Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Science
Related: About this forumThe Mistrust of Science
If this place has done its joband I suspect it hasyoure all scientists now. Sorry, English and history graduates, even you are, too. Science is not a major or a career. It is a commitment to a systematic way of thinking, an allegiance to a way of building knowledge and explaining the universe through testing and factual observation. The thing is, that isnt a normal way of thinking. It is unnatural and counterintuitive. It has to be learned. Scientific explanation stands in contrast to the wisdom of divinity and experience and common sense. Common sense once told us that the sun moves across the sky and that being out in the cold produced colds. But a scientific mind recognized that these intuitions were only hypotheses. They had to be tested.
~~~
The sociologist Gordon Gauchat studied U.S. survey data from 1974 to 2010 and found some deeply alarming trends. Despite increasing education levels, the publics trust in the scientific community has been decreasing. This is particularly true among conservatives, even educated conservatives. In 1974, conservatives with college degrees had the highest level of trust in science and the scientific community. Today, they have the lowest.
Today, we have multiple factions putting themselves forward as what Gauchat describes as their own cultural domains, generating their own knowledge base that is often in conflict with the cultural authority of the scientific community. Some are religious groups (challenging evolution, for instance). Some are industry groups (as with climate skepticism). Others tilt more to the left (such as those that reject the medical establishment). As varied as these groups are, they are all alike in one way. They all harbor sacred beliefs that they do not consider open to question.
~~~
The challenge of what to do about thishow to defend science as a more valid approach to explaining the worldhas actually been addressed by science itself. Scientists have done experiments. In 2011, two Australian researchers compiled many of the findings in The Debunking Handbook. The results are sobering. The evidence is that rebutting bad science doesnt work; in fact, it commonly backfires. Describing facts that contradict an unscientific belief actually spreads familiarity with the belief and strengthens the conviction of believers. Thats just the way the brain operates; misinformation sticks, in part because it gets incorporated into a persons mental model of how the world works. Stripping out the misinformation therefore fails, because it threatens to leave a painful gap in that mental modelor no model at all.
So, then, what is a science believer to do?...http://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/the-mistrust-of-science
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
9 replies, 1006 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (8)
ReplyReply to this post
9 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Mistrust of Science (Original Post)
progressoid
Jun 2016
OP
PJMcK
(22,074 posts)1. What a great speech
That was a powerful, insightful and intelligent commencement address. Thanks for linking it, progressoid.
progressoid
(50,020 posts)8. My pleasure!
trotsky
(49,533 posts)2. "This is particularly true among conservatives, even educated conservatives."
Back in the day, despite ideological differences, the parties could USUALLY agree on the science at least. But when the GOP decided it loved power (and money) more than reality itself, that went out the window.
AlbertCat
(17,505 posts)4. loved power (and money) more than reality itself,
Sounds like religion.
Response to trotsky (Reply #2)
SouthernDemLinda This message was self-deleted by its author.
goldent
(1,582 posts)3. One problem is all the hyped-up news about science
especially medical science stories. I think there is a weekly cure for cancer.
progressoid
(50,020 posts)6. I like John Oliver's excellent piece on that...
HuckleB
(35,773 posts)5. This is awesome!
It should be required reading before one signs the new DU agreement!
But according to a couple posters here, We DUers who frequent the Skepticism, Science and Pseudoscience forum are anti-science!