Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Demsrule86

(68,552 posts)
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 07:16 AM Jun 2016

Warren For VP! Screw it, Hillary Clinton should definitely pick the Massachusetts senator...

Going nuts because such face-to-face meetings in someone’s home during campaigns are frequently the harbingers of a running mate announcement. Warren is wildly popular amongst Democrats, especially those who put a priority on fighting income inequality and the shenanigans of Wall Street and other capitalist vultures who have done so much damage to our economy. Because of this, there’s been chatter for months about Warren as a potential running mate for Clinton, to shore up Clinton’s image as a true progressive and to keep these issues at the forefront of the campaign as Bernie Sanders does his fade-out.

But there’s also been a chorus of skeptics, and I’ve been one. Not because of any objection to Warren herself! On the contrary, I’m a massive Elizabeth Warren fangirl who pins gold stars and hearts to her picture that I have hanging over my bed.




http://www.salon.com/2016/06/10/warren_for_vp_screw_it_hillary_clinton_should_definitely_pick_the_ma

15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Warren For VP! Screw it, Hillary Clinton should definitely pick the Massachusetts senator... (Original Post) Demsrule86 Jun 2016 OP
I am fully on board. It would be awesome if she could have an economic role as VP. Metric System Jun 2016 #1
She would be great Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #4
Please add my name to her nomination Protalker Jun 2016 #2
Time to take the GOP to the wood shed!!!! Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #5
Yes that is exactly what is needed polar opposites on Wall Street matters on the same ticket. gordianot Jun 2016 #3
They are not opposites at all. Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #7
No misrepresentation of Hillary intended. gordianot Jun 2016 #11
Never say never I would not have thought that Howard Dean would be involved in banking and lobbying. Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #13
Always a few insider trades available. gordianot Jun 2016 #14
Warren or Castro..either one would drive Trump crazy! Sancho Jun 2016 #6
I like Castro too Demsrule86 Jun 2016 #8
Not a chance. TheCowsCameHome Jun 2016 #9
It would be a big mistake. She is much more useful in the Senate than.... Bonhomme Richard Jun 2016 #10
Ding Ding Ding winner winner. gordianot Jun 2016 #12
Elizabeth Warren is my pick. Skid Rogue Jun 2016 #15

Demsrule86

(68,552 posts)
4. She would be great
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 07:55 AM
Jun 2016

And let's face it. Donald Trump doesn't like women...it would drive him crazy...and the gaffes would flow...like the mighty Mississippi.

Demsrule86

(68,552 posts)
5. Time to take the GOP to the wood shed!!!!
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 07:56 AM
Jun 2016

Trump is the worst candidate I have ever seen. I would crawl across broken glass to vote for Hillary Clinton.

gordianot

(15,237 posts)
3. Yes that is exactly what is needed polar opposites on Wall Street matters on the same ticket.
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 07:42 AM
Jun 2016

Warren's ability to foil Republicans where she is now in the Senate is too valuable. Warren may be the last true anti establishment, anti trade deal non one percent lobbyist sell out left in the Democratic Party.

Demsrule86

(68,552 posts)
7. They are not opposites at all.
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 08:02 AM
Jun 2016

You all have misrepresented Hillary Clinton's positions. I want to win. I get that some Bernie supporters seem to think that losing the general is some sort of payback for the rest of us for not supporting Bernie or proves they were right, and we were wrong, but we simply can't lose this election...not with five court picks and the likelihood of the GOP having all three branches of government. Hell, there would be nothing left four years from now...voting rights, abortion right, LGBT, Healthcare... perhaps even nuclear war which Trump has said is on the table. Thus, if Warren helps us win, I am all for it...the senate would be pretty useless if it remains in GOP hands especially if they combine it with the courts, the House, and the presidency.

gordianot

(15,237 posts)
11. No misrepresentation of Hillary intended.
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 11:52 AM
Jun 2016

I seriously doubt Warren will ever be paid to make speeches to Wall Street to the tune of $20,000,000. On that aspect maybe alone Elizabeth and Hillary are polar.

I hold out some hope on Hillary's new religion on trade deals that appear to separate from President Obama.

Demsrule86

(68,552 posts)
13. Never say never I would not have thought that Howard Dean would be involved in banking and lobbying.
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 10:01 PM
Jun 2016

I don't object to Hillary making money ...more power to her. I don't care about the speeches. I have never seen any indication she gives anything but a rousing speech for the money. Sitting Senator can't make paid speeches you know.

Bonhomme Richard

(9,000 posts)
10. It would be a big mistake. She is much more useful in the Senate than....
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 08:36 AM
Jun 2016

in the VP slot where she will be marginalized with zero influence. Of course that may be the plan just as the republicans did to T. Roosevelt.
Elizabeth is way too smart for that.

Skid Rogue

(711 posts)
15. Elizabeth Warren is my pick.
Sat Jun 11, 2016, 10:26 PM
Jun 2016

8 years of Obama, 8 years of Hillary, then 8 years of Warren?????

This country would be a much different place.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Warren For VP! Screw it, ...