Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
LGBT
Related: About this forumFact Checking Janice Raymond: The NCHCT Report
It has long been asserted that the iconic TERF, Janice Raymond, played a part in bringing an end to the public and private coverage of transgender medical care, resulting in measurable death and suffering within the trans community. Unsurprisingly, Raymond rejects any assertion that she has blood on her hands. Over on TheTERFs.com, Raymond objects to the following assertion:
It was only after the NCHCT [National Center for Health Care Technology] published Raymonds bigotry in 1980 that the US government reversed course in 1981 and took up Raymonds views and rhetoric. Raymonds hate became the governments stance. Raymond a Catholic ethicist, not a clinician was the architect of the anti-trans stance the US government adopted in the 1980s
<snip>
First of all, you need to know that there wasnt just one, but TWO reports:
The report the National Center for Health Care Technology (NCHCT) commissioned Raymond to write; and,
The report the Office of Health Technology Assessment (OHTA) issued which drew upon Raymonds work to support one of three basic fact claims it made about trans care.
Next, you need to know that the OHTA was, for a brief time, a section of the NCHCT. The NCHCT existed as its own entity for 3 years and its duties were shifted to OHTA in 1981 . NCHCT made 75 coverage recommendations during those 3 years and a recommendation about trans care was one of them. If one wanted to muddy the water, one could technically assert that her research was merely one source from which the NCHCT pulled when writing their report on trans care because in 1981, NCHCT and OHTA was basically one organization. The fact that gets lost is that, in reality, the NCHCT commissioned ONLY ONE trans report: the one Raymond wrote. It was the OHTA Report not the NCHCT Report that drew from the research bodies Raymond claims. Raymond claims that My paper was never published by the NCHCT but was treated as a consultative paper among many that were solicited from other experts and groups at the same time. Yes, her report was indeed used in this manner for the OHTA report. However, NCHCT commissioned reports such as Raymonds NCHCT report were available, in their entirety and these reports were targeted to very specific groups. Moreover, Raymonds report one of only 2 governmental reports on the efficacy of trans care at the time was later available through the OHTA after the NCHCT shut its doors.
It was only after the NCHCT [National Center for Health Care Technology] published Raymonds bigotry in 1980 that the US government reversed course in 1981 and took up Raymonds views and rhetoric. Raymonds hate became the governments stance. Raymond a Catholic ethicist, not a clinician was the architect of the anti-trans stance the US government adopted in the 1980s
<snip>
First of all, you need to know that there wasnt just one, but TWO reports:
The report the National Center for Health Care Technology (NCHCT) commissioned Raymond to write; and,
The report the Office of Health Technology Assessment (OHTA) issued which drew upon Raymonds work to support one of three basic fact claims it made about trans care.
Next, you need to know that the OHTA was, for a brief time, a section of the NCHCT. The NCHCT existed as its own entity for 3 years and its duties were shifted to OHTA in 1981 . NCHCT made 75 coverage recommendations during those 3 years and a recommendation about trans care was one of them. If one wanted to muddy the water, one could technically assert that her research was merely one source from which the NCHCT pulled when writing their report on trans care because in 1981, NCHCT and OHTA was basically one organization. The fact that gets lost is that, in reality, the NCHCT commissioned ONLY ONE trans report: the one Raymond wrote. It was the OHTA Report not the NCHCT Report that drew from the research bodies Raymond claims. Raymond claims that My paper was never published by the NCHCT but was treated as a consultative paper among many that were solicited from other experts and groups at the same time. Yes, her report was indeed used in this manner for the OHTA report. However, NCHCT commissioned reports such as Raymonds NCHCT report were available, in their entirety and these reports were targeted to very specific groups. Moreover, Raymonds report one of only 2 governmental reports on the efficacy of trans care at the time was later available through the OHTA after the NCHCT shut its doors.
- See more at: http://www.transadvocate.com/fact-checking-janice-raymond-the-nchct-report_n_14554.htm?utm_content=buffer3ca98&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook.com&utm_campaign=buffer#sthash.G3JDDhDU.dpuf
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
0 replies, 1101 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post