Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Juicy_Bellows

(2,427 posts)
2. You beat me to it - missing from the list....
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 03:28 PM
Jun 2016

Sierra Club should have just sat on their hands - no need to endorse anyone this time 'round.





okasha

(11,573 posts)
4. Hillsry has said, repeatedly, that we need to get away from fossil fuels altogether.
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 03:32 PM
Jun 2016

She has a concrete plan to achieve that over eight years.

No fossil fuels, no fracking.

TwilightZone

(25,517 posts)
5. This may come as a shock, but orgs look at more than one issue when deciding on whom to
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 03:33 PM
Jun 2016

endorse. They look at a candidate's entire body of work.

Response to BootinUp (Original post)

Skwmom

(12,685 posts)
7. How can you push funding of massive coal fired electric plants while believing in global warming?
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 05:09 PM
Jun 2016


Anybody? Because, I am just not seeing it.

qdouble

(891 posts)
8. Of course Hillary is better than Trump on the environment...
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 05:49 PM
Jun 2016

but rabid Hillary haters don't like facts...they'll pick one issue ("omg, she won't ban fracking&quot and pretend she's on the same footing who doesn't even think global warming exists and plans to expand coal mining.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»The divide between @Hilla...