Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
116 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Predicted: Clinton picks a Republican for VP (Original Post) Recursion May 2016 OP
No way. She's a Democrat, through and through. auntpurl May 2016 #1
She also can smell blood in the water Recursion May 2016 #3
Huntsman worked for Reagan and has restricted abortion rights in Utah. auntpurl May 2016 #32
Clinton said she would support restrictions as well Android3.14 May 2016 #57
Oh, rubbish. auntpurl May 2016 #61
Yes, we do. randome May 2016 #66
Yes, she panders. And the amusing part for me is that her supporters IdaBriggs May 2016 #67
If Hillary does anything, one single thing, to restrict abortion rights auntpurl May 2016 #73
Here's your rubbish Android3.14 May 2016 #76
Yes, that's exactly what we were talking about above. auntpurl May 2016 #77
Huntsman already endorsed Trump. Try to keep up. onenote May 2016 #83
You think Clinton puts party loyalty ahead of personal ambition? You ar SO out of touch. n/t leeroysphitz May 2016 #64
Yes, I do and I guess we'll see. nt auntpurl May 2016 #65
I guess we have... leeroysphitz May 2016 #112
Can't we mock you now and save time? brooklynite May 2016 #2
Of course! Recursion May 2016 #6
I don't see that happening cali May 2016 #4
I'm talking about a Huntsman or a Snowe Recursion May 2016 #5
Huntsman has endorsed Trump. Snowe? Maine. cali May 2016 #10
Well, actually, yes: Powell Recursion May 2016 #14
Colin Powell is 79. And yes, huntsman has flat out endorsed cali May 2016 #26
I agree - it would be a brillant move. CanadaexPat May 2016 #7
Exactly: I'd be pissed as hell, but it would be fucking brilliant Recursion May 2016 #8
It wouldn't be brilliant, it would be idiotic. Warren DeMontague May 2016 #13
We'll see. (nt) Recursion May 2016 #17
After all the complaining she's had her surrogates do at Sanders about not being a real Democrat? Warren DeMontague May 2016 #20
I think this is the first time I've agreed with one of your posts. auntpurl May 2016 #37
And I agree with yours, here. Warren DeMontague May 2016 #40
Ha ha, maybe. auntpurl May 2016 #41
"brilliant" and Hillary are not words that go together. closeupready May 2016 #106
That would be stupid and she isn't BeyondGeography May 2016 #9
Who exactly is this supposed to convince? Warren DeMontague May 2016 #11
Debbie Wasserman Shultz? B Calm May 2016 #12
Beat me to it. Warren DeMontague May 2016 #15
No mocking... Mike Nelson May 2016 #16
That's a different possibility, which envisions a different campaign Recursion May 2016 #19
You know what would be really radical and game changing? Warren DeMontague May 2016 #18
Like herself? That would be kind of cool. Recursion May 2016 #21
We'll have to agree to disagree. Warren DeMontague May 2016 #27
Seems like natural fit TrueDemVA May 2016 #22
She voted with Sanders 93% of the time. fun n serious May 2016 #24
Yes but the times they differed were important CentralMass May 2016 #44
Why did he vote NO on this? fun n serious May 2016 #62
You answered your own question Beowulf May 2016 #75
I don't buy it. nt fun n serious May 2016 #78
He has consistently articulated his support for legal immigration CentralMass May 2016 #95
You don't have to buy it. Beowulf May 2016 #109
No, you're completely wrong, but you're exactly why she'll do this Recursion May 2016 #25
Greenlighting warfare is the POLAR OPPOSITE of liberality. closeupready May 2016 #107
well the definition of "liberal" is fluid, ya know dana_b May 2016 #114
Nope.. fun n serious May 2016 #23
Kaine would be good. Obviously I like O'Malley as well Recursion May 2016 #28
It looks like Trump may be looking at fun n serious May 2016 #29
he's essentially stealing the joke Obama made at the WHCD about him. Warren DeMontague May 2016 #43
Scott Brownis a POS fun n serious May 2016 #50
Oh, I thought Trump said it. Either way, same difference. Warren DeMontague May 2016 #59
No kidding! There is so much we can use against them nt fun n serious May 2016 #108
Scott Brown? LenaBaby61 May 2016 #105
