Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

virginia mountainman

(5,046 posts)
Fri Jul 27, 2012, 09:19 PM Jul 2012

I am confused about something..

Why is the press and gun control advocates making a big deal about the amount of ammunition James Holmes had in his apartment...

When he only fired a few boxes worth in his shooting spree?? (maybe 100 rounds, give or take a few)

Makes absolutely no sense whatsoever why some people are all worked up about it. Or are they simply pontificating to hear themselves?

44 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I am confused about something.. (Original Post) virginia mountainman Jul 2012 OP
Joking? elleng Jul 2012 #1
I would suppose it's an indicator of future plans, or of mentality. krispos42 Jul 2012 #2
Heck, I stockpile ammo too.. virginia mountainman Jul 2012 #14
You might want to step down from your mountain occasionally Starboard Tack Jul 2012 #43
I wait for deals, too Glaug-Eldare Jul 2012 #44
Stockpiling ammo is often caused by the fact that the price of ammo has and will skyrocket. ... spin Jul 2012 #40
Or are they simply pontificating to hear themselves? gejohnston Jul 2012 #3
Because NOBODY Politicalboi Jul 2012 #4
This message was self-deleted by its author Simo 1939_1940 Jul 2012 #5
"Kapow works well when shooting someone to let them know you shot them." Simo 1939_1940 Jul 2012 #6
What? Politicalboi Jul 2012 #10
yeah we would gejohnston Jul 2012 #12
Pure nonsense. Simo 1939_1940 Jul 2012 #20
The blame belongs to the cartels and the US Trunk Monkey Jul 2012 #36
How many rounds did Holmes use? n/t cherokeeprogressive Jul 2012 #39
Wrong. Clames Jul 2012 #9
Well they should at least limit Politicalboi Jul 2012 #11
Why are you using a "needs" qualifier when discussing the practicing of a civil liberty?? virginia mountainman Jul 2012 #21
Why are you buying cold medicine so often? Clames Jul 2012 #25
YAWN.. virginia mountainman Jul 2012 #15
I'll give your rant -1 based on it's weakness... -..__... Jul 2012 #29
wasn't the apartment booby-trapped? wouldn't all that ammo contribute to big boom that was intended Tuesday Afternoon Jul 2012 #7
Ammo really is not that explosive..."outside of a pressure vessel" virginia mountainman Jul 2012 #18
what does concern me is the fact that an obviously disturbed young man was able to escape Tuesday Afternoon Jul 2012 #27
You are spot on correct... virginia mountainman Jul 2012 #37
Possibly... -..__... Jul 2012 #26
Two comments about this: Tuesday Afternoon Jul 2012 #28
Actully.. virginia mountainman Jul 2012 #30
As a 28+ year firefighter... -..__... Jul 2012 #35
if he was thinking that way, virginia mountainman Jul 2012 #31
Maybe if that's someone like you or me who knows that kind of stuff... -..__... Jul 2012 #33
I'd be thrilled to be living next to TheCowsCameHome Jul 2012 #8
maybe you do gejohnston Jul 2012 #13
Go for it. TheCowsCameHome Jul 2012 #17
you been watching too many TV cop shows gejohnston Jul 2012 #19
Certainly, everyone has that much ammo and booby traps on hand. TheCowsCameHome Jul 2012 #22
not that much ammo gejohnston Jul 2012 #23
why, is the couch polyester???? virginia mountainman Jul 2012 #38
Yes.. virginia mountainman Jul 2012 #24
Because it adds to the emotion-based argument sylvi Jul 2012 #16
Because big numbers are scary. Acronyms are scary. Faux-psychiatric terms like petronius Jul 2012 #32
Because it helps sell the story and grabs headlines Reasonable_Argument Jul 2012 #34
This would be the correct answer. ManiacJoe Jul 2012 #42
They still believe guns and ammo kill people. ileus Jul 2012 #41

elleng

(131,277 posts)
1. Joking?
Fri Jul 27, 2012, 09:24 PM
Jul 2012
???

You MUST be kidding. mountainman doesn't understand that the 'amount of ammunition' might be USED somewhere/somehow? And he 'only fired a few boxes worth in his shooting spree.'

