Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

StayFrosty

(237 posts)
Thu May 12, 2016, 07:17 PM May 2016

When will the tantrum end?

I keep reading about how people won't settle for the lesser to two evils ever again

Well if that's your plan then you're in for a world of pain because you're never going to get your perfect candidate that aligns 100% with your views

And even if you did, not everyone will be supportive of him and he might lose.

The common sense decision would be to move on to the next candidate that best fits your views that's how we make progress.

90 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
When will the tantrum end? (Original Post) StayFrosty May 2016 OP
When will the tantrums end, indeed. nt villager May 2016 #1
Come on, you can do better than that. Broward May 2016 #2
Good help is *so* hard to find nowadays. n/t bvf May 2016 #23
LOL Art_from_Ark May 2016 #30
They use a computer, its "generative art" of the prose variety. Baobab May 2016 #39
I'm sure you comfort yourself leftynyc May 2016 #61
Most who take that positioin will feel less pain than the Muslims or Latinos or gays or blacks Jackie Wilson Said May 2016 #3
So which of those groups are you part of and which are you simply using as props for your Bluenorthwest May 2016 #57
You see, I am a liberal, so I dont need to be part of any of the groups a Drumpf administration Jackie Wilson Said May 2016 #74
Add women to that group leftynyc May 2016 #62
You know, I'm getting tired of people glossing over how Hillary treats Muslims. Fawke Em May 2016 #69
Post removed Post removed May 2016 #4
A Brock plant? EndElectoral May 2016 #6
It sure looks that way Ned_Devine May 2016 #7
They're not doing right by their employer, though. QC May 2016 #10
Unbelievable hide. panader0 May 2016 #55
The Bernie supporters are desperate leftynyc May 2016 #63
Seriously. We're hiding info anyone can see by clicking profile? bunnies May 2016 #65
What a bullshit hide. I'd appeal that. pinebox May 2016 #86
Most likely. Probably paid to post as well. Either that berni_mccoy May 2016 #12
Love how copy n paste of a user profile is now a hideable offense. frylock May 2016 #37
Always should have been...I don't know why some get away with that call out Sheepshank May 2016 #72
So using your logic Andy823 May 2016 #14
Here's what we know... Ned_Devine May 2016 #16
Thats such a low figure though, for that kind of thing. Baobab May 2016 #41
When will frosty grab a clue? cali May 2016 #5
No more of that "lesser"shit for me. TheCowsCameHome May 2016 #8
.that^ 840high May 2016 #13
Absolutely Art_from_Ark May 2016 #35
Am I having a tantrum? I haven't even had the opportunity to vote yet. I will vote for Sanders. Todays_Illusion May 2016 #9
This old Latina has spent over 40 years moving on to the next candidate that best fits my views. Autumn May 2016 #11
"we people seem to be losing ground on everything" BillZBubb May 2016 #28
We have yet to see the worst. #HillarySoGenerous (with Americas' jobs) Baobab May 2016 #42
Did you vote for McGovern or Mondale? Don't get people your age who don't think about history. kerry-is-my-prez May 2016 #38
Did you vote for Gore and Kerry? Don't get people who don't think about history. BillZBubb May 2016 #44
You will see another republican president. the democratic leadership will see to it. Autumn May 2016 #48
and gosh whoever would that next candidate be ? azurnoir May 2016 #15
When you stop posting? TheCowsCameHome May 2016 #17
When people like you get bored with shit-stirring and leave. cherokeeprogressive May 2016 #18
JFK quote pdsimdars May 2016 #19
