Please rate the level of intellectual discussion in GD-P

[BootinUp]

Last edited Thu May 5, 2016, 02:20 PM - Edit history (1)

Edited to add my comments: I rate it Poor to Fair. There is really too much calling people names, calling Democratic politicians liars to really have much intelligent discussion.

9 votes, 2 passes | Time left: Time expired
	Excellent - Well worth the time
	0 (0%)
	Good - A lot of good stuff
	0 (0%)
	Fair - Some material is worth reading
	5 (56%)
	Poor - Not worth a red cent
	1 (11%)
	Terrible - I feel dumber after reading it
	3 (33%)
	2 DU members did not wish to select any of the options provided.
Show usernames Disclaimer: This is an Internet poll

[JaneyVee]

1. Math skills seem to be lacking for some, other than that...

Fun!

[morningfog]

2. I know! Like those who say Bernie is mathematically eliminated!

Mathematically challenged dip shits!

[JaneyVee]

3. Can he reach pledged delegate target?

[morningfog]

4. He is not yet mathematically eleminated.

Your question confirms that.

[JaneyVee]

6. Sure he is. He cannot reach pledged delegate target.

The supers will put the one with most dels and pop vote over the edge.

[morningfog]

7. Those are separate questions.

God, this is tedious.

Whether he is politically non-viable is a wholly different question than whether he is mathematically eliminated.

And you last sentence is problematic as well. It is conceivable and mathematically possible, albeit not likely, that one candidate could take the pop vote, and the other the pledged delegate race.

[NurseJackie]

5. It's entertaining, not enlightening. It's like a circus or a carnival, not a library or a classroom.

[cloudythescribbler]

8. as with so many things, there's a ton of crap and some gems nt

[BootinUp]

9. kick