Appears you have no understanting about the huge social issues presented by the fact that an apparently 'insane' person could acquire, and might have used, all of these deadly items.

krispos42

(49,445 posts)
2. I would suppose it's an indicator of future plans, or of mentality.
Fri Jul 27, 2012, 09:26 PM
Jul 2012

"Stockpiling" ammunition has connotations that are negatives. People expecting (and possibly hoping for) the end of civilization, civil war, famine, etc.

virginia mountainman

(5,046 posts)
14. Heck, I stockpile ammo too..
Fri Jul 27, 2012, 09:49 PM
Jul 2012

I buy it when it's cheap... I have no idea how much I have here, but around 5,000 rounds would be a good guess.

I still have several Bandoleer of Turkish 8mm Mauser ammo, I bought for practicably a penny a round back in the 1990's

I also have a few belts left over of British MK VII .303 Vickers MG ammo, we would pull several rounds out of the cloth belts, when we would go shooting.

And we are not even talking about the 7.62 stuff I have packed away.

The ammo was dirt cheap, so why not stock up?

Not to mention lots and lots of reloading supplies.

WOW, look at what the Vickers belts are going for now!! I think I gave $30 for each one, still sealed in it's zinc lined wooden box!

http://www.gunauction.com/buy/10694662/collectible-ammo-for-sale/foreign-military/-num-540-.303-vickers-machine-gun-web-belt-and-ammo

No more shooting of that stuff, its too valuable!!

Starboard Tack

(11,181 posts)
43. You might want to step down from your mountain occasionally
Sat Jul 28, 2012, 01:09 PM
Jul 2012

and check out how the rest of the world thinks and operates. You buy ammo because it's "cheap"? Are there other things you buy just because they're cheap? Makes one wonder what you're preparing for.

Glaug-Eldare

(1,089 posts)
44. I wait for deals, too
Sat Jul 28, 2012, 01:39 PM
Jul 2012

Ammunition is expensive -- I prefer to wait until I see a deal where I can buy a few thousand at a time and save on both quantity and shipping, then not have to be concerned about buying more ammo for a year or more. It's a significant cost savings, and for a shooter with no violent intent, there's no reason to ask themself, "do I really NEED three thousand rounds at once?" The question is "What's the discount if I buy four thousand instead?" Innocent people don't second-guess themselves when they buy controlled medicines before they get sick, innocent people don't second-guess themselves when they buy extra groceries to use a coupon, innocent people don't second-guess themselves when they buy extra model glue because it's on sale, and innocent people don't need to second-guess themselves when they see an opportunity to save tens or even hundreds of dollars on ammunition for lawful use.

I think the problem is that many non-shooters perceive ammunition as an inherently dangerous thing, which should only be possessed in small amounts, whereas shooters don't see a five thousand round reserve as any more sinister than a spare can of gas for the lawnmower.

spin

(17,493 posts)
40. Stockpiling ammo is often caused by the fact that the price of ammo has and will skyrocket. ...
Sat Jul 28, 2012, 07:13 AM
Jul 2012

Stored properly ammo will last decades. Many people in the shooting sports go through thousands of rounds each year.

I used to reload ammo and I usually reloaded 6000 rounds per year. That may sound like a lot but I went to the range once a week and fired two 50 round boxes of ammo through whatever handgun I took that day. That would account for 5200 rounds and occasionally I would shoot more than 2 boxes especially if I took two of my revolvers out to practice. I also would usually shoot a box of 50 .22 caliber bullets as a warm up. You don't reload this type of ammo.

I was never was a competitive handgun shooter and had I been I would have fired thousands of rounds each month.

Many shooters who do not reload buy ammo when they find it at a good price and are able to still enjoy their hobby when political fears cause ammo prices to jump dramatically or when the demand clears the store shelves of all popular ammo.

gejohnston

(17,502 posts)
3. Or are they simply pontificating to hear themselves?
Fri Jul 27, 2012, 09:26 PM
Jul 2012

Yeah. It sounds like a big deal, so they use it to sensationalize it even more.

 

Politicalboi

(15,189 posts)
4. Because NOBODY
Fri Jul 27, 2012, 09:27 PM
Jul 2012

Needs that amount of ammo. Those for gun rights should go after ammo instead of guns. The right to bear arms doesn't say anything about your arms being loaded. Kapow works well when shooting someone to let them know you shot them.