I say let them get all the tears out now. tritsofme May 2016 #20
Yea but #Imwithhim. I prefer my candidate have a spine and stand up rather than a bowl of nc4bo May 2016 #21
Why does it even matter outside of Ohio, Florida, and a few other battleground states. I'll probably Attorney in Texas May 2016 #22
Insult us all you want. See where it gets ya? I could just as easily say "when will the anxious highprincipleswork May 2016 #24
I'm hoping the tantrum will end when she gets her way Vote2016 May 2016 #25
They wont. Nor will the fake drama. Baobab May 2016 #43
"...never going to get your perfect candidate that aligns 100% with your views" dchill May 2016 #26
"Game over man, game over"! deathrind May 2016 #27
Never ever ever EVER!!!!! zappaman May 2016 #29
66 posts and you "keep reading"? BillZBubb May 2016 #31
Tool jack_krass May 2016 #32
Trevor Noah: Are Sanders Voters Really Gonna Act Like ‘Children’ and Go With Trump? MrWendel May 2016 #33
Why is this so hard for the media to understand? Fawke Em May 2016 #68
NO ONE... MrWendel May 2016 #70
You're awfully new to be put on ignore. kayakjohnny May 2016 #34
All Hail to ol' Brock U! frylock May 2016 #36
So let me get this straight StayFrosty May 2016 #40
Hillary is "with them" Baobab May 2016 #45
Republicans have a stronghold in so many states because the BillZBubb May 2016 #47
Actually republicans have a stronghold timmymoff May 2016 #59
There IS a candidate that aligns with 97% of my views dana_b May 2016 #60
You'd think Brock would have a better HR staff. Lizzie Poppet May 2016 #66
Pretty good advice. My ballot comes with more than "really evil" and "lesser evil". Tierra_y_Libertad May 2016 #46
I suspect many of the people who will not vote Dem in the general election Haveadream May 2016 #49
Most are selfish, clearly. Problem with that is it will harm them eventually. Drumpf WILL Jackie Wilson Said May 2016 #75
Trump is an unmitigated disaster Haveadream May 2016 #89
I just borrowed this for a friend, or former friend. I told him supporting Trump is a deal Jackie Wilson Said May 2016 #90
I'm sure the "tantrum" SpareribSP May 2016 #50
Why don't you.. coco77 May 2016 #51
As one who has had it with voting for the lesser of two evils, SheilaT May 2016 #52
Just curious WhiteTara May 2016 #76
A candidate failing to win support is not a tantrum on the part of voters. hellofromreddit May 2016 #53
All thes people will vote for the D in Novemeber...their hissy fits are clown shit alcibiades_mystery May 2016 #54
Hopefully after the primary ends. redStateBlueHeart May 2016 #56
The beatings will continue untl morale improves Amaril May 2016 #58
Tantrum? Oh, piss right the fuck off. Lizzie Poppet May 2016 #64
Never. Dem2 May 2016 #67
Indiana, Michigan, West Virginia... GreatGazoo May 2016 #71
We cannot insist on a duty to vote reponsibly... Orsino May 2016 #73
Let's see, Faux pas May 2016 #77
This message was self-deleted by its author NowSam May 2016 #78
I don't equate people holding firm to their own ethical convictions as a tantrum. LanternWaste May 2016 #79
Tantrums? Remember The Stages of Loss & Grief jamese777 May 2016 #80
6. None of the above n/t Contrary1 May 2016 #82
I'm Glad To Hear It jamese777 May 2016 #83
No point in letting this whole thing affecting a person to that point... Contrary1 May 2016 #88
You mean when will people stop demanding TheFarseer May 2016 #81
The best time to not make a decision is when you know it's not a good time to make decision nolabels May 2016 #84
So now, wanting a New Deal style Democrat is a tantrum lbrtbell May 2016 #85
Asked a frustrated Borg Drone whatchamacallit May 2016 #87
 

