Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

madfloridian

(88,117 posts)
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 08:34 PM Jan 2016

NARAL spokeswoman who spoke against Bernie is also a DNC Regional Press Secretary.

In my mind there is something just not right about a press secretary for the DNC openly criticizing one of the candidates.

Here is the Slate article quoting her:

Bernie Sanders Just Can’t Get It Right With Women’s Groups

But Sanders is right that the general public can’t know whether Planned Parenthood backed Clinton out of genuine gusto or because the embattled healthcare provider made a political calculation that she was its most electable hope—and that she, like Planned Parenthood, might need all the help she can get.

NARAL rightly tweaked Sanders not for what he did say on Tuesday, but for what he didn’t. “When asked a direct question about why he would be the best candidate for women, he ignored the impending crisis that restricts access to abortion,” spokeswoman Kaylie Hanson wrote. Sanders responded to the controversy over his “establishment” comment, but not to the question at hand: of how he would fight for women’s rights in office. He’s made it clear that, in his mind, the economic critique at the center of his campaign trumps the importance of any identity politics, including gender.

But as Hanson points out, access to health care—and especially to birth control and abortion, which allow women to time their families around their economic situations and their careers—“is an economic issue, and one that's fundamental to a woman's ability to succeed.” Sanders had a great opportunity to make that point last night, and thereby to signal that he really deserved Planned Parenthood’s endorsement. Once again, he passed.


So Kaylie is saying that Bernie did not go far enough to signal he deserved the endorsement. That really should not be an issue in this conversation right now....

Because NARAL has given Bernie Sanders 100% rating through the years.

Bernie on Women's Rights

What has Bernie actually accomplished as far as pro-choice legislation?

During his 16 years in the House of Representatives and 8 years in the Senate, Bernie has consistently supported a woman’s right to choose a safe abortion.

In addition to co-sponsoring the 1993 Freedom of Choice Act, Bernie voted numerous times to allow women to travel interstate for abortions, supported permitting federal funding of organizations that conduct abortions, voted to increase access and funding for family planning for women, and co-sponsored the Women’s Health Protection Act of 2013, which prohibited many limitations on abortions. In March 2008, Bernie voted against defining an unborn child as eligible for State Children’s Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) and in turn defining life as beginning at conception.

In light of these votes, Bernie has repeatedly received ratings of 100 percent from NARAL Pro-Choice America, and ratings of 0 percent from the National Right to Life Committee, indicating a pro-choice stance.


Much more at the link.

Kaylie Hanson in her role as NARAL Spokeswoman is free to say whatever she likes about Bernie's stances.

However Kaylie Hanson in her role as DNC Regional Press Secretary for the Northeast should be a little more careful and show neutrality when speaking of Democratic candidates.



