Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Soph0571

(9,685 posts)
Sat Nov 23, 2019, 10:43 AM Nov 2019

Is 2019 the new 1983?

Is Brexit the new Falklands? Both are significant external factors that impact significantly on voter behaviour.

Is Corbyn’s new manifesto the Foot manifesto? Corbyn’s manifesto is the most radical since Foots ‘longest suicide note in history’.

Is Boris the new Maggie? Widely despised and disliked, but using the external factor of Brexit, the way Maggie used the Falklands to get across the line?

I think there are some substantial if maybe shallow similarities… of course this is a different century and elections are run very differently and the demographics in the country have changed significantly, so I am not sure how much the similarities actually mean. Still, I thought it interesting.

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Is 2019 the new 1983? (Original Post) Soph0571 Nov 2019 OP
In a lot of ways I believe Corbyn is this generations Foot. mwooldri Nov 2019 #1
Hope not, but who knows LeftishBrit Nov 2019 #2
I'm too young to remember Michael Foot T_i_B Nov 2019 #3

mwooldri

(10,291 posts)
1. In a lot of ways I believe Corbyn is this generations Foot.
Sat Nov 23, 2019, 03:19 PM
Nov 2019

Their political stances are very similar. Both joined the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament (CND). Both campaigned for withdrawal from the European Economic Community. Both campaigned for higher taxes on the rich, and both campaigned in renationalising certain industries.

The 1983 Labour party manifesto was described as the "longest suicide note in history".

However there are a lot of differences too. The Falkland Islands / Malvinas conflict had actually helped Margaret Thatcher a lot in public standing. The UK generally were supportive of the mission, and the outcome was generally received positively.

There has also been no major spinoff political party from either the Conservative Party or the Labour Party that resulted in a third force commanding a lead in the opinion polls (yes, Change UK / The Independent Group came about, but they gained zero significant traction).

There is also no major military conflict that is engaging the UK at this time. There is a civil and cultural conflict that is called Brexit, and it has split the country right in the middle.

I have no idea on what the potential outcome of this election will be. If the election is 99% Brexit it really doesn't help Labour whose official position on Brexit is similar to the hokey pokey. But when the main players are a reincarnated Worzel Gummidge versus a softer Alan B'stard ... it confuses the heck out of me that there are plenty of people who would actually vote for Alan B'stard.

LeftishBrit

(41,175 posts)
2. Hope not, but who knows
Sun Nov 24, 2019, 08:35 AM
Nov 2019

There are several differences. Foot was not politically savvy or media-friendly, but he was intelligent, which Corbyn isn't. Maggie was obnoxious and had very damaging policies, but she was competent and honest (within her own rather appalling worldview), which Boris isn't. The Falklands war was directly started by a foreign leader, though the British first risked this through unpreparedness and then treated it as a glorious opportunity for jingoism. Brexit is entirely self-inflicted. There was no Internet or social media then; and this makes a huge difference to how politics are run.

T_i_B

(14,734 posts)
3. I'm too young to remember Michael Foot
Sun Nov 24, 2019, 02:50 PM
Nov 2019

But I do know that Jeremy Corbyn has what can only be described as limited appeal.

As much as Thatcher did a lot of bad things, it's an insult to compare Boris Johnson to her. Johnson does unfortunately have a talent for telling people what they want to hear, even if it's totally untrue. The central Tory message of "get Brexit done" is an utterly false promise and he's not being held to account properly on his dishonest campaign.

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»United Kingdom»Is 2019 the new 1983?