Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Religion
Related: About this forumAnti-LGBT So-Called “First Amendment Defense Act” Would Have Dangerous & Far-Reaching Consequences
http://www.hrc.org/blog/entry/anti-lgbt-so-called-first-amendment-defense-act-has-dangerous-and-far-reachJuly 17, 2015 by Stephen Peters
Today, HRC pinpointed the dangerous consequences of the so-called First Amendment Defense Act (S. 1598, H.R. 2802), introduced by Senator Mike Lee (R-UT) and Representative Raúl Labrador (R-ID). Going far beyond protecting the rights established in the First Amendment, this anti-LGBT legislation would undermine the rule of law and promote taxpayer-funded discrimination. The legislation is scheduled for a markup in the House Oversight and Government Affairs Committee next week.
Once again, House Republicans are pursuing an extreme agenda that is designed to harm LGBT families under the guise of religious freedom. The right to believe is fundamental. The right to use taxpayer dollars to discriminate is not," said HRC Legal Director Sarah Warbelow. Religious freedom is valued by all Americans, but this bill has nothing to do with the First Amendment.
The stated purpose of the First Amendment Defense Act is to prevent discriminatory treatment of any person on the basis of views held with respect to marriage. On its face, the bill would prohibit the federal government from making funding or tax status decisions based on an organizations views on marriage that are driven by religious belief or moral conviction. The right to free exercise of religion is fundamental, and the federal government must already respect the rights of religious institutions to practice their faith including the choice not to perform marriages that are not supported by their faith. However, the First Amendment Defense Act goes far beyond protecting these rights and threatens to create a breakdown of government services, opening the door to discrimination against same-sex couples, their families, and those who love them.
Here are the facts:
The First Amendment Defense Act Provides No New Protections Under the First Amendment.
The First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution provides meaningful and weighty protections for both individuals and religious organizations from burdensome government intrusion. In recent years, federal courts have interpreted the First Amendment to protect religious organizations ability to proselytize and to freely express their beliefs without government interference. Federal courts have also broadly interpreted existing exemptions from federal civil rights laws, affirming religious organizations ability to make decisions concerning employment to a wide variety of employees from teachers to administrative staff based on religious convictions. No religious organization or clergy is required to sanction or perform same-sex marriage under any federal or state law.
more at link
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
1 replies, 574 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
1 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Anti-LGBT So-Called “First Amendment Defense Act” Would Have Dangerous & Far-Reaching Consequences (Original Post)
cbayer
Jul 2015
OP
skepticscott
(13,029 posts)1. Religion makes people stupid
It makes them think stupid, say stupid and do stupid.
And the religionists here try their darnedest to excuse and rationalize the most despicable things. Good thing we've seen less of some of them lately..