LGBT
Related: About this forumThe reality disconnect is strong in this post
http://www.democraticunderground.com/125138253#post12William769
(55,148 posts)Thanks for pointing that out.
pinto
(106,886 posts)You have received this Alert message because you are currently a Host of the group: LGBT.
ALERTED DISCUSSION THREAD
-- Author: dbackjon
-- Title: The reality disconnect is strong in this post
-- Location: LGBT
-- Posted: Thu May 17, 2012, 06:15 PM
-- Link: http://www.democraticunderground.com/113713188
ALERT INFORMATION
-- Sent by: TheWraith
-- Reason: This discussion thread violates the Statement of Purpose for this forum.
-- Alerter's comments: Call out.
STATEMENT OF PURPOSE: LGBT
A group for LGBT DUers and allies. All topics of interest to the LGBT community are welcome.
ABOUT THIS ALERT
As a forum Host it is your duty to ensure that threads meet the forum's Statement of Purpose. You are empowered to lock threads which you believe do not meet the Statement of Purpose.
You should only review the thread's originating post (otherwise known as the OP). You are not required to review the replies.
If you believe the OP is off-topic for the forum and/or does not meet the forum's Statement of Purpose, you should lock the thread by clicking the "Super powers" link at the bottom left corner of the OP and selecting the option "Lock thread (Reason: Violates this forum's Statement of Purpose)."
If you choose to lock the thread, a basic explanation -- including your username -- will be pasted automatically into the OP. If you wish to provide a more detailed explanation, you should post your explanation as a reply to the OP before you lock the thread.
The person who posted the OP is permitted to appeal your decision directly via DU Mail. If an appeal is sent, it is your responsibility to consider the merits of the appeal, and decide whether the thread should remain locked. If you decide to unlock it, you can do so by clicking the "Super powers" link on the post.
Only you (or a DU Administrator) will be able to unlock the thread once you have locked it.
dbackjon
(6,578 posts)I have seen many threads linking to other threads, with similar purpose.
Zorra
(27,670 posts)If I did not support the civil right of African Americans to get married on the basis of the color of their skin, then I would be engaging in discrimination, and therefore, could be considered a bigot.
The same could be said about a person who does not support same sex marriage on the basis of someone's love/sexual preference partner.
It's not rocket science.
QC
(26,371 posts)HillWilliam
(3,310 posts)This is a safe-haven group, part of whose purpose is to discuss posts on Greater DU that to, from, or about us.