2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumAJAM’s David Shuster Exclusive: Clinton to be Interviewed by FBI Director Comey in Coming Days
"Per Shuster:
While Hillary Clinton fights for the Democratic presidential nomination, law enforcement officials tell Al Jazeera America the Federal Investigation into her personal email system while she was Secretary of State has reached a critical stage.
The FBI, led by Director James Comey, has now finished examining Clintons private emails and home server. And the sources add that Comeys FBI team has been joined by the Justice Department prosecutors. Together, they are now examining the evidence, analyzing relevant laws, and attempting to arrange interviews with key figures in the investigation.
Those interviews, according to attorneys, will include former State Department aides Philippe Reines, Former Clinton Chief of Staff Cheryl Mills, and Clinton herself.
Soon after those interviews in the next few days and weeks officials expect Director Comey to make his recommendation to Attorney General Loretta Lynch about potential criminal charges"
http://www.mediaite.com/online/ajams-shuster-exclusive-hillary-clinton-to-be-interviewed-by-fbi-director-comey-in-mere-days/
enough
(13,255 posts)and he certainly will do that. No problem.
Seems I need to add: SARCASM
NWCorona
(8,541 posts)grasswire
(50,130 posts)It does sound hella scary for anyone sitting in that hot seat before Comey.
I assume this will take place at FBI HQ. I'll have to watch Shuster's tweets.
NWCorona
(8,541 posts)Last edited Wed Mar 30, 2016, 11:31 PM - Edit history (1)
Samantha
(9,314 posts)You will see it there.
Sam
NWCorona
(8,541 posts)This will be happening right before Wisconsin, NY and the debate.
Maybe this is why Hillary was reluctant to debate? These interviews have to be scheduled by now.
grasswire
(50,130 posts)For many reasons.
But it is strange that Huma wasn't listed on the interview list.
Maybe that means she is turning state's evidence. LOL. Not likely.
NWCorona
(8,541 posts)Out of them all I would peg her as the first to break.
I will always give credit where credit is due and Hillary has a loyal circle. Huma seems like she'd be the first to want nothing to do with jail lol!
Jarqui
(10,122 posts)I don't think she'd take it. She and Cheryl will probably try to take the fall for Hillary if it comes to that.
They'll be set for life as a charity for the Clinton Foundation if they do.
They can tap into the Sidney Blumenthal Charity Fund.
morningfog
(18,115 posts)leveymg
(36,418 posts)Makes one wonder about him, as well.
840high
(17,196 posts)Jarqui
(10,122 posts)Apparently the Clinton interview could be in days ...
Going back to her first press conference and since, Hillary has lied about the emails - which helped inspire the investigation - to see why she was lying. That's beyond dispute.
As Shuster reminds, Scooter Libby and Bill Clinton got into trouble - not so much for the underlying potential crime but for lying to investigators.
Hillary has spent the last 25 years having big problems telling the truth. Unlike her husband, she's not a good liar. If she has a Bosnia sniper moment with these guys, she's toast. It's one thing to lie to voters but you can't lie to top people in law enforcement trained to spot deceit who have thoroughly done their homework. Hillary's lying is so chronic, I do not know if she could help herself. This is going to be a tense moment.
So why would her lawyers let her expose herself to that? Maybe if she pleads the 5th her goose is cooked anyway.
NWCorona
(8,541 posts)Got tripped up in the interview and it was a wrap.
The FBI can lie to you and lead you down a path without even realizing it. Normally a lawyer would advise their client to decline the interview. Hillary can't do that and still look clean.
Jarqui
(10,122 posts)Several batches of emails were not turned over by Hillary and have since been found. Many of them were of a potentially classified/delicate nature between Obama, Petraeus, on Benghazi, Dept of Defense, etc
If those emails do not fit the purge criteria they provided when they turned over the balance of the emails they did not delete, then they've got a problem. Now,.the FBI have the IT guy who probably helped them purge the emails as a witness who with immunity, must testify honestly.
So that could be a very tricky dialogue for Hillary. Though I'm sure her lawyers will attempt to prep her with "I did not have sexual relations with ..." type lines.
NWCorona
(8,541 posts)Stating that she turned over everything. I really wonder how the judge feels about this development as he seemed pissed that emails kept popping up after he was told the record was complete.
Jarqui
(10,122 posts)Perjury is a felony.
I was imagining some of the questions:
FBI: "Hillary, you signed off on the nondisclosure agreement that you knew what classified info was and had attended briefings where our people verified you understood. What does born classified mean?
Hillary: "yada yada yada .." (whatever answer she can come up with - she can't say she doesn't know)
FBI: "So why didn't you think defense emails on drones was classified? Or why didn't you think "Sudan Intel" might be classified? Or "extremely sensitive"?"
============
FBI: "Hillary, you gave us the purging rules for your emails. How come Obama, Petraeus, Dept of Defense and Benghazi emails got caught in your purging rules? Aren't these work related and in many cases, classified?"
=============
FBI: "Hillary, how come Saudi Arabia and many other weapons dealers or customers don't give the Clinton Foundation any money for about ten years but after the State Dept approves an arms deal, they send the Clinton Foundation millions? Why does this keep happening while you are Secretary of State but doesn't happen before or after you are Secretary of State?
===============
A lot of very awkward questions
NWCorona
(8,541 posts)Has Hillary released the methodology to how she instructed her team on what to keep and delete? I've followed this case closely but haven't had time to keep up as much as I'd like but that is one thing I've been waiting for.
I'm very interested in Hillary's answers to your questions.
B2G
(9,766 posts)Wedding
Yoga
Funeral
Blumenthal
Saudi Arabia
7wo7rees
(5,128 posts)Is is....."
Never able to get over that one.
H2O Man
(73,506 posts)Recommended.
frylock
(34,825 posts)knr
NWCorona
(8,541 posts)Regardless of what some would say. I think it's starting to sink in.
She's going to be interviewed by the FBI with prosecutors present. This is huge!
RiverLover
(7,830 posts)NWCorona
(8,541 posts)agracie
(950 posts)PonyUp
(1,680 posts)antigop
(12,778 posts)NWCorona
(8,541 posts)Leaves a lot to the imagination. I just wonder if that was an intentional omission.
PonyUp
(1,680 posts)DebbieCDC
(2,543 posts)B2G
(9,766 posts)of who will be interviewed.
bbgrunt
(5,281 posts)MineralMan
(146,255 posts)No names; No Truth!
NWCorona
(8,541 posts)But what will you say if it turns out to be true?
MineralMan
(146,255 posts)When we hear something directly from the FBI, we will have information that is accurate. My issue is with stories that are all over the map and use anonymous sources.
The FBI never releases information about investigations until it finishes them and issues a report. Anyone who claims to have inside information but refuses to be identified should be treated as a bogus source.
NWCorona
(8,541 posts)Judging by our exchanges here, I'd expect just what you said and I'm fine with that if you are consistent.
I also have a problem with anonymous sources but I realize that this is how it works and not only with this story. If things turn out differently I have no problem admitting I was wrong.
MineralMan
(146,255 posts)My guess is that there will be no indictment nor any report that calls for one. If I'm wrong, of course I will admit being wrong. You can't argue with facts. I can, however, and will argue against politically motivated stories that rely on unnamed sources. We can all wait for actual information, and should, I believe.
NWCorona
(8,541 posts)And I'll respect the outcome.
randome
(34,845 posts)[hr][font color="blue"][center]"There is a crack in everything. That's how the light gets in."
Leonard Cohen, Anthem (1992)[/center][/font][hr]