leftynyc

(26,060 posts)
61. I'm sure you comfort yourself
Fri May 13, 2016, 09:42 AM
May 2016

thinking all Hillary supporters are getting paid but it's only in your fevered imagination that it's true. The desperate search for reasons your favored candidate is losing is getting pathetic to watch.

Jackie Wilson Said

(4,176 posts)
3. Most who take that positioin will feel less pain than the Muslims or Latinos or gays or blacks
Thu May 12, 2016, 07:20 PM
May 2016

they obviously cant give a shit about by their actions.

Most, not all, who take this childish position, are middle class white folks who will suffer, believe me, but not as bad as the other.

 

Bluenorthwest

(45,319 posts)
57. So which of those groups are you part of and which are you simply using as props for your
Fri May 13, 2016, 09:25 AM
May 2016

own agenda? I'm gay, I support Bernie Sanders and not Ronald Reagan's press agent Hillary Clinton. I know one person who supports Hillary. One.

Jackie Wilson Said

(4,176 posts)
74. You see, I am a liberal, so I dont need to be part of any of the groups a Drumpf administration
Fri May 13, 2016, 12:51 PM
May 2016

will openly and aggressively try to destroy.

I vote for the protection and benefit of the whole, not for myself.

I find that when everybody else is benefited, so am I.

So, whether I am or am not a part of any of those minority groups, I will vote as if I am.

Props? What a ridiculous comment.

 

leftynyc

(26,060 posts)
62. Add women to that group
Fri May 13, 2016, 09:44 AM
May 2016

they don't give a shit about. Donnie has promised to only put forced birth candidates up for the court. And that will be only the beginning.

Fawke Em

(11,366 posts)
69. You know, I'm getting tired of people glossing over how Hillary treats Muslims.
Fri May 13, 2016, 09:55 AM
May 2016

Trump has said some mean, nasty things, but you know what he hasn't done that Hillary has? Bomb them.

In her speech to AIPAC, she didn't even acknowledge the Palestinians, most of whom are Muslim. She doesn't even seem to consider them as people.

In other words, if the choices are Trump or Clinton, Muslims really don't have a choice. They're hated by both.

Response to StayFrosty (Original post)

QC

(26,371 posts)
10. They're not doing right by their employer, though.
Thu May 12, 2016, 07:36 PM
May 2016

I would be ashamed to turn in a time card after doing such shoddy, uninspired work.

 

leftynyc

(26,060 posts)
63. The Bernie supporters are desperate
Fri May 13, 2016, 09:45 AM
May 2016

these days. Like putting their hands over their ears and shouting LALALALALALALA

 

bunnies

(15,859 posts)
65. Seriously. We're hiding info anyone can see by clicking profile?
Fri May 13, 2016, 09:46 AM
May 2016

WTF? OPs been here 10 days and already lecturing / demeaning us. No reason at all that info should have been hidden.

 

Sheepshank

(12,504 posts)
72. Always should have been...I don't know why some get away with that call out
Fri May 13, 2016, 11:28 AM
May 2016

the only reason to post a profile of a newbie is to call out the fact they are new..against TOS

Andy823

(11,495 posts)
14. So using your logic
Thu May 12, 2016, 07:39 PM
May 2016

All the "new" posters who are pushing the Clinton hate and "claiming" they are supporting Bernie, are most likely Karl Rove plants, right?

 

Ned_Devine

(3,146 posts)
16. Here's what we know...
Thu May 12, 2016, 07:45 PM
May 2016

...the CTR people put $1million into creating online profiles on political websites such as this one to combat negative posts against HRC and to post positive and glowing things about her. Many of these posters seem to fit that bill. As for the Karl Rove plants, I don't know about that. I do know that I've been here since 2004 and have a tendency to pay more attention to and converse with those who have higher post counts and have been here for the better part of the past 5-10 years.

Baobab

(4,667 posts)
41. Thats such a low figure though, for that kind of thing.
Thu May 12, 2016, 08:35 PM
May 2016

I would believe $1M /day

Look at the stakes, just the 2008 bailout alone is $12T Bailouts are big bucks.

Healthcare is at least $500k/person in US over a lifetime difference.


Wars too, that's a lot of money.

TheCowsCameHome

(40,169 posts)
8. No more of that "lesser"shit for me.
Thu May 12, 2016, 07:34 PM
May 2016

Been there, done that, never again.