I predict Cory Booker. A centrist who could win the Dem nomination in 2024 Eric J in MN May 2016 #30
Booker would be interesting (nt) Recursion May 2016 #31
Yes, yes, we must look for candidates from ALL across this great land! Warren DeMontague May 2016 #33
*snort* Recursion May 2016 #46
it has been mentioned in legend Warren DeMontague May 2016 #60
Booker is overrated. phleshdef May 2016 #53
What if she actually wins? surrealAmerican May 2016 #34
well yeah, there's that too. Warren DeMontague May 2016 #36
Gavin Newsom. Warren DeMontague May 2016 #35
Newsom would be very interesting too Recursion May 2016 #38
He's young and represents not just the future but a pretty different perspective Warren DeMontague May 2016 #42
The problem is both coasts are contrary to the zeitgeist Recursion May 2016 #45
No, please... LenaBaby61 May 2016 #102
And I still like O'Malley (nt) Recursion May 2016 #104
Why not...? It wouldn't be the most conservative thing she has ever done. Motown_Johnny May 2016 #39
No... SidDithers May 2016 #47
Remember where I am on the DU spectrum and ask yourself if that's truly insane Recursion May 2016 #48
Republican / Third Way Dems - whats the difference FreakinDJ May 2016 #49
Millions of people's lives Recursion May 2016 #51
Try putting that into some sort of perspective FreakinDJ May 2016 #56
You're pretty nonchalant about the next set of wars. JackRiddler May 2016 #111
You people don't even know what third way was Demsrule86 May 2016 #93
Bill didn't win with DLC politics FreakinDJ May 2016 #98
I think this whole election is a set up going to plan but I don't see her ReasonableToo May 2016 #52
You know, I really don't like this thread. auntpurl May 2016 #54
Understood Recursion May 2016 #55
Can she pick one from a time machine? DemocratSinceBirth May 2016 #58
Bookmarked. yardwork May 2016 #63
That prediction shows how much you're thinking has been distorted by the Bernie supporters' lies Onlooker May 2016 #68
National unity rogerashton May 2016 #69
No way, man. betsuni May 2016 #70
Nah. I have long thought, and still think, Julian Castro Orangepeel May 2016 #71
Birds of a feather. 99Forever May 2016 #72
As a sensible centrist I support this! Warren Stupidity May 2016 #74
No IMO it'll be Julián Castro and it will be LEAKED 36+- 12 hours prior to the CA primary azurnoir May 2016 #79
That'll work. nt auntpurl May 2016 #85
it's her only hope of winning IMO azurnoir May 2016 #87
I think she'd win against Trump with a ficus plant as her running mate. auntpurl May 2016 #92
. baldguy May 2016 #80
The question isn't whether you will be wrong. It is whether you are capable of learning onenote May 2016 #81
What do you think my "perception of Clinton" is? Recursion May 2016 #88
I think your perception of her is that she'd be willing to overlook many viable onenote May 2016 #91
Are you saying nominating a Republican would be a bad thing? Recursion May 2016 #94
Yes i do. onenote May 2016 #99
Here's a stranger one for y'all: Clinton picks Sanders. DinahMoeHum May 2016 #82
She'll pick someone younger, browner, and more western Recursion May 2016 #89
Sanders doesn't help her, or the party, in some important ways. auntpurl May 2016 #90
Any ideas who she might pick Proud Liberal Dem May 2016 #84
You all come up with silly stuff all time Demsrule86 May 2016 #86
interesting thought - with all the turmoil in the GOP right now, to include DrDan May 2016 #96
Food for thought. joshcryer May 2016 #97
I think you're the one person who got the import, though... (nt) Recursion May 2016 #103
At this point I am voting for the Democratic nominee for President and Vice President. gordianot May 2016 #100
There is a large pool of Democrats in which to select, as stated already, birds Thinkingabout May 2016 #101
Oh, I believe you are serious. JackRiddler May 2016 #110
Vice-presidential running mates—both parties—will be same-party picks; born 1960s or 1970s CobaltBlue May 2016 #113
Why, when we have so many strong Dems willing to do the same work? n/t Orsino May 2016 #115
Well since it's a fantasy DVRacer May 2016 #116

