Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumClinton Has the Map on Her Side, But History Working Against Her
The Enthusiasm for Bernie and his policies is strong, and he is in it through the Convention, which gives him an advantage that Hillary as an "incumbent" doesn't have. Anyway, an interesting view from Matt Bai.-------------
Clinton has the map on her side, but history working against her
Matt Bai
National Political Columnist
May 5, 2016
But if history is any guide, Clinton comes to the campaign with a structural disadvantage, too, and one that shouldnt be overlooked. It may explain why she cant seem to put Bernie Sanders away and why the outcome in November is hardly assured.
------------------
The next-in-line always has more trouble than he should unifying the party, because the fissures that were suppressed through eight years of a presidency in the cause of staving off the opposition rise to the surface. The end of every eight-year presidency is something like the fall of Tito, with disparate factions and pent-up emotions finally unleashed.
Clinton runner-up in 2008, loyal soldier thereafter is the prototypical next-in-line. Thanks to a couple of dreadful midterm election cycles, shes had to contend only with a 74-year-old protest candidate who just recently joined the party, and even then she hasnt been able to excite enough of her own partys base to lock down the nomination by May.
Shes had to lash herself tightly to the president while at the same time trying to co-opt the ideological fury among the partys dissatisfied factions. She will emerge from this process with her agenda opaque, her convictions hedged.
Maybe Gore and McCain, having gone through the exact same thing, have some sort of support group she can visit.
Unlike both of those guys, of course, Clinton seems to have gotten astoundingly lucky in her opposition. Its true: Trumps appalling rhetoric will make for some whopping TV ads. And yes, if his numbers hold, especially among women, Trumps next reality-show gig might be called The Biggest Loser of All Time.
But heres the thing about Trump: Hes run the flat-out most offensive, least substantive and crassest campaign in memory, and national polls show him trailing Clinton by 10 points, with six months yet to go.
Think about that. In presidential politics, 10 points can fall away faster than Carly Fiorina on a riser.
And while voters impressions at this point in a campaign are normally hard to change, what we dont know about Trump the big question, to my mind is whether the larger electorate will ultimately judge him by the standards of a politician or, like primary voters, as a celebrity.
Politicians arent allowed to simply shrug off their records and respawn entirely. The voters, finely attuned to any sign of inauthenticity, wont have it.
But entertainers reinvent and redeem themselves all the time; its what gossipy magazines exist for. And Trump is closer to inhabiting this realm than any candidate weve ever seen.
Dont expect the Trump who takes the stage in Cleveland to be remotely like the Trump who bragged about his genitalia in a debate. And dont assume, just because his bigotry and base antics are a matter of record, that the rules of traditional politics will apply.
Next-in-lines have been known (at least once) to win, and assuming she can nail down the nomination, Clinton is as clear a favorite as weve seen in a while. But Clinton shouldnt delude herself into thinking shes headed for a layup, and neither should anyone else.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/clinton-has-the-map-on-1421857612800054.html
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 797 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (6)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Clinton Has the Map on Her Side, But History Working Against Her (Original Post)
KoKo
May 2016
OP
grasswire
(50,130 posts)1. I disagree that Hillary was a "loyal soldier" after 2008
She demonstrated her nature by running a rogue and risky foreign policy hidden from President Obama's oversight and threatening his administration/legacy at the time, and now as well. She thought so little of him or so highly of herself that she indulged herself as she wished -- indulged in activity that may very well be deemed criminal soon.
KoKo
(84,711 posts)4. She wasn't a "Happy Warrior" for Obama...but, she did end up as SOS
with Deals Made... And, what a mistake that was.
So I see what you are saying.
Faux pas
(14,697 posts)2. K N R-ed