Why gay people are a higher form of evolution

[TexasTowelie]

Advisory: The article contains some adult language.

Science has yet to definitively declare a “gay gene” — probably because all those evil-gelicals would abort their gaybies left and right and all hell would break loose (hallelujah?) – but just because the argument for biological evidence that determines sexual orientation hasn’t been substantiated doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist. Barring the discovery of an actual genetic modification that predisposes people to being gay, studies have shown that homosexuality is a heritable trait. Nonetheless, the research as it stands now is still just a bunch of lab-coat mumbo jumbo caught up in a tornado of politics.

Personally, I believe I’m a higher form of evolution. Not just me, though, but all gay people. I look at our community as a whole and, well, we do just about everything better than those who are not inherently equipped to think above the status quo.

I’m not a kook, either. Rather, I’m skeptical of most oddball concepts — like psychics, paranormal activity, crop circles, and whoever convinced Bill Cosby it’s a good idea to launch a speaking tour about sexual assault. But I do earnestly believe that you and I are genetically superior to our heterosexual counterparts. Here’s why.

We encourage, adapt to, and continue the pursuit of progression. Since the earliest recorded history –—about 97th-century BCE when Mesolithic rock in Sicily is said to depict male homosexual intercourse – gays have infiltrated and influenced all aspects of life, from art to government. We’re drawn to positions of power because we affect change more swiftly and more democratically than those seeking to rule, often iron-fistedly, simply to make up for their lack of anatomical endowment (which isn’t just conjecture, by the way; a study by the Kinsey Institute reported that gay guys typically have bigger dicks than straight guys) and we don’t have to look any further than our own current administration to see this time-honored tradition in practice. It stands to reason then that we have less to prove than straight men seeking power, who much of the time want to stifle progression, while we advocate on behalf of forging ahead, quite happy with what’s been bestowed between our legs. In the meantime, we may have already answered the age-old question: Does size matter? All the world’s conflicts started by cranky old straight men decidedly point to yes.

Read more: http://www.dallasvoice.com/gay-people-higher-form-evolution-10240445.html

[uriel1972]

1. No such animal as "More Evolved"

Perhaps "More Civilized" would be a better concept, but even then that's loaded language. Perhaps "More Benign" is it, in the end.

[LakeArenal]

2. Superior?

Yikes...

[Odoreida]

3. Love you, but it's still pseudoscience. n/t

[TexasTowelie]

4. Thanks.

I agree, I posted more the entertainment value and some laughs rather than an unyielding belief that this opinion is true. I don't want to recognize a master sexual orientation much like I wouldn't want to recognize a master race.

[Beautiful NM]

5. I agree

We should not claim to be a master sexual orientation, but clearly we were "chosen by God", ours is a special life to lead.

[lambchopp59]

6. Semi snarky post as this seems, there is a progressive notation as a born-gay I'll add.

There is a far higher consciousness of human imminent demise as a species of which many gay people are keenly, and I'll even say innately aware. Such that so many of us end up taking care of ready-made kids. The ones none of the hetero's would adopt.
And that's all I'll say about that.
And...
the adoptees tend to end up fully cared for through their college educations.