Gun Control & RKBA
Related: About this forumLake County residents say law has them dodging stray bullets
MOUNT DORA Gerry and Barbara Benedict hoped to enjoy a quiet Sunday afternoon in their backyard pool at the Country Club of Mount Dora. Then they heard gunfire.
The couple, who live adjacent to a private shooting range in unincorporated Lake County, took cover when a bullet flew into their backyard, just several feet from their pool.
"It's nerve-racking," Barbara Benedict said. "It's like living in the old wild West."
Local officials are having a tough time trying to muzzle the gunfire, saying the gun-rights lobby has succeeded in making city and county governments powerless to manage such situations. A new state law passed year prohibits cities and counties from passing or enforcing local gun regulations.
http://articles.orlandosentinel.com/2012-06-30/news/os-gun-regulations-neighborhoods-20120630_1_gun-ordinances-gun-rights-local-gun
CreekDog
(46,192 posts)or at the very least that people with guns have more rights than people without them?
gejohnston
(17,502 posts)and public shooting ranges are more important than private country clubs. I say that as a class warrior first, gun nut second.
ManiacJoe
(10,136 posts)CreekDog
(46,192 posts)this should be on the epitaph of this group.
congratulations.
your quest to make this look like the most ridiculous group has succeeded.
gejohnston
(17,502 posts)someone should be inspecting the berms etc. In Florida, a bullet firing across property lines without a really good reason is a crime. Did they call the cops? If a stray bullet came into my place, I would be calling cops not bitching to the media.
shadowrider
(4,941 posts)if this really happened or if it's just they don't like it.
CreekDog
(46,192 posts)why should i answer all your questions when it's all in the article?
jeez.
gejohnston
(17,502 posts)and it is a typical cultural conflict between native and colonist. Here in Citrus County, these are the same people who join teabag organizations because they don't like having to slow their big assed boats through manatee sanctuaries. Wake free zones are "unconstitutional", they move next to the water and bitch about the alligators and gun toting rednecks. They hire people to dispose of the gators.
My question was not answered in the article. Bullets flying across property lines is a crime, they should have reported it as a crime. That is part of the uniform law in the state of Florida. That question is not answered in the article. It is not the same as bitching about the noise or duck hunters 100 yards from the house.
Response to SecularMotion (Original post)
Turbineguy This message was self-deleted by its author.
ManiacJoe
(10,136 posts)At least the way I am reading the article.
permatex
(1,299 posts)it is the neighbors, not a gun club. Apparently they didn't make the berms high enough which I believe is being rectified.
Would be nice if certain posters here would read the articles.
spin
(17,493 posts)For example being downrange of a shooting range or right next to a major airport.
shadowrider
(4,941 posts)with a chicken farm on the other side of the hill (that's been there for 50 years), then complaining about the smell.
Clames
(2,038 posts)"It's not like the criminal just went out and said, 'Hey they've repealed this ordinance let's go out and start firing,'" he said.
Criminals not paying attention to the laws you say? Duh.
He heard a metallic "ping" and later found a spent .45-caliber shell on his driveway. A metal cap on a gate post was missing, which he suspects had been knocked off by the bullet.
He would have heard more than a "ping" if he had in fact found the spent shell in his driveway. That would have meant somebody actually fired the gun from his driveway. The shell doesn't travel with the bullet....
"But our No. 1 concern is stray bullets leaving the property and endangering everyone else, and we do not have the ability to regulate that," he said.
Actually you do. You have to have somebody accurately identify an "impact" area downrange. Federal, State, and locals have been doing just that for decades. It costs money because you have to have somebody with expertise survey the area. But we all know anti-gun religionists hate dealing with facts and it's easier just to ask for a ban.
PavePusher
(15,374 posts)Surely they saved this bullet for evidence, yes? But it makes no appearance in the article. Hmmmm....
Actual history doesn't seem to agree with you, madam.
There are plenty of state laws (and local laws about firearms discharge) that could be effective here if correctly applied, assuming the problem is real and not invented.
Not at all relevent, as it is revealed, in the second sentence of the article, that the range is not in city limits.
A "spent shell" and a bullet are not the same thing. And where is this item, to be used as evidence?
What?!?! You mean there must be actual evidence of a crime before law enforcement can take action? Say it ain't so!!!!
DonP
(6,185 posts)These people are probably friends of the Romney family.
They are special people and much better than you and I and state laws should just be overlooked to give them what they want. They paid for privacy from the hoi polloi and I bet the guard at their gated community would never let a gun owner in their controlled environment.
I'm sure they built the gun club just to annoy them after they were all moved in. <sarcasm off>
This reminds me of the stories about people that bought their property at a lower cost next to the airport glide path, complaining about the airplane noise and where the homeowners holds up a complete 30.06 cartridge for the TV cameras as "proof the the danger they constantly live under".
Sorry, the story has hair all over it.
jody
(26,624 posts)rl6214
(8,142 posts)""It's like living in the old wild West."
I live in the wild west and there are never any bullets landing near me. I think she's full of it.
ileus
(15,396 posts)Actually it sounds like 1%er's complaining their neighbors are shooting their firearms instead of polishing their BMW's
NewMoonTherian
(883 posts)Moving in next to a shooting range(or a chicken farm, or an airport, or anything) and then complaining about it is an asinine, elitist load of garbage.
However, legally, it seems that gun range and its users should be held responsible for any damage done by their bullets. To be in the clear, they would have to buy all the land downrange for... what, a mile and a half? For the sole purpose of keeping it empty.
Short of that, any gun range simply has to rely on others to not be complete pricks, which, in 2012, is far too much to ask of most people.
ManiacJoe
(10,136 posts)Response to SecularMotion (Original post)
Tuesday Afternoon This message was self-deleted by its author.