Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Rhiannon12866

(205,320 posts)
Fri Apr 21, 2017, 04:27 AM Apr 2017

Deepwater Horizon: Seven years after explosion and oil spill study finds clean-up workers got sicker

On the seventh anniversary of the Deepwater Horizon disaster, the health impacts that the spewing oil had on the people who came into contact with it are still raising questions about how the cleanup was handled.

The latest studies by the National Institutes of Health found that the thousands of clean-up workers who came into contact with the oil that coated the coastlines of four states in 2010 were more susceptible to health woes during the cleanup, according to Dale Sandler, chief of the NIH's epidemiology branch.

"People who had the greatest exposure were more likely than other workers to report itchy eyes, burning throats, coughing, wheezing and skin irritations," she said.

Often those symptoms were initially blamed on heat exhaustion, she said. But the NIH has found that the workers in contact with the oil experienced those symptoms two to three times more than other workers who weren't in contact with the oil.

"We were seeing symptoms that were not part of the definition of heat stress," she said.

More: http://www.tampabay.com/news/environment/deepwater-horizon-seven-years-after-explosion-and-oil-spill-study-finds/2320962



The Deepwater Horizon oil rig burns in the Gulf of Mexico on April 21, 2010, more than 50 miles southeast of Venice, La. BP and five Gulf states announced an $18.7 billion settlement Thursday, July 2, 2015, that resolves years of legal fighting over the environmental and economic damage done by the energy giant's oil spill in 2010. The settlement involves Florida, Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana and Texas. (Associated Press)

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Deepwater Horizon: Seven years after explosion and oil spill study finds clean-up workers got sicker (Original Post) Rhiannon12866 Apr 2017 OP
Just like the Ground Zero workers and first responders... Cooley Hurd Apr 2017 #1
Exactly! Rhiannon12866 Apr 2017 #2
Don't count on Corporate America to do it, or Corporate UK, either, I suppose... Cooley Hurd Apr 2017 #3
Senators Clinton and Gillibrand have had a hell of a time getting care for 9/11 First Responders Rhiannon12866 Apr 2017 #4
Was it the oil -- or the Corexit ? eppur_se_muova Apr 2017 #5
You're absolutely right! I read this just today: Rhiannon12866 Apr 2017 #6

Rhiannon12866

(205,320 posts)
2. Exactly!
Fri Apr 21, 2017, 06:37 AM
Apr 2017

Who is going to stand up for those who risk their health and lives to protect and save others???

Rhiannon12866

(205,320 posts)
4. Senators Clinton and Gillibrand have had a hell of a time getting care for 9/11 First Responders
Fri Apr 21, 2017, 06:58 AM
Apr 2017

Last I knew, Senator Gillibrand was still fighting for them - and so many have already died.

Rhiannon12866

(205,320 posts)
6. You're absolutely right! I read this just today:
Sat Apr 22, 2017, 04:48 AM
Apr 2017
The Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill Catastrophe: After 7 Years, We’re Still Stuck with Toxic Corexit

<snip>

Nearly 2-million gallons of Corexit were dumped onto spilled oil in the Gulf or injected into the leaking wellhead after the spill. Dispersants act similarly to dish soap – but are not as benign, despite BP’s frequent comparisons. Dispersants like Corexit contain chemicals that are harmful to human health and to sea life; the small droplets not only disperse more widely than the oil itself while being harder to see, but are also more easily ingested by organisms up and down the food chain, threatening entire ecosystems in the Gulf.

BP and the government made a tradeoff using Corexit. They believed it was more dangerous to allow oil to reach the shoreline and vulnerable estuaries than to use dispersants in the Gulf, to break up the oil to accelerate biodegradation. But the risks of using dispersants in such quantities and at such depths have never been fully analyzed. The harm to life on the sea floor, in the water column, and along the shoreline should be enough to halt future use under such conditions until the long-term impacts of the use of dispersants in the Deepwater Horizon aftermath can be adequately assessed.

Harm to sea life and the environment are just some of the many downsides to the unprecedented use of dispersants following the BP disaster. In Nalco’s application to the EPA for Corexit, they recommended using protective gear when applying the dispersant to avoid skin or eye contact, and seeking medical attention in case such an accident occurs. GAP has previously documented the harmful health effects of contact with Corexit to Gulf responders who cleaned the spill. Some of these impacts are severe, rendering victims incapable of carrying on their normal lives.


More: https://www.whistleblower.org/blog/091121-deepwater-horizon-oil-spill-catastrophe-after-7-years-we%E2%80%99re-still-stuck-toxic-corexit
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Deepwater Horizon: Seven ...