2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumFULL: Bernie Sanders One-on-One Interview With Rachel Maddow on MSNBC (March 30, 2016)
nc4bo
(17,651 posts)I keep thinking Rachel would have loved to have a Tweety/Trump moment.
She didn't get it from Bernie so now "the panel" gets to have a great discussion on how Rachel can fabricate her Tweety/Trump moment.
The entire bullshit dog and pony circus show post-interview is incredible.
Walk away
(9,494 posts)some of his political contributions (as Hillary is doing and every other candidate usually does) he responds by telling us that he is getting so many millions of dollars that he can't believe it but, sorry, he needs every penny of it to buy the nomination. (out-spending Hillary 6 to 1 in New Hampshire!)
He's a real "saint" alright.
nc4bo
(17,651 posts)It's the 99% buying a voice to represent US.
Who butters Hillary's bread?
Walk away
(9,494 posts)a revolution.
NWCorona
(8,541 posts)At least not me.
If his position bothers you to the point you won't vote for him. That's well within your rights. I just happen to agree with him on this. He needs every penny to beat the Clinton machine.
Walk away
(9,494 posts)because in the real world, the government isn't just some friendless leader with an ideology straight out of the 1950s.
BernieforPres2016
(3,017 posts)She went from the process questions (designed to show Bernie can't win) to questions about how bad Trump is, what do you think about the Republican Party imploding, etc. Not one question about any of Bernie's policies, any of Hillary's policies, any contrast between them. Maddow was basically pretending that the Democratic primaries are over and then capped it off at the end by asking Bernie if he would start giving some of his money to other Democratic candidates.
It was a complete disgrace. No reason for Bernie supporters to even waste their time watching it.