Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ballreward

(15 posts)
Sun Dec 11, 2011, 11:39 AM Dec 2011

Another Linux User saying hi

I have been using Linux for a few years now, was using Ubuntu on my main computer. I don't hate Unity, but found when I want to pay bills, get information I don't want a learning curve, I just want to get it done. I also wanted to move to a Distro with a Rolling Release, and get away from the Grand Releases where you had to reinstall, or have a huge upgrade every year or two. I actually find that Gnome 3 is a bit easier to use. Like to know your experiences.

I found that for beginners Ubuntu, Mint, and PClinuxOS work well, my wife is a Newbie and has used those with out a problem. I had problems using Unity on a working desktop, I guess its in what you get used to. My wife did not have problems with Unity. She is now using Crunchbang with Debian Stable on her netbook, and is doing quite well with it. She likes it.

I have tried most of the distros I like Debian but its not a beginners distro in my opinion. Crunchbang is an exception to that. I am using Crunchbang and love it. I tried Gentoo and did not have the time to put in it. I was working on Arch but did have a problem getting the Desktop going, haven't got the hang of editing the config files yet. I have used Archbang I like it even through its not as involved as regular Arch it will get you a desktop openbox, but you will have to learn command line if you want to update or add or remove software, not hard just different if you are used to one that has a GUI software to do that like Ubuntu.

Right now on my main computer I am using an Arch based distro KahelOS that seems to be like Ubuntu in choce of software and preloads flash and the other proprietary stuff you need. Looks like I may keep it as my main desktop. It has a very good Gnome3 setup for its desktop.

What are you using? Interested in hearing about the Distros you like. Hope to hear from you all.

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Another Linux User saying hi (Original Post) ballreward Dec 2011 OP
Oooh, another Archie toddaa Dec 2011 #1
Arch is great to learn on ballreward Dec 2011 #3
I'm running Open SuSE 11.4 SnowCritter Dec 2011 #2
Open SuSE is a very good distro ballreward Dec 2011 #4
What am I using? Mac and Windows DissedByBush Dec 2011 #5
Welcome to the group. HopeHoops Dec 2011 #6
I've been running Fedora with Gnome as desktop for about 5-6 years now SecularMotion Dec 2011 #7

toddaa

(2,518 posts)
1. Oooh, another Archie
Sun Dec 11, 2011, 05:24 PM
Dec 2011

I'm more enamored with Arch than you, I guess. I distro hopped until installing Arch three years ago. At first, I loaded it up with every KDE doodad I could grab from the package databases, but last year I took it upon myself to see how minimal I could get. I run a barebones Openbox, and stick to the command line and vi. After a few months of tinkering and resisting the urge to reinstall KDE, I've built up a tricked out openbox config, a sizeable set of bash scripts, and an every evolving collection of vi settings, that I don't find myself missing much. In fact, I find I'm more productive without all the eye candy. A suggestion I'd make is to force yourself to use the command line. It's scary at first, but once you get accustomed to it and bash, you'll be amazed at how much of a productivity killer the mouse is.

Other distros I've tried include Suse, Fedora, Mandrake, Mint, and Slackware, but I doubt I'll ever actively seek out another distro, considering how much work I've put into Arch to get a system that is perfectly tailored to what I want it to do. Plus, there's an undeniable thrill to opening up a command prompt and keying 'pacman -Syu'. The only downside to Arch is lack of package signing, but that is currently in the test repositories and looks like a loophole that will finally be filled.

A couple of months ago, I started playing with LFS, but that partition remains idle. I started messing around with it, but then got distracted when someone at work showed me clojure.

ballreward

(15 posts)
3. Arch is great to learn on
Sun Dec 11, 2011, 10:24 PM
Dec 2011

For me I found that on a computer that I do all those items that keep my household up and running going minimal gets frustrating. I will agree that command line is very fast, but sometimes I like a simple GUI style search to find what I want. Being able to scan what software can be downloaded and reading what it does is a great help sometimes. I am still working on command line to get comfortable to do all from it . I really like pacman, packer, and yaourt on command line. I find I like using command line to Apt-get in Debian it is very fast. Some activities I prefer some sort of a GUI. I did get Arch going up to a desktop and it was fun, and so I use Arch to learn on not as my main desktop. I like Archbang and CTKArch because they get you to the desktop, and are still minimial so you still have only what you want in it. I have several computers which I use to check out Distros and and work on learning Arch. On my main computer I don't want to be fixing all the time thats why I gave up on Windows. I spent more time fixing than getting things done.
I know that some Arch users don't like the concept of Archbang, CTKArch, and KahelOS as not not being true to the ideal of Arch. They do introduce newbies to Arch and most likely would make them more willing to try Arch. The big reason I went to these Arch distros was for the Rolling updates, and no huge Distro upgrade every year or two.

