Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

n2doc

(47,953 posts)
Fri Aug 11, 2017, 07:56 AM Aug 2017

That 'wonder fuel' at Idaho National Lab is now radioactive waste that won't go away

In the early days of atomic energy, the federal government powered up an experimental reactor in Idaho with an ambitious goal: create a “wonder fuel” for the nation.

The reactor was one of the nation’s first “breeder” reactors — designed to make its own new plutonium fuel while it generated electricity, solving what scientists at the time thought was a looming shortage of uranium for power plants and nuclear weapons.

It went into operation in 1964 and kept the lights burning at the sprawling national laboratory for three decades.

But enthusiasm eventually waned for the breeder reactor program owing to safety concerns, high costs and an adequate supply of uranium.

Today, its only legacy is 26 metric tons of highly radioactive waste. What to do with that spent fuel is causing the federal government deepening political, technical, legal and financial headaches.

more
http://www.latimes.com/local/california/la-na-idaho-nuclear-waste-2017-story.html

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
That 'wonder fuel' at Idaho National Lab is now radioactive waste that won't go away (Original Post) n2doc Aug 2017 OP
That article sets a new record. JayhawkSD Aug 2017 #1
First you don't adequately fund the project or train enough scientists and engineers... hunter Aug 2017 #2
In other words, wonder fuel ain't wonderful Doug the Dem Aug 2017 #3
 

JayhawkSD

(3,163 posts)
1. That article sets a new record.
Fri Aug 11, 2017, 10:47 AM
Aug 2017

For the most words and the least actual information.
Mostly it simply tells us that the government won't say what's going on.

hunter

(38,334 posts)
2. First you don't adequately fund the project or train enough scientists and engineers...
Fri Aug 11, 2017, 12:31 PM
Aug 2017

... to tackle the problem.

Then you claim the project is a failure and piss away indefinitely whatever inadequate budget you have on contractors who have no real incentive to complete the work.

The reactor ran from 1965 to 1995.

Here's the Wikipedia article about the plant:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Experimental_Breeder_Reactor_II



This interesting history is from the Wikipedia external links:

http://www2.ans.org/pubs/magazines/nn/docs/2004-2-2.pdf

I think it's fascinating how people freak out about nuclear stuff when they voluntarily expose themselves to toxic carcinogenic non-nuclear waste every day, especially that generated by automobiles.

In any case it will be global warming that destroys this civilization and what's left of the natural environment our species proliferated in, especially as we accelerate our use of "clean natural" gas. There ain't nothing clean or natural about this gas and with known "reserves" of a century thanks to modern extraction techniques, we humans have got plenty enough rope to hang ourselves.



Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»That 'wonder fuel' at Ida...