Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

onecaliberal

(32,478 posts)
Wed Apr 6, 2016, 10:42 PM Apr 2016

Why is it acceptable for Hillary Clinton to run for POTUS while under FBI investigation

And probably be indicted? I can't even imagine what the corporate media would be saying if it were Bernie. It's beyond the pale. I don't want another nano second of that scandal plagued pathalogic liar. Her hands are soaked in blood.

16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why is it acceptable for Hillary Clinton to run for POTUS while under FBI investigation (Original Post) onecaliberal Apr 2016 OP
She is not under FBI investigation. DURHAM D Apr 2016 #1
Yeaaaah...it's her server that's in trouble Press Virginia Apr 2016 #8
Then WHO Pretell IS The FBI Investigating? CorporatistNation Apr 2016 #11
You're just making up 'facts' everywhere tonight Joe the Revelator Apr 2016 #12
Joe, DURHAM D Apr 2016 #13
First POTUS candidate ever to be under FBI criminal investigation while campaigning. HooptieWagon Apr 2016 #2
Because there are less than 140 but more than 0 who are working on a non-criminal investigation... Kalidurga Apr 2016 #3
That is 100% not true. Maybe you should read about the investigation onecaliberal Apr 2016 #4
This message was self-deleted by its author Press Virginia Apr 2016 #9
And now the Panama Papers Politicalboi Apr 2016 #5
It definitely is worse. Kalidurga Apr 2016 #7
her quid pro quo behavior was shocking; she used the State Dept as a slush fund amborin Apr 2016 #6
Eugene Debs ran from prison. Downwinder Apr 2016 #10
Because if you do not allow someone to run when under investigation demigoddess Apr 2016 #14
This isn't a bullshit investigation and you know it. I hear what you're saying but this woman onecaliberal Apr 2016 #16
Post removed Post removed Apr 2016 #15

CorporatistNation

(2,546 posts)
11. Then WHO Pretell IS The FBI Investigating?
Wed Apr 6, 2016, 11:27 PM
Apr 2016

Unbelievable! THIS Is Legal? But Is It Ethical?






Rosario Dawson ... WHY She Supports Bernie...

&nohtml5=False

Kalidurga

(14,177 posts)
3. Because there are less than 140 but more than 0 who are working on a non-criminal investigation...
Wed Apr 6, 2016, 10:47 PM
Apr 2016

I think they had 140 at one time, but now that they have gone through all the emails and stuff I am guessing there are less than that working on a non-criminal investigation. Gebus that sounds hinky that so many FBI agents would be working on a non-criminal investigation. Could it be someone is trying to hoodwink us into believing it's a non-criminal investigation. And that Hillary isn't being investigated it's just the emails she sent from her server that is being investigated.

Response to onecaliberal (Reply #4)

 

Politicalboi

(15,189 posts)
5. And now the Panama Papers
Wed Apr 6, 2016, 10:51 PM
Apr 2016

Clinton Foundation laundering money. Is that going to go away? I think this is worse than the FBI investigation.

Kalidurga

(14,177 posts)
7. It definitely is worse.
Wed Apr 6, 2016, 10:54 PM
Apr 2016

She got speaking fees from a German bank that she had greatly enriched with her votes for the trade deal. I could think of worse things she did, but those things are matters of opinion. This however is well documented now.

demigoddess

(6,640 posts)
14. Because if you do not allow someone to run when under investigation
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 01:36 AM
Apr 2016

then a really fast way to take out the opposition party is to have someone investigated. As it is, it is bad publicity and propaganda and the republicans do it anyway. Where were you in Government class, anyway??

onecaliberal

(32,478 posts)
16. This isn't a bullshit investigation and you know it. I hear what you're saying but this woman
Thu Apr 7, 2016, 10:02 AM
Apr 2016

Damn well knew better and did what she was told not to do. She purposely went around the process, hid things, and didn't turn over ANY records even though they all belong to the government. Then lied about how they went through the emails after the fact. She broke the law, if you had done the same thing she did, you'd already be in prison.

On Edit: My government class didn't teach me that is was okay to break the law and threaten national security and get away with it because you're well connected.

Response to onecaliberal (Original post)

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»Why is it acceptable for ...