51 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
NARAL spokeswoman who spoke against Bernie is also a DNC Regional Press Secretary. (Original Post) madfloridian Jan 2016 OP
Ah, another DNC official staying faithful to the duty of neutrality. merrily Jan 2016 #1
It's utterly ridiculous how neutrality has gone out the window this primary. madfloridian Jan 2016 #3
Doesn't help any of us. DirkGently Jan 2016 #49
Great research as usual, mad. beam me up scottie Jan 2016 #2
Thanks. madfloridian Jan 2016 #5
Ok, that's bullshit. They're not even trying to hide it anymore Arazi Jan 2016 #4
No, they don't even try to hide it. madfloridian Jan 2016 #6
That figures. CharlotteVale Jan 2016 #7
I can never find this stupid thing when I need it, hold on a moment... Fumesucker Jan 2016 #8
perfect! nashville_brook Jan 2016 #10
sooooooo, that would be The Establishment. nashville_brook Jan 2016 #9
Yep. madfloridian Jan 2016 #12
Sounds like the "Establishment" issue is real, then. DirkGently Jan 2016 #11
"woven into the fabric of" madfloridian Jan 2016 #13
I think everyone knew exactly what he meant. DirkGently Jan 2016 #15
Yes, and "grasp" they did. madfloridian Jan 2016 #45
there's also an amount of unspoken coercion nashville_brook Jan 2016 #17
Price of being nice? DirkGently Jan 2016 #18
This is the often glossed over, avoided, ignored pangaia Jan 2016 #33
it's the BIG reason why the media has gotten the story so wrong. nashville_brook Jan 2016 #47
Another DNC press secretary for Hillary. Quite open about it. madfloridian Jan 2016 #40
Kaylie's twitter page is all Hillary, hardly mentions Bernie...and then negatively. madfloridian Jan 2016 #14
Her tweet about Bernie... madfloridian Jan 2016 #19
lmao the response retrowire Jan 2016 #25
lol good catch. She's so proud of what she does. madfloridian Jan 2016 #28
Here are a bunch more of her little tweeties... pangaia Jan 2016 #35
K&R for Establishment Exposure. nt stillwaiting Jan 2016 #16
Kick! FloriTexan Jan 2016 #20
Where are all the HRC supporters now? Go ahead and defend this Ned_Devine Jan 2016 #21
And notice retrowire Jan 2016 #23
Kaylie proves Bernie's point, wouldsman Jan 2016 #22
Well said. That is so true. madfloridian Jan 2016 #27
Excellent takedown madfloridian. draa Jan 2016 #24
Another Hillary Crony FreakinDJ Jan 2016 #26
She's urging to commit to Hillary right now...links to her support page. NOT neutral. madfloridian Jan 2016 #29
I can't believe the unethical conduct of these people. azmom Jan 2016 #30
Ugh. AzDar Jan 2016 #31
Good gawd...it's so fucking blatant... SoapBox Jan 2016 #32
I was going to say this is unbelievable HerbChestnut Jan 2016 #34
Makes you wonder where some of that Clinton Foundation money went? n/t Skwmom Jan 2016 #36
I've been looking. madfloridian Jan 2016 #37
DNC regional press secretary for the South is IA state director for O'Malley. madfloridian Jan 2016 #38
Her latest tweet: Bernie can't win over reproductive rights groups. Very negative. madfloridian Jan 2016 #39
I always so enjoy your posts & always end the reading so much better informed emsimon33 Jan 2016 #41
Kind words. madfloridian Jan 2016 #43
I believe they call that, "Attempting to wear two hats." Conflicts between job duties. nt TheBlackAdder Jan 2016 #42
That's a good way to put it. madfloridian Jan 2016 #44
Recommend..... KoKo Jan 2016 #46
another careerist insider hijacking feminism for personal gain: sickening zazen Jan 2016 #48
Adamantly fights for women and a part of the DNC. NCTraveler Jan 2016 #50
In 2008 Hillary DEMANDED Dean as chair remain neutral. He did anyway of course. madfloridian Jan 2016 #51

merrily

(45,251 posts)
1. Ah, another DNC official staying faithful to the duty of neutrality.
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 08:40 PM
Jan 2016

Again, Willie Geist said that, when the story of the DNC's role in this primary is written, it's going to look very bad (or words to that effect).

I could not agree more.

DirkGently

(12,151 posts)
49. Doesn't help any of us.
Wed Jan 27, 2016, 12:35 PM
Jan 2016

No one who favors HRC should be onboard with the appearance of cronyism either. It undermines the Democratic brand and supports the criticism we are no better than the other party.

Arazi

(6,829 posts)
4. Ok, that's bullshit. They're not even trying to hide it anymore
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 08:46 PM
Jan 2016

And justifies the accusations that these groups are part of the "establishment"



madfloridian

(88,117 posts)
6. No, they don't even try to hide it.
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 08:57 PM
Jan 2016

The DNC is officially the Hillary campaign committee now. No neutrality anymore.

DirkGently

(12,151 posts)
11. Sounds like the "Establishment" issue is real, then.
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 09:09 PM
Jan 2016

This is precisely what Sanders meant. The leadership of perfectly wonderful progressive groups nonetheless is woven into the fabric of, and beholden to, the DNC.

It doesn't mean he should support them any less, but it does undercut the implication that they have somehow come to a reasoned conclusion that Hillary Clinton is the better candidate on these issues.

DirkGently

(12,151 posts)
15. I think everyone knew exactly what he meant.
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 09:36 PM
Jan 2016

And that he was right. It was simply an opportunity to try to grasp at some advantage by taking offense.

madfloridian

(88,117 posts)
45. Yes, and "grasp" they did.
Wed Jan 27, 2016, 10:12 AM
Jan 2016

Groups that were advocacy groups for women made themselves political arms of the Clinton campaign.

nashville_brook

(20,958 posts)
17. there's also an amount of unspoken coercion
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 09:43 PM
Jan 2016

it's widely known that you don't get a second bite at the Clinton apple. you're either with them, or shut out forever. these LEADERS ALL know this. from unions to progressive groups, everyone wants a seat at the table should some miracle deliver a Clinton win.

these leaders also know that Sanders has no such compunction. so they're free to dis him all they want, and he'll welcome them back into the fold. no harm no foul.

as if.

the rank and file will remember, and there's plenty of foul odor emanating from these ESTABLISHMENT endorsements.