Some gun fanatics are also pro-life idiots. So why not fuck with their rights for a change. Make them jump through hoops to keep their sacred guns loaded. If we regulate ammo it would help eliminate more deaths due to guns.

Response to Politicalboi (Reply #4)

Simo 1939_1940

(768 posts)
6. "Kapow works well when shooting someone to let them know you shot them."
Fri Jul 27, 2012, 09:33 PM
Jul 2012

And promoting/smoking grass works well in financing/empowering the cartels primarily responsible for gun violence worldwide.
 

Politicalboi

(15,189 posts)
10. What?
Fri Jul 27, 2012, 09:39 PM
Jul 2012

LOL! Don't blame us potheads for the cartels who deal in anything illegal. If the US made pot legal we wouldn't have those cartels. The blame belongs to the cartels and the US. Marijuana is a harmless weed that hurts no one.

And if the US made owning over 100 rounds illegal we wouldn't have these mass shootings as often. It wouldn't get rid of the problem, but to encourage it by not making it illegal leaves the door to the asylum open for all.

gejohnston

(17,502 posts)
12. yeah we would
Fri Jul 27, 2012, 09:46 PM
Jul 2012

and what about the pot heads who buy from the cartels and local street dealers who shoot each other? Why should my individual liberties be curtailed because a problem I don't contribute to?

Simo 1939_1940

(768 posts)
20. Pure nonsense.
Fri Jul 27, 2012, 10:00 PM
Jul 2012

And if the US made owning over 100 rounds illegal we wouldn't have these mass shootings as often.

The hell we wouldn't. It's excruciatingly naive to believe that owning over 100 rounds of ammo will ever be made illegal, OR that a highly motivated psycho couldn't find a work-around to such an absurd fantasy.

I'm actually with you w/regard to decriminalizing MJ -- but until that happens don't pretend for a moment that sales of grass don't provide the financial bedrock that the cartels depend on for their other activities.
 

Trunk Monkey

(950 posts)
36. The blame belongs to the cartels and the US
Fri Jul 27, 2012, 11:58 PM
Jul 2012

Really? So no blame should attach itself to the pot heads that support the cartels?

The ones who create the demand that drives the supply and makes it a lucrative enough business to kill people over should share none of the blame?

 

Clames

(2,038 posts)
9. Wrong.
Fri Jul 27, 2012, 09:39 PM
Jul 2012

That's all there is. You are wrong...

http://constitution.org/leglrkba.htm

The U.S. Constitution does not adequately define "arms". When it was adopted, "arms" included muzzle-loaded muskets and pistols, swords, knives, bows with arrows, and spears. However, a common- law definition would be "light infantry weapons which can be carried and used, together with ammunition, by a single militiaman, functionally equivalent to those commonly used by infantrymen in land warfare."
 

Politicalboi

(15,189 posts)
11. Well they should at least limit
Fri Jul 27, 2012, 09:45 PM
Jul 2012

The amount. If I get questioned for buying cold medicine too often, then they can do it with ammo too. Nobody needs a stock pile of ammo.

virginia mountainman

(5,046 posts)
21. Why are you using a "needs" qualifier when discussing the practicing of a civil liberty??
Fri Jul 27, 2012, 10:00 PM
Jul 2012

That is very dangerous logic. Would you want someone to use a needs qualifier when talking about our other civil liberties?

How about applying the needs qualifier to the right to free speech, or the right to health care??

Our civil liberties is not like a cheap Chinese buffet, where you can pick over the stuff you like and don't like..

It very much is "all or NOTHING"

 

Clames

(2,038 posts)
25. Why are you buying cold medicine so often?
Fri Jul 27, 2012, 10:09 PM
Jul 2012

Don't need medicine to get over a cold. You stocking up for some reason?

 

-..__...

(7,776 posts)
29. I'll give your rant -1 based on it's weakness...
Fri Jul 27, 2012, 10:32 PM
Jul 2012

and lack of bug-eyed, fist pounding, sweat beads outrage.

However... to your credit, I'll give you a +1 for not posting that same'ol, same'ol Chris Rock "if bullets cost
$5,000.. he must have done something... he got $5,000 worth of bullets in his ass" belly laugh.

