Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Gun Control & RKBA
Related: About this forumI want to see this movie!
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/03/29/956910/-RKBA-Deacons-for-DefenseRKBA: Deacons for Defense
The film, produced by Showtime stars academy-award winner Forest Whitaker, Ossie Davis and Jonathan Silverman. The film is based on the actual Deacons for Defense and their struggle to fight against the Jim Crow South in a powerful area of Louisiana that is controlled by the Ku Klux Klan. The film bases the story around a white-owned factory that controls the economy of the local society and the effects of racism and intimidation on the lives of the African-American community. The film follows the psychological transition of a family and community members from ones that believe in a strict non-violent stance to ones that believe in self-defense.
Looks like an extremely interesting take on the RKBA, has anyone here seen it?
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 1041 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (1)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I want to see this movie! (Original Post)
Tejas
Jul 2012
OP
shadowrider
(4,941 posts)1. I've heard it's pretty good n/t
ProgressiveProfessor
(22,144 posts)2. I had family in the Deacons for Defense (not the movie)
They owned the night in some areas...not the guys in the white hoods
spin
(17,493 posts)3. The KKK was a bunch of bullies ...
who loved to terrorize the helpless. Bullies fear those who can fight back.
[blockquote
The Secret History of Guns
***snip***
For many years gun control largely was designed primarily to prevent minorities from owning firearms.
Indisputably, for much of American history, gun-control measures, like many other laws, were used to oppress African Americans. The South had long prohibited blacks, both slave and free, from owning guns. In the North, however, at the end of the Civil War, the Union army allowed soldiers of any color to take home their rifles. Even blacks who hadnt served could buy guns in the North, amid the glut of firearms produced for the war. President Lincoln had promised a new birth of freedom, but many blacks knew that white Southerners were not going to go along easily with such a vision. As one freedman in Louisiana recalled, I would say to every colored soldier, Bring your gun home.
After losing the Civil War, Southern states quickly adopted the Black Codes, laws designed to reestablish white supremacy by dictating what the freedmen could and couldnt do. One common provision barred blacks from possessing firearms. To enforce the gun ban, white men riding in posses began terrorizing black communities. In January 1866, Harpers Weekly reported that in Mississippi, such groups had seized every gun and pistol found in the hands of the (so called) freedmen in parts of the state. The most infamous of these disarmament posses, of course, was the Ku Klux Klan. ...emphasis added
***snip***
The Fourteenth Amendment illustrates a common dynamic in Americas gun culture: extremism stirs a strong reaction. The aggressive Southern effort to disarm the freedmen prompted a constitutional amendment to better protect their rights. A hundred years later, the Black Panthers brazen insistence on the right to bear arms led whites, including conservative Republicans, to support new gun control. Then the pendulum swung back. The gun-control laws of the late 1960s, designed to restrict the use of guns by urban black leftist radicals, fueled the rise of the present-day gun-rights movementone that, in an ironic reversal, is predominantly white, rural, and politically conservative.
http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2011/09/the-secret-history-of-guns/8608/
The Secret History of Guns
***snip***
For many years gun control largely was designed primarily to prevent minorities from owning firearms.
Indisputably, for much of American history, gun-control measures, like many other laws, were used to oppress African Americans. The South had long prohibited blacks, both slave and free, from owning guns. In the North, however, at the end of the Civil War, the Union army allowed soldiers of any color to take home their rifles. Even blacks who hadnt served could buy guns in the North, amid the glut of firearms produced for the war. President Lincoln had promised a new birth of freedom, but many blacks knew that white Southerners were not going to go along easily with such a vision. As one freedman in Louisiana recalled, I would say to every colored soldier, Bring your gun home.
After losing the Civil War, Southern states quickly adopted the Black Codes, laws designed to reestablish white supremacy by dictating what the freedmen could and couldnt do. One common provision barred blacks from possessing firearms. To enforce the gun ban, white men riding in posses began terrorizing black communities. In January 1866, Harpers Weekly reported that in Mississippi, such groups had seized every gun and pistol found in the hands of the (so called) freedmen in parts of the state. The most infamous of these disarmament posses, of course, was the Ku Klux Klan. ...emphasis added
***snip***
The Fourteenth Amendment illustrates a common dynamic in Americas gun culture: extremism stirs a strong reaction. The aggressive Southern effort to disarm the freedmen prompted a constitutional amendment to better protect their rights. A hundred years later, the Black Panthers brazen insistence on the right to bear arms led whites, including conservative Republicans, to support new gun control. Then the pendulum swung back. The gun-control laws of the late 1960s, designed to restrict the use of guns by urban black leftist radicals, fueled the rise of the present-day gun-rights movementone that, in an ironic reversal, is predominantly white, rural, and politically conservative.
http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2011/09/the-secret-history-of-guns/8608/
(This entire above article is a worthwhile read.)
******
Sullivan Act
The Sullivan Act, also known as the Sullivan Law, is a controversial gun control law in New York State. Upon first passage, the Sullivan Act required licenses for New Yorkers to possess firearms small enough to be concealed. Possession of such firearms without a license was a misdemeanor, and carrying them was a felony. The possession or carrying of weapons such as brass knuckles, sandbags, blackjacks, bludgeons or bombs was a felony, as was possessing or carrying a dagger, "dangerous knife" or razor "with intent to use the same unlawfully". Named for its primary legislative sponsor, state senator Timothy Sullivan, a notoriously corrupt Tammany Hall politician, it dates to 1911, and is still in force, making it one of the older existing gun control laws in the United States.
***snip***
Controversy
Some question the constitutionality of the act, due to the Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. While the Supreme Court has only recently ruled that the Second Amendment prevents localities from enacting outright handgun bans, (See: Incorporation), the question of whether the Second Amendment provides grounds to invalidate local gun control laws like the Sullivan Act may be addressed given the recent decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit in Parker v. District of Columbia, which was affirmed by the Supreme Court in the case District of Columbia v. Heller. Other critics have argued the arbitrary nature of the law violates New York State constitution protections of due process and equal justice.[9]
Many believe the act was to discriminate against immigrants in New York, particularly Italians, as the first person arrested under the law was mobster Giuseppe Costabile [1]
Whether this was part of the law's intent, it was passed on a wave of anti-immigrant rhetoric as a measure to disarm an alleged criminal element. The police granted the licenses, and could easily discriminate against "undesirable" elements....emphasis added
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sullivan_Act
One of the main reasons that I support RKBA and the Second Amendment is because I support the rights of all American citizens to live without having a fear of oppression by others who might be of a different race, a different sexual orientation or hold different political views than a ruling majority.