Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
Fri Jul 24, 2015, 09:05 PM Jul 2015

Kerry: If Congress rejects Iran deal, world will blame Israel

http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-defense/1.667631

U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry told the Council on Foreign Relations think tank on Friday that should Congress rejects the nuclear deal with Iran, Israel might find itself more isolated and "more blamed by the international community."

Also on Friday, Kerry said in an interview with NBC that it would be a "huge mistake" for Israel to take unilateral military action against Iran.

Kerry was asked in the "Today" show interview if the nuclear deal would make an Israeli military or cyberattack on Tehran more likely.

"That'd be an enormous mistake, a huge mistake with grave consequences for Israel and for the region, and I don't think it's necessary," Kerry said.
34 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Kerry: If Congress rejects Iran deal, world will blame Israel (Original Post) geek tragedy Jul 2015 OP
people could get hurt. Mosby Jul 2015 #1
Well, if Israel succeeds in its attempt to hijack the American political process geek tragedy Jul 2015 #2
the p5 + 1 are the interventionists. Mosby Jul 2015 #3
No no, let's hear your logic behind that. In detail. Scootaloo Jul 2015 #4
Good luck getting that. BillZBubb Jul 2015 #27
Oh? geek tragedy Jul 2015 #7
Yoor funny! R. Daneel Olivaw Jul 2015 #21
Since when is a majority all? Agnosticsherbet Jul 2015 #29
Nice country, that Israel. It would be a shame if something bad happened to it. n/t shira Jul 2015 #8
Well, shira, Israel has its George Bush at the helm of state; along with all the other RW bigots R. Daneel Olivaw Jul 2015 #22
It's worse than that. They love their version of George Bush. SolutionisSolidarity Jul 2015 #31
This message was self-deleted by its author 6chars Jul 2015 #20
Sunni states oppose the deal. If they don't carry out attacks themselves.... shira Jul 2015 #5
Which Sunni states are trying to interfere with geek tragedy Jul 2015 #6
Sunni states are scared shitless. They don't trust Iran's Shiite leadership.... shira Jul 2015 #9
I see a lot of brain dead Neocon, pro-war geek tragedy Jul 2015 #10
Except for the fact there are Democrats against it, and most Israeli Liberals too.... shira Jul 2015 #11
You need to read something besides bombiranrightnow.com geek tragedy Jul 2015 #13
Where has Iran agreed to anytime/anywhere inspections? shira Jul 2015 #15
Oy. nt geek tragedy Jul 2015 #18
I'm for a negotiated deal with Iran, BTW. You think the deal is as good.... shira Jul 2015 #12
It's this deal or nothing. geek tragedy Jul 2015 #14
I'll ask again. Do you think this deal could've been significantly better? n/t shira Jul 2015 #16
No. nt geek tragedy Jul 2015 #17
It sounds as if you are not behind President Obama on this. R. Daneel Olivaw Jul 2015 #24
This message was self-deleted by its author 6chars Jul 2015 #25
Oh, no. It's something a little more esoteric. You wouldn't understand. R. Daneel Olivaw Jul 2015 #32
Apparently. Unless I agree with Obama 100% on everything, my loyalty.... shira Jul 2015 #33
Hans Blix and other experts say the deal is far-reaching, and more comprehensive blm Jul 2015 #30
I believe, IMHO, that is what the hasbara neocon / xtian / xion cheerleaders want: a US-Iranian war. R. Daneel Olivaw Jul 2015 #23
Iran nukes Harry_Scrote Jul 2015 #28
Sunni states aren't scared of Israeli nukes. They fear Iran's nukes. Why? n/t shira Jul 2015 #34
Kerry speaks the truth. n/t Little Tich Jul 2015 #19
The world will condemn the US (justifiably) as puppets of Israel. BillZBubb Jul 2015 #26
 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
2. Well, if Israel succeeds in its attempt to hijack the American political process
Fri Jul 24, 2015, 09:29 PM
Jul 2015

to torpedo a diplomatic solution, you bet your ass the Israelis will own the aftermath.

They will deserve the blame, and they'll reap the whirlwind.

All of Israel is behind Netanyahu in this interventionism.

They had better pray they fail.

 

R. Daneel Olivaw

(12,606 posts)
22. Well, shira, Israel has its George Bush at the helm of state; along with all the other RW bigots
Sat Jul 25, 2015, 05:57 AM
Jul 2015

that he could invite to join him.

If they sink Israel internationally then they only have themselves to blame.


But as a loyal Democrat you are fully behind our POTUS on this agreement, right?
31. It's worse than that. They love their version of George Bush.
Sat Jul 25, 2015, 02:50 PM
Jul 2015

We at least had the decency to hate ours after a few years in office. I remember when we all had our hopes up that they were going to throw Bibi out, but in my heart I knew better. Israel is Bibi now.

Response to Mosby (Reply #1)

 

shira

(30,109 posts)
5. Sunni states oppose the deal. If they don't carry out attacks themselves....
Fri Jul 24, 2015, 10:13 PM
Jul 2015

....they'll race to the bomb in order to defend their interests against Iran. Even if the deal goes through Congress, Israel accepts, and doesn't decide to bomb Iran's nuclear facilities.

It will be nuclear proliferation on steroids. Don't say you didn't see it coming either.

Will Israel be blamed for that? Of course they will. Same shit, different millenium.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
6. Which Sunni states are trying to interfere with
Fri Jul 24, 2015, 10:15 PM
Jul 2015

a vote in the US Congress?

This deal makes Iran a lot less likely to develop a nuke. No serious person us disputing that.

