2016 Postmortem
Related: About this forumIf Hillary is aspiring to be president she must not be frightened of 'tone'
Presidents are supposed to be tough and deal with the world's leaders - some of them have 'tone and are really nasty. She will have to prove to us that she can deal with these ogres. Why would she complain about a debate with her gentlemanly opponent Senator Sanders.
TDale313
(7,820 posts)insta8er
(960 posts)fun n serious
(4,451 posts)I think you know that. It's not about that. It's about the way it was DEMANDED and at this point we do not know his intentions.
insta8er
(960 posts)fun n serious
(4,451 posts)I don't know what he is seeking.. exposure in NY at her expense? Destruction of DNC? I don't know. We need to back away from him. WE meaning Clinton, supporters and Campaign. Stay away. We have no idea what his intentions are.
Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)I would have thought a debate in NY would be OK. I don't know why she doesn't want to?
insta8er
(960 posts)That you will not be her adviser.
insta8er
(960 posts)Looking it up yourself, so I did it for you. Now you know what was asked for.
https://berniesanders.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/nydebate.pdf
ljm2002
(10,751 posts)...his intention is to have a debate, preferably in New York.
How fucking hard is that to figure out? The letter they wrote was pretty damned clear.
Now you may not agree they should debate in New York, but she did agree to a debate in April, and it would certainly be more respectful to the voters -- more democratic in fact -- to hold the promised debate before the New York primary rather than after.
At the moment her campaign seems to be floating trial balloons to see if they can get away with reneging on their agreement.
fun n serious
(4,451 posts)JimDandy
(7,318 posts)Gwhittey
(1,377 posts)That Sanders is running a negative campaign so that is now the reason she will not debate. That poster is just parroting it because he can not think for himself and figure out that discussing voting and actions of a person in office is not a negative. But with Hillary talking about her actions in office are negative because they are crappy and hurt people all over the world.
JimDandy
(7,318 posts)fun n serious
(4,451 posts)riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)morningfog
(18,115 posts)What is it with the rich New Yorkers who think they can just renege on debates?
Politicalboi
(15,189 posts)He's seeking another chance so voters can make a choice. If his intentions are to shed some light on Hillary's Wall Street speeches and being part of pay to play, then that's a good thing. The more truth, the more it hurts Hillary. She scared of Bernie and the truth.
2banon
(7,321 posts)malokvale77
(4,879 posts)you must be joking.
Corrupt does not mean tough.
Bernie's intentions have been clear his whole life.
Your intentions, however, could not be more obvious.
redstateblues
(10,565 posts)Still waiting for proof of quid pro quo. Envy is an ugly emotion.
malokvale77
(4,879 posts)I in no way envy corruption.
Onlooker
(5,636 posts)delrem
(9,688 posts)Everyone knows that women can be every bit as sadistic as men, or as pleasant as men.
We all know that qualities like that are universal.
So, you're stretching it to imply any kind of sexist interpretation.
DemocracyDirect
(708 posts)redstateblues
(10,565 posts)desmiller
(747 posts)nichomachus
(12,754 posts)That Russian and Chinese psy-ops people aren't taking copious notes on how to rattle her.
Nonhlanhla
(2,074 posts)This is silly.
RoccoR5955
(12,471 posts)Frightened that she is going to lose!
Nonhlanhla
(2,074 posts)given the fact that she is pretty far ahead in delegates, votes, and in the polls.
But apart from that, even if she feared that she would lose, why would refusing to debate help her? She's pretty good at debating.
If anything, her stance here is based on the fact that she is the prohibitive frontrunner and most likely nominee, and that she refuses to give free air time to her losing rival, at least as long as he does not stop running a negative campaign against her.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)dubyadiprecession
(5,706 posts)ogres. Some of us have been around her for decades seeing her battle the nastiest, meanspirited republicans around.
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)You liken Mitch McConnell, Paul Ryan, Rand Paul, David Vitter, and Lindsey Graham to a KGB Officer who used to pull people's fingernails out with pliers?
Um, you're kidding, right?