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
3. She also can smell blood in the water
Thu May 5, 2016, 05:57 AM
May 2016

A Clinton/Huntsman ticket effectively ends the Republican party.

auntpurl

(4,311 posts)
32. Huntsman worked for Reagan and has restricted abortion rights in Utah.
Thu May 5, 2016, 06:22 AM
May 2016

Also, he's a REPUBLICAN. Choosing a Republican for the Democratic ticket effectively ends the DEMOCRATIC party.

auntpurl

(4,311 posts)
61. Oh, rubbish.
Thu May 5, 2016, 07:08 AM
May 2016

Have you never seen political pandering before? She can't come out and say "Abortion is off the table, next question" even though I'm sure she wants to, because the Repukes will take that and run with it in all 50 states til November. She's been endorsed by Planned Parenthood and NARAL. She's not going to do a damn thing to restrict abortion rights and everyone knows it.

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
66. Yes, we do.
Thu May 5, 2016, 07:16 AM
May 2016

[hr][font color="blue"][center]A 90% chance of rain means the same as a 10% chance:
It might rain and it might not.
[/center][/font][hr]
 

IdaBriggs

(10,559 posts)
67. Yes, she panders. And the amusing part for me is that her supporters
Thu May 5, 2016, 07:19 AM
May 2016

are convinced she's doing it to the other side.

When you examine her policy positions, she only looks like a Democrat because of the letter after her name.

auntpurl

(4,311 posts)
73. If Hillary does anything, one single thing, to restrict abortion rights
Thu May 5, 2016, 07:35 AM
May 2016

in her presidency, I will personally pay you $50. Bookmark this post.

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
10. Huntsman has endorsed Trump. Snowe? Maine.
Thu May 5, 2016, 06:03 AM
May 2016

Collins? Maine and she's endorsed Trump. The pickings are slim. Who is left? Powell?

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
14. Well, actually, yes: Powell
Thu May 5, 2016, 06:05 AM
May 2016

But anyways: Huntsman has said he doesn't want a contested GOP convention, which is not the same as endorsing Trump.

CanadaexPat

(496 posts)
7. I agree - it would be a brillant move.
Thu May 5, 2016, 06:00 AM
May 2016

I wouldn't agree with it, but as a campaign strategy she would build an anti-Trump movement, that would marginalize the left and the far right, with the rationale being that we need to join together to stop Trump, and, perhaps, an added point that by doing this - creating a party or coalition of the center/right - we could overcome the gridlock in Washington by marginalizing groups like that 40-member tea party group in the House that has been such a problem for the Republicans.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
8. Exactly: I'd be pissed as hell, but it would be fucking brilliant
Thu May 5, 2016, 06:01 AM
May 2016

What's the ancient Chinese curse, "Live in interesting times"?

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
13. It wouldn't be brilliant, it would be idiotic.
Thu May 5, 2016, 06:04 AM
May 2016

For all the talk of "too much partisanship", the parties exist for a reason.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
20. After all the complaining she's had her surrogates do at Sanders about not being a real Democrat?
Thu May 5, 2016, 06:07 AM
May 2016

Why were they having such a freakout over independents voting in the primaries, if they're gonna stick a Republican on the ticket that they only wanted capital-D Democrats to vote for?

auntpurl

(4,311 posts)
37. I think this is the first time I've agreed with one of your posts.
Thu May 5, 2016, 06:28 AM
May 2016

"The parties exist for a reason" - exactly.

And the OP is way off base. There's no chance Hillary picks a Republican. Despite what people here say, Hillary is a true-blue Democrat, through and through.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
40. And I agree with yours, here.
Thu May 5, 2016, 06:31 AM
May 2016

Also it would kind of look silly for her to have spent all this time going after Sanders for just joining the party, not to mention all the noise about non-democrats voting in them.


Although --- "the first time", that's odd, usually I make a lot of sense. At least to myself. Maybe you're just reading the wrong ones!