 

shira

(30,109 posts)
9. Sunni states are scared shitless. They don't trust Iran's Shiite leadership....
Fri Jul 24, 2015, 10:23 PM
Jul 2015

Have you read the news the past several decades? They don't get along very well. Iran with a nuke, even in 15 years, is a threat much bigger than Sadaam Hussein taking Kuwait. He'd have it and still be in power today if Israel didn't take his nuke program out in 1981. Imagine Syria today if Assad had nukes that Israel didn't destroy back in 2007. Hell, Iran could very possibly have Syria's nukes today.

Scary thought.

Sunni states aren't stupid. They know what Iran is capable of with nukes & they can't allow themselves to be vulnerable to that threat.

This deal is supposed to prevent nuclear proliferation. It's doing just the opposite.

Consider how Imperialist Iran is pulling the strings in Syria, Lebanon, Iraq, and Yemen. With nukes, it's 100x worse. Not happening without counter-moves.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
10. I see a lot of brain dead Neocon, pro-war
Fri Jul 24, 2015, 10:28 PM
Jul 2015

talking points from you.

Nothing explaining how walking away from diplomacy will prevent Iran from developing the bomb.

Do you support a war with Iran over this?

 

shira

(30,109 posts)
11. Except for the fact there are Democrats against it, and most Israeli Liberals too....
Fri Jul 24, 2015, 10:33 PM
Jul 2015

Nice try.

I don't support a war with Iran. Israel didn't declare war on Iraq in '81 or Syria in '07. What makes you think this will be different? To use your words, I see a lot of brain dead fear-mongering talking points from you.

Nothing explaining how walking away from diplomacy will prevent Iran from developing the bomb.


It won't. But neither do we have to give away the store to Iran w/o them doing anything substantial in return. We don't have to all but guarantee they'll have the bomb within 10-15 years. They're still calling for war against America and Israel. My people have learned to take these threats from crazed fascists seriously over the past few millenia. Iran will cheat & we know it. They haven't even agreed to anytime/anywhere inspections.
 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
13. You need to read something besides bombiranrightnow.com
Fri Jul 24, 2015, 10:43 PM
Jul 2015

It is apparent you know absolutely nothing about the Iran deal other than what Netanyahu tells you to think.

You claim that Iran is not doing anything substantial.

That is a flat-out lie.

Iran's enriched uranium stockpile will be reduced by over 90%.

It's shutting down the reactor core at Arak.

It is turning Fordo into a research facility.

There will be vigorous inspections of not only the main sites but all points along the supply chain.

You want Israel to bomb Iran.

Nothing is stopping Israel from doing that now. But they need to do it without dragging us into their goddamn war.

 

shira

(30,109 posts)
15. Where has Iran agreed to anytime/anywhere inspections?
Fri Jul 24, 2015, 11:11 PM
Jul 2015

They haven't.

So they can cheat their asses off, especially at unknown nuke sites. The deal doesn't account for Iran opening a nuke shop somewhere else.

Iran has also threatened to walk from the deal if sanctions are snapped back, which gives the West every incentive not to catch them cheating, unless it's a ridiculously gross violation. Anything less, we see, speak, and hear no evil. Nice.

Also, the Vienna deal recognizes over and over Iran's right to develop advanced centrifuges, better than the archaic WW2 era ones they have now. This will be enabled by the West, which will help them achieve this by 2025 or sooner. All but ensuring Iran gets nukes.

What's there for Iran not to love?

The deal could've been much, much better. Remember, the administration has repeatedly said no deal is preferable to a bad deal. Do you at least agree with that?



 

shira

(30,109 posts)
12. I'm for a negotiated deal with Iran, BTW. You think the deal is as good....
Fri Jul 24, 2015, 10:40 PM
Jul 2015

....as it could possibly be?

I think it could've been a lot better considering Iran blinked first & begged for these negotiations.

 

R. Daneel Olivaw

(12,606 posts)
24. It sounds as if you are not behind President Obama on this.
Sat Jul 25, 2015, 06:09 AM
Jul 2015


#t=34

IMHO, you sound more like one of our President's critics and not a supporter. Curious.

Response to R. Daneel Olivaw (Reply #24)

 

shira

(30,109 posts)
33. Apparently. Unless I agree with Obama 100% on everything, my loyalty....
Sun Jul 26, 2015, 08:00 AM
Jul 2015

....to the USA is in question.

Them, not so much.

blm

(113,124 posts)
30. Hans Blix and other experts say the deal is far-reaching, and more comprehensive
Sat Jul 25, 2015, 02:49 PM
Jul 2015

than anyone expected. The desperate tone from Bibi and BibizBoyz in Congress are BECAUSE they know they couldn't have gotten a better deal because none of them know anything about diplomacy, and nothing more than bluster and bombings…..just like Bush and Cheney.

IMO, anyone not on board with this deal is FOR a greater harm to Israel.

 

R. Daneel Olivaw

(12,606 posts)
23. I believe, IMHO, that is what the hasbara neocon / xtian / xion cheerleaders want: a US-Iranian war.
Sat Jul 25, 2015, 06:01 AM
Jul 2015

How will they keep their end times hatred alive without a new enemy?

BillZBubb

(10,650 posts)
26. The world will condemn the US (justifiably) as puppets of Israel.
Sat Jul 25, 2015, 02:43 PM
Jul 2015

Most of the enmity from the failure will fall where it belongs, on the US. Everyone already knows Israel's position, so no additional fallout happens to them.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Israel/Palestine»Kerry: If Congress reject...