DirkGently

(12,151 posts)
18. Price of being nice?
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 09:51 PM
Jan 2016

That's part of my sense too. It's an easy Pascal's Wager to throw in with the one who will bring the whole establishment (there's that word again) down on your head if you don't, when there is no such danger in leaving the grassroots person out in the cold.

A pattern progressives are pretty familiar with, I think.

nashville_brook

(20,958 posts)
47. it's the BIG reason why the media has gotten the story so wrong.
Wed Jan 27, 2016, 10:27 AM
Jan 2016

there's no beltway reporter who wants the door shut on them should there be a new Clintonian Camelot.

madfloridian

(88,117 posts)
40. Another DNC press secretary for Hillary. Quite open about it.
Wed Jan 27, 2016, 01:10 AM
Jan 2016
Miryam Lipper has taken over as the new Deputy National Press Secretary and Director of Broadcast Media after serving in assistant press secretary and press assistant roles at the DNC. Miryam spent time in Georgia through the 2014 midterms helping to elect Democrats up and down the ticket. Miryam is a graduate of Indiana University. @MiryamLipper


http://www.p2016.org/parties/dnc033015pr.html

retrowire

(10,345 posts)
23. And notice
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 10:30 PM
Jan 2016

we post this stuff out in the GD: P for all to discuss. This isn't in a protected group where they'll be immediately banned for speaking against it.

But they seem to hide when the lights come on. :/

wouldsman

(94 posts)
22. Kaylie proves Bernie's point,
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 10:25 PM
Jan 2016

If she holds a position both as a NARAL spokesperson and a DNC press secretary, then she is in fact part of the establishment. But that is so obvious anyone can see that.

SoapBox

(18,791 posts)
32. Good gawd...it's so fucking blatant...
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 11:26 PM
Jan 2016

Related to that gem, Kathy Sullivan?

Time to clean house at the DNC.

 

HerbChestnut

(3,649 posts)
34. I was going to say this is unbelievable
Tue Jan 26, 2016, 11:38 PM
Jan 2016

But at this point it really isn't. I was worried a bit when Bernie made those comments about HRC, PP, etc. but now I see he was perfectly justified. It's a wonder this type of stuff doesn't make the news.

madfloridian

(88,117 posts)
37. I've been looking.
Wed Jan 27, 2016, 12:09 AM
Jan 2016

I will follow a link that takes me in circles, but never to a definitive answer. I would like to know what, if any, groups get money from them.

madfloridian

(88,117 posts)
38. DNC regional press secretary for the South is IA state director for O'Malley.
Wed Jan 27, 2016, 12:18 AM
Jan 2016
Kristin Sosanie has been tapped as Regional Press Secretary for the South. She comes to the DNC from the South Carolina Democratic Party and Vincent Sheheen’s campaign for Governor in South Carolina, where she served as the Communications Director. Before that, she was the Communications Director for the Obama campaign in Minnesota, after serving as the Communications Director for the Minnesota DFL. Originally from New Jersey, Kristin is returning to DC – she’s spent time on the Hill, working for the House Agriculture Committee, and received both her undergraduate and graduate degrees from The George Washington University. @KSosanie


http://www.p2016.org/parties/dnc033015pr.html

madfloridian

(88,117 posts)
39. Her latest tweet: Bernie can't win over reproductive rights groups. Very negative.
Wed Jan 27, 2016, 12:28 AM
Jan 2016
https://twitter.com/KaylieEHanson/status/692181817689010176


Kaylie Hanson
?@KaylieEHanson

Why Bernie Sanders can't win over reproductive rights groups http://ti.me/1JBIdt3 via @TIMEPolitics



Sounds like their minds are made up.
 

NCTraveler

(30,481 posts)
50. Adamantly fights for women and a part of the DNC.
Wed Jan 27, 2016, 12:37 PM
Jan 2016

This is really a shock to know one. It makes perfects sense. Both organizations fight for me.

One group here keeps trying to frame these people and organizations in a negative light.

madfloridian

(88,117 posts)
51. In 2008 Hillary DEMANDED Dean as chair remain neutral. He did anyway of course.
Wed Jan 27, 2016, 01:33 PM
Jan 2016

This is two-faced. Now the DNC is OPENLY in her well-filled pockets.

This is NOT okay.

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»2016 Postmortem»NARAL spokeswoman who spo...