Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Texas
Related: About this forumAttorney General Holder and Section 3 of Voting Rights Act
The announcement by Attorney General Holder that the DOJ is seeking to apply Section 3 of the Voting Rights Act to Texas is a big deal and carries some risk. Section 3 of the voting rights act is the bail in section where courts can force a jurisdiction to submit changes for preclearance. http://firstread.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/07/25/19678352-holder-justice-dept-will-contest-texas-redistricting?lite&ocid=msnhp&pos=4
"This request to 'bail in' the state -- and require it to obtain pre-approval from either the department or a federal court before implementing future voting changes -- is available under the Voting Rights Act when intentional voting discrimination is found," he said.
"We believe that the State of Texas should be required to go through a pre-clearance process whenever it changes its voting laws and practices."
In the filing with the Federal Court, the DOJ raises a number of reasons why preclearance is necessary for Texas http://txredistricting.org/post/56451053952/dojs-court-filing-on-section-3 The pleading and brief filed here is well done and there are good facts to show that Texas needs to be subject to preclearance
I love the fact that Abbott, Goodhair, Senator Box Turtle and others are very upset by this filing. http://txredistricting.org/post/56440055042/reactions-from-texas-members-of-congress-on-the-latest and http://txredistricting.org/post/56436751447/gov-perrys-press-statement-on-dojs-section-3-move
Gov. Rick Perrys press statement responding to DOJs move on section 3:
"Once again, the Obama Administration is demonstrating utter contempt for our countrys system of checks and balances, not to mention the U.S. Constitution. This end-run around the Supreme Court undermines the will of the people of Texas, and casts unfair aspersions on our states common-sense efforts to preserve the integrity of our elections process."
The DOJ's use of Section 3 is high risk in that the SCOTUS may review this section but has the potential of stopping the Texas voter id law
The state of Texas has made clear it will fight the DOJs efforts, and argues that both Section 3 and Section 5 are unconstitutional. That means they could appeal directly to the Supreme Court if civil rights advocates succeed at bailing in Texas. It would go as a direct appeal to the Supreme Court, Hasen said. And I think the Supreme Court would take the case.
If Texas wins the case, its unclear if DOJ would appeal. But if it loses, its all but certain Texas will appeal. In a statement Thursday, Gov. Rick Perry (R) slammed Holders move as reflecting utter contempt for our countrys system of checks and balances and said that an end run around the Supreme Court undermines the will of the people of Texas.
The Justice Department sees this as the first step in their efforts to crack down on voter discrimination with the tools they still have under the Voting Rights Act. Officials are closely watching other state-level moves, such as the voter ID push in North Carolina. Part of the aim is to fire a warning shot to states and make clear that theyll face DOJ pushback if they seek to exploit the Supreme Court decision.
This will be a fun fight to watch.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
0 replies, 909 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (4)
ReplyReply to this post