Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumThe polarizing impact of science literacy and numeracy on perceived climate change risks
Seeming public apathy over climate change is often attributed to a deficit in comprehension. The public knows too little science, it is claimed, to understand the evidence or avoid being misled. Widespread limits on technical reasoning aggravate the problem by forcing citizens to use unreliable cognitive heuristics to assess risk. We conducted a study to test this account and found no support for it. Members of the public with the highest degrees of science literacy and technical reasoning capacity were not the most concerned about climate change. Rather, they were the ones among whom cultural polarization was greatest. This result suggests that public divisions over climate change stem not from the publics incomprehension of science but from a distinctive conflict of interest: between the personal interest individuals have in forming beliefs in line with those held by others with whom they share close ties and the collective one they all share in making use of the best available science to promote common welfare.
Source: http://www.nature.com/nclimate/journal/vaop/ncurrent/full/nclimate1547.html
A trivial result (anyone could've pointed this out), but it's nice to see a study backing it.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 1182 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The polarizing impact of science literacy and numeracy on perceived climate change risks (Original Post)
joshcryer
May 2012
OP
dipsydoodle
(42,239 posts)1. "deficit in comprehension"
is a polite way of saying stupid - stupid being lack of understanding as opposed to ignorance which is complete lack of knowledge.
bananas
(27,509 posts)2. Prediction vs Actual Response
joshcryer
(62,280 posts)3. I think part of that is due to the science literate / numeracy types think we can solve it.
This is why I posit that geoengineering will be the fall back since nothing of significance is being done about CO2.