 

closeupready

(29,503 posts)
106. "brilliant" and Hillary are not words that go together.
Thu May 5, 2016, 08:37 AM
May 2016

If she did this, she'd simply be underscoring the fact that she's not very bright, as she's shown everyone, repeatedly.

But if she betrayed the Democratic Party by doing this, I would not be surprised in even the slightest.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
11. Who exactly is this supposed to convince?
Thu May 5, 2016, 06:04 AM
May 2016

It's more playing to this imaginary middle that just doesnt exist.

People thought McCain might pick a right-leaning Democrat in 2008, too. Frankly it stinks of desperation, and I'd like to hope we're not there.

Mike Nelson

(9,980 posts)
16. No mocking...
Thu May 5, 2016, 06:05 AM
May 2016

...but I don't agree. She will pick a Democrat, a 100% Democrat. Now, to your point... it's a good one. Hillary will attempt to find a visible Republican to campaign with and will pick a couple for her Administration. She will take advantage of their unhappiness with Trump, but would not put a Republican in line for the Presidency.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
19. That's a different possibility, which envisions a different campaign
Thu May 5, 2016, 06:07 AM
May 2016

We'll see.

I have absolutely no problem being wrong (I'd like to be, in fact); I just wanted that out there.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
27. We'll have to agree to disagree.
Thu May 5, 2016, 06:11 AM
May 2016

Some versions of herself seem to have been more progressive than others. The iteration in the Senate from 2002-2006, that voted for the IWR, called marriage a "sacred bond between a man and a woman", and wanted to put flag burners in prison for a year, ehhhh. The version that wants a "manhattan project" to make sure people can't encrypt their snapchats, who is "open to" restrictions on abortion and who can only bring herself to support the most basic federal reform to our approach to marijuana despite a majority of Americans favoring legalization, again... ehhhhhhhh


I tell you what, I hope she governs like the progressive I once believed she was. I really do.

TrueDemVA

(250 posts)
22. Seems like natural fit
Thu May 5, 2016, 06:08 AM
May 2016

I would be more surprised if she selected a left leaning democrat. On key issues, she votes as a republican, so this would not be a shock at all. It would probably be the icing on the cake that the Democratic Party is no more.

I know. Sounds all doomsday like. I tend to get a little glass half empty when thinking about a Hillary-Trump election.

CentralMass

(15,265 posts)
44. Yes but the times they differed were important
Thu May 5, 2016, 06:37 AM
May 2016
http://mobile.nytimes.com/2015/05/28/upshot/the-senate-votes-that-divided-hillary-clinton-and-bernie-sanders.html?referer=


The 31 times that Mrs. Clinton and Mr. Sanders disagreed happened to be on some the biggest issues of the day, including measures on continuing the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, an immigration reform bill and bank bailouts during the depths of the Great Recession. Mr. Sanders, who formally kicked off his campaign Tuesday evening in Burlington, Vt., was opposed to all these actions."

Foreign Policy and Defense

The two disagreed most often on military and foreign policy issues, including approval of the civilian nuclear deal between the United States and India in 2008 — Mrs. Clinton was for it — and the confirmation of George W. Casey Jr. as Army chief of staff (Mrs. Clinton was against it). Mr. Sanders was among a small number of senators who voted to allow Guantánamo detainees to be transferred to American prisons, and he was against developing and deploying a defense system to stop Iranian ballistic missiles.


Immigration

Seven of the dissenting votes came when the Senate considered an immigration reform bill in 2007, and most of them were cloture votes to advance debate of the proposal. Mr. Sanders voted no on six such votes in an attempt to block the bill from being voted on by the Senate, mainly because of concerns about fraud in guest-worker programs. Mrs. Clinton supported advancing the bill, which would have offered legal status to millions of undocumented immigrants and improved border security.


Financial Crisis

Mrs. Clinton parted ways with Mr. Sanders over his opposition to the bank bailout bill a month before the November 2008 election. He also voted to deny the Treasury Department the ability to spend the remaining $350 billion in the troubled assets purchase program at the start of the next Congress, while she favored it.


