Environment & Energy
Related: About this forumDeepwater Horizon: Seven years after explosion and oil spill study finds clean-up workers got sicker
On the seventh anniversary of the Deepwater Horizon disaster, the health impacts that the spewing oil had on the people who came into contact with it are still raising questions about how the cleanup was handled.
The latest studies by the National Institutes of Health found that the thousands of clean-up workers who came into contact with the oil that coated the coastlines of four states in 2010 were more susceptible to health woes during the cleanup, according to Dale Sandler, chief of the NIH's epidemiology branch.
"People who had the greatest exposure were more likely than other workers to report itchy eyes, burning throats, coughing, wheezing and skin irritations," she said.
Often those symptoms were initially blamed on heat exhaustion, she said. But the NIH has found that the workers in contact with the oil experienced those symptoms two to three times more than other workers who weren't in contact with the oil.
"We were seeing symptoms that were not part of the definition of heat stress," she said.
More: http://www.tampabay.com/news/environment/deepwater-horizon-seven-years-after-explosion-and-oil-spill-study-finds/2320962
The Deepwater Horizon oil rig burns in the Gulf of Mexico on April 21, 2010, more than 50 miles southeast of Venice, La. BP and five Gulf states announced an $18.7 billion settlement Thursday, July 2, 2015, that resolves years of legal fighting over the environmental and economic damage done by the energy giant's oil spill in 2010. The settlement involves Florida, Alabama, Mississippi, Louisiana and Texas. (Associated Press)
Cooley Hurd
(26,877 posts)Rhiannon12866
(205,320 posts)Who is going to stand up for those who risk their health and lives to protect and save others???
Cooley Hurd
(26,877 posts)Rhiannon12866
(205,320 posts)Last I knew, Senator Gillibrand was still fighting for them - and so many have already died.
eppur_se_muova
(36,262 posts)Rhiannon12866
(205,320 posts)<snip>
Nearly 2-million gallons of Corexit were dumped onto spilled oil in the Gulf or injected into the leaking wellhead after the spill. Dispersants act similarly to dish soap but are not as benign, despite BPs frequent comparisons. Dispersants like Corexit contain chemicals that are harmful to human health and to sea life; the small droplets not only disperse more widely than the oil itself while being harder to see, but are also more easily ingested by organisms up and down the food chain, threatening entire ecosystems in the Gulf.
BP and the government made a tradeoff using Corexit. They believed it was more dangerous to allow oil to reach the shoreline and vulnerable estuaries than to use dispersants in the Gulf, to break up the oil to accelerate biodegradation. But the risks of using dispersants in such quantities and at such depths have never been fully analyzed. The harm to life on the sea floor, in the water column, and along the shoreline should be enough to halt future use under such conditions until the long-term impacts of the use of dispersants in the Deepwater Horizon aftermath can be adequately assessed.
Harm to sea life and the environment are just some of the many downsides to the unprecedented use of dispersants following the BP disaster. In Nalcos application to the EPA for Corexit, they recommended using protective gear when applying the dispersant to avoid skin or eye contact, and seeking medical attention in case such an accident occurs. GAP has previously documented the harmful health effects of contact with Corexit to Gulf responders who cleaned the spill. Some of these impacts are severe, rendering victims incapable of carrying on their normal lives.
More: https://www.whistleblower.org/blog/091121-deepwater-horizon-oil-spill-catastrophe-after-7-years-we%E2%80%99re-still-stuck-toxic-corexit