So... you're breaking even in my book... quit while you can still maintain some dignity.


Added note... can you gun grabber types please, please stop referring to that stupid ass routine?

It was funny once, maybe twice.. more than that, it just becomes another gun grabber talking point.

Try quoting some Yoda shit or something next time if you expect to be taking seriously.

Tuesday Afternoon

(56,912 posts)
7. wasn't the apartment booby-trapped? wouldn't all that ammo contribute to big boom that was intended
Fri Jul 27, 2012, 09:35 PM
Jul 2012

or did I miss something?

virginia mountainman

(5,046 posts)
18. Ammo really is not that explosive..."outside of a pressure vessel"
Fri Jul 27, 2012, 09:56 PM
Jul 2012

A live round tossed into a fire, will eventually go "pop" like a fire cracker, but since it is not in a gun's chamber, and cannot build up pressure, the force released is relativity very small compared to the POTENTIAL energy it has.

It might surprise you to learn, that when ammo "cooks off" in a open fire, the bullet (projectile) actually will still be close to where the was before it went "pop". The only slightly dangerous part, is the empty shell casing, as it comes out of the fire. The bullet is too heavy to go flying, but the empty shell casing is not.

Tuesday Afternoon

(56,912 posts)
27. what does concern me is the fact that an obviously disturbed young man was able to escape
Fri Jul 27, 2012, 10:19 PM
Jul 2012

notice from society. Something is very wrong. How did this happen?

That is the number One question that, I think needs to be asked and answered.

How do we as a society help these young men.

I include the "thugs" and "terrorists" in this group because it is my contention that they are as seriously disturbed as James Holmes.

I think we are focusing on the wrong issue.

I am beginning to think that I am the only person that wants to frame the discussion in this manner.

virginia mountainman

(5,046 posts)
37. You are spot on correct...
Sat Jul 28, 2012, 12:39 AM
Jul 2012

It is mental health issue first, and foremost by far..

But attacking Gun Owners is much easier than even starting to talk about mental health issues. And then the "powers that be" and "news makers" wish to talk about banning things, and paint the rosy picture that "all would be ok if we banned A, B, and C"

Than this fine forum denigrates and the usual suspects start "Iverglas-ing" at length in OP's, and other threads and causing lots of angst among people that in normal times would be getting along fine for the most part.

Than it is time to get defensive, to defend your view, that is suddenly under attack from many people that the only thing they know about guns is which end the bullet comes out of....And of course, what movies and the TV show "law and order" has taught them.

We loose sight of the fact, that it, at its core, is a mental health issue. And that up until the moment, he entered the theater with his weapons, he probably would have been viewed as someone in need of help.

 

-..__...

(7,776 posts)
26. Possibly...
Fri Jul 27, 2012, 10:12 PM
Jul 2012

all depends on what his intentions/plans were.

One possibility is that he used a bullet puller (or pair of pliers), in order to empty the casings for the smokeless powder to construct his devices.

Say he kept 500 for his shooting spree; that leaves 5,500 rounds with roughly 20.00 grains (+/- a grain or two), with 7,000 grains in a pound...

5,500 x 20 / 7,000 = 15.714 lbs of powder.

That would make one fuck of a mess in a confined space, especially if flammable liquids are thrown into the mix.

The problem I have with that scenario, is that it would have been much cheaper and less time consuming to purchase 1lb or 5lb canisters of powder as sold to shooters who reload their own ammo.

If they were just loose and/or packaged rounds... it wouldn't have done jack shit except for being a waste of perfectly good ammo.

Tuesday Afternoon

(56,912 posts)
28. Two comments about this:
Fri Jul 27, 2012, 10:25 PM
Jul 2012

That would make one fuck of a mess in a confined space, especially if flammable liquids are thrown into the mix.


that is what I was thinking .... not good at all.



The problem I have with that scenario, is that it would have been much cheaper and less time consuming to purchase 1lb or 5lb canisters of powder as sold to shooters who reload their own ammo.


Obviously, this is a disturbed mind with which we are dealing.

virginia mountainman

(5,046 posts)
30. Actully..
Fri Jul 27, 2012, 10:42 PM
Jul 2012

As a reloader I know this....

