2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumWhy is Bernie doing the NRA's work going after Gov. Malloy?
Can anyone explain why Bernie would demand to have him removed other than his harsh stance on guns?
I want to believe it's something else, because it's truly insidious if that is the reason.
Tavarious Jackson
(1,595 posts)scscholar
(2,902 posts)He doesn't support the door to door solution.
pablo_marmol
(2,375 posts)Based on your posting history on this subject, I need not even ask you to clarify your "door to door" statement. I'll just......
cali
(114,904 posts)oberliner
(58,724 posts)California governor signs 'gun violence restraining order' law
People who fear a close relative may commit gun violence will be able to petition a judge to temporarily remove the person's firearms in California, under a bill signed into law on Tuesday by Democratic Governor Jerry Brown.
The legislation - the first such measure in the United States - was introduced after police in Isla Vista near Santa Barbara said they were unable to confiscate weapons from a man who later went on a rampage and killed six people, despite concern from his family.
"In the case of the Isla Vista shooter, Elliot Rodger, his mother was noticing that he was becoming more agitated and making these threats of violence, but there was little she could do and little the police could do," said Democratic Assembly member Nancy Skinner of Berkeley, who introduced the bill along with Santa Barbara Democrat Das Williams.
Under the so-called gun violence restraining order in the court system, immediate family members and law enforcement agencies could ask a judge to order guns temporarily removed from certain individuals.
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-california-gun-control-idUSKCN0HP2JD20141001
cali
(114,904 posts)oberliner
(58,724 posts)If not, hopefully the other poster will clarify what they were talking about.
cali
(114,904 posts)evidence Bernie doesn't support it?
oberliner
(58,724 posts)Breaking: Federal Agents Going Door to Door Confiscating Guns
According to recent reports, California has just introduced a new gun law that takes effect at the beginning of this year. Following the lead of President Obama, the law threatens the Second Amendment rights of California residents.
The Gun Violence Restraining Order act reportedly gives the state the right to seize your legally-owned weapons for up to three weeks based on word of mouth evidence alone. If anyone cites concerns a judge can strip you of your weaponsand therefore your protection.
http://www.worldnewspolitics.com/2016/02/25/breaking-federal-agents-going-door-to-door-confiscating-guns/
I don't know what Bernie's position is on the law.
cali
(114,904 posts)oberliner
(58,724 posts)I don't know why you are being snarky, I was just trying to hypothesize as to what that poster might have been talking about.
Hopefully they can fill us in with more information.
cali
(114,904 posts)And that poster's intentions seem quite clear.
I am not understanding what you are accusing me of. I was only trying to help explain what the other poster might have been referencing. I'll step out of this exchange. Didn't mean to cause any offense, was just trying to help.
Trajan
(19,089 posts)(EDIT: Just read your journal .... ta ta ...)
The truth hurts, don't it?
Response to MirrorAshes (Original post)
TM99 This message was self-deleted by its author.
MirrorAshes
(1,262 posts)And I don't want anti-gun democrats to be punished for standing up for their beliefs. It's reprehensible.
jillan
(39,451 posts)you have spent making up this bullcrap.
On edit - IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH GUNS!
MirrorAshes
(1,262 posts)That Malloy has been unfair to Bernie on the subject.
Response to MirrorAshes (Reply #5)
TM99 This message was self-deleted by its author.
merrily
(45,251 posts)another sucky DU OP bashing Bernie for no reason.
jillan
(39,451 posts)Some people just post the first thing that pops into their mind.
MirrorAshes
(1,262 posts)Bernie can't take the heat for his regressive views on guns so he aims to punish the person who has called him out on it most strongly.
It's crystal clear, and truly shameful.
jillan
(39,451 posts)MirrorAshes
(1,262 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)Chan790
(20,176 posts)I know because he's my governor.
Last month he wanted to cut social services spending and break union contracts to balance the budget and when the Democrats in the CGA wouldn't play ball, he tried to negotiate a backroom deal with CTGOP. He's Scott Walker with a D after his name.
I don't really give a hell why Bernie wants Malloy removed (I know why, I just don't care why. He's accusing him of being partisan in an appointed position that is supposed to be neutral...it has very little to do with guns, though that's the meme/lie of the day)...the mere act of wanting to see Malloy disempowered on any grounds is a good start.
MirrorAshes
(1,262 posts)put forth in the letter?