Bernie is the first one in decades that I can say I am voting "for"

Art_from_Ark

(27,247 posts)
35. Absolutely
Thu May 12, 2016, 08:12 PM
May 2016

My vote on Super Tuesday was FOR Bernie. He's absolutely one of the best presidential candidates in my lifetime, which goes back to the Eisenhower years.

Todays_Illusion

(1,209 posts)
9. Am I having a tantrum? I haven't even had the opportunity to vote yet. I will vote for Sanders.
Thu May 12, 2016, 07:35 PM
May 2016

I will also continue to support the Bernie Sanders campaign until the convention.

You can surrender to Hillary, I will continue to support Bernie Sanders.

Autumn

(45,120 posts)
11. This old Latina has spent over 40 years moving on to the next candidate that best fits my views.
Thu May 12, 2016, 07:37 PM
May 2016

It hasn't worked yet because we people seem to be losing ground on everything.

Baobab

(4,667 posts)
42. We have yet to see the worst. #HillarySoGenerous (with Americas' jobs)
Thu May 12, 2016, 08:38 PM
May 2016

I wonder what happened in Geneva today..

kerry-is-my-prez

(8,133 posts)
38. Did you vote for McGovern or Mondale? Don't get people your age who don't think about history.
Thu May 12, 2016, 08:22 PM
May 2016

I'm about your age, like Bernie on a lot of issues but I remember McGovern, Mondale and Dukakis. I do not care to see another Republican President.

BillZBubb

(10,650 posts)
44. Did you vote for Gore and Kerry? Don't get people who don't think about history.
Thu May 12, 2016, 08:46 PM
May 2016

Now your voting for another loser: Hillary. Some people never learn.

Autumn

(45,120 posts)
48. You will see another republican president. the democratic leadership will see to it.
Thu May 12, 2016, 08:55 PM
May 2016
They allowed Bush, who later beat your guy kerry to be installed with nary a whimper. They went on to validate him and everything he did.

tritsofme

(17,423 posts)
20. I say let them get all the tears out now.
Thu May 12, 2016, 07:48 PM
May 2016

After Bernie's enthusiastic endorsement, they will look even more ridiculous in their obstinance.

nc4bo

(17,651 posts)
21. Yea but #Imwithhim. I prefer my candidate have a spine and stand up rather than a bowl of
Thu May 12, 2016, 07:49 PM
May 2016

unmolded barbed wire infused corporate jello.

We still have a choice.

My 1st choice chose not to run and O'Malley is no longer campaigning.

Attorney in Texas

(3,373 posts)
22. Why does it even matter outside of Ohio, Florida, and a few other battleground states. I'll probably
Thu May 12, 2016, 07:49 PM
May 2016

vote for Hillary is she's the nominee (depending on her running-mate, platform, willingness to reform the party rules and the DNC's disastrous leadershit, etc.).

But if she is nominated and she were to pick a Lieberman running-mate, stack the platform committee for neoliberal stooges, double down and the broken party rules, etc., I might write in or vote Jill Stein.

Why should it matter? If I lived in a swing-state, I agree there is merit to maximize the likelihood of defeating Trump by voting for a neoliberal who offers a neocon foreign policy, but my presidential vote in Texas is NOT going to turn the state blue so why should I feel compelled to compromise my values by voting for a candidate I don't trust or share values with?

More likely than not, if Hillary is the nominee, I'll vote for her, but why all of the knicker twisting demands for nose-pinching votes in non-battleground states?

 

highprincipleswork

(3,111 posts)
24. Insult us all you want. See where it gets ya? I could just as easily say "when will the anxious
Thu May 12, 2016, 07:57 PM
May 2016

calls for Bernie to drop out of the race stop?"

He told you his plans. They are the same as Hilary's were in 2008. We're behind him, all the way.

Frankly, I hope he takes it further, to the convention. And if he takes it beyond, I'll probably go there too.

But listen, the "tantrums" asking him to drop out are at least as silly. We don't intend to give up our principles. We actually value them quite highly, and they are no different than what Democrats have been fighting for for years.