Practically ALL, Smokeless powder, used in modern ammunition, is NOT explosive, If you put a lit match to a pile of it, it will simply burn. It MUST build up pressure in a firearm, to become "explosive".



Now, Black powder,Pyrodex, and other black powder substitutes, as used in muzzle loaders, are much more "energetic animal" and must be treated very carefully.




 

-..__...

(7,776 posts)
35. As a 28+ year firefighter...
Fri Jul 27, 2012, 11:53 PM
Jul 2012

5,000 rounds of improperly stored ammo wouldn't concern me nearly as much as 5 gallons of improperly stored gasoline would.

By "improperly", I mean near a source of ignition.

virginia mountainman

(5,046 posts)
31. if he was thinking that way,
Fri Jul 27, 2012, 10:47 PM
Jul 2012

He would have simply bought a 8 lb keg of powder and been done with it. Anyplace that sells reloading gear, could have sold it too him. Heck he could have ordered it online for that matter.

http://www.ballisticproducts.com/Hodgdon-Pyrodex-RS-1-lb/productinfo/0812221/

If he was serious about it and did a bit of research he would have done what Timothy McVeigh did..

 

-..__...

(7,776 posts)
33. Maybe if that's someone like you or me who knows that kind of stuff...
Fri Jul 27, 2012, 11:41 PM
Jul 2012


By that I mean people experienced with firearms, reloading and what would work, and what wouldn't.

But, who really knows what this guy was thinking and how much serious thought he put into it.

If he had done enough research... he would have known that Beta Mags are a POS.

Obviously... he didn't.

A little more research, and a little more imagination, and he could have created even more mayhem without a single round being fired or explosive being detonated.

I'm guessing this guy got his ideas from crap like "The Anarchist Cookbook" and Loompanics/Paladin Press publications and worked out some of the bugs.

TheCowsCameHome

(40,169 posts)
17. Go for it.
Fri Jul 27, 2012, 09:53 PM
Jul 2012

When the hoarder drops a lit butt in on the couch, you'll go quickly.

And who's talking about meth labs, anyway? Stay on topic.

TheCowsCameHome

(40,169 posts)
22. Certainly, everyone has that much ammo and booby traps on hand.
Fri Jul 27, 2012, 10:01 PM
Jul 2012

It's a basic staple, like milk and cereal.

And I don't watch cop shows, Nostradamus.

gejohnston

(17,502 posts)
23. not that much ammo
Fri Jul 27, 2012, 10:06 PM
Jul 2012

I once bought 8K rounds of .22s. Actually, it was for three sets of tins with Fredrick Remington paintings on them. Each tin had about 675. It took me a couple of years to shoot them all. .22s don't take up that much space. Full of ammo or not, they looked nice on my book shelf.

virginia mountainman

(5,046 posts)
24. Yes..
Fri Jul 27, 2012, 10:08 PM
Jul 2012

A can of gasoline, is far FAR, more dangerous than a few thousand rounds of stored ammo.

You can ship ammunition, it does not even rate a hazmat designation, try to ship a full gas can,

 

sylvi

(813 posts)
16. Because it adds to the emotion-based argument
Fri Jul 27, 2012, 09:52 PM
Jul 2012

SIX THOUSANDZ ROUNDZ!!! OH NOOOESSSS!!!11!1ELEVENTYONE!!

What shooter in the history of mass murders has ever come close to using that much ammo? Usually it's a few dozen rounds at most before they off themselves, are shot, or run away temporarily before being caught.

It's not unusual for legitimate gun enthusiasts to have that much ammo on hand or more if they've recently come across a sale or the ammo is spread over several different guns.

petronius

(26,608 posts)
32. Because big numbers are scary. Acronyms are scary. Faux-psychiatric terms like
Fri Jul 27, 2012, 10:52 PM
Jul 2012

"hoarding" and "obsession" are scary. Military monikers like AK-47 are scary. And it's so much easier to sway public opinion with 'scary' than it is with facts...

 
34. Because it helps sell the story and grabs headlines
Fri Jul 27, 2012, 11:48 PM
Jul 2012

Many people don't know a damn thing about firearms, just look at this forum for example, and by adding "1000s of rounds" to a story it makes it sound more sinister so it grabs people's attention.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Gun Control & RKBA»I am confused about somet...