Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
U.S. to weigh arming Syrian rebels, official says
Source: Reuters
U.S. to weigh arming Syrian rebels, official says
By Arshad Mohammed and Matt Spetalnick
WASHINGTON | Mon Jun 10, 2013 11:04am EDT
(Reuters) - The United States could make a decision as early as this week on whether to arm Syrian rebels, U.S. officials said on Monday, as U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry put off a Middle East trip to attend meetings on the subject.
However, the U.S. government has debated for months whether to provide weaponry to the rebels in their civil war against Syrian President Bashar al-Assad's forces and has so far decided against.
One U.S. official who spoke on condition of anonymity stressed that while a decision on whether to start arming the rebels is possible as soon as this week, deliberations on the issue could easily take longer.
Kerry put off a planned trip to Israel and the Palestinian territories to attend the White House meetings, an Obama administration source said.
[font size=1]-snip-[/font]
By Arshad Mohammed and Matt Spetalnick
WASHINGTON | Mon Jun 10, 2013 11:04am EDT
(Reuters) - The United States could make a decision as early as this week on whether to arm Syrian rebels, U.S. officials said on Monday, as U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry put off a Middle East trip to attend meetings on the subject.
However, the U.S. government has debated for months whether to provide weaponry to the rebels in their civil war against Syrian President Bashar al-Assad's forces and has so far decided against.
One U.S. official who spoke on condition of anonymity stressed that while a decision on whether to start arming the rebels is possible as soon as this week, deliberations on the issue could easily take longer.
Kerry put off a planned trip to Israel and the Palestinian territories to attend the White House meetings, an Obama administration source said.
[font size=1]-snip-[/font]
Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/06/10/us-usa-syria-idUSBRE9590HY20130610
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 887 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
U.S. to weigh arming Syrian rebels, official says (Original Post)
Eugene
Jun 2013
OP
clarice
(5,504 posts)1. Uh, yes, a GREAT plan. Like giving kids beer and the keys to the corvette. nt
DetlefK
(16,423 posts)2. In other news (here on DU), Al-Qaeda in Syria executes 15 year-old
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1014505000
This is exactly the situation that was avoided in Libya: If Gaddafi's army had crushed the rebels in Benghazi, the would have fractured, gone undercover and radicalized. The West stopped Gaddafi's offensive with bombings and a more or less regular warfare began.
The conflict in Syria was left to simmer.
The West hoped, the rebels would win and all this unpleasantness would just go away.
Russia hoped, their ally Assad would win and all this unpleasantness would just go away.
And now it's to late for a clean cut. Syria is in a downward-spiral nobody can stop.
This is exactly the situation that was avoided in Libya: If Gaddafi's army had crushed the rebels in Benghazi, the would have fractured, gone undercover and radicalized. The West stopped Gaddafi's offensive with bombings and a more or less regular warfare began.
The conflict in Syria was left to simmer.
The West hoped, the rebels would win and all this unpleasantness would just go away.
Russia hoped, their ally Assad would win and all this unpleasantness would just go away.
And now it's to late for a clean cut. Syria is in a downward-spiral nobody can stop.
rbixby
(1,140 posts)3. I think this is definitely a case of 'stay out of this'
Neither side is the 'good' guy. At the end of the day, at least Assad was the devil you know, all these various rebel groups...who knows about them?