Environment & Energy
Related: About this forum5 Countries That Prove the World Doesn’t Need Fossil Fuels
Jul 17, 2015
Jake Anderson and TheAntiMedia.org.
A decade ago, the renewable energy movement faced an uphill battle. Today, environmentally-minded nations of the world increasingly embrace alternative energy sources. These countries now lead the way toward a future free of petroleum and dirty energy. In the process, they save significant amounts of money on national energy costs while preserving and protecting the worlds natural resources.
Despite powerful corporate disinformation campaigns meant to convince populations that renewable energy is not a viable way to satisfy the needs of global industry, the following five nations arent just subsisting on renewable energythey are thriving on it.
Costa Rica
Since the start of 2015, Costa Rica has gone 100% green. This move away from fossil fuels will help ensure that lush jungles and pristine beaches remain intact. The comprehensive shift will help Costa Ricans not only save their natural resources, but ensure that the country continues to benefit from its very profitable eco-tourism industry, though they would be wise to be vigilant of the effects of tourism on local ecosystems.
One of Costa Ricas renewable efforts involves utilizing its own plentiful rainfall to power their growing hydroelectric infrastructure. Incredibly, the small country has the second best electric infrastructure in Latin America. Yet, it has not put all its eggs in one basketCosta Rica is also generating power from geothermal sources, wind, biomass and solar energy products.
Denmark
Denmark knows a thing or two about windmills, which have peppered their countryside for decades. In fact, the nation installed its first wind turbines as far back as the 1970s and has not let up in recent years. Denmark is now the leading country in the world for wind power. In the year 2014, Denmark set a world record for windmill production. The country now enjoys around 40% of its total electricity from this one clean energy source, alone.
New studies show that Denmark is well on its way to meeting its self-set goal of being 50% powered by renewable resources by 2020. Not happy with half, Denmark hopes to be 100% renewable by 2050. This would make it one of the first advanced countries in the word to be 100% renewable. Its an ambitious goal, but Denmarks recent success proves they are up to the task. Just this month, the nation celebrated a day in which it drew 140% of its electrical power from wind turbines.
Scotland
2014 was a very good year for Scotland and renewables. In one month of December 2014, Scotland set a personal record in renewable energy. Using wind power alone, Scotland provided almost 1300 MWh (megawatt-hours) to its growing national grid. Thats enough energy to supply almost 4 million homes with electricity.
Scotland is now using wind power to produce and supply almost 100% of the countrys household needs, but it has not stopped there. During the summer months, Aberdeen, Edinburgh, Glasgow, and Inverness harvested enough solar energy to power 100% or more of the electric demands for the average home.
Scotland has also invested large amounts of money into creating one of the most advanced computer-driven energy infrastructures in the world.
Sweden
Sweden is joining its Nordic neighbor, Denmark, and doubling down on green with a limited-coal approach that has been so successful the IEA, or International Energy Agency, commended the country for its new energy policies. But Sweden is not content relying on limited coal alonethe country is also developing advanced biomass energy systems. The strategy has been so successful that by 2010, Sweden was already producing more energy from biomass than from fossil fuels. Steps like these are putting Sweden high on the list of green countries.
Finland
It seems like Finland is not happy playing second fiddle to its northern neighbors. Wind powered energy is quickly transforming the countrys energy needs. These recent steps have dramatically reduced the countrys greenhouse gas emissions, caused from the burning of fossil fuels.
Finland is not as far along as Sweden and Denmark when it comes to renewable energy, but it is quickly moving in the right direction. By the year 2012, was already producing enough energy to cover almost 34.3% of the energy needs and by 2020, it hopes to be closer to 40%. With its neighbors leading the way, the future looks bright for Finland.
This article (5 Countries That Prove the World Doesnt Need Fossil Fuels) is free and open source. You have permission to republish this article under a Creative Commons license with attribution to the author Jake Anderson and TheAntiMedia.org.
http://themindunleashed.org/2015/07/5-countries-that-prove-the-world-doesnt-need-fossil-fuels.html
99th_Monkey
(19,326 posts)because these 5 nations are light years ahead of US.
polly7
(20,582 posts)pscot
(21,024 posts)RiverLover
(7,830 posts)We put too much focus on national elections. And we're paying the price.
nationalize the fed
(2,169 posts)The US is busy drone bombing suspects at wedding parties, planning the next war with Syria, shoveling $5 Billion Dollars into overthrowing the Ukraine government (hardly anyone even wants an audit for that absurdity...), putting missiles on Russia's border, and trying to convince the rest of the world that Fracking is Good.
How Hillary Clinton's State Department Sold Fracking to the World
A trove of secret documents details the US government's global push for shale gas
http://www.motherjones.com/environment/2014/09/hillary-clinton-fracking-shale-state-department-chevron
So the people of the US get what they deserve. A spoiled, ignorant, arrogant, lazy and morally bankrupt bunch of children, gullible to the point of destruction. If it's Bush vs. Clinton in 2016 it's time to give up.
It could have been so much better. Now the next generations will have to fix it- and hopefully they will put the blame where it belongs.
GliderGuider
(21,088 posts)"The exception that proves the rule" is an exception to a generally accepted truth. This is an archaic use of the word 'prove', which means 'to test'. It does not mean that it demonstrates a rule to be true, but that it tests the rule. It is usually used when an exception to a rule has been identified: for example, Mutillidae are wasps without wings, and therefore are an exception that proves (tests) the rule that wasps fly.
"The exception (that) proves the rule" also means that the presence of an exception applying to a specific case establishes ("proves" that a general rule exists. For example, a sign that says "parking prohibited on Sundays" (the exception) "proves" that parking is allowed on the other six days of the week (the rule). A more explicit phrasing might be "the exception that proves the existence of the rule."
In short, the article is cheerleading bullshit. The energy situation in these five tiny nations "proves" nothing of the sort.