Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

yallerdawg

(16,104 posts)
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 11:55 AM Feb 2016

After Getting Blown Out in South Carolina, Bernie Again Impugns Hillary’s Integrity (Hillary Group)

Source: Blue Nation Review by Peter Daou

The Minnesota speech started out positive, but then...

*****
Alas, he couldn’t maintain the uplifting tone and by the second half of the speech, Bernie resorted to his “release the transcripts” attack against Hillary. In essence, he’s accusing Hillary of corruption — without an iota of evidence.

As we wrote recently, Hillary confronted Bernie on his continued insinuation that she is somehow tainted by financial industry contributions:

I would just say, I debated then Senator Obama numerous times on stages like this, and he was the recipient of the largest number of Wall Street donations of anybody running on the Democratic side ever. Now, when it mattered, he stood up and took on Wall Street. He pushed through, and he passed the Dodd-Frank regulation, the toughest regulations since the 1930’s. So, let’s not in anyway imply here that either President Obama or myself, would in anyway not take on any vested interested, whether it’s Wall Street, or drug companies, or insurance companies, or frankly, the gun lobby to stand up to do what’s best for the American people.

Hillary is absolutely right. Does Bernie think President Obama is compromised by Wall Street contributions? If so, he should have the courage to say it. If not, he shouldn’t imply that a female candidate would be influenced by donations or speaking fees. There’s a word for that.

The endless drumbeat that Hillary is dishonest is now driven directly from the top of Bernie’s campaign. It is an “artful smear” where any mention of the “establishment” or Wall Street is a Pavlovian trigger designed to impugn Hillary’s character. The Wall Street Dog Whistle.

Read the rest at: http://bluenationreview.com/bernie-again-impugns-hillarys-integrity/
24 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
After Getting Blown Out in South Carolina, Bernie Again Impugns Hillary’s Integrity (Hillary Group) (Original Post) yallerdawg Feb 2016 OP
This isn't working out so well for him is it? livetohike Feb 2016 #1
"I would just say, I debated then Senator Obama numerous times on stages like this, and he was the Cha Feb 2016 #2
"She's a liar!" 72DejaVu Feb 2016 #3
ROFL! BlueCaliDem Feb 2016 #17
"I will never go negative", "I will never attack Secretary Clinton". George II Feb 2016 #4
NO means Yes. Up is Down. Straight is Crooked. Revolution is Not. Cha Feb 2016 #7
"Loss" is "tie" George II Feb 2016 #8
I had to do some spelling corrections. yallerdawg Feb 2016 #5
lol Lucinda Feb 2016 #10
Mineral Man! stonecutter357 Feb 2016 #12
A great DU contributor! Content that keeps us coming back! yallerdawg Feb 2016 #14
Sanders is desperately pathetic riversedge Feb 2016 #6
He is wanting free training for his next position as a speaker, if he can earn from the Thinkingabout Feb 2016 #9
When you are a politician... yallerdawg Feb 2016 #11
Yes he was for Civil Unions in Vermont, he changed his position. He talks about Thinkingabout Feb 2016 #13
But he NEVER flip-flops!11 BlueCaliDem Feb 2016 #18
He says MN is "smart" so he'll win Rose Siding Feb 2016 #15
I can't believe he said that. What an insult to the voters. FloridaBlues Feb 2016 #16
Y'know, he gave it a good shot HillareeeHillaraah Feb 2016 #20
Did he really say that?? BlueCaliDem Feb 2016 #19
That's appalling. Ellen Forradalom Feb 2016 #23
Bernie Sanders and supporters Loki Feb 2016 #21
Or maybe a mass ejection. yallerdawg Feb 2016 #22
What do you call someone who keeps doing the same thing but expects a different result? SunSeeker Feb 2016 #24

Cha

(297,220 posts)
2. "I would just say, I debated then Senator Obama numerous times on stages like this, and he was the
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 12:01 PM
Feb 2016
the recipient of the largest number of Wall Street donations of anybody running on the Democratic side ever. Now, when it mattered, he stood up and took on Wall Street. He pushed through, and he passed the Dodd-Frank regulation, the toughest regulations since the 1930’s. So, let’s not in anyway imply here that either President Obama or myself, would in anyway not take on any vested interested, whether it’s Wall Street, or drug companies, or insurance companies, or frankly, the gun lobby to stand up to do what’s best for the American people."


