Poor polls, scandal, a cussed rival … how it’s all going wrong for Hillary Clinton
"The week that Donald Trump finally sealed the Republican presidential nomination ought to have been a triumphant one for Hillary Clinton. With a final few delegates nudging him past the official finishing line on Thursday, here at last was the candidate that Democrats always dreamed of running against: unpopular, undisciplined and ostensibly unelectable in November’s general election.
Yet in the Alice in Wonderland world of American politics in 2016, nothing is what it seems. Clinton supporters would instead have to stomach six impossible things before the week was out.
The first was the sight of the former secretary of state falling behind her Republican opponent in an average of national opinion polls. Though by a wafer-thin – and probably temporary – margin, the breaching of this symbolic threshold could yet become self-fulfilling if it normalises the once unthinkable prospect of a Trump-themed White House
Then came a damning report by an independent inspector at the Department of State, who contradicted her claims that she had been allowed to use a private email server for official business while serving as the nation’s chief diplomat. Once again, things were not quite as simple as they appeared, and Clinton allies argue that the report also shows other former secretaries of state up to the same tricks. But only one of them is running for president. With the FBI still investigating whether she broke federal law, this is an old wound that could reopen again before the contest is over.
Some Democrats, such as progressive champion Elizabeth Warren, show signs of trying to rally around their beleaguered team captain, yet the ongoing FBI investigation also complicates the ability of the party’s most influential cheerleader to come to the rescue. At a press conference in Japan, the normally loquacious Barack Obama flat out refused to take a question from a journalist asking whether the email scandal undermined Clinton’s “trustworthiness”."
http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/may/28/hillary-clinton-us-presidential-electiond-democrats
= new reply since forum marked as read
They must of found something. Because AG said that the FBI case started as a security review and that was the Genesis of the investigation. So unless the AG. who is one top lawyers in country, does not know what word Genesis(the origin or mode of formation of something.). Now they question is are they finding more and what.
I don't think she means 
We're locked into a cycle where any criticism of Clinton is met by a slam at Sanders and high school "LOLs," and meanwhile, Trump has been largely silent when it comes to Clinton.
Every attack he initiated on the occupants of the GOP Primary Clown car is going to look tame in comparison once we are in full GE mode.
The solution behind a candidate who is a disaster waiting to happen is not to "rally behind" them with the blinders on.
There are basically two options:
1). Fight the battle of a lifetime that will diffuse anything Trump throws at her, or
2). Find a new candidate between now and June.
Then there's option 3, which is to "LOL" our way to November.
I'm pretty sick of the "LOL" crap.