Energy

Mrs. Clinton supported ethanol production — an issue favored by many voters in Iowa — against livestock industry backers, and backed an attempt to end a tax credit for producing renewable diesel by adding animal fat to petroleum. Opponents of the tax credit said the program, designed to help small businesses, was being exploited by large oil and gas companies.


Homeland Security

Mr. Sanders voted to end consideration of three amendments relating to how Homeland Security grants were awarded that pitted small-state senators against senators representing more populous states. Mrs. Clinton favored those amendments, as well as a measure granting limited immunity for reporting suspicious behavior.


Other Topics

The two also disagreed on a 2008 vote that would have barred congressional earmarks — Mrs. Clinton was for an earmark moratorium — and another that would have eliminated a research and development assistance program at the National Institute of Standards and Technology. (Opponents like Mr. Sanders considered the program an example of wasteful spending, and it was eventually shut down.) Mr. Sanders was the only senator to oppose the passage of a bill to reauthorize drug and device user fees set by the Food and Drug Administration, and he also opposed expanding estate tax exemptions that Mrs. Clinton supported."
 

fun n serious

(4,451 posts)
62. Why did he vote NO on this?
Thu May 5, 2016, 07:08 AM
May 2016

Immigration

Seven of the dissenting votes came when the Senate considered an immigration reform bill in 2007, and most of them were cloture votes to advance debate of the proposal. Mr. Sanders voted no on six such votes in an attempt to block the bill from being voted on by the Senate, mainly because of concerns about fraud in guest-worker programs. Mrs. Clinton supported advancing the bill, which would have offered legal status to millions of undocumented immigrants and improved border security.

Beowulf

(761 posts)
75. You answered your own question
Thu May 5, 2016, 07:41 AM
May 2016

The bill had very limited protections for guest workers, the potential for creating permanent indentured servitude was real. The guest workers would be legal and terrifically exploited

Beowulf

(761 posts)
109. You don't have to buy it.
Thu May 5, 2016, 08:53 AM
May 2016

But I wonder why so many Clinton supporters have such difficulties with a representative who actually studies the bills he votes on rather than just going along with the crowd. Maybe that's why he rarely has to apologize for his votes.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
25. No, you're completely wrong, but you're exactly why she'll do this
Thu May 5, 2016, 06:10 AM
May 2016

She's one of the most liberal Senators of the past century, by her voting record, but that wasn't enough. So, yeah: she'll probably look to other realms for support to win. "Congratulations"? Seriously, "great job"

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
28. Kaine would be good. Obviously I like O'Malley as well
Thu May 5, 2016, 06:12 AM
May 2016

Warren I just don't see adding anything, though I love the woman. Same problem Sanders had: she speaks only to the converted.

 

fun n serious

(4,451 posts)
29. It looks like Trump may be looking at
Thu May 5, 2016, 06:16 AM
May 2016

Scott Brown.. He attacked Warren yesterday... said she was "drunk tweeting." They're getting nasty already!

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
59. Oh, I thought Trump said it. Either way, same difference.
Thu May 5, 2016, 07:05 AM
May 2016

The entire Republican apparatus is in no position to be throwing stones on the concept of inebriation, personal or collective.

LenaBaby61

(6,979 posts)
105. Scott Brown?
Thu May 5, 2016, 08:35 AM
May 2016


I usually don't get so giddy but the guy is a loser. But maybe he does belong on a Trump ticket.

Eric J in MN

(35,619 posts)
30. I predict Cory Booker. A centrist who could win the Dem nomination in 2024
Thu May 5, 2016, 06:17 AM
May 2016

...and keep us from having a liberal president for another 8 years after HRC's presidency.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
33. Yes, yes, we must look for candidates from ALL across this great land!
Thu May 5, 2016, 06:25 AM
May 2016

the entire span of the United States of America, all the way from the middle of Pennsylvania, all the way to New Jersey! Lo, all the way from Boston, down to Richmond, to the distant shores of Long Island. The entire great land! The whole entire thing, like, all of it.









Recursion

(56,582 posts)
46. *snort*
Thu May 5, 2016, 06:42 AM
May 2016

OK, that was awesome.