Excellent response, Hillary.

"Hillary is absolutely right. Does Bernie think President Obama is compromised by Wall Street contributions? If so, he should have the courage to say it. If not, he shouldn’t imply that a female candidate would be influenced by donations or speaking fees. There’s a word for that. "

sanders is desperate.. it's not pretty.

It didn't work in South Carolina so he thinks it will work in Minnestota.. I can imagine what Sen Franken and Gov Dayton think of him.

Mahalo yallerdawg

yallerdawg

(16,104 posts)
14. A great DU contributor! Content that keeps us coming back!
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 12:28 PM
Feb 2016

But I'm pretty sure he believes "if it's worth posting, it's worth spell-checking"!

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
9. He is wanting free training for his next position as a speaker, if he can earn from the
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 12:13 PM
Feb 2016

subjects Hillary has spoke about then he can get as much money for one speech as he makes in Congress. Hillary spoke while she was at Wellesley, she was good then, she is better now.

He hasn't offered to release his conversation transcripts with lobbyists especially Lockheed Martin and NRA. I would like to see if they influenced his voting. Also he has been fund raising with firms like Goldman Sachs, where are those transcripts. Was there anything said which influenced his voting. He has admitted LULAC influenced his voting on the immigration bill, what else is there we do not know.

yallerdawg

(16,104 posts)
11. When you are a politician...
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 12:19 PM
Feb 2016

to attack another politicians character ("Corrupt!&quot often backfires!

"He who is without sin..."

And we are all sinners.

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
13. Yes he was for Civil Unions in Vermont, he changed his position. He talks about
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 12:27 PM
Feb 2016

breaking up the big banks, the Dodd Frank on the books already does this. He rants about Goldman Sachs donating funds for elections and then he goes to fund raisers with Goldman Sachs. He rants about the criminalizing and the number of people sent to prison but he voted for the Crime bill. What is the real story then and the real story now, he was for it before he is against it, he was against it before he was for an issue.

FloridaBlues

(4,008 posts)
16. I can't believe he said that. What an insult to the voters.
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 03:16 PM
Feb 2016

Some one on March 2 put a fork in him he's Bernt as toast

BlueCaliDem

(15,438 posts)
19. Did he really say that??
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 05:12 PM
Feb 2016

So what does that mean? Is he chastising Nevadans and South Carolinians for being...well, not as smart as Minnesotans?

Loki

(3,825 posts)
21. Bernie Sanders and supporters
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 05:50 PM
Feb 2016

have adopted the right wing smear tactics that we have seen since Bill Clinton took office. Watergate, TravelGate, Vince Foster, Benghazi, Benghazi, Benghazi, and the email server. They use these tactics of "not trustworthy" because they know that it has been an incessant dog whistle to the right wing. I thought Sander's was above this, but he's just another curmudgeon that can't stand that a woman is going to be President of this country. Many people can't handle that idea, just like they couldn't handle the fact that we, as Democrats nominated a black man and he became the first African American President. I don't know what is going to happen to this board once Hillary takes the nomination, probably a mass exodus back to Free Republic where they have all come from.

yallerdawg

(16,104 posts)
22. Or maybe a mass ejection.
Sun Feb 28, 2016, 06:00 PM
Feb 2016

They have made the last year miserable.

We should have all been friends in a common cause - beat the Republicans!

Latest Discussions»Retired Forums»Hillary Clinton»After Getting Blown Out i...