

if that seems a bit laissez-faire we can let the banksters write the regulations

…right...

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Walmart, for Victory!