Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Atheists & Agnostics
Related: About this forumWP: Dawkins: Don’t need God to be good … or generous
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/guest-voices/post/dawkins-dont-need-god-to-be-good--or-generous/2012/07/06/gJQA4fvLSW_blog.html?tid=pm_national_popDawkins: Dont need God to be good or generous
Freethinkers, atheists, agnostics, secular humanists whatever name non-believers go under, are not Americas most popular minority. They are also, not a small minority. According to Gallup, in 2011, and Pew in 2012, they comfortably outnumber Mormons, Muslims, Jews, Hindus and Buddhists all put together. One reason for our unpopularity is the widespread belief that you need God in order to be good. Going along with that misconception is further belief that atheists are less generous than religious people, less philanthropic, less likely to donate to charity. Even if that were the case it would, of course, have no bearing on the truth of religious beliefs.
I would hypothesize that the difference in giving between the religion and nonreligious is negligible if you only count donations to pure charity and discount donations to atheist advocacy organizations, or to churches (including tithes) and charities that unscrupulously use their resources to proselytize rather than bestow real charitable benefits.
Incidentally, because churches are automatically classified as charities for taxation purposes is a disgrace. Nobody denies that some churches do charitable work. But that doesnt mean that any organization should automatically qualify for tax-free status simply by calling itself a church. Each church organization separately should make the case that it does charitable work, just as anybody else has to when seeking tax exemption.
-snip-
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 1445 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (6)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
WP: Dawkins: Don’t need God to be good … or generous (Original Post)
Trajan
Jul 2012
OP
Tithing is a tax mainly for the purpose of maintenance of the church and staff.
LiberalFighter
Jul 2012
#1
LiberalFighter
(51,299 posts)1. Tithing is a tax mainly for the purpose of maintenance of the church and staff.
There should be an accounting determining the usage of contributions showing how much stays with the church and how much is used for real charitable purposes.
Back in the early days with the Colonies and shortly after the Constitution there were states that tax everyone for the church and then handed the funds over to the approved church. Even if they were not members of the church or didn't attend church.
Kennah
(14,352 posts)2. Since a church is tax exempt, isn't tithing really an anti-tax?