I believe your erroneous map continues south of Richmond, though: clearly there is no such area.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
36. well yeah, there's that too.
Thu May 5, 2016, 06:28 AM
May 2016

Talk about dangling a big juicy steak in front of the House of Representatives. Not like they'd need much encouragement anyway.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
35. Gavin Newsom.
Thu May 5, 2016, 06:27 AM
May 2016

You want a moderate, try Ron Wyden. A solid track record of working with Republicans and he can appeal to the disenfranchised independents concerned about privacy and excesses in unconstitutional spying.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
42. He's young and represents not just the future but a pretty different perspective
Thu May 5, 2016, 06:33 AM
May 2016

than the east coast boomer-centric one which holds court now.

I like my Ron Wyden idea, though.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
45. The problem is both coasts are contrary to the zeitgeist
Thu May 5, 2016, 06:38 AM
May 2016

And that includes Gavin. I'd look for someone from flyover country.

LenaBaby61

(6,979 posts)
102. No, please...
Thu May 5, 2016, 08:31 AM
May 2016

Leave Gavin right here in California. He really needs to succeed Jerry Brown as governor ......

I still think Hillary Clinton's VP pick will be the HUD Secretary, Julian Castro.

 

Motown_Johnny

(22,308 posts)
39. Why not...? It wouldn't be the most conservative thing she has ever done.
Thu May 5, 2016, 06:31 AM
May 2016

She may as well shore up her left flank with an (R).


Recursion

(56,582 posts)
51. Millions of people's lives
Thu May 5, 2016, 06:49 AM
May 2016

You know that, right?

Do you actually not?

Glad you feel comfortable to be nonchalant about that...

 

FreakinDJ

(17,644 posts)
56. Try putting that into some sort of perspective
Thu May 5, 2016, 06:53 AM
May 2016

Or at least whole sentences

Your like totally coming out of left field with your insinuations

 

JackRiddler

(24,979 posts)
111. You're pretty nonchalant about the next set of wars.
Thu May 5, 2016, 09:08 AM
May 2016

Millions of people outside the U.S., no problem.

Demsrule86

(68,770 posts)
93. You people don't even know what third way was
Thu May 5, 2016, 07:59 AM
May 2016

in 1992 we had lost the presidential election three times and were well on our way to a fourth...the country was solidly behind the Reagan myth. Bill Clinton got the presidency back by triangulation...he paved the way for Obama. It was a different time...but you are seriously simplistic in your analysis. Hillary Clinton was always more liberal than Bill was and has a liberal voting record in the Senate. You all can keep this up another couple of weeks but after that your nonsense is done. She won he lost and at some point, you will have to face reality.

 

FreakinDJ

(17,644 posts)
98. Bill didn't win with DLC politics
Thu May 5, 2016, 08:08 AM
May 2016

And fuck your "You People" comment

Bill's DLC triangulation publicly was touted as a means to gather "White Middle Class Men" back into the DNC "Big Tent". In reality Bill politically catered to Silicon Valley's moneyed High Tech Corporations and won on the Black Vote through out the Southern States.

America's Economy was in Recession at the time and Working Class Voters voted with the financial interest just to be sold out to NAFTA 4 years later

ReasonableToo

(505 posts)
52. I think this whole election is a set up going to plan but I don't see her
Thu May 5, 2016, 06:50 AM
May 2016

Picking an actual republican. I definitely see her picking a "Reagan democrat" but not a registered R.

I'll say this though, if she DOES pick an R then we can write in Bernie with no guilty conscience. And if she does pick an R then the Dems SHOULD regroup with many independents and form new party. The ads that show favorable/unfavorable should be plastered all over the country.

But again, I don't see her picking a registered R.

auntpurl

(4,311 posts)
54. You know, I really don't like this thread.
Thu May 5, 2016, 06:51 AM
May 2016

Last edited Thu May 5, 2016, 07:43 AM - Edit history (1)

It plays into the stereotype some Bernie supporters have that all Hillary supporters care about is winning.

Well, I'm a big Hillary supporter and I still care a hell of a lot more about the Democratic Party than I do about Hillary. Saying things like "It'll be genius!" as a political strategy completely ignores that we'd be giving a Republican power on OUR ticket! No way. I want her to choose someone young who can carry the mantle after her 8 years. She's got the experience, she doesn't need a Biden like Obama did. She could raise someone up, someone who can represent hope and the future for our party.