"Putin acknowledges that the KGB evaluated him as a man with stunted emotions. His instructors concluded he was at risk, not of succumbing to the temptations of women or drink, but because of his pervasive lowered sense of danger. He was also classified as a man unhelpfully unsocial. To this day, he still only grudgingly half admits the agencys character assessment. I dont think that I had a lowered sense of danger, but the psychologists came to this conclusion having followed my behaviour for a long time, he told journalists back in 2000. This, I fear, is what makes him so ruthless."
This man has no fear. Does not know it. Is so immune to it that Russian psychologists thought it put him at risk. Well, he's no longer at risk; he's in power.
http://www.newstatesman.com/2015/10/ruthlessness-vladimir-putin-0
ibegurpard
(16,685 posts)IdaBriggs
(10,559 posts)Give ONE example, please.
You have nearly 25 years of public service - WHEN did she EVER "win" in a fight against the Republicans about ANYTHING?
Arkansas Granny
(31,514 posts)dealt with world leaders.
Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)redstateblues
(10,565 posts)He said he wouldn't go negative. He lied
cherokeeprogressive
(24,853 posts)I bet he still laughs about "перегрузка" while he's having a Stoly.
TDale313
(7,820 posts)You seriously think Bernie's gone negative?!? He's treated her with kid gloves from the start. Pointing out her record and that she is too cozy with Wall Street is not going negative. Her campaign's red baiting, otoh...
2banon
(7,321 posts)that's the head scratching buga boo here, links?
riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)he has never been disrespectful to her
slipslidingaway
(21,210 posts)sadoldgirl
(3,431 posts)Bernie out to be a bully.
The best response to that could be:
"Madame Secretary will you refuse to talk
to Assad or Putin until they become really
nice and sweet to you?"
No, this makes her look very weak after all,
as well as a person, who cannot be trusted.
timmymoff
(1,947 posts)suspend the campaigns while dealing with the economic collapse. Obama said basically, " No we will sometimes have to deal with two issues at once being president." Hillary seems weak having her campaign call for a change of tone. If she had any courage she would ask them to "cut it out" like she did when she saved us all from economic collapse with her great leadership.
cui bono
(19,926 posts)As a woman I find it deeply disturbing that a woman of her privilege and standing would act so weak so often. And really, for no reason. She's not weak, so why does she play victim so much? It's not like a lot of people have compassion for her, so it doesn't play well.
.
Firebrand Gary
(5,044 posts)It's about party unity. As long as surrogate's continue their unhealthy tone, this party will have difficulty unifying.
BuelahWitch
(9,083 posts)All the fucking spinning they have to do would cause great amounts of motion sickness in normal individuals...
ibegurpard
(16,685 posts)Autumn Colors
(2,379 posts)of Hillary with one hand on her hip and the other shaking a finger .... "I don't like your TONE, young man!"
ibegurpard
(16,685 posts)that's very threatening!
MFM008
(19,804 posts)Shes ahead, she may win the states that are left except for 2, there's been plenty of debates, frankly im sick of debates. The next debate I want to see is between HRC and Tramp. HE needs debates, not her.
Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)TDale313
(7,820 posts)Bernie agreed to a debate before NH-when the Clinton campaign needed/wanted it. On the condition that they agree to 3 more- one each in March, April, and May.
If she tries to weasel out cause it no longer seems to be in her best interest it shows her word means nothing. It reinforces many of the negative impressions people have about her and her lack of trustworthiness. She has more to lose by not debating than by sucking it up and honoring her commitments.
Sheepshank
(12,504 posts)......of someone who has pulled the short straw.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)she needs to worry about tune, since her tune changes every time the sun rises.
Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)until they change their tone.
ThePhilosopher04
(1,732 posts)SheilaT
(23,156 posts)I sincerely doubt it.
Response to Rosa Luxemburg (Original post)
felix_numinous This message was self-deleted by its author.
BreakfastClub
(765 posts)say she is too timid and everyone winds up agreeing that she can't win no matter what she does? Sure sounds that way. Have no fear: Hillary Clinton is a bad-ass, and she will stand up for America and American interests. Hillary never backed down as SoS. Bernie is completely unproven in that regard.
Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)why is she so worried about Bernie's tone? this really isn't working for her.