Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumKeystone, climate change and the US economy: the truth behind the myths
Six-plus years of robust debate has led to plenty of speculation about the perceived benefits of the pipeline some of which are drastically overstatedAmerica has 2.5m miles of oil and gas pipelines. But none of those pipelines are anywhere near as contentious as the Keystone XL, which would transport tar sands crude oil from Canada to refineries on the US gulf coast. Over the past six-plus years, Keystone has become a stand-in for a broader debate about climate change. Its also the subject of much myth-making about climate change and the economy. Below, a look at some of the most prominent of those myths, and the truth behind them.
Myth #1: Keystone XL wont contribute to climate change
The State Department said the pipeline would not have a significant impact on development of the tar sands or crude oil demand and so would not have much impact on climate change. But even the State Departments own analysis found found the pipeline, once operational, would cause the equivalent emissions of 300,000 cars a year, and it noted that tar sands were 17% more carbon intensive than the average barrel of US crude oil. Subsequent analyses by the Congressional Research Service have found tar sands up to 20% more carbon intensive than the average barrel of crude.
Myth #2: Keystone will create thousands of jobs
The American Petroleum Institute lobby group claimed in 2009 that Keystone would create up to 343,000 new US jobs over a four-year period, based on demand for new goods and services, and add up to $34bn to the US economy in 2015. However, the non-partisan Congressional Research Service found those estimates were based on an internal study that had not been subject to review. The State Department in its analysis found Keystone would create about 42,000 direct and indirect temporary construction jobs, and about 50 permanent jobs once construction is finished.
More: http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/jan/06/keystone-xl-pipeline-climate-change-us-economy-truth-behind-myths?utm_source=Daily+Carbon+Briefing&utm_campaign=64b48948b3-cb_daily&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_876aab4fd7-64b48948b3-303441369
The endless debate over the benefits of these pipes has outgrown the proposed Keystone pipeline itself. Photograph: Sue Ogrocki/AP
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 1538 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (5)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Keystone, climate change and the US economy: the truth behind the myths (Original Post)
Rhiannon12866
Jan 2015
OP
NYC_SKP
(68,644 posts)1. Recommended. (nt)
Rhiannon12866
(204,850 posts)3. Thanks!
I actually ran across this on http://www.gasbuddy.com/ checking local gas prices, where some FReeper called it "propaganda," so I knew it had to be a good one that I should read and pass on...
CaliforniaPeggy
(149,534 posts)2. Excellent analysis, my dear Rhiannon! K&R n/t
Rhiannon12866
(204,850 posts)4. Thanks, my friend! I thought it covered pretty much everything...
Great to see you!
CaliforniaPeggy
(149,534 posts)5. Great to see you too!
Cooley Hurd
(26,877 posts)6. Recommended - thank for posting this!