As a strong Hillary supporter, if she chose a Republican, I don't know if I could vote for her.

That said, it's never going to happen. Hillary is a Democrat and she will choose a Democrat. But I don't like the sentiment of this thread at all. Just my two cents.

DemocratSinceBirth

(99,719 posts)
58. Can she pick one from a time machine?
Thu May 5, 2016, 07:01 AM
May 2016

She could award her most stalwart supporters by choosing Frederick Douglass or Thaddeus Stevens.

 

Onlooker

(5,636 posts)
68. That prediction shows how much you're thinking has been distorted by the Bernie supporters' lies
Thu May 5, 2016, 07:22 AM
May 2016

If you knew anything about Hillary, you'd know she would not choose a Republican and you'd know that there is no Republican that would come close to her liberal views.

rogerashton

(3,920 posts)
69. National unity
Thu May 5, 2016, 07:23 AM
May 2016

Lincoln chose a democrat as his running mate in the 1864 election. Now 1) that may have been a mistake -- Johnson was the only president impeached before Bill Clinton, and 2) our national disunion is not as serious today as it was in 1864. Still ....

On the other hand, if she wants to unite the Democratic Party, Jeff Merkley of Oregon would be a good choice. About the right age, too.

 

Warren Stupidity

(48,181 posts)
74. As a sensible centrist I support this!
Thu May 5, 2016, 07:36 AM
May 2016

We need to reach across the isle to our Republican friends and build a strong centrist coalition that will continue the neolib-neocon agenda. Our economy, or at least the Big Donor sector of the economy, depends on perpetual war, on stagnant wages, on huge financial bubbles, and we need to keep the peasants divided over race and gender and culture and religion. We centrists have common ground with the other half of the duopoly.

This is another reason why I am a sensible centrist for Clnton.

auntpurl

(4,311 posts)
92. I think she'd win against Trump with a ficus plant as her running mate.
Thu May 5, 2016, 07:59 AM
May 2016

And no, I'm not getting complacent. She will work her ass off. But I don't believe she NEEDS a Latino on the ticket to win. I'd like to see one, because Latinos are American's fastest-growing demographic and it's about time they had some representation at the executive level.

onenote

(42,821 posts)
81. The question isn't whether you will be wrong. It is whether you are capable of learning
Thu May 5, 2016, 07:49 AM
May 2016

from your mistakes.

When it turns out your wrong -- and you will be -- will it cause you to rethink your perception of Clinton and, more importantly, how your own bias distorts your view of reality?

If so, I'm happy you made the prediction.

If not, I just feel sad that your political acumen is so far below sea level.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
88. What do you think my "perception of Clinton" is?
Thu May 5, 2016, 07:55 AM
May 2016

I think she's one of the more effective democrats in the past generation.

You disagree?

onenote

(42,821 posts)
91. I think your perception of her is that she'd be willing to overlook many viable
Thu May 5, 2016, 07:58 AM
May 2016

Democratic candidates for VP and choose a republican when there is nothing in her history as a politician that suggests that she would do such a thing.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
94. Are you saying nominating a Republican would be a bad thing?
Thu May 5, 2016, 08:00 AM
May 2016

We may disagree there.

You have to win, first. That's number one.

onenote

(42,821 posts)
99. Yes i do.
Thu May 5, 2016, 08:13 AM
May 2016

Picking a repub VP would be a particularly bad idea.
First and foremost, it will upset and alienate many Democrats who support her first and foremost out of party loyalty.

Second, it will be a slap in the face to the side of the party and electorate that is to the left of Clinton. The Sanders' supporters are going to be unhappy as it is. Throwing a repub in their face gives them one more reason not to support the ticket.

Finally, the folks attending the convention will include a combination of Sanders supporters and Clinton supporting party loyalists. Her pick would be controversial and the last she wants -- and the last thing we should want -- is any more controversy at the convention and anything that contributes to a storyline that the Democrats are not united.

