2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumLet's be clear: You are no longer a progressive if you are supporting Trump in the General
Last edited Fri May 6, 2016, 02:05 AM - Edit history (1)
And also, clearer: not having a good enough clothespin, sufficient antiemetics, a barf bag, and enough intoxicants available after to be able to vote for Hillary in the General does not make you "not a Progressive", "not a Democrat" or "supporting Trump".
Edit to add: I was trying to say that even if people couldn't manage to vote for Hillary in the GE, they were still Democrats, Progressives, and not supporting Trump unless they were casting a vote for him.
Maybe I should have worded it that way.
bobbobbins01
(1,681 posts)::crickets::
Exactly.
dlwickham
(3,316 posts)bobbobbins01
(1,681 posts)But thanks for trying.
iandhr
(6,852 posts)Not voting only helps him.
ChisolmTrailDem
(9,463 posts)bobbobbins01
(1,681 posts)And not voting doesn't help him, much like being an atheist doesn't help Christianity.
bettyellen
(47,209 posts)I have never seen so many totally fabricated allegations against a Republican here. It is sickening.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)These common characteristics are defining of people on the extremes. You might as well try to convince the hard-cores in the GOP base to be honest about people they've identified as opponents. They won't change. It's a personality thing, and it's wired in.
Joe the Revelator
(14,915 posts)Duckhunter935
(16,974 posts)Silver_Witch
(1,820 posts)....Not voting for Hillary is NOT voting for Trump.
It is easy.
dlwickham
(3,316 posts)HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)They have no interest in getting votes from the left.
Hillary to Bush donors: "I share your values".
moriah
(8,311 posts)Would it be called being "Bern-Outs", people switching to Trump instead of leaving the top of the ticket blank or for neither party?
I can't advocate for people voting another way than Democratic, but unless you're going to vote for Trump in the GE, I say you still keep all progressive cred.
(I was also mocking another thread).
Silver_Witch
(1,820 posts)It was clever and well played.
Until Bernie quits I will not quit.
Thinkingabout
(30,058 posts)Joe the Revelator
(14,915 posts)moriah
(8,311 posts)runaway hero
(835 posts)People are upset and want change. Hillary is not that.
moriah
(8,311 posts)I was saying that even if people couldn't manage to vote for Hillary in the GE, they were still Democrats, Progressives, and not supporting Trump.
Maybe I should have worded it that way instead of the opposite.
runaway hero
(835 posts)Personally if I was in the country right I would vote Hillary. I understand why people are upset. If not for Obama, we would have had a Bush or Clinton in power since 1988.
dgauss
(884 posts)With the general election it's the pragmatism angle.
Response to moriah (Original post)
Hydra This message was self-deleted by its author.
moriah
(8,311 posts)And he will lose.
Hydra
(14,459 posts)joshcryer
(62,287 posts)*oops he said that raising the minimum wage, in that same interview, would hurt competition.
But he said he wants to make the other countries pay for their own wars or we'll leave!*
*oops he said that it'd be the ideal outcome but if we had interests we'd have to stay.
Joob
(1,065 posts)Tiggeroshii
(11,088 posts)Trump is counter intuitive to what a progressive has stood for. Yet so is supporting Clinton, as she has taken a stand against everything that progressives have attempted. Against higher wages, serving on the board of wal mart, accepting money from Republicans, support for and from the oil and gas industry, etc. Progressivism was founded to fight against the powerful and wealthy that pollute our air, taint our water and harm the fabrics of society. To accept money and support to and from those who perpetuate those issues is the opposite of progressive. Which isn't bad, necessarily -since it is simply taking a different, more corporate inclusive approach to the problem. But it is far from the historical and current definition of what "progressive" means. Nothing wrong with not being progressive.
Historical example -Liberal: Woodrow Wilson
Progressive: Theodore Roosovelt
Modern example -Liberal: Hillary Clinton
Progressive: Bernie Sanders
It's just a difference in creed and approach. While I think the progressive approach is better, it's okay to differ and say a liberal economic approach with less oversight is best.
It's okay for us to be different, I just think we should be more open and honest about what those differences are =)
HooptieWagon
(17,064 posts)So the major party ballot choices are a Bush-Republican and a madman. Looks to me like the third parties are going to have a banner year.
kiva
(4,373 posts)"none of the above" as a ballot choice.
I will never vote Trump.
JPnoodleman
(454 posts)It seems its solely about ethnic groups stabbing at one another.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)moriah
(8,311 posts)I'll let you re-read, but tell me where on earth there's a request for a loyalty oath from me. (The thread was also a copycat, but the original ended up getting hidden.)
Unless you count criticism of anyone stupid enough to actually vote FOR Trump in the GE, and then hell yeah, I'll gladly say everyone should take that loyalty oath. If anyone on DU plans to vote for Trump jn the GE, they don't belong here, need immediate mental health care, or both.
Edit because I thought the post was at 12:48 AM, this was a last night thread)
jeff47
(26,549 posts)You don't have to actually include an oath to make a loyalty oath thread.
Just insinuating that people have no other choice is enough. Which you do plenty in your op.
Btw, Trump is to the left of Clinton on a few issues. Such as not being enthusiastic about military adventures in the middle east, and not fond of trade agreements. Does that mean everyone voting for Clinton is "not a progressive" on those issues? Or can we stop this childish bullshit and realize life has complexity?
moriah
(8,311 posts)Please?
Because I thought I said explicitly that even if you couldn't make yourself vote for Hillary, unless you ARE voting for Trump, you are not his supporter.
The thread I was mocking was entitled " Let's be clear: You are no longer a progressive if you are supporting Hillary in the Primary".
I was defending my candidate, but attempting to make it clear that not embracing Hillary with open arms did NOT equal Trump-humping, just in case anyone thought that was my point, and DEFENDING the Bernie supporters who have been accused of working for Trump by still supporting Bernie.
Maybe if you'd seen the original you would have understood.
VulgarPoet
(2,872 posts)Not sure who keeps floating the idea that Bernie supporters would really be willing to support him when there's a viable second option.
moriah
(8,311 posts)... of someone applying some "no longer a Progressive" purity test to people on DU.
My point was the only purity test I cared about was not going total PUMA and voting for the Hair.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)Trump is a lunatic and Hillary is just another ambitious centrist politician without ethics.
moriah
(8,311 posts)Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)Demsrule86
(68,788 posts)It makes you all of those things and more.