Cooking & Baking
Related: About this forumList of CA Wines in Lawsuit
As you may know, there is a lawsuit over arsenic levels in California wines.
This is important because arsenic is linked to cancer. Here is the list of wines, courtesy of Associated Press:
A FULL LIST OF THE 31 DIFFERENT WINE BRANDS NAMED IN THE LAWSUIT
The 83 bottles of wine cited in a lawsuit this week as having dangerously high levels of arsenic came from 28 California wineries and were bottled under 31 different brand labels.
Some of the labels included several different types of wine.
Acronym (GR8RW Red Blend)
Almaden (Heritage White Zinfandel, Heritage Moscato, Heritage Chardonnay, Mountain Burgundy, Mountain Rhine, Mountain Chablis)
Arrow Creek (Coastal Series Cabernet Sauvignon)
Bandit (Pinot Grigio, Chardonnay, Cabernet Sauvignon)
Bay Bridge (Chardonnay)
Beringer (White Merlot, White Zinfandel, Red Moscato, Refreshingly Sweet Moscato)
Charles Shaw (White Zinfandel).
Colores Del Sol (Malbec)
Glen Ellen by Concannon (Glen Ellen Reserve Pinot Grigio, Glen Ellen Reserve Merlot)
Concannon (Selected Vineyards Pinot Noir)
Cook's (Spumante)
Corbett Canyon (Pinot Grigio, Cabernet Sauvignon)
Cupcake (Malbec)
Fetzer (Moscato, Pinot Grigio)
Fisheye (Pinot Grigio)
Flipflop (Pinot Grigio, Moscato, Cabernet Sauvignon)
Foxhorn (White Zinfandel)
Franzia (Vintner Select White Grenache, Vintner Select White Zinfandel, Vintner Select White Merlot, Vintner Select Burgundy)
Hawkstone (Cabernet Sauvignon)
HRM Rex Goliath (Moscato)
Korbel (Sweet Rose Sparkling Wine, Extra Dry Sparkling Wine)
Menage A Trois (Pinot Grigo, Moscato, White Blend, Chardonnay, Rose, Cabernet Sauvignon, California Red Wine)
Mogen David (Concord, Blackberry Wine)
Oak Leaf (White Zinfandel)
Pomelo (Sauvignon Blanc)
R Collection By Raymond (Chardonnay)
Richards Wild Irish Rose (Red Wine)
Seaglass (Sauvignon Blanc)
Simply Naked (Moscato).
Smoking Loon (Viognier).
Sutter Home (Sauvignon Blanc, Gerwurztraminer, Pink Moscato, Pinot Grigio, Moscato, Chenin Blanc, Sweet Red, Riesling, White Merlot, Merlot, White Zinfandel)
Source: Associated Press
There's a good article at the San Francisco Chronicle:
http://www.sfgate.com/health/article/The-cheap-wine-you-re-drinking-may-hold-6147956.php
And here's the actual complaint:
https://irp-cdn.multiscreensite.com/f0533877/files/uploaded/Summons_Complaint.pdf
Cher
NYC_SKP
(68,644 posts)Auggie
(31,232 posts)NJCher
(35,827 posts)Just pour the wine in a wide pitcher--even a glass measuring cup will do--and let the sulfites evaporate. Takes about 10-12 minutes.
Cher
NYC_SKP
(68,644 posts)I never knew, will share that with friends!
Major Nikon
(36,827 posts)Here's my other post on the subject:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=6398117
Auggie
(31,232 posts)From Forbes:
Arsenic And California Wine: Do You Need To Worry?
I am what I have termed a blue collar wine snob. Im picky about my wine and am even a member of a wine club, but I rarely pay more than $10 a bottle, mainly because I drink about two bottles a week. So when I caught a headline about popular wines supposedly containing enough arsenic to eventually cause cancer, you can bet I raised an eyebrow. CBS News reported last Thursday that very high levels of arsenic showed up in almost a quarter of 1,300 wines tested by independent Denver-based lab BeverageGrades. Very high, according to BeverageGrades founder and former wine distributor Kevin Hicks, meant four to five times more arsenic than the EPA standard for drinking water, which is 10 parts per billion (ppb), or 10 micrograms per liter (mcg/L).
Among the top-selling wines with three, four and five times the 10 ppb standard were, respectively, Trader Joes Two-Buck Chuck White Zinfandel, Ménage à Trois Moscato and Franzia White Grenache. Hicks told CBS he noticed a trend of higher amounts of arsenic the cheaper the wine was on a per-liter basis.
The CBS report reads as alarmist though they mention at the end that their own independent testing of four wines yielded arsenic levels above 10 ppb but much lower than BeverageGrades results and Hicks clearly finds these results concerning enough that hes filing a class action suit against more than two dozen wine makers and sellers for their unsafe products. Hes also, by the way, marketing his companys testing services to wine makers who might be concerned about
arsenic in their wine. This news report and lawsuit could easily be seen as creating ones own demand. But if we assume the BeverageGrades results are correct a big if since the results have not been independently confirmed, the company has not described its methods, and the company is simultaneously attempting to sell winemakers its services after creating a news story how much should you be concerned if youre a regular wine drinker?
The shortest answer, according to Kenneth Spaeth, MD, chief of occupational and environmental medicine at the North Shore-LIJ Health System in Great Neck, NY, is we dont know yet.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/tarahaelle/2015/03/23/arsenic-and-california-wine-do-you-need-to-worry/
Major Nikon
(36,827 posts)This same lab posted an advertisement soliciting it's testing service to retailers coincident with the filing of the lawsuit. Kinda makes you go, hmmmmm.
Auggie
(31,232 posts)like Costellation, Trefethan and Boisset, do.
dolphinsandtuna
(231 posts)Unless you have your backyard tested safe and grow your own or ship food in, you pretty much will have arsenic exposure. Note the prevalence in the Central Valley agricultural area.
azurnoir
(45,850 posts)that's mighty curious indeed
The plaintiffs in the lawsuit are four individual wine consumers from Southern California. A lawyer for the plaintiffs, Brian Kabateck, said Friday that the suit stemmed from a former wine industry employee who was curious about arsenic levels and had 1,306 wines tested.
http://www.sfgate.com/health/article/The-cheap-wine-you-re-drinking-may-hold-6147956.php
NJCher
(35,827 posts)I'm going to choose not to put arsenic in my system.
Regardless of the motivation of the testing lab (and according to attribution theory, none of us can really know or state another's motivation), arsenic was found--enough that they are willing to put it into the court as proof.
On my last trip to the wine store, I went with Australian wines. I did research to see if I could turn up anything on arsenic and Australian wines, but so far, I haven't turned up anything.
Yes, it was a little more expensive, but as they say about matters of health, you can pay now or you can pay later.
I'm very disappointed with this development. I had a CA wine I really enjoyed and which I bought on a regular basis for the not-so-special occasions. I'm lucky enough to have a wine connoisseur as a partner who chooses the special occasion wines.
The CA wine I enjoyed is mfr'd by a company in Ripon, but who is to say where they buy their grapes? This company isn't on the list on the OP. I'd like to know which companies they tested and that did not show arsenic.
Maybe I'll contact the testing lab with that question.
Cher
NJCher
(35,827 posts)I just got home from the wine store and I was looking at Fisheye, which says it is Australian. Fisheye pinot is listed above.
But I thought these were just California wines.
I don't understand how a California importer can import an Australian wine and it has arsenic.
I asked the wine store manager about this, and he said Fisheye is just a marketing company that buys wines from all over.
Do you think that explains it? I still don't quite get how that could happen.
Anyway, I left the store with a couple Italian wines.
Cher