The real mystery is why they get so little respect from you and your fellow H supporters. The other mystery is why Hillary doesn't just keep embracing them, and us, and ride this all the way to the White House.

Baobab

(4,667 posts)
43. They wont. Nor will the fake drama.
Thu May 12, 2016, 08:45 PM
May 2016

Its going to be a very very long four years if she wins.

I hope people realize the implications of five and a half more years of FastTrack. That means this next President is likely to be forever.

No chance of voting away anything thats in a trade deal, its permanent.

Thats their whole point.

dchill

(38,599 posts)
26. "...never going to get your perfect candidate that aligns 100% with your views"
Thu May 12, 2016, 08:04 PM
May 2016

Already did. Your OP is completely meritless, and everyone knows where tantrum central is on DU.

Fawke Em

(11,366 posts)
68. Why is this so hard for the media to understand?
Fri May 13, 2016, 09:53 AM
May 2016

No one is "going with Trump." Bernie or Bust means his supporters either write him in (in states that allow it) or they'll vote Green.

In no way do Bernie supporters endorse Trump.

Maybe in your bilateral world, but there are more than two candidates on the ballot.

MrWendel

(1,881 posts)
70. NO ONE...
Fri May 13, 2016, 10:49 AM
May 2016

is GOING with Trump? You sure about that? What makes you so confident to speak in absolutes?

kayakjohnny

(5,235 posts)
34. You're awfully new to be put on ignore.
Thu May 12, 2016, 08:12 PM
May 2016

Lately, I've saved that feature for long time posters. But you seem quite worthy.

I don't want the perfect candidate. Only one that will move the country forward, not back to the 90's or worse.

Buh-bye, oh one of limited thinking skills.

StayFrosty

(237 posts)
40. So let me get this straight
Thu May 12, 2016, 08:28 PM
May 2016

If you don't get the candidate that aligns 100% with your views

You all will make sure the candidate that's the polar opposite of what your views are wins?

And you will ensure that whatever progressive values you believe in get shot down in the Supreme Court for the next 30 years?

Lol

Shit no wonder Republicans have a stronghold in many states

BillZBubb

(10,650 posts)
47. Republicans have a stronghold in so many states because the
Thu May 12, 2016, 08:52 PM
May 2016

Democrats there keep putting republican lite Democrats up against them. Now we are going to run a republican lite for president. That's always worked so well for us.

How about giving voters a real economic choice between us and the republicans? How about running someone who really will address income inequality, too big to fail corrupt banks, the Wall Street money crowd, climate change, and disastrous trade deals?

Nah, we wouldn't want to upset our corporate masters. Let's put up their darling Hillary!

 

timmymoff

(1,947 posts)
59. Actually republicans have a stronghold
Fri May 13, 2016, 09:34 AM
May 2016

because third way democrats have caused apathy amongst former democrats. Given a choice to vote for a republican who tells you what they will do and a democrat who wants to act like a republican the voters choose the republican. With Hillarity we get a democrat who wants to act like a republican and proves it by courting GOP money. This is why she isn't viable to the democratic wing of the democratic party.

dana_b

(11,546 posts)
60. There IS a candidate that aligns with 97% of my views
Fri May 13, 2016, 09:41 AM
May 2016

and I am voting for him and ONLY him. So I DO get my candidate of choice.

 

Lizzie Poppet

(10,164 posts)
66. You'd think Brock would have a better HR staff.
Fri May 13, 2016, 09:48 AM
May 2016

I mean...surely they can weed out people who have no concept of "false dichotomy."

 

Tierra_y_Libertad

(50,414 posts)
46. Pretty good advice. My ballot comes with more than "really evil" and "lesser evil".
Thu May 12, 2016, 08:48 PM
May 2016
A long habit of not thinking a thing wrong gives it a superficial appearance of being right. Thomas Paine Author of "Common Sense".

