Science
Related: About this forumdrm604
(16,230 posts)That brings back memories.
I look forward to seeing Orion there in a few years.
jimlup
(7,968 posts)Only because they are looking towards making this thing manned in the future. Am I wrong or will they change the name to "Orion" when they place people in it?
This is a significant accomplishment because it means that private corporations may be able to shoulder some of the burden of facilitating a space program. Obviously the program will remain deeply tied to the governments pockets for decades to come but we are perhaps on the first step of making space "profitable".
Gore1FL
(21,164 posts)It will be used as the command module in future exploration of worlds and asteroids. It's purpose is to push the frontier. NASA still has that mission.
jimlup
(7,968 posts)But the thing is I think "Orion" is essentially on hold and given the current climate I expect it is semi-permanent if not permanent. Don't get me wrong. I'm a huge fan of the space program.
I think of the days of fully funded NASA manned programs may unfortunately be permanently over. What that means is that private industry has to step in if our manned program is to continue.
My point is and I'm very sorry to say - I think that "Orion" is currently approaching DOA.
drm604
(16,230 posts)Here, for example is a list of Saturn V subcontractors.
http://history.nasa.gov/SP-4206/app-e.htm
NASA has always used private companies.
Rhiannon12866
(206,519 posts)Back in the day they brought TVs into our classrooms so we could watch liftoffs and splashdowns. It was a huge deal and the nation was glued to those broadcasts. Are kids still excited about watching, or has the whole country lost interest?
Javaman
(62,534 posts)drm604
(16,230 posts)so I guess that makes sense.