Should Hillary repudiate Richard Kagan's endorrsement?

[jack_krass]

Last edited Fri Jun 3, 2016, 12:49 PM - Edit history (2)

Trump was (rightly) forced to repudiate David Duke's endorsement. Why not repudiate Kagan's endorsement?) PNAC was an integral piece of the pro war propaganda puzzle, and I think its fair to argue that this organiation has much blood on its hands.

Hillary would go a long way toward winning my vote if she did this.

[Renew Deal]

1. The best way to do it is to say that she can't control who supports her and

Kagan will have no place in her administration, but people that care about American security should support her.

[HumanityExperiment]

2. interesting non answer.. answer...

When did DEM folks embrace war hawk positions with such zeal?

[Renew Deal]

3. Democrats won WW1, WW2, captured Bin Laden

The Democratic Party is not a party of pacifism and isolation.

[HumanityExperiment]

4. ...not war hawk...

DEM party is not war hawk, but please continue with showing us how RW of a position you're willing to take with these continued war hawk replies

[BootinUp]

9. How is that a non-answer? Explain.

[SheilaT]

5. I think you mean repudiate.

Rebuke means to scold.

Repudiate means to refuse to accept, or deny the validity of.

You can't really scold an endorsement, but you can refuse to accept it.

[jack_krass]

6. Thanks, uodated

[Agschmid]

17. *updated

[jack_krass]

19. Do'h widh I xould spell

[Agschmid]

21. Me too.

It always makes an argument more convincing.

[MariaThinks]

7. I think Hillary should focus on defeating trump and stop letting the public harrass and bully her

for things all the other politicians have done

[Tarc]

8. A neoconservative and a white supremacist are not in the same ballpark

Hell, they're different fucking sports entirely.

Seriously, get a grip.

[jack_krass]

10. I know, I know ITS HER TURN. And I feel so bad for interrupting your euphoric rapture, I really do..

But Neocons and PNACers are really, really bad, and have caused incalculable misery and death this decade. The fact that they are hovering around HRC, salavating at the prospect of spilling more blood sort of bothers me, just a little.

Note to the counters: the above is intended as constructive criticism. So please dont count at me.

ITS HER TURN

[Tarc]

11. I didn't bring any notion of "turn" into the discussion

We're not a warmongering nation, but we're not a pacifist/isolationist one either. Neocons may have been wrong, and stupid, sometimes blindingly so. But I reserve a special place in hell for racists...not just garden-variety racists but supporters and organizers of race wars.

[jack_krass]

12. PNACers are racists, and if you think what they're doing to/have done/will do

to the middle east is NOT RACIST, then theres no need for us to be talking.

[Tarc]

13. PNACs are not racists. This is where the word loses its effect, when you use it for...

...straight-up political disagreement.

[jack_krass]

14. LOL, you're a riot. Guess it's just a coincidence that they blow up countties full of brown

and black people then.

Yes, they are racists, every bit as much as David Duke, except they actually kill millions of people. They are the first order of Hell.

Not in name. Not ever.

[Tarc]

15. Yea...

I can't even take you seriously anymore.

/adds to Ignore List.

[jack_krass]

20. Surrender accepted, next?

[Agschmid]

18. *you're