Haveadream

(1,630 posts)
49. I suspect many of the people who will not vote Dem in the general election
Thu May 12, 2016, 09:45 PM
May 2016

can make that choice because it will either not impact them very much or their vote will have little influence on the outcome in their state. It is very hard to imagine someone in a swing state with something or someone at risk not running to the polls to vote to protect themselves and their loved ones. And, even if they are willing to sacrifice themselves for an ideal, few people are willing to sacrifice people they love and care about. I think as the election draws nearer, many who are convinced they will never vote Dem, especially those who take politics very seriously, will feel a real moral obligation to keep Trump and the republicans out of the White House and the Supreme Court.



Jackie Wilson Said

(4,176 posts)
75. Most are selfish, clearly. Problem with that is it will harm them eventually. Drumpf WILL
Fri May 13, 2016, 12:53 PM
May 2016

NUKE the first foreign country leader who makes fun of him or criticizes him.

What we need to be discussing is does the prez, on her or his own, have the power to push that button whenever she or he wants?

Anybody know?

Please, people, admit this is a reality.,

Haveadream

(1,630 posts)
89. Trump is an unmitigated disaster
Fri May 13, 2016, 03:36 PM
May 2016

Rather than making school affordable in any way, he has said he wants to eliminate the Department of Education. Rather than addressing the climate crisis, he has vowed to eliminate the Environmental Protection Agency. Rather than developing green energy resources and jobs, he has placed a priority on the cheapest fuel possible. That means an expansion of present carbon emissions and ground water contaminating processes. Rather than a path to citizenship, he repeatedly states he wants to deport 11 million people. Rather than single payer or affordable health care, he wants to completely privatize health insurance and make it competitive by "drawing borders around states". Rather than reopening clinics so the poor can find reproductive health care, he wants to find some kind of "punishment" for women who have abortions.

Seriously?

That doesn't even begin to address his unhinged and aggressive foreign policy rants and nuclear option promises. Anyone who is complicit in allowing this man into the oval office, knowing what they do about him, is responsible for their part in if he wins the Presidency. At this point, all of our efforts should be spent on preventing that.



Jackie Wilson Said

(4,176 posts)
90. I just borrowed this for a friend, or former friend. I told him supporting Trump is a deal
Fri May 13, 2016, 04:05 PM
May 2016

killer for our friendship.

SpareribSP

(325 posts)
50. I'm sure the "tantrum"
Thu May 12, 2016, 09:58 PM
May 2016

Will continue as long as progressives who feel disenfranchised are treated like children

 

SheilaT

(23,156 posts)
52. As one who has had it with voting for the lesser of two evils,
Thu May 12, 2016, 10:07 PM
May 2016

I apparently have to remind you that the lesser evil is still evil. That does NOT mean I'm holding out for my perfect candidate, just one who isn't evil.

I want to vote for a good candidate, that's all. And if my preferred candidate doesn't get the nomination, the one who apparently will get it is NOT the next candidate that best fits my views, but rather a candidate who emphatically doesn't fit my views at all. Alas, the candidate who truly best fits my views is not running. Maybe I could write her name in come November.

WhiteTara

(29,731 posts)
76. Just curious
Fri May 13, 2016, 12:57 PM
May 2016

who was the last "lesser evil" you voted for? You don't have to answer of course, but I didn't hear that phrase until Ralph Nadir came on the scene, and I was wondering if that was Gore.

 

hellofromreddit

(1,182 posts)
53. A candidate failing to win support is not a tantrum on the part of voters.
Thu May 12, 2016, 10:09 PM
May 2016

Talking down to those voters is a great way to fail at helping that candidate.

Amaril

(1,267 posts)
58. The beatings will continue untl morale improves
Fri May 13, 2016, 09:29 AM
May 2016

'Course, in our case, we should probably substitute "condescending snark" for "beatings".

 

Lizzie Poppet

(10,164 posts)
64. Tantrum? Oh, piss right the fuck off.
Fri May 13, 2016, 09:45 AM
May 2016

Didn't bother reading any further; a post that starts off with an insufferably condescending insult has virtually zero chance of being worth the time.

Now off to Ignore with your Brockian ass...

Dem2

(8,168 posts)
67. Never.
Fri May 13, 2016, 09:50 AM
May 2016

The malcontents have been at it for 10+ years, nothing ever changes with those who choose to scream into people's faces for a living.

Orsino

(37,428 posts)
73. We cannot insist on a duty to vote reponsibly...
Fri May 13, 2016, 11:33 AM
May 2016

...without also acknowledging a duty to govern responsively. That earns votes.

Implict in our calls for voter engagement in the process is the power of a candidate to engage with the voters. The greater power, IMO, carries the greater responsibility.

Faux pas

(14,704 posts)
77. Let's see,
Fri May 13, 2016, 01:05 PM
May 2016

one candidate is under FBI investigation, one candidate isn't. I'm voting for the one who isn't. Not a real hard choice for honest logical thinkers.

Response to StayFrosty (Original post)

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
79. I don't equate people holding firm to their own ethical convictions as a tantrum.
Fri May 13, 2016, 01:27 PM
May 2016

I don't equate people holding firm to their own ethical convictions as a tantrum. Indeed, I equate those who do as much with a dramatic lack of both education and rational thought.

jamese777

(546 posts)
80. Tantrums? Remember The Stages of Loss & Grief
Fri May 13, 2016, 01:27 PM
May 2016

1. Denial and Isolation
2. *ANGER*
3. Bargaining
4. Depression
5. Acceptance

New Rasmussen Poll
May 13, 2016
"The media may portray Bernie Sanders as a continuing political threat to Hillary Clinton, but voters aren’t buying: They remain overwhelmingly convinced that Clinton is the likely Democratic presidential nominee for 2016.

The latest Rasmussen Reports monthly Hillary Meter finds that 92% of Likely Democratic Voters believe Clinton is likely to win their party’s nomination, with 62% who say it’s Very Likely. That’s unchanged from a month ago and ties the highest number of Democrats who consider Clinton’s nomination Very Likely in monthly surveys since last July. (To see survey question wording, click here.)

Among all likely voters, 84% think Clinton is likely to be the nominee, including 57% who say it’s Very Likely. The overall finding is unchanged from April, but the number of voters who say her nomination is Very Likely is a new high.

Just seven percent (7%) of Democrats and 15% of all voters think a Clinton nomination is Not Very or Not At All Likely.

Sixty percent (60%) of voters think Clinton is likely to win the presidency, compared to 53% who see Republican Donald Trump as the likely victor instead. These findings include 28% who say Clinton and Trump are Very Likely to win."
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections/election_2016/hillary_meter

jamese777

(546 posts)
83. I'm Glad To Hear It
Fri May 13, 2016, 01:56 PM
May 2016

Certainly not everyone is grieving or experiencing loss, but some folks are. And those who are irrationally hostile just might be at the anger stage.

Contrary1

(12,629 posts)
88. No point in letting this whole thing affecting a person to that point...
Fri May 13, 2016, 02:30 PM
May 2016

I wish things were different, but it is what it is. Anger can eat you up.

TheFarseer

(9,328 posts)
81. You mean when will people stop demanding
Fri May 13, 2016, 01:30 PM
May 2016

A non-corrupt government that looks out for non-billionaires citizens? Never, I hope.

nolabels

(13,133 posts)
84. The best time to not make a decision is when you know it's not a good time to make decision
Fri May 13, 2016, 01:58 PM
May 2016

The common sense tells one that making a choice that was not your first choice is not a choice at all.

lbrtbell

(2,389 posts)
85. So now, wanting a New Deal style Democrat is a tantrum
Fri May 13, 2016, 02:08 PM
May 2016

The only tantrums I see are those of the sore-winner HRC supporters.

Keep it up...you'll just push more and more independents into the Trump column.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»When will the tantrum end...