Chan790
(20,176 posts)An example of that put forth in the letter was that Malloy continues to repeat a falsehood about Sanders' role in the 3-day limit on background checks in the Brady Bill that Malloy knows is a lie...and which even the Clinton campaign acknowledged was untrue. (This is the problem with debating someone that actually reads things like the letter in question...)
This is par for the course for Malloy. It's what he does...he lies and misrepresents to cast political opponents in a bad light. I've been listening to him do it for 5+ years now. In just the last year, he's lied about teachers, firefighters, police officers (and their unions) as he tried to renege on their contracts; he's lied about his responsibility in a change in tax-policy that was going to increase the cost of hospital care in CT; he's lied about the Democratic leadership of the CGA when they opposed his budget...there's a pattern with Dandy Dannel, he has a remote association with facts--particularly facts he does not like.
Beyond any issue regarding the primary...he's not neutral and it's really questionable why Clinton would even accept his support. He's not the kind of Democrat any good Democrat should want to associate with on account of his actual policy positions and his behavior.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)The letter states:
"It is expected, acceptable, and even desirable, that committee members will represent a diversity of political views and presidential preferences."
About Malloy, the letter says he has "a closed mind and a lack of civility" and also "an open animosity to Senator Sanders".
The only example in the letter provided in support of that claim relates to gun control.
Chan790
(20,176 posts)An example of a behavior is not the totality of that behavior.
I could say for example, "Bob has a habit of stealing mine and other people's property when drunk. Last week, when he was a bit deep in his gin, he stole my lawn tractor." Clearly, from the statement at hand (a habit of stealing mine and other people's property when drunk), the subsequent example is not the totality of the behavior.
Likewise with Malloy. The gun-control issue is not the only issue on which he lied about Sanders...it's just the one that was used as an example in the letter. Further, the grounds given in the letter for opposing Malloy's appointment, is the lying, not the difference of opinion on gun-control.
If you'd like a list and can wait for me to get home from work, I'd be happy to give you a list of known lies that Malloy slandered against Sanders, particularly in the run-up to the CT primary.
Tavarious Jackson
(1,595 posts)debate even " vigorous" debate like Bernie says then get along to get things done. He should not be able to dictate who Hillary can have! You don't see the power play in this?
Response to Tavarious Jackson (Reply #14)
TM99 This message was self-deleted by its author.
Tavarious Jackson
(1,595 posts)but in truth dems bent over backward for him.
Response to Tavarious Jackson (Reply #18)
TM99 This message was self-deleted by its author.
Tavarious Jackson
(1,595 posts)Response to Tavarious Jackson (Reply #20)
TM99 This message was self-deleted by its author.
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)He's a frumpy Vermonter, not Professor Charles Xavier, Tavarious.
Maybe stick to not knowing how the DNC chair is appointed.
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)Don't know why exactly but they let him play without any binding guarantees and now we're seeing what a great idea that was.
riversedge
(70,445 posts)the ads Rove and company put up against Hillary that help Bernie
Response to riversedge (Reply #36)
TM99 This message was self-deleted by its author.
ucrdem
(15,512 posts)https://www.americancrossroadsDOTorg/2016/05/will-debbie-wasserman-schultz-return-domestic-violence-linked-cash/
......................
NOTE: this is not a direct link to AmericanCrossroads. I've replaced the period in the link with the word "dot."
Chan790
(20,176 posts)The presumed nominee only gets things 100% their way if they get to the magic number and lock up the nomination before the convention. There is no mathematical way for either candidate to get there.
Otherwise, precedent (and precedent is most important of the three), logic and fairness all dictate that decision-input and authority for any open convention (whether brokered or not) are proportional to the % of pledged delegates earned. Sanders will get about 45% of those to Clinton's expected 49%...that's exactly how much he gets to dictate.
opiate69
(10,129 posts)One would think a million bucks would buy a workforce that passed 5th grade English.
BreakfastClub
(765 posts)for his career in government, after all.
cali
(114,904 posts)He was Mayor of Burlington for 4 terms before running for Congress and the NRA has never given him a cent.
Demsrule86
(68,799 posts)"BURLINGTON, Vt. A few days before Election Day in 1990, the National Rifle Association sent a letter to its 12,000 members in Vermont, with an urgent message about the race for the states single House seat.
Vote for the socialist, the gun rights group said. Its important.
Bernie Sanders is a more honorable choice for Vermont sportsmen than Peter Smith, wrote Wayne LaPierre, who was and still is a top official at the national NRA, backing Sanders over the Republican incumbent.
That was odd. Sanders was the ex-hippie ex-mayor of Burlington, running as an independent because the Democrats werent far enough left. He had never even owned a gun.
But that year, he was the enemy of the NRAs enemy."
Judy Shailor, seen July 16, 2015 in Milton, Vt., managed Peter Smith's congressional campaign in 1990. (Jabin Botsford/The Washington Post)
Smith had changed his mind about a ban on assault weapons. The NRA and its allies wanted him beaten. They didnt much care who beat him."
Oh and after a debate...the NRA sent this sweet tweet to Sanders...
"Though the National Rifle Association isnt known for supporting Democrats, on Monday the organization tweeted praise for Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-VT) after he backed gunmakers immunity from certain types of lawsuits during Sundays Democratic presidential debate."
cali
(114,904 posts)They just wanted to defeat Peter. I was here. Don't fucking try and tell me how he was elected.
They have never given him a red cent
Lizzie Poppet
(10,164 posts)Bernie has a D- rating from the NRA, a fact any six year old could obtain with five seconds and an internet connection.
bigwillq
(72,790 posts)CT is a mess.
MirrorAshes
(1,262 posts)Bernie didn't say he wanted him out of the convention because he was a bad governor. He said he wanted him out because he attacked him on guns.
SwampG8r
(10,287 posts)Its telling you are defending a proven liar but thats a hillarian for you.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)It just says that his attacks were unfair, which is a matter of opinion.
Cobalt Violet
(9,905 posts)Can't even drive to NYC from MA anymore without getting stuck in nightmare CT traffic for hrs. and hrs. It's was a 3.5-4 hr drive now it's at least 6.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)Otherwise, you are part of the problem.
Cobalt Violet
(9,905 posts)Maybe you should consider not be so judgemental and condesending next time. Otherwise, you are a problem.
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)Fixed.
silvershadow
(10,336 posts)MirrorAshes
(1,262 posts)Doing the NRA's work for them just doesn't sit right with me. Does it you?
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)MirrorAshes
(1,262 posts)Is Bernie that thin-skinned, or is he carrying water for the gun lobby once again? To demand the man is removed from the committee seems a little excessive, no?
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)but apparently you agree with Malloy?
Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)I don't think it's thin-skinned to be offended by someone asserting you're responsible for every gun death in the country. Of course, you favor Clinton, so you see no problem with such blood libel. But that's what it is.
it IS thin-skinned, however, to make that claim about someone as a "revenge" for their criticism of your garbage policies. Bernie and Malloy have gone around before, mostly about Malloy's apparent passion for setting fire to Connecticut's social safety nets.
Demsrule86
(68,799 posts)and grew up in Connecticut...Bernie Sanders has stepped in it this time...his views on guns disqualify him .
Pat Riots
(76 posts)Didn't she approve arms deals as SOS? Didn't she advocate using weaponry as SOS? By what bizzare standard do you support Hillary and disqualify Bernie?
Chan790
(20,176 posts)I liked him at one point too...worked for his campaign even.
Right now, he's so popular here that his approval rating makes Congress's approval rating look like "Everybody loves Congress!"
The only good thing about it is that he has basically no chance of ever winning a CT Democratic primary again, let alone a gubernatorial election. He's destroyed our economy, put us into a statewide recession at a time when the economy nationally is strong, shit on worker's rights, and used crony capitalism to benefit his friends. Hell of a job, Dann!
Anybody who loves Malloy should probably get their head examined...or join the GOP.
stone space
(6,498 posts)Thanks!
I hadn't read that, before.
Disgusting!
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)stone space
(6,498 posts)azurnoir
(45,850 posts)do you really wish that to be revealed?
stone space
(6,498 posts)Thank you!
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)Demsrule86
(68,799 posts)So now he helps the NRA out...nice going Bernie...Malloy is a great guy and Bernie...angry and bitter...destructive.
stone space
(6,498 posts)99Forever
(14,524 posts)Bye bye.
workinclasszero
(28,270 posts)riversedge
(70,445 posts)Thomas Cantwell
?@AstoriaTom
@Amy_Siskind Sanders is scared of an old gay liberal & the Governor of Connecticut. He's probably not up to taking on Putin.
Robbins
(5,066 posts)if superdelegates push clinton over the top he should then walk out of convention.his issues will get nothing but lip service in CLinton Party.