As a footnote I might add that I can't think of any repub who would be a compatible, qualified choice to share the national ticket -- and be put in the position of being a heartbeat away from the presidency. Maybe you could help me out with some more specific names of someone who you think would help her more than it would hurt.

DinahMoeHum

(21,825 posts)
82. Here's a stranger one for y'all: Clinton picks Sanders.
Thu May 5, 2016, 07:49 AM
May 2016

Well, why not? JFK chose LBJ in 1960, and Reagan chose George HW Bush in 1980.
Both pairs weren't exactly buddy chum pals during their primaries.

Hell, Hillary could do a whole lot worse than pick Sanders - and she might do this to keep the Sanders supporters in the party come November.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
89. She'll pick someone younger, browner, and more western
Thu May 5, 2016, 07:57 AM
May 2016

Geography and demographics don't take a break just because we found a shiny.

auntpurl

(4,311 posts)
90. Sanders doesn't help her, or the party, in some important ways.
Thu May 5, 2016, 07:57 AM
May 2016

1. He's too old. No, not too old to be president, but Hillary should raise some young talent up in the party, someone who can represent the future. She's got the experience, she doesn't need a Biden like Obama did. She could set us up for 16 more years of WH control if she chooses well.

2. VT is already going to go blue. It'd be good if her choice gave us a swing/contested state that we need to win.

3. We really don't want to take any Democratic senators out of Congress. I'd rather she didn't poach a governor either.

4. Sanders is unlikely to bring his supporters along. His supporters, as has been stated many times on DU, are not interested in the individual but rather the ideology. So if he "sells out", they will abandon him.

Proud Liberal Dem

(24,452 posts)
84. Any ideas who she might pick
Thu May 5, 2016, 07:53 AM
May 2016

Who would be even remotely acceptable? I don't even think the much loathed DWS and elites of the DNC would allow this.

Demsrule86

(68,770 posts)
86. You all come up with silly stuff all time
Thu May 5, 2016, 07:55 AM
May 2016

But this has to be the worst...no Democrat is going to pick a Republican. She is not a Republican as most of you know. When this primary is done...they will study the 'Bernie' voter and conclude...that they had a shot at something great but because of fanaticism over one person...they let it slip away...every day, you people write and say stuff that does damage to Bernie's revolution...he does it too. It really is kind of sad. '

DrDan

(20,411 posts)
96. interesting thought - with all the turmoil in the GOP right now, to include
Thu May 5, 2016, 08:04 AM
May 2016

their efforts re running a third-party/independent GOP candidate - it sure would stir things up.

Huntsman would not be a bad choice.

But it sure is a long-shot - Hillary is a staunch-Dem. The party leaders would sure not want a repub a heartbeat away from the WH.

gordianot

(15,251 posts)
100. At this point I am voting for the Democratic nominee for President and Vice President.
Thu May 5, 2016, 08:14 AM
May 2016

Both should claim Democratic membership. I am particularly interested what the Vice President has to offer given the age of both Presidential candidates and potential legal problems of Hillary Clinton.

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
101. There is a large pool of Democrats in which to select, as stated already, birds
Thu May 5, 2016, 08:25 AM
May 2016

Of a feather flock together, ergo she is a Democrat, been a Democrat all of her voting life and will select a Democrat as a VP. I will remember the birds of a feather line, yes we do flock together, we are Democrats.

 

JackRiddler

(24,979 posts)
110. Oh, I believe you are serious.
Thu May 5, 2016, 09:07 AM
May 2016

You really want to see the full test of Everything That Is Wrong vs. Everything That Is Crazy.

 

CobaltBlue

(1,122 posts)
113. Vice-presidential running mates—both parties—will be same-party picks; born 1960s or 1970s
Mon May 9, 2016, 10:22 AM
May 2016

• R/R
• D/D

Why the 1960s or 1970s?

A contrast in age will be necessary. It is cliche. But, it is also real.

DVRacer

(707 posts)
116. Well since it's a fantasy
Mon May 9, 2016, 02:13 PM
May 2016

How about Jeb Bush you know her brother from another mother. He has already denounced Don Don and this way she can can bring the whole family together.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Predicted: Clinton picks ...