Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumWhat Tech Is Next for the Solar Industry?
http://www.technologyreview.com/news/516306/what-tech-is-next-for-the-solar-industry/[font size=4]Solar manufacturers are eager to implement several new technologies that could make solar power cheaper, and the panels easier to make.[/font]
By Kevin Bullis on June 21, 2013
[font size=3]Solar panel installations continue to grow quickly, but the solar panel manufacturing industry is in the doldrums because supply far exceeds demand (see Why We Need More Solar Companies to Fail). The poor market may be slowing innovation, but advances continue; judging by the mood this week at the IEEE Photovoltaics Specialists Conference in Tampa, Florida, people in the industry remain optimistic about its long-term prospects.
The technology thats surprised almost everyone is conventional crystalline silicon. A few years ago, silicon solar panels cost $4 per watt, and Martin Green, professor at the University of New South Wales and one of the leading silicon solar panel researchers, declared that theyd never go below $1 a watt. Now its down to something like 50 cents of watt, and theres talk of hitting 36 cents per watt, he says.
The U.S. Department of Energy has set a goal of reaching less than $1 a wattnot just for the solar panels, but for complete, installed systemsby 2020 (see Why Solar Installations Cost More in the U.S. than in Germany). Green thinks the solar industry will hit that target even sooner than that. If so, that would bring the direct cost of solar power to six cents per kilowatt-hour, which is cheaper than the average cost expected for power from new natural gas power plants. (The total cost of solar power, which includes the cost to utilities to compensate for its intermittency, would be higher, though precisely how much higher will depend on how much solar power is on the grid, and other factors.)
All parts of the silicon solar panel industry have been looking for ways to cut costs and improve the power output of solar panels, and thats led to steady cost reductions. Green points to something as mundane as the pastes used to screen-print some of the features on solar panels. Greens lab built a solar cell in the 1990s that set a record efficiency for silicon solar cellsa record that stands to this day. To achieve that record, he had to use expensive lithography techniques to make fine wires for collecting current from the solar cell. But gradual improvements have made it possible to use screen printing to produce ever-finer lines. Recent research suggests that screen-printing techniques can produce lines as thin as 30 micrometersabout the width of the lines Green used for his record solar cells, but at costs far lower than his lithography techniques.
[/font][/font]
wtmusic
(39,166 posts)Just thinking outside the box.
OKIsItJustMe
(19,938 posts)Solar panels are easily recycled.
http://pvrecycling.com/
wtmusic
(39,166 posts)OKIsItJustMe
(19,938 posts)Or do you prefer to avoid them?
wtmusic
(39,166 posts)I know reputable solar sources are hard to find, but that's ridiculous.
OKIsItJustMe
(19,938 posts)quadrature
(2,049 posts)solar PV only seems to work for
US, Germany, and Japan.
why is that?
lots of places worldwide
have poor or no electric service.
lots of places worldwide have
yucky diesel powered neighborhood
electric systems.
how about somebody else do something
for a change
wtmusic
(39,166 posts)Of course with distributed anything there's a lot of waste and not much reliability.
SheilaT
(23,156 posts)that they can own the solar rights above your land, just as today (at least in the West) they can own the mineral rights underneath your property.
I am honestly surprised it hasn't happened yet. If I can think of this, and I'm fairly bright, but far from the smartest person out there . . . .
jtuck004
(15,882 posts)Solar Industry Anxious Over Defective Panels
LOS ANGELES The solar panels covering a vast warehouse roof in the sun-soaked Inland Empire region east of Los Angeles were only two years into their expected 25-year life span when they began to fail.
Coatings that protect the panels disintegrated while other defects caused two fires that took the system offline for two years, costing hundreds of thousands of dollars in lost revenues.
It was not an isolated incident. Worldwide, testing labs, developers, financiers and insurers are reporting similar problems and say the $77 billion solar industry is facing a quality crisis just as solar panels are on the verge of widespread adoption.
...
Problems like this get press that could slow the adoption of newer technology.
More Here
kristopher
(29,798 posts)This is their latest go-to source for misinformation. It's set up and functions exactly like The Tobacco Institute, only in this case they are serving the right wing energy establishment.
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/Tobacco_Institute
June 17, 2013
Ive recently stumbled upon a number of articles by the Breakthrough Institute (BTI) that aimed at discrediting renewable energy on the one hand and on the other preaching about nuclear energy as the solution for the global energy crisis of the 21st century. With their hearts and minds pre-set on pushing their narrative, that some kind of a nuclear salvation is being held back by leftish environmentalists (sinister!), the so called German Energiewende (Energy Transition) has apparently become a regular target of the Breakthrough Institute staffs publications.
Read more at http://cleantechnica.com/2013/06/17/the-breakthrough-institute-why-the-hot-air/#ABU468biCz85Axtk.99
Iterate
(3,020 posts)Maybe the next innovation isn't strictly technological.
Production companies may want to swap out old panels for new as efficiency increases, or may want to keep a plant under warranty, who knows. Changing them is not a big deal once the infrastructure is in place. There is no reason they would necessarily keep them until failure, which might be 40 years.
For them, better to sell them downmarket, and I'm sure many buyers would be interested if the price is right. For marginal buyers, even a panel that produces 80% of new output and has 15 years of life left would be too much to pass up. Hell, I'd even buy a used panel from...a DUer.