Debian stable was just to out of date for me very stable but out of date, and you had to know your repositories well to change that. Debian testing is a bit better with updated software. Arch seem easier to set up and maintain than a Debian Sid distro.

maybe if you won't mind sometime if I could ask you guestions when I get stuck working on a Arch setup. I do agree that once you get Arch setup the way you want why would want to leave it. Have you tried Gentoo?
Thanks for posting a reply to my post.



SnowCritter

(810 posts)
2. I'm running Open SuSE 11.4
Sun Dec 11, 2011, 09:13 PM
Dec 2011

I started out quite a while back with Slackware 1.0, then moved through Red Hat 5 and 6 (a couple of my co-workers bought me a red fedora as a wedding gift). Moving to Open SuSE was an offshoot of installing Novell SuSE Enterprise Server 10 at work 6 or 7 years ago.

I've found that the network installation works pretty well, but if you don't have a good, high-speed Internet connection, then fugetaboudit. Open SuSE has an updater application that works pretty well.

ballreward

(15 posts)
4. Open SuSE is a very good distro
Sun Dec 11, 2011, 10:43 PM
Dec 2011

I have used Open SuSe and have a very high opinion of it. I haven't tried a network install. I have some Sun Servers one being an ultra 60 that I am having a problem getting with cd rom disk drive going it maybe a simple problem but I might have to do a network install to get am OS on it. I have no experience with that. I have some older servers some Sun servers and some used computers that I am using to learn hands on networking with a home system. I am using the Sun servers to learn Solaris. I use used Computers so it keeps my hobby affordible money wise. My wife likes that.

I have installed Novel SusE Enterprise Server 10 still have the software. it, I have Centos on them now. I enjoy learning how to setup and use computers and servers sort of a hobby. I don't work in IT just enjoy learning. Thanks for the reply.

 

DissedByBush

(3,342 posts)
5. What am I using? Mac and Windows
Mon Dec 12, 2011, 12:36 AM
Dec 2011

Just having some fun.

But, seriously, both do contain open source software. Windows to only a small extent (like ftp.exe) and Mac OS X quite extensively (not only the core OS and web browser, but the server tools are almost all open source).

As far as Linux, after playing with many I settled on Ubuntu for workstation and CentOS (Red Hat) for server, both in VMs on the Mac. My responsibilities at work changed, so I almost never have a daily professional reason to use Red Hat anymore (which we used mainly for Snort, an awesome open source application), but I want to keep my general Linux knowledge up to date. Red Hat isn't my favorite, thus the others.

As far as workstation, I'm a serious stickler for an elegant and fluid user interface for daily use, and I still haven't found anything close to OS X in Linux.

 

HopeHoops

(47,675 posts)
6. Welcome to the group.
Wed Dec 14, 2011, 11:44 AM
Dec 2011

I've got an HP mini that came pre-installed with Ubuntu (and a solid state drive). It's "on" when I open the lid. I use it for writing in bed and sometimes surfing.

 

SecularMotion

(7,981 posts)
7. I've been running Fedora with Gnome as desktop for about 5-6 years now
Wed Dec 14, 2011, 12:29 PM
Dec 2011

I like what they're doing with Gnome 3 but I find it awkward to move between the applications and open windows screens. I read an article about Linus Torvalds switching to Xfce

http://digitizor.com/2011/08/04/linus-torvalds-ditches-gnome-for-xfce/

I tried Xfce and have using it for a few months now. I use 4 desktops - one for web and email, another for ebooks, another for film and music collections, and the last for file and system management. It's much easier to navigate between running applications and open windows.

Latest Discussions»Culture Forums»Open Source and Free Software»Another Linux User saying...