2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumThePhilosopher04
(1,732 posts)frustrated_lefty
(2,774 posts)one of the stupidest posts I've seen on this forum since 2003.
vintx
(1,748 posts)never.
frustrated_lefty
(2,774 posts)You are an idiot.
southerncrone
(5,506 posts)jillan
(39,451 posts)Scootaloo
(25,699 posts)think
(11,641 posts)Because there is plenty of ground to cover....
Silver_Witch
(1,820 posts)Whatcha mean by this post. I know your posts are goofy - but this one is meaningless.
I would not be HRC for five minutes. I would never stay married to a man who put his dick in another woman's mouth, nor to one who slept around - no matter how powerful or handsome.
So nooo I can safely say I would not want to "be her"
Grassy Knoll
(10,118 posts)Just Counting Responses, Like Fox News, Thanks For your response.
timmymoff
(1,947 posts)is to remind us of her awesome foreign policy experience.
AgerolanAmerican
(1,000 posts)I'm seeing it more as symbolic of her demolition of the Democratic Party political coalition.
barrow-wight
(744 posts)I think Hillary epitomizes that very phenomenon. But I love that she just keeps on keeping on.
underthematrix
(5,811 posts)She did a great job with her daughter. Chelsea has a PhD - very very smart fierce young woman.
dchill
(38,579 posts)A non-existent quantity outside the bubble. Chelsea has a PhD - and a failed hedge fund manager for a hubby! Precious!
underthematrix
(5,811 posts)akbacchus_BC
(5,704 posts)underthematrix
(5,811 posts)smart girls whose parents did a great job like HRC Bill Clinton. A person's children are their testimony.
I judge a Presidential candidate on the basis of how well their children are doing. In 2008, Edwards was definitely a nonstarter because of the challenges of his children. I didn't believe he was a good parent and would be a very poor role for America's children and families.
Chelsea has always been the center of the Clintons and it definitely shows.
Jester Messiah
(4,711 posts)Give it a dozen or so years though...
k8conant
(3,030 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)Given the level of the OP that could be interpreted as an insult, but I did not mean it that way.
SpareribSP
(325 posts)Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)snowy owl
(2,145 posts)sakabatou
(42,192 posts)oasis
(49,434 posts)Laura Ingraham, the Sane Progressive and Morning Joe's, Mika Fullashitsky.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)She is utterly consumed in the drive for wealth and power, I wouldn't be her for a nanosecond.
Mnpaul
(3,655 posts)Here I thought that opening this thread would be a total waste of time but you saved it.
tk2kewl
(18,133 posts)i couldn't imagine being so willing to screw people for my own gain
Waiting For Everyman
(9,385 posts)I guess you never thought of that.
Chasstev365
(5,191 posts)Is what I might have said in tne 4th Grade!
My Good Babushka
(2,710 posts)I wouldn't want to be someone chronologically closer to death, since she's 30 years my senior
or someone who doesn't paint, since I am a painter and love to paint more than anything.
As Salvador Dali said, "Every day when I awake, the greatest of joys is mine- that of being Salvador Dali"
merrily
(45,251 posts)Makes me feel sorry for them.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Hmmm, lemme think about this for a minute.
Jester Messiah
(4,711 posts)stone space
(6,498 posts)AUTOMATED MESSAGE: Results of your alert
Mail Message
On Sat May 21, 2016, 07:24 AM you sent an alert on the following post:
If I -were- her, I'd probably jump off a building to escape the guilt. n/t
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1251&pid=2020441
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
YOUR COMMENTS
Oh, good grief!
Please hide.
JURY RESULTS
A randomly-selected Jury of DU members completed their review of this alert at Sat May 21, 2016, 07:31 AM, and voted 1-6 to LEAVE IT ALONE.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: way over the top and i'd normally vote to hide, but the op is dumb flame bait that adds nothing to the discussion board, so i'll vote to keep it.
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: This whole thread is ridiculous but jumping off a building goes the extra mile.
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: I don't agree with the statement but don't think it needs a hide.
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: Political commentary about a public figure. Not a personal attack on a DU member. Leave it.